To date, Russian motorists are offered huge assortment various models of SUVs and SUVs, which differ from each other not only in technical characteristics, but also in the exterior. One of the most popular and sought-after SUVs is the legendary Pajero, which has experienced more than one restyling since the release of the first generation. It is fair to say that the current fourth generation of this car already bears little resemblance to the car that was introduced in 1996. The body became much larger, the transmission was improved, fuel consumption decreased, and the interior of the SUV began to look really chic. Despite the fact that this model has a lot of competitors in its segment, in this article we will compare the Mitsubishi Pajero fourth generation with full size and updated crossover Nissan Pathfinder.
General characteristics of the models
Nissan Pathfinder is one of the most prominent representatives of the crossover segment of this manufacturer. It is known for its fairly large size, as well as elegant interior trim. cannot be ignored and specifications 2016 models, which have been significantly improved. The choice of the buyer is offered two engine options - gasoline (3.5 liters), as well as a hybrid power plant, which has a record low fuel consumption for a car with such indicators and dimensions. In turn, Pajero 4 is no less bright representative SUV class from Mitsubishi. For more than twenty years of existence, it has changed dramatically and now it can be safely called a reliable and proven car that can easily cope with any obstacles and difficulties during the most long trip.
To provide high permeability, as well as ease of control, the manufacturer has equipped this model with a powerful power plant, which, unfortunately, has very immodest appetites, especially in urban areas. But, as practice shows, even such significant disadvantage does not cause a decrease in demand for this SUV, therefore, according to preliminary information, the fifth generation of Pajero will soon see the world. These two cars, of course, are worthy of attention, they have much in common in the exterior, provide a comfortable ride for passengers in the cabin, but at the same time they have a significant difference in price. As strange as it may seem, but full size crossover from Nissan is almost half a million more expensive than its competitor.
Appearance Pajero and Pathfinder
As already mentioned, these two cars have a lot common features in appearance. The first thing worth noting is the rather large size, as well as the almost complete absence of smooth outlines of the body. Unlike Nissan. Pathfinder Pajero noticeably higher, largely due to the increased ground clearance. Both cars look presentable and are perfect for people who need to demonstrate their status. As you know, one of the most striking events in the automotive world is the annual Dakar race, in which Pajero won the championship 12 times. It should be noted the uncharacteristic shape of the radiator grille in Pathfinder. It is designed in such a way that the front of the car looks aggressive, thereby indicating the presence of a sporty character. Many automotive market experts are sure that the fourth generation Pajero has already outlived its usefulness, since this generation has been implemented for more than ten years.
Therefore, the Nissan Pathfinder has every chance to compete with it. But, despite the foregoing, there are still ardent fans of the “brutal” SUV from the Japanese automaker. The reason for this is not only a specific exterior, but also quite good technical characteristics, in terms of which it is second only, perhaps, to its older brother, the Pajero Sport. Like the Pathfinder, the car has a lot of chrome body parts and headlights of a similar shape. Based on the foregoing, it can be noted that both models look presentable and impressive. If you need a vehicle with an aggressive appearance, then, of course, it is worth giving preference to a large SUV. However, if elegance and modernity are a priority, then smart decision there will be a choice in favor of Pathfinder.
Interior comfort: Mitsubishi or Nissan?
The interior of these two Japanese cars has almost no common features. The fourth generation of the Nissan crossover is offered to motorists around the world exclusively in a seven-seater version. All rows of seats are arranged in such a way that passengers can travel as comfortably and conveniently as possible. The interior of the Pathfinder was trimmed with high-quality leather with beige and black decorative inserts. It's not the first year this model is famous for the quality of interior trim around the world and, as practice shows, it is very justified.
The fourth generation Pajero is a truly proven and comfortable five-seat SUV. Alas, after almost every restyling, the appearance of the cabin remains the same. Fastening of all elements is made strictly according to the instructions, which ensures long service trim, all the important buttons for driving a vehicle are located right at the driver’s fingertips, and the cabin itself is quite spacious. The interior is made in a classic style using traditional Mitsubishi details. You should not expect something unusual from Pajero in the fifth generation, therefore, for those who care about a luxurious interior and maximum amount auxiliary options, we strongly recommend that you turn your attention to the Nissan Pathfinder.
luggage compartment of these two cars is quite roomy, however, if we compare the volume indicators with the seats folded down, of course, the Nissan crossover has surpassed its competitor. Of course, the reason for this can be larger size a body designed for seven passengers, as well as the presence of an additional niche under the floor for transporting things.
Specifications
The new Pathfinder will be offered to Russian motorists with two types of engines:
- 3.5 liter petrol engine. It has a fairly good power - 249 horsepower. Compared to the third generation, fuel consumption has significantly decreased (by more than 25%) and now, according to the manufacturer, in urban conditions it will not exceed 12.7 liters for front-wheel drive and, accordingly, 13.7 liters for all-wheel drive vehicles.
- hybrid engine. It consists of a 4-cylinder petrol engine that has 234 horsepower, as well as a 20-horsepower electric motor. As a result, this increases the total power of the car to 254 hp. It should be noted that the hybrid version has small appetites - 10.9 liters in a metropolis, and on the highway the consumption is completely reduced to 7.5 liters.
