High fuel prices have led drivers to pay more and more attention to the moment of burning and appreciate those vehicles that provide the lowest consumption of "liquid gold". Car manufacturers began to tempt drivers with pamphlets offering economical models. These results were most likely obtained in laboratories and cannot be replicated in reality. Therefore, part of the most economical car depends on the type of engine and class.
Fuel economy is a hot topic, and automotive firms respond by making their transport ever more efficient. Nowadays, it is more common to see new cars that travel 35 km on just one liter of fuel, even family cars regularly drive an average of 27 km/litre.
Type of fuel and its effect on economy
Efficiency automotive fuel depends on a number of factors. Diesel fuel is more economical than gasoline due to the slow burning rate, however, the cost per liter of diesel can be higher than that of gasoline. However, their costs are on average 20–30% higher than for cars with gasoline engine. More expensive are oils and spare parts. It is worth remembering that the particle filter is mounted in exhaust systems diesel engines and is only cleaned during long journeys.
It is a common misconception that higher octane number fuel provides increased power And best run. Octane only affects engine resistance and does not improve fuel economy or Horse power. Today they are completely used different types fuels that significantly affect fuel economy.
The German engineers of the automobile club ADAC have presented a new rating in which cars are divided into classes in terms of fuel consumption. They are almost all cars sold by European dealers.
Video about an economical car that runs without oil:
Economy car with petrol engine
The list of the most economical cars in each class was generated by filtering by various criteria such as car class, price, CO 2 emission group.
Minicars and city cars
Along with the continuous development of modern cities, small mini-cars are becoming indispensable. small car in addition to its individuality and modern silhouette, it is equipped with modern, economical engines, with the help of which the cost of operating these cars is low.
The top five leaders look like this:
1. Toyota IQ, 1.0L engine (city - 4.9, highway - 3.9, average - 4.3).
Toyota IQ combines interesting design And compact dimensions with a corresponding sense of freedom inside, functionality and harmony with nature, emitting the least amount of CO 2 into the atmosphere. This complete four-seat hatchback that is truly unique car, has a 1.0-liter petrol engine and mechanical box gears. The declared performance of the car puts it in the first position as the most economical car in the city car class. Reaching 100 km in 14.7 seconds, it consumes only 4.3 liters of gasoline. On a full 32-liter tank, the car can travel 740 km.
2. Nissan Pixo, unit 1.0 l (city - 5.5, highway - 4.8, average - 4.4).
The Nissan Pixo has been on the list of the cheapest cars on sale for several years. and interior trim is rather boring, while a small engine allows you to overcome 29 km per liter of gasoline.
3. Suzuki Alto, 1.0L engine (city - 5.5, highway - 4.8, average - 4.4).
Minicars with diesel engine
Surprisingly low emissions and fuel economy make the Smart Fortwo CDI 0.8 diesel a top seller, especially with a growing number of environmentally minded car buyers.
2. VW Polo, 1.2L TDI engine (urban - 4.0, highway - 2.9, medium - 3.3).
The VW Polo has become one of the most attractive superminis on the market thanks to its combination of running costs, build quality and . The most economical car in the C class offers an economical and powerful engine range.
3. Vauxhall Corsa, 1.3L CDTI engine (city - 4.6, highway - 3.2, average - 3.7).
The Vauxhall Corsa mini car made a mini revolution when it was launched in 2006. Manufacturers offered a good interior and many features big car. The most economical version of the model is the three-door 1.3 CDTi Ecoflex, which currently reaches 36 km/l.
4 . Seat Ibiza SC, 1.4L TDI Ecomotive engine (city - 4.9, highway - 3.0, average - 3.7).
SEAT Ibiza - this small car was in the top five of the 2013 supermini rankings. The stylish look does not sacrifice the practicality, spaciousness and usefulness of the interior layout. Ecomotive with a diesel engine allows you to overcome 34 km / l of fuel and emit only 92 g / km CO 2 .
5.Ford Fiesta ECOnetic, 1.6L TDCi DPF engine (city - 4.6, highway - 3.2, average - 3.7).