The maximum speed that the Pathfinder can reach is 190 km / h, and acceleration to the first 100 km is achieved in 8.5-8.7 seconds.
The main competitor in the SUV segment is equipped with several types of power plants, among which the most popular and economical is the diesel version with a capacity of 200 horsepower and a volume of 3.2 liters. But despite this, according to the reviews of the owners of this car, the most reliable is Gas engine. Of course, in terms of power characteristics, it is good, but still noticeably inferior to the diesel counterpart (178 hp). However, the manufacturer has fully adapted it for domestic brand fuel AI-92, which is undoubtedly the most important advantage.
Specifications Nissan Pathfinder 2016
Engine and transmission
Cost and equipment
Mitsubishi price pajero fourth generation by domestic standards is low when compared with the cost of the main competitors in Russian market. Despite this, this car is famous for its excellent quality, presentable appearance and the absence of the need to frequently contact service centers. Considering that the fourth generation saw the world more than ten years ago, there are two options for everyone who wants to purchase a model - buy a used vehicle or purchase a car from the last restyling assembly line. The new Pajero at the time of 2017 will cost about 2,749,000 rubles, depending on the chosen performance. See the table below for details and prices:
Price Nissan crossover The fourth generation Pathfinder starts at 2,755,000 rubles (basic version with a 3.5-liter power plant). Top equipment will cost 3,065,000 rubles with the same engine. The price of a hybrid modification is from 2,975,000 rubles and more. Below is a table with the cost of the model, depending on its execution:
conclusions
Of course, Pajero is the flagship of Mitsubishi, which has been produced for more than twenty years and at the same time does not lose its popularity. This SUV can easily cope with any obstacles on the road and has quite good technical characteristics. Of the main disadvantages, one can single out only the lack of luxury in interior trim, as well as considerable fuel consumption. Seven-seater crossover The fourth-generation Pathfinder is a recent addition, but has already attracted the attention of many experts and critics in the automotive industry.
The body of the car is large, the interior vehicle stylish and without sacrificing comfort. Buyers are given the opportunity to purchase a hybrid modification of the model, which has improved power characteristics and a record low consumption fuel as for a representative of the crossover segment of this size. It is impossible to say unequivocally which is better - Pajero or Pathfinder, but based on all that has been said, it can be noted that an SUV from Mitsubishi is perfect for people who need big SUV, time-tested, but it is better to give preference to the Pathfinder car in cases where you need a modern and powerful crossover with a stylish interior and exterior.
| Model | Pajero IV | |||
| Number of doors / seats | 5 / 5 | |||
| Dimensions, mm | Length | 4900 | ||
| Width | 1875 | |||
| Height | 1870 | 1900 | ||
| Wheelbase | 2780 | |||
| Minimum ground clearance | 235 | 225 | 235 | |
| Weight | 2100 | 2315 | 2210 | |
| Maximum Gross Weight | ||||
| Engines | 3.0 | 3.2TD | 3.8 | |
| Maximum power, hp at rpm | 178/5250 | 200/3800 | 250/6000 | |
| Maximum torque, Nm at rpm | 261/4000 | 441/2000 | 329/2750 | |
| Fuel tank | 88 | |||
| Suspension | Front | on double transverse levers (spring, with SPU) | ||
| rear | Multi-link, spring with SPU | |||
| Brake mechanisms | front | Disk. vent.16D/17 | ||
| Rear | Disk. vent.16D/17 | |||
| Tires | 265/65R17 | 265/65R17 | 265/60R18 | |
| R17 | R17 | R18 | ||
| Transmission | 5MT/5AT | 5AT | 5AT | |
| Acceleration 0-100km/h. sec. | 12,6/13,6 | 11,1 | 10,8 | |
| Maximum speed, km/h. | 175 | 185 | 200 | |
| Fuel consumption per 100 km/h | City | 15,8/15,9 | 11,4 | 17,7 |
| track | 10 | 8 | 11,2 | |
| Mixed | 12,2 | 9,3 | 13,5 | |
| Qty. valves | 24 | TD | 24 | |
| Qty. cylinders | 6 SOHS | 4 DOHS | 6 MIVEC | |
Which is better: Pajero or Pathfinder?
updated: November 15, 2017 by: dimajppajeric testRead the test to the end! That's what athletes write!
Through the eyes of athletes
Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Land Cruiser is one of the most popular cars in the "serial" classes of rally-raid championships, including Russian ones. Why do athletes choose these cars? We decided to get a first-hand answer by inviting two experienced raiders to the off-road part of our test.Dmitry Feklichev
Winner of the Russian Rally Raid Championship and Cup rounds in 2000-2006.
rides on Toyota car Carina 2In the Tuareg, I never got rid of the feeling of a car - the desire to move off the road in it is minimal. Excellent landing, quite comfortable suspension, but no, no, and you will catch on the crest of the track with the bottom. It's still a city car.
In Discovery, at first I felt confident - you sit high, you look far away. But to understand all the troubles of his off-road modes, apparently, one day is not enough. The Terrain Response system reminded me of sophisticated cameras: they buy them because there are a lot of opportunities, but in the end they shoot only on the “automatic”. Yes, and slurred traction control ... In a word, Land Rover remained a stranger to me.
Land Cruiser 200 behaves predictably and is especially good on "slow" off-road. After all, the quieter the car drives through the swamp, the farther it drives, and the electronics allow it to literally crawl. But still, the heavy and big Toyota is a stayer, an expedition car, in which a huge margin of reliability is felt.
And Pajero is a typical sprinter, briskly taking off from a place and leaving everyone on a rigid suspension. I like the lack of intrusive electronics in it, and I am ready to forgive the noise and low comfort. Availability rear lock and less weight allows me to put the Pajero on par with the Cruiser. And let Volkswagen and Land Rover share the second place.
Alexey Elyshev
Champion of Russia in rally-raids in 1999 and 2000.
rides on Opel car MontereyVolkswagen Touareg is simple and straightforward, and its cross-country ability surpasses the initial impressions of a “passenger” appearance. True, off-road, the driver has to raise the seat to see the hood. The transmission control is logical, and I like the unobtrusiveness of Volkswagen electronics - I myself am free to choose the suspension and transmission mode.
But Land Rover Discovery did not evoke positive emotions. It is impossible to turn on the combination of modes that is convenient for me - only Terrain Response controls the blocking at its own discretion. It strikes traction control, sometimes "choking" the car to a complete stop! It turns out that the computer stands between the driver and the car. For what? There seems to be enough power, excellent visibility, there are no complaints about geometric cross-country ability, but there is no thrill from driving either. It feels like the Discovery was designed for the idiot behind the wheel.
Toyota Land Cruiser 200 is high-torque and has huge suspension travel. I liked the Crawl Control system - I did not want to interfere with its work. But, apparently, a large mass prevents the car from turning - when fast driving the steering wheel must be turned in advance, before turning. It doesn't fit with my aggressive driving style.
Whether business Mitsubishi Pajero! This is the most nimble and understandable machine of the four. The suspension is harsh, but that's how it should be: most of the bumps can be stormed, jumped over, jumped over. There is also a feeling that Pajero has the highest power density.
In a word, this is the most sport car off-road, which is why Mitsubishi tops my list. In second place is the no less understandable Volkswagen. Toyota is a little heavy for most Russian road roads - it’s good to go on long runs or race in the desert. Land Rover, I could not understand. The machine tries to do everything itself - why does it need me? Let her go by herself.
Modern trends dictate complete failure from dependent suspensions- with them it is impossible to achieve good handling and smoothness. It is not so much reliability that comes to the fore difficult conditions operation, how much real convenience in everyday situations. Therefore, comfort, capacity, behavior on paved roads will be our top priority. Who is faster, more economical, who is better controlled - the instruments and roads of the landfill will judge. However, let's not forget about the off-road - dirt lifts and gravel scree will replace the mud up to the hub. Too different shoes for our wards ....
The only car on display load-bearing body. He promises a minimum of mass and height, but in fact "" is not the lowest and heaviest. However, this weight is evenly distributed along the axes, and only when fully loaded does a large mass fall on rear wheels. A fair share of the load on the front adds a 3.2-liter turbodiesel, specially for Russia, released in the Euro II standard (instead of Euro III). This one is less sensitive to fuel quality and at the same time a little more powerful.
Introduced in autumn 1999. Available with 3- and 5-door body.
Engines: petrol V6 with direct injection 3.5 l (202 hp), diesel turbocharged 3.2 l (165 hp).
Transmissions: manual and automatic 5-speed.
Options: GLS, Exclusive.
Price in Russia: $47,990-50,950.
A promising newcomer from Nissan has finally arrived. This car is produced for both the American and European markets. Previously, Pathfinder (in Russian - Pathfinder) was the prerogative of America. In Europe, "II/">Terrano II used to perform in this class.
Of course, the designers of the new Nissan took into account most of the modern trends. In terms of the size of the Pathfinder cabin, it is noticeably larger than the "". Pros: Rectangular in plan luggage compartment and impeccable seat folding scheme. A small lack of space above the driver's head can be explained by the configuration: the sunroof hides about 40 mm in height.
There are complaints about visibility from the driver's seat - the massive A-pillars in the lower part of the body significantly interfere in sharp turns and when maneuvering in the parking lot. In the rear, there is full space and an unexpected ease of landing due to the original shape of the doors, which noticeably widen upwards.
The third row of seats gracefully hides into the floor and, if necessary, is suitable for "full-size" passengers, although it is noticeably inferior to the "Ford" one. Fans of traveling on rutted primers will undoubtedly be pleased with the abundance internal handles, which can be grabbed on a bumpy road. But the pretty circles of climate control are not as convenient as they seem. Due to their low height, they are inconvenient to use.
Introduced in spring 2005.
Engines: petrol V6 4.0 l (269 hp), diesel turbocharged 2.5 l (174 hp). In Russia, only diesel.