Middle class diesel cars
1. Seat Leon, engine 1.6 l TDI Ecomotive (city - 4.6, highway - 3.2, average - 3.8).
Attractive and reliable, the Seat Leon is practical family hatchback with a cheaper price tag and an emphasis on dynamic processing. The efficient 1.6 TDI unit makes the Ecomotive an ultra-efficient car.
2. Ford Focus, 1.6L TDCi DPF ECOnetic engine (city - 4.5, highway - 3.4, medium - 3.8).
Is practical car with an excellent diesel engine, the most economical among which will be 1.6 TDCi. Thanks to the aerodynamic body kit, low resistance and high gear ratio, the oil burner of the engine is able to drive it 28 km on just 1 liter of gasoline. Electronic system stability control is standard on all Ford models, as well as five stars in the EuroNCAP rating.
3. Volvo C30, 1.6L Start-Stop engine (city - 4.6, highway - 3.3, average - 3.8).
Volvo recently announced prices for the facelifted C30 Sportcoupe. In addition to conventional petrol and diesel engines, they offer 1.6L DRIVe Start/Stop which claims savings figures of 31 km/l (combined) and 104 g/km CO 2 .
4. Audi A3, 1.6L TDI Attraction (DPF) engine (city - 4.7, highway - 3.3, average - 3.8).
With a fantastic interior and a wide range of engines, the new Audi A3 is a premium small car that competes with the BMW 1 Series and Volkswagen Golf, offering practical and with the quality you would expect from German car manufacturers. 1.6 liter TDI diesel engine allowed to overcome 30 km/l of fuel and has emissions of 106 g/km CO 2 .
Pretty spacious station wagon Volkswagen Jetta TDI offers better economy diesel fuel among cars in the ranking of the most economy cars. It consumes less than 6 liters of fuel per 100 km on the highway and seven and a half liters in the city.
executive class
1. Volvo V70 1.6D DRIVe (city - 5.9, highway - 4.3, average - 4.9).
The Volvo V70 is a spacious, safe and comfortable contender Skoda Superb, Ford Mondeo and BMW 5 in the executive car class. Customers can purchase 1.6- and 2.0-litre diesel engines, which minimize fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions. Combination consisting of PowerShift and double clutch, provides an impressive 29 km/l and 111 g/km of emissions.
2. Volvo S80 1.6D DRIVe (medium - 6.0).
Volvo S80 similar in size to Audi A6 and 5th BMW series, It has spacious salon, a lot of equipment in standard equipment not to mention the range of diesel engines. Its 1.6-litre engine achieves 30 km/l of fuel while emitting 114 g/km CO 2 .
3. BMW 520d (city - 6.6, highway - 4.2, average - 5.1).
High performance and handling mixed with efficiency make the BMW 520d one of the most economical cars in its class. The two-cylinder engine accelerates to 100 km in 8.3 s, overcoming every 18 km of the road due to 1 liter of fuel.
All models shown have particulate filter DPF.
Fuel economy is the main selection criterion for new car buyers. However, the figures cited by manufacturers are obtained in the laboratory and very often differ from the real ones. And the economy of the car depends not only on fuel consumption. Fuel economy is affected by the overall technical condition car, correct, load, weather, Availability additional features(air conditioner) and more. Therefore, the rating is not everything. If you have comments, you can leave them below.
There is no such driver who would not monitor the fuel consumption of his car. Even if only to get to the gas station on time. At the same time, for most drivers economical cars have always been of great interest. The rating of such cars, compiled by the various media themselves, as a rule, is studied quite carefully and scrupulously.
Cars with low fuel consumption - economical or not?
In fact, this is a provocative question. The expected answer is yes, it will not always be correct. So, cars with diesel engines are rated as more economical than gasoline ones, but it would be wrong to judge this by fuel consumption alone. In addition, in our conditions sometimes diesel fuel by price more expensive than gasoline, and this alone will be an additional cost for maintaining diesel cars, it is worth considering that they need more frequent maintenance.