Transmissions: 6-speed manual and 5-speed automatic.
Options: XE, SE, LE.
Price in Russia: $44,800 - 56,450
TIRES DO EVERYTHING?
What to put on an SUV? This task is especially difficult if you rarely have to drive on dirty primers.
The Michelin Pilot LTX, which was shod with "", provided him with minimal rolling resistance, the most low level noise and minimum permeability in loose soil. Nissan's Goodyear Wrangler HP compromise helped it unleash its braking and handling potential on pavement, but on sand, the tires were almost as helpless. Finally, "", shod in a toothy "BF Goodrich T / A", showed the best off-road results, but pretty much lost on asphalt: the grip qualities of tires here do not stand up to criticism.
Set your priorities when choosing tires, because for our cars it's only 2% of the price.
WHERE TO DO THE RESERVE?
The spare wheel of an all-terrain vehicle is a big, heavy thing and does not want to be successfully assembled. There are two main mounting methods - on the back door (if it opens to the side) or under the trunk floor from below - then the door can be lifted up “in a passenger way”. " " and " " went the second way, providing passenger scheme, protecting "from the rain", by the way, with additionally opened glass. "" preferred a spare wheel on the door, saving space for the trunk.
The spare tire design on the tailgate is the simplest, but not every current driver can handle a 30-kilogram wheel that needs to be raised to chest level. Horizontal "underground" spare wheels are equipped with a mechanism for lifting and lowering and formally require less effort to remove and install. In fact, pulling the wheel out from under the car is not at all easier. And with a lowered rear and on a dirty road, this is a task that stimulates creative thinking and innovative word formation.
4.6 l, 239 hp, automatic transmission gears, Limited trim, $49,320.
3.2 l, 165 hp, manual transmission. GLS package, $47,990.
2.5 l, 174 hp, automatic transmission. LE trim, $53,750.
SUMMARY
One hundred percent American: the first tractor on the highway. To satisfy driving ambitions or real transport work, "" is not the best choice.
Overall score 7.2
Comfortable third-row seats, high equipment, quietness in the cabin, comfortable landing on the second row of seats, the ability to tow a trailer up to 3.5 tons.
Indistinct operation of the gearbox, poor stability on rough roads, insufficiently informative steering wheel and brakes, high gas mileage, moderate geometric cross-country ability.
SUMMARY
Still one of the best compromises between on-road and off-road performance. However, age is already making itself felt.
Overall score 7.8
Convenient driver's seat, good visibility, high smoothness, biggest moves suspension, roomy trunk, full range of transmission modes, hard blocking rear differential, low fuel consumption.
Modest dynamics, cramped third-row seats, noisy tires, uncomfortable footrests, low selectivity of the gear lever.
SUMMARY
An attempt to cross utilitarian values and driving pleasure was successful, albeit with the loss of some off-road qualities.
Overall score 7.8
Convenient driver's seat, large convertible trunk, exemplary handling, nimble "automatic", modern interior design.
Small suspension travel, limited forward visibility, small diesel operating range, mediocre ride, no mechanical locking rear differential.
There are not so many real frame SUVs left on the market, especially when it comes to affordable models. But among used cars, there are still such options. Here are the two most common representatives of this class: Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and Nissan Pathfinder. Let's see how reliable they are and whether they are worth the money.
Prices and equipment
The best option for buying on the secondary market is Pajero Sport and Pathfinder 2008-2014 - the cars are relatively fresh, and the prices are about the same (from 750 to 1,350 thousand rubles as of December 2018). Off-road configurations are also comparable.
Body, frame and paintwork
Gentle paintwork Pajero Sport and Pathfinder, like on most classmates, are quickly overwritten, after a couple of years of operation, chips and scratches appear on it. large quantities. Unfortunately, some of the body parts on both cars are subject to corrosion, namely: the tailgate and the rear of the roof. At the same time, the frame rusts intensively on the Nissan, so much so that sometimes it is not possible to disassemble the VIN.
Chassis
As befits a real SUV, the suspension on the Pajero Sport and Pathfinder has a very high endurance. On average, up to 120 thousand kilometers, no manipulations are required with it at all. In the future, only Maintenance and gradual replacement of worn bearings, shock absorbers, etc.
Transmission and all-wheel drive
The manual transmissions that were installed on the Pajero Sport and Pathfinder with regular maintenance are able to work the entire life of the car. Automatic transmissions require more attention, as the load on them is serious. Nevertheless, a 5-speed "automatic" on Mitsubishi, as well as 5- and 7-speed automatic transmissions on Nissan, nursed without serious complaints up to 300 thousand km. The all-wheel drive system on both SUVs is extremely necessary to service on time, in which case it will not surprise.
Power units
If with Mitsubishi motors 3.2- and 2.5-liter diesel engines, as well as with a 3.0-liter gasoline V6, there are practically no difficulties, then Pathfinder has problematic engines. So, Nissan diesel engines with a volume of 2.5 and 3.0 liters often overheat, which is why the cylinder head cracks on the first run of 70-80 thousand km, and the second one has an oil appetite and the EGR fails. There are practically no complaints about the 4.0-liter Pathfinder gasoline engine, except for the catalyst that collapses over time.
What is better to choose - Mitsubishi Pajero Sport or Nissan Pathfinder?
Both SUVs certainly deserve attention. If you decide to buy a Nissan Pathfinder, then opt for a car with a 2.5-liter diesel or 4.0-liter gasoline engine. 3.0-liter diesel - better not to take. And also carefully examine the condition of the body and frame.
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport can be considered with any motors and transmissions.
Nissan Pathfinder, Mitsubishi Pajero and Land Rover Discovery. All three are honest SUVs. Unlike today's fashionable crossovers, they are equally designed for driving on asphalt and off-road outings. In any case, such are Pajero and Disco - we have already checked this. How does it look against their background? new nissan Pathfinder?
Looks new Pathfinder menacingly. Especially in black. Chopped shapes, sharp edges, a powerful chrome-plated front with a corporate letter V on the grille. But the "disguised" handles rear doors associated with cars such as Alfa Romeo. A hint of temperament?
The third-generation Discovery is a state-of-the-art collection of Land Rover self-quotes. Here and Range Rover with its huge block headlights, and previous Disco with a characteristic roof shape. And the “inflated” Mitsubishi Pajero next to two modern competitors looks... No, not outdated - it's just different, and we like it.
The design of all three interiors is good in its own way. In Discovery - monumentalism, in Nissan - technostyle. And Mitsubishi, despite its age, looks hearty - some devices in deep wells are worth something.
“Our” Discovery 2.7 TDV6 with a diesel engine in the SE version has neither leather upholstery nor electric seat adjustments. And yet wins in ergonomics. Adjustment ranges - what you need, the profile of the seats is optimal, and their high location provides good visibility - thanks to the "commander" landing, the Discovery driver feels the dimensions of the car very well and easily controls the situation. The steering wheel on the Disco is adjustable not only in height, as on our two "Japanese", but also in reach - it's easier to choose an individual fit. You won’t get lost on the center console either – there are a lot of buttons, but they are all large and with visual symbols. The only thing missing is a color display, which is equipped with more expensive versions.
The Nissan Pathfinder loses out a bit. The seat is not so comfortable, the steering wheel is adjustable only in height, and in the upper position it is littered forward, and in the lower position it stands almost vertically. The lever of the six-speed box does not shine with the clarity of work, and the move is too big. But on the other hand, Pathfinder can have a contactless transponder key that does not need to be taken out of your pocket at all - like on the Micra. You approach the car, you press the button on one of the door handles and locks open. Press again and close. Start engine? Turned the plastic handle in place of the ignition switch - and you're done.
And there is also a rear-view camera, and color. You can park with five centimeter gaps! And also - fuel consumption graphs on the display, the ability to communicate with a cell phone via bluetooth protocol, Bose acoustics and a six-charge CD-changer that accepts mp3 discs ... Of course, most of this equipment is offered for a surcharge.
Mitsubishi Pajero is simpler. Although there is leather upholstery seats, a steering wheel with wood trim, a large sunroof and a display that displays not only the operating modes of the air conditioning system, but also the readings of the compass and altimeter. Do you want to know the altitude above sea level? Please — 150 m for Moscow.
The most spacious of our three seven-seat cars— Discovery. If the Nissan Pathfinder hides two folding “chairs” in the underground of the luggage compartment, and Pajero even offers the inhabitants of the “gallery” something like a folding bench, then Land Rover has two full-fledged places behind where two tall riders will calmly settle down. The second-row seats on the Disco are also more comfortable. But Nissan and Mitsubishi have a separate climate control unit for rear passengers- and with their air ducts on the ceiling.
In general, in terms of interior transformation possibilities, our SUVs are not much inferior to minivans. Having folded the two rear rows of seats in the Disco and Pajero, you can transport a refrigerator or a small sofa: the luggage compartment with a flat floor allows. And Nissan, in addition, has a folding back of the front passenger seat and a rear window that opens separately from the tailgate. For the transportation of a three-meter oak plinth, successfully purchased at construction market, - what you need!
Now let's talk about motors. More precisely, about diesel engines - after all, Pathfinder is still sold in Russia only with a four-cylinder diesel engine with a volume of 2.5 liters and a power of 174 hp. Accordingly, the test Pajero and Discovery are also diesel. But Nissan - with a manual transmission, and its competitors - with "automatic".
Of course, diesel cars with a curb weight of under 2.5 tons do not claim sports records - the whole trinity accelerates to a hundred in almost 14 seconds. Moreover, Nissan, despite the manual transmission, is only tenths of a second faster than its “automatic” competitors. The Nissan diesel is not bad - it starts to show activity from 1500 rpm, which corresponds to 80 km / h in sixth gear, actively “spins” up to 4500 rpm, and the limiter works at 5000 rpm. The gear lever is a little "cotton", but you do not make mistakes when changing gears.