More frequent replacement of oil, filters, and consumables are sometimes more expensive than required for a gasoline engine, and the maintenance itself will eat up all the imaginary savings from using diesel fuel. In addition, do not forget about its quality. It must be admitted that the fuel at our gas stations often does not meet any requirements, and when using it, you may well have to spend a lot on repairing the engine of your car. 
Therefore, when trying to determine which car is more economical, it is worth considering not only fuel consumption data, but also maintenance costs, as well as the cost possible repair due to the use of cheap and low-quality fuel.
Cars with low fuel consumption - what are they?
However, all of the above does not mean that car manufacturers are not engaged in reducing fuel consumption. Cars with low fuel consumption have always opened the rating about economical cars, the authors of which are numerous organizations, from reputable to little-known ones. If you look closely at any rating, you will notice some rather curious facts.
- The ranking of cars with low fuel consumption, as a rule, is headed by hybrid cars. There is nothing surprising in this, they were conceived as vehicles with low fuel consumption. But the number of such cars is significantly inferior to the number of cars with conventional internal combustion engines, and they are not very popular, especially in our country;
- In cases where a non-hybrid vehicle is included in the rating, its characteristic features there will be relatively small power and volume of internal combustion engines. The consequence of which is the small size that cars of this type have. So, paying attention to economical cars, be prepared for the fact that they are far from cars. executive class. Large, heavy, powerful and dynamic machines do not differ in low consumption and profitability;
- To keep fuel consumption low, manufacturers often use a variety of additional systems which result in increased efficiency. An example of such a technical solution is the start-stop system used on many vehicles. Its essence lies in the fact that in the absence of movement (when stopped at a traffic light or in a traffic jam), the engine is turned off by electronics and turned on by it when the position of the pedals (clutch and gas) changes.
This approach allows you to reduce fuel consumption by up to ten percent from normal, but reverse side This will increase the price of the vehicle, and the cars ranked at the bottom of the list will be cheaper.
Fuel efficient cars
When thinking about buying a car with low fuel consumption, in addition to data on the consumption of gasoline of a new car, you should also think about its operation. If your car consumes more fuel than it should technical specifications, then it is possible that it is not only the value of the value of gasoline consumption. Economical fuel consumption in many cases is associated not only directly with the machine, but also with how it is operated. 
The simplest example is when a traffic light turns green, cars, accelerating sharply, rush along the avenue in order to again face the prohibition signal after two hundred meters. With this kind of driving low consumption there will never be gasoline. At the moment of acceleration, the engine consumes more fuel than is necessary for a quiet movement, and in addition, it does not completely burn out. In addition, the entire expense was in vain, because. I had to stop at the traffic lights again.
The movement should be fast, but smooth, with a transition in the minimum time to top gears, on them the indicators for gasoline consumption will be lower, and profitability will increase. 
Another factor, despite its insignificance, providing fuel economy, will be aerodynamic drag movement and use of additional devices. The most ordinary windows, lowered while driving, increase the aerodynamic drag of the car, which will result in additional expense gasoline. Switching on the air conditioner leads to an increase in electricity consumption on board, additional load on the generator and increased fuel consumption.
You should not think that everyone should drive with closed windows and sweat in the heat. You just need to be aware that if you turn on the air conditioner, loud music or open the windows, this will lead to more significant gas mileage.
There are many other ways and techniques to ensure economical operation your car. They are enough to ensure that your steel horse does not become too burdensome for you.
The question of which cars are economical and which are not is quite complicated for a definite answer. And the first lines in world rankings cannot sometimes serve as an unambiguous criterion for such an assessment. Proper operation even an ordinary, albeit old, car can be much more profitable than the inept use of the most “hit” car.
Every year for decades. The price of gasoline is rising even more - this is partly due to the financial crisis. Thus, the operation of the car is becoming more and more expensive, and many drivers are thinking that it is time to get behind the wheel of a more economical car. The rating is designed to assess the market for vehicles with the lowest fuel consumption - both conventional, with an internal combustion engine, and hybrids, which in addition have an electric motor.