The Pajero diesel offers a more modest rev range - the “automatic” shifts gears at 4000 rpm. Switches quickly, albeit with small jolts. But the Discovery box spends a second on each gear change. Moreover, the “thoughtfulness” of the Disco transmission is sometimes not just annoying. When you go out to overtake, you press the gas, but there is no traction - this is already unsafe! But passengers like it: Land Rover accelerates as smoothly as if it were a continuously variable transmission.
The brakes on all three SUVs are not bad. The best one here is the Discovery, with superbly tuned ABS that subtly “catches” the edge of wheel lock. On a Nissan, the brake pedal is too long-stroke, which is not the best option at emergency braking. And on Pajero, in such a situation, the ABS is activated too early - the tires do not work at the limit of traction, and braking distances from a speed of 100 km / h it is extended by a good five meters. A lot of!
Controllability? Here again, Discovery is in the lead. The ease with which this heavy and large car reacts to steering turns is surprising. The sensations are very unusual: you sit high, and the overloads in the corners are almost “passenger”! On high speed the high sensitivity of the Disco seems even unnecessary - after all, this is not a gasoline car, but a calm "diesel".
However, the anti-roll system contributes a lot to the controllability - recognizing body roll using pendulum sensors, the electronics selectively slows down the wheels, preventing the development of this roll.
Such a system would come in handy for Pajero as well. In sharp turns, the car rolls like a longboat on steep waves. Tires squeak in the most harmless corners ... And if you overcome fear and turn the steering wheel sharper, then Pajero lifts the unloaded front wheel. IN emergency when you need to go around an obstacle, such a chassis setup is a poor help. But there is no stabilization system on the Pajero - unlike the Discovery, where the electronics effectively "strangle" rolls and slips in the bud.
Nissan Pathfinder - peace of mind. The car stands very well on a high-speed straight line, smoothly responds to the actions of the steering wheel when changing lanes. Sometimes even too smoothly. But no stress! The Pathfinder is reluctant to enter tight corners, showing a fair amount of understeer, and the tires remind themselves of themselves with a hoarse grinding too early. But on the steering wheel - a distinct reactive action. Perhaps this is exactly what the handling of a serious SUV should be like. But Pathfinder seemed to us too sluggish, lazy and a little old-fashioned. Especially in comparison with Discovery.
And in terms of smoothness, Land Rover also wins with its air suspension - it does an excellent job with our roads! In addition, the Disco's cabin is quite quiet: even the diesel grunt is muffled more effectively than in the two Japanese cars.
In second place in terms of comfort is the Mitsubishi Pajero. Tire noise and diesel rumble are more noticeable here. The suspension is a bit firmer, but the high-profile tires smooth out bumps in small bumps. And Nissan's suspension is even stiffer, but on bad road palpable vibrations unsprung masses- despite independent suspension all wheels. diesel engine here, too, declares itself in full voice - the rumble in the cabin is heard even on idling. But neither on the steering wheel, nor on the gear lever - no vibrations.
Emergency situation
We decided to try SUVs in the same situation as cars: on " elk dough". Recall that this is a maneuver of an emergency detour of a sudden obstacle.
Of course, we assumed that it would be much more difficult to avoid an accident in an SUV in the same conditions. But we didn't think it was impossible at all! At a standard speed of 65 km / h, none of the drivers could go around the obstacle the first time! The chances of avoiding an accident appear at a speed of about 5 km / h lower than that of passenger cars ...
In a series of races performed by an expert tester, the best top speed showed Land Rover - 74.4 km / h. Of course it was worth it great work. But it is obvious that Discovery has the most "passenger" chassis of the whole trinity. In addition, the stabilization system here interferes with the driver's actions very harshly and in the very early phase - and slows down the Disco almost to a complete stop! Inexperienced driver this will certainly help to cope with a heavy car in an emergency.
Pajero has no systems. But in vain. Understeer with high lateral forces develops into such a frank demolition, which the test expert cannot overcome at speeds above 65.8 km / h. And from the side it’s just scary to look at it - the car reacts to sharp movements with the steering wheel by tearing off one, or even two wheels at once. Togo and look will turn over ...
Nissan is equipped with a stabilization system, and it works softer than in Discovery. But a less “passenger” chassis and a noticeable “step” in force when turning the steering wheel quickly prevented a quick maneuver - only 67.5 km / h, only slightly faster than the Pajero.
Finally, permeability.
All three SUVs crawl along the sandy quarry with surprising ease. The difference is due only to ground clearance: in a track where Mitsubishi and Nissan cling to the bottom of the ground, Land Rover rides "contactless" - in the upper position of the air suspension, its ground clearance is 5-6 cm more than that of competitors.
The suspension travel has a considerable influence on the car's patency - the smaller it is, the higher the risk of diagonal hanging. We evaluated the suspension travel of all three cars, driving the front wheel onto the overpass ramp until the moment the rear wheel was hung out. At the same time, we evaluated the change in the position of the centers of the wheels relative to the car body. The results are shown in the table.
Now let's try to take a steep hill by storm, and without the so-called diagonal hanging - when two wheels "diagonally" are in the air, front and rear - we can't do it. Here the king is Pajero with its super transmission. We block the inter-axle and rear inter-axle differentials, turn on the downshift - and go! The car crawls up confidently and smoothly, without jerks - even when reliable grip with the ground have only two wheels.