Profitability is one of the main parameters when choosing a car
Obviously, buying a car is the first in a long line of expenses. In the long term, it is fuel that will become the main reason for wasting the budget. Many engineering companies, seeing the demand for economical vehicles, have created models that consume the least amount of mixture. In the production of such machines, they use the following principles:
- Reduced body weight;
- Improving the aerodynamic properties of the car;
- Increase in efficiency and increase in specific engine power;
- Reducing the volume of the engine;
- Reducing horsepower in quantity;
- Reduced rolling resistance while driving. Due to the allowable deformation of the tire, 30% more energy can be spent during movement, which is emitted by the engine.
The introduction of a complex of such measures makes it possible to obtain an extremely low consumption. An example of this is the Peugeot 308 BlueHDI 120, which consumes only 3.1 liters per 100 km.
It is also interesting that the most economical in terms of energy consumption emit the least amount of harmful waste into the atmosphere. This is explained by the fact that they create less exhaust in general, and also, as a rule, have a more advanced engine mechanism.
Of course, the efficiency of the engine directly affects driving performance car. It becomes less maneuverable compared to its counterparts, and also often increases in price.
Rating of the ten most economical gasoline and diesel cars in 2015
ICE cars are classic vehicles. Far from every driver will be able to refuse this system, even if possession hybrid car will be more economical.
The top ten is opened by a modification of the famous MINI Cooper. This version differs primarily in that it has less engine power. The horsepower rating dropped 20 points to 94. Anyway, the MINI hits 100 km/h in 11 seconds, which is not bad for an urban compact. The car consumes approximately 3.4 liters of gasoline per 100 kilometers. The emission of carbon dioxide into the air is about 87 g/km.
Compact French hatchback with an original appearance - his Windshield occupies a small part of the roof. Available with different engines. So, the most powerful of them received a volume of 1.6 liters and 110 liters. With. The basic interior is equipped with only basic functions, so it is advisable to purchase more expensive equipment. The consumption of the most economical engine is 3.4 liters per 100 km. Emission rate harmful substances is 87 g/km.
The model is completed with diesel and petrol units. The most powerful of all has a volume of 1.6 liters, and the most economical is the 1.4-liter, which consumes 3.4 liters per 100 km, emitting no more than 87 grams of carbon. Despite the interesting and pleasant body design, there is rather modest equipment inside the car - users do not consider it comfortable.
A similar brand name is Opel. The car has long been known to drivers who seek to save money. The 1.3-liter engine allows you to save on fuel, while providing good traction. Motorists note that the model behaves well on the road - a sensitive control system and a moderately soft suspension.
The Econetic package is the most attractive among the entire line, as it is equipped with an Ecoboost engine. It has 99 horsepower, consumes approximately 3.3 liters per 100 kilometers and emits no more than 85 grams of waste per kilometer. Together with automatic transmission and seven airbags, the car is reliable and economical.
A complete set with a 1.6-liter engine consumes up to 3.2 liters per 100 km. It also compares favorably with other models in the line with excellent handling and high level security, which, among other things, is provided by pillows and curtains. Reliable Systems safety allowed the Golf to earn all five stars in the NCAP rating.
The new Rio model received a diesel engine, an improved aerodynamic body and tires with low rolling friction. The combination of these technologies made it possible to achieve a waste of 3.2 liters of the mixture per 100 kilometers. turbocharged engine emits no more than 85 g of waste per kilometer. Salon hatchback is spacious and comfortable.
On the 3rd place in the ranking of the most economical cars with internal combustion engines is located diesel version i20. With an engine capacity of 1.1 liters, the car consumes 3.2 liters per 100 km. The car is characterized by spaciousness and excellent comfort in the cabin, but its equipment is rather modest.
The one and a half liter diesel engine of this car consumes 3.2 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. The emission of substances in this case is 83 g/km. A body with an attractive design hides a modest interior with simple equipment, but this is an advantage - additional opportunity.
The first place is occupied by another French hatchback, which can rightfully be considered not only the most economical car with an internal combustion engine in refueling, but also the best family car. budget car. The machine does not require expensive maintenance, while having a spacious interior, excellent safety and good power. Consumes up to 3.1 liters of fuel per 100 km.
TOP 10 most economical hybrids in 2015
Hybrid cars, despite experts' forecasts made long ago, have not yet replaced classic cars - their market share is only a few percent. One way or another, they can safely be called economical vehicles, because electricity is very cheap, and most hybrids have a driving mode in which only the electric motor is active.
The top ten is opened by a car with fuel consumption of 3.3 liters per 100 km. Equipped with a 75 hp petrol unit. With. and an electric motor. The total power of the machine is equivalent to 100 hp. With. ICE is activated only when dialing high speed, so the car is great for economical movement on tight roads. It also has an environmentally friendly emission rate of hazardous waste - 75 g / km.
The hybrid is made in the corporate style of Porsche - a sloping roof, high front fenders, distinctive headlights. It differs from the rest of the concern's products primarily by the presence of an electric motor. Electric energy is enough for 36 kilometers. As for the gasoline engine, it consumes 3.1 liters per 100 kilometers.
This car is very different from its relatives. It belongs to the roadster class. general power model is 887 horsepower, 608 of which generates a gasoline engine, and the rest - two electric. Excellent dynamic characteristics provide acceleration to hundreds in 2.8 seconds. This is partly achieved by the active aerodynamics system, with which the body shape can be manually adjusted. The car consumes approximately 3.3 liters per 100 km. The model has the highest cost among all Porsche products.
The hybrid consumes only 2.5 liters of the mixture per 100 kilometers. The emission of substances in this case is no more than 49 g / km. The multi-speed automatic transmission provides responsive control and excellent dynamics. In a car with a low rolling friction, which is a kind of disadvantage - at speeds of 125 km / h, they make an unpleasant noise.
One charge of the car's electric motor is enough for a journey of 18 km. Total power power units equivalent to 134 "horses". The model consumes about 2.1 liters of fuel per 100 km. This line is the most common in the entire hybrid car market.
Instead of a gearbox, the car is driven by a gearbox. fuel engine consumes 1.9 liters of mixture per 100 km, but all its energy is spent on charging the electric motor, which provides traction.
The hybrid combines three important qualities for the car of the future - excellent driving performance, economical fuel consumption and. The car accelerates to 125 km / h only on the electric motor, after which the internal combustion engine is used, which allows you to pick up a speed of 230 km / h. Also he has four-wheel drive. The engine consumes 1.8 liters of fuel per 100 km.
Ruler classic cars A3 has the widest selection complete sets, which cannot be said about the hybrid. So, E-Tron is a five-door hatchback, which is equipped with automatic transmission and front-wheel drive transmission. The car consumes about 1.6 liters of fuel per 100 km.
Almost silent when driving, the car can cover 60 km on a charge of the electric motor. The internal combustion engine has a consumption of 1.2 liters per 100 kilometers. Opel, who are the owners of the brand, assured that driving on electricity was about 5 times more economical than using fuel, but the demand from motorists was small. So, Ampera is no longer available.
1st place among the most economical hybrids in 2015. The car is affordable not only in terms of spending on the purchase and operation, but also in terms of management - it has an extremely simple system control and a minimum of functionality, so as not to alienate beginners. Now the car is at the concept stage - the Germans have to finalize the noisy engine and stiff suspension. Spends 0.9 liters per 100 km.
Conclusion
In modern financial terms economy is of great importance. There are many cars with low fuel consumption that will appeal to both lovers classic device, and hybrid. It is worth noting that now owning a hybrid in Russia is a difficult task, since there are almost no recharging stations.
The best prices and conditions for the purchase of new cars
Loan 6.5% / Installment / Trade-in / 98% approval / Gifts in the salonMas Motors
The most economical cars in terms of fuel consumption are always in high demand. Buying such a machine is not only a cost-effective solution, but also a concern for safety environment, which is also important. Economical machines consume less fuel, which means they produce less exhaust gases.