Discovery with its "smart" Terrain Response transmission also climbs the hill, but less confidently. Electronics cannot decide in any way - which and when to block differentials, completely or partially? Therefore, Land Rover crawls up with stops and under the crunch of actuators.
Nissan Pathfinder for off-road "charge" is simpler. Here permanent drive to the rear wheels (2H mode), and the front is connected using a multi-plate clutch - in Auto mode by electronics decision, and in positions 4H and 4Lo it is rigid, forced. There are no interwheel locks - there is only their electronic imitation. Until you stall, you won't go any further. So in the case of diagonal hanging, the driver can only put pressure on the gas - which we did until a loud crunch came from under the hood. Traction on the front wheels disappeared, and from the crankcase of the front main gear dripped oil...
The "autopsy" showed that one of the wheel drives burst - an all-metal shaft with a diameter of about three centimeters. Apparently, the numerous blows that this Pathfinder suffered during a month of constant journalistic tests made themselves felt.
We sent the wounded Nissan to Moscow on a tow truck - and began to count the points of expert assessments. The leader of this test is Discovery, and the leader is unconditional. But it is also more expensive - from $ 53,000. Mitsubishi Pajero prices start at $48,000. And the $45,300 base Nissan Pathfinder is the best deal. Due to the relationship with the pickup truck Nissan Navara the new Pathfinder is relatively affordable (in any case, prices for this model are still set at the lowest limit of off-road analog cars), and in terms of the abundance of fashionable equipment, it surpasses many more expensive cars.
What's the price?
Nissan Pathfinder is currently only available with a 2.5 dCi diesel engine (174 hp). "In the base" - a stabilization system, climate control and seat heating. For $45,300, this is a very interesting offer. The Pathfinder SE version with a third row of seats, a CD player, light and rain sensors is $2,200 more expensive, and such an SUV can already be ordered with an “automatic” ($49,200). And at the top of the row is Pathfinder LE with leather interior, xenon, additional air conditioning, key card and sunroof ($52,290 with “mechanics” and $53,990 with “automatic”). For an additional $2,700, you can get a communication package with an expensive audio system, a rear-view camera with a color display and a hands-free system.
The petrol Pathfinder V6 4.0 (269 hp) will appear in mid-autumn and will be offered only in the most rich equipment with "automatic". The price is $58300.
Warranty - 3 years or 100 thousand km. The dealer network covers 33 enterprises in 14 cities of Russia.
The most affordable Land Rover Discovery TDV6 S with a V6 2.7 diesel engine (190 hp), manual transmission and spring suspension for $ 52,900 involves a simple air conditioner, a stabilization system and a full set of airbags. The SE version with air suspension and Terrain Response, climate control, parking sensors and xenon is $4,000 more expensive. And leather upholstery, cruise control and an expensive HSE audio system push the price up to $61,900. Power and heated seats, rear differential lock, “climate” for rear passengers and turning headlights are on the list of options. Like the "automatic" - you will have to pay another $ 2,700 for it.
Petrol Discovery V8 4.4 (295 hp) is offered in SE and HSE versions only with air suspension and "automatic". These cars are exactly $10,000 more expensive diesel versions with the same level of equipment. For example, the "base" Discovery V8 4.4 HSE costs $71,900, and the same car with a third row of seats, winter package, turning lights, a sunroof, additional air conditioning, parking sensors and a navigation system will cost $84,100.
Warranty - 3 years or 100 thousand km. The dealer network covers 16 enterprises in 9 cities of Russia.
Prices for Mitsubishi Pajero start at $47,990 - for this amount you can buy a diesel Pajero 3.2 DI-D (165 hp) with a manual transmission. "In the base" is additional heater interior, third row of seats and rear differential lock. For leather seats with heating and electrical adjustments, an audio system and an information display, you will have to pay $ 2920, for an “automatic” - another $ 1750.
Pajero with a V6 3.5 petrol engine (202 hp) can also be equipped with a manual gearbox, but a rear differential lock is not provided for it. But even the base Pajero V6 3.5 ($50,950) is equipped with a stabilization system. The cost of the top version with the “automatic” is $56,910. In addition, you can buy SUVs limited edition Pajero eXclusive, which are distinguished by interior trim, original optics, a "sporty" body kit and a more solid set of equipment. Prices range from $56,990 to $60,990.
Warranty - 3 years or 100 thousand km. The dealer network covers 66 enterprises in 49 cities of Russia.
And what else?
The new Pathfinder is a car on the verge between SUV and full-fledged SUVs. Approximately the same position is occupied by the aging Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, but even in the maximum configuration with a V6 3.0 petrol engine (170 hp) and an “automatic” it costs $40,500. In addition, Pajero Sport cannot drive with all-wheel drive on asphalt.