It is quite difficult to rank cars that consume less fuel and are more beneficial for the owner. Which type of fuel should be taken into account: gasoline, diesel or electricity? Usually small diesel SUVs consume little fuel, but their potential cannot be fully exploited in urban driving. Cars with a gasoline engine are much cheaper diesel models. And if you take into account when compiling the list of the most economical cars in terms of fuel consumption of electric vehicles, they will easily bypass diesel and gasoline counterparts.
3.4 l/100 km
Do you want environmentally clean car fuel efficient? Take a look at this car -. Fuel consumption in the city is only 4.1 liters per 100 kilometers. On average (taking into account urban conditions and country trips), a car's diesel engine consumes 3.4 liters of fuel. Skoda decided to realize the idea of producing cars that will produce as little as possible harmful emissions in atmosphere. This is how the Fabia Greenline series of fuel-efficient cars appeared. Skoda has managed to achieve such impressive performance due to the fact that their cars use the Start & Stop system, which automatically turns off the engine when the car stops, for example, at a traffic light. The energy recovery system saves up to 3% of fuel when braking the car, and special indicator prompt best time for gear shifting, which also helps to significantly save fuel. But the main thing is the engine latest generation, developed by the concern for the most environmentally friendly and economical Fabia cars.
What this car is capable of was shown by the famous race car driver Gerhard Plattner, who covered 2000 kilometers on a Skoda Fabia and spent only one tank of fuel (45 liters). He drove the car at a speed of approximately 82 km / h, and fuel consumption was about 2.2 liters per 100 kilometers. All this allows us to call the Fabia Greenline II one of the most economical cars in terms of fuel consumption.
4 l/100 km
with model 208 concern Peugeot managed to create not only a supermini with a pleasant appearance, but also an economical 1.4-liter fuel-saving electric motor. Thanks to him, the Peugeot 208 1.4 e-HDi 70 EGC consumes about 4 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers, and is able to increase fuel economy up to 2.8 liters. In this, he, as in the previous car from Skoda, helps intelligent system Start&Stop. Worthy Choice the most economical car for those who care about the preservation of the environment.
3.2 l/100 km
The model is considered one of the most economical cars in its class. Fuel consumption - 3.2 liters per combined cycle. In this case, a full tank will last for 1500 kilometers. The car is also among the most environmentally friendly vehicles - CO2 emissions into the environment are approximately 85 g / km. The car combines practicality, style, quality and performance. It is equipped special systems designed to reduce the amount of harmful emissions into the environment and save fuel. These are regenerative braking, a start-stop system and an optimal gear sensor.
3.2 l/100 km
Is a worthy competitor to another economical Kia car Rio, because it was created on the same platform with it. The 1.1-liter three-cylinder engine consumes 3.2 liters of fuel. Hyundai's CO2 emissions are slightly lower than Kia's at 84g/km. This super efficient diesel car Korean manufacturer positioned as one of the most environmentally friendly.
2.7 l/100 km
The new model of the concern Kia EcoDynamics appeared on the market quite recently - in 2009. It is a practical and spacious supermini that stands out low level emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere, making it one of the most environmentally friendly, or "green" cars in the class of any non-electric vehicles. But this model impresses with its amazing economy. Under the hood of the car is an efficient 1.1-liter diesel engine, which allows you to consume 2.7 liters of fuel per hundred kilometers.
Equipped with a "Start&Stop" system that shuts off the engine when stopped, the car significantly saves fuel and does less harm to the atmosphere, emitting 85 g of CO2 per kilometer into the environment. In addition, the manufacturer equipped the model with several more innovative technologies. One of them is the ECO system. It turns on at the touch of a button and is designed to limit engine torque, which allows for earlier gear changes.
It should be noted that the Kia concern is seriously concerned about creating the most environmentally friendly and economical cars. So, the company plans to release models in which steel, if possible, will be replaced by lightweight composite materials. This will reduce the weight of the car by 9-10% and save up to 3% of fuel. For now Kia model EcoDynamics is the most economical car in terms of fuel consumption.
The maximum reduction in fuel consumption for most manufacturers when creating new models has long become a kind of trend. Customers want to see not only beautiful, but also practical vehicle. Those who, due to circumstances, have a limited budget, first of all pay attention to the most fuel-efficient cars, even if the price for such models is above average.
Vehicles with classic machine, as a rule, are less economical compared to their "mechanical" counterparts. Probably, at a short distance, the difference in fuel costs is not so noticeable, but if you estimate the expenses for the year, the amount will be quite significant. Therefore, we have made a selection of the most economical cars with automatic transmission based on passport expense fuel in mixed driving mode (city + highway). Let us immediately make a reservation that we took into account only petrol versions, since diesel modifications are traditionally not popular in Russia, and in the case of hybrids, the average fuel consumption depends too much on many factors: driving style, ambient temperature, etc.
It is obvious that the consumption of gasoline is less, the more perfect the engine and transmission of the car. Yes, and the size of the machine is of fundamental importance, because what more compact model, the lower its curb weight and aerodynamic drag.
So let's go...
12th place
The rating closes by far not the most modern, but one of the smallest cars that you can buy from us. This is the Uzbek Ravon R2, the successor to the Chevrolet Spark. Five door hatchback equipped with a fairly powerful engine for such a baby with a working volume of 1.3 liters (86 hp), which is paired with an outdated 4-speed hydromechanical automatic machine. But Ravon R2 boasts the lowest price for the version with automatic transmission. IN minimum configuration"Comfort" it will cost only 389,000 rubles. The average consumption according to factory data is 6.7 l per 100 km.
11th place
Shares the penultimate line of the efficiency rating with our most popular "Koreans" Hyundai Solaris And Kia Rio. Average consumption fuel for all three is 6.6 l/100 km. It should also be noted that the Lada with a 106-horsepower engine combines an auto-mechanical transmission (AMT). By the way, Lada Kalina also demonstrates a similar indicator with robotic box gears, but in combination with a 4-speed hydromechanical automatic, the Togliatti hatchback consumes noticeably more than 7.2 l / 100 km.
It would seem that the 107-horsepower Solaris and Rio also have a classic 4-speed automatic, but they can handle the consumption of 6.6 liters. As for the new 6-speed automatic box transmission, which is installed on more powerful 123-horsepower modifications of Solaris and Rio, then its average rate was 0.1 liters higher than that of the younger version.
10th place
toyota corolla Russian market in terms of economy competes with. Both cars spend on average 6.3 l per 100 kilometers. Moreover, in the arsenal of the Corolla there is a 122-horsepower engine and stepless variator, by the way, the only one in our rating. And Ford has a 6-speed PowerShift robot with two clutches as a gearbox. At the same time, both versions of the Ford 1.6-liter engine (with a capacity of 105 and 125 hp), according to the manufacturer, consume the same amount of fuel in the combined cycle.
9th place
Slightly lower fuel consumption 5.9 l per hundred - demonstrates the 105-strong Fiesta. The difference of 200 kg of curb weight compared to the Focus did their job, bringing the car to the ninth position. Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TSI (125 hp), 7DSG - from 856,900 rubles.
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TSI (125 hp), 7DSG - from 856,900 rubles.
Volkswagen Polo sedan Kaluga assembly even more economical. Its turbo version with a 1.4 TSI engine is paired with a 7-speed DSG robot spends on average 5.7 l for every 100 km run. Do you believe? It is quite possible if you drive in eco-rally mode, but if you overdo it once or twice with pressing the accelerator pedal, all the savings will be in vain. It's good that there is an alternative: a tandem of a 1.6-liter aspirated (110 hp) and a 6-speed automatic will require, according to the manufacturer, a little more - 5.9 liters per hundred. But to achieve such an indicator in practice is much easier.