For the amount of $ 45,000-55,000, you can already buy serious frame SUVs. For example, gasoline Chevrolet Trailblazer 4.2 (273 hp, $49,000) and Ford Explorer V8 4.6 (240 hp, $51,700) expensive versions or a "medium" Jeep Grand Cherokee with a 3.0 CRD diesel (218 hp, $45,500). The same $45,000 is worth a Toyota Land Cruiser 100 with an atmospheric diesel engine (4.2 liters, 130 hp) and a manual or well-equipped Kia Sorento(3.5 l, 197 hp) and SsangYong Rexton(3.2 l, 220 hp).
| Equipment of the vehicles participating in the test | |||
| Brand | Land Rover | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Discovery 2.7TDV6 | Pajero 3.2 DI-D | Pathfinder 2.5dCi |
| Price basic version | $52900 | $47990 | $45300 |
| Automatic transmission | O | O | — |
| Front airbags | + | + | + |
| Side airbags | + | + | + |
| Inflatable "curtains" | + | — | + |
| ABS | + | + | + |
| Dynamic stabilization system | + | — | + |
| Electronic parking brake | + | — | — |
| Downhill control system | + | — | — |
| Center differential lock | + | + | — |
| Rear axle differential lock | O | + | — |
| Transfer box with step-down row | + | + | + |
| Adjustable air suspension | O | — | — |
| power steering | + | + | + |
| Height adjustable steering column | + | + | + |
| Reach-adjustable steering column | + | — | — |
| Hands free access system | — | — | ABOUT |
| Anti-theft alarm | + | — | ABOUT |
| Power and heated exterior mirrors | + | + | + |
| Power windows front and rear doors | + | + | + |
| Power front seat adjustment | — | ABOUT | ABOUT |
| Driver's seat memory | — | — | ABOUT |
| Light sensor | ABOUT | — | ABOUT |
| Rain sensor | ABOUT | — | ABOUT |
| Heated front seats | — | + | + |
| Passenger climate control unit | — | + | ABOUT |
| Climate control | +* | + | +* |
| Folding rear seat | + | + | + |
| Additional two seats | ABOUT | ABOUT | ABOUT |
| Cruise control | ABOUT | — | ABOUT |
| Electric sunroof | — | ABOUT | ABOUT |
| CD changer | ABOUT | ABOUT | ABOUT |
| Telephone preparation | — | — | ABOUT |
| Leather upholstery | — | ABOUT | ABOUT |
| Fog lights | ABOUT | + | ABOUT |
| bi-xenon headlights | ABOUT | — | ABOUT |
| Parking radar front/rear | -/ABOUT | —/— | -/O** |
| Full size spare tire | + | + | + |
| Tested car price | $63600 | $52750 | $54990 |
| (+) Package contents of the basic version | |||
| (—) Not included in the basic configuration | |||
| (O) Options fitted to test vehicles | |||
| * With separate temperature control | |||
| ** Rear view camera | |||
| Land Rover Discovery 2.7 TDV6, Mitsubishi Pajero 3.2 DI-D, Nissan Pathfinder 2.5 dCi (manufacturer data) | |||
| Land Rover | Mitsubishi | Nissan | |
| body type | 5-door station wagon | ||
| Number of places | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Maximum trunk volume, l | 2558 | 2020 | 2091 |
| Curb weight, kg | 2504 | 2125 | 2267 |
| Gross weight, kg | 3230 | 2810 | 2880 |
| Engine | turbodiesel | turbodiesel | turbodiesel |
| Location | front, lengthwise | front, lengthwise | front, lengthwise |
| Number and arrangement of cylinders | 6, V-shape | 4, in a row | 4, in a row |
| Working volume, cm3 | 2720 | 3200 | 2488 |
| Cylinder diameter / piston stroke, mm | 81,0/88,0 | 98,5/105,0 | 89,0/100,0 |
| Compression ratio | 17,3 | 17,0 | 16,5 |
| Number of valves | 24 | 16 | 16 |
| Maximum power, hp/kW/r/min | 190/140/4000 | 160/118/3800 | 174/128/4000 |
| Maximum torque, Nm / rpm | 445/1900 | 373/2000 | 403/2000 |
| Transmission | A6 | A5 | M6 |
| gear ratios | |||
| I | 4,17 | 3,79 | 4,69 |
| II | 2,34 | 2,06 | 2,71 |
| III | 1,52 | 1,42 | 1,78 |
| IV | 1,14 | 1,00 | 1,29 |
| V | 0,87 | 0,73 | 1,00 |
| VI | 0,69 | — | 0,83 |
| Reverse | 3,40 | 3,87 | 4,26 |
| main gear | 3,54 | 3,92 | 3,69 |
| Transfer case | 1,00/2,93 | 1,00/1,93 | 1,00/2,60 |
| Drive unit | constant, | full, | full, |
| full | with pluggable | with pluggable | |
| front axle | front axle | ||
| Front suspension | independent, | independent, | independent, |
| pneumatic, | spring, | spring, | |
| on transverse arms | on transverse arms | McPherson | |
| Rear suspension | independent, | independent, | independent, |
| pneumatic, | spring, | spring, | |
| on transverse arms | on transverse arms | on transverse arms | |
| Front brakes | disc, ventilated | disc, ventilated | disc, ventilated |
| Rear brakes | disc, ventilated | disc, ventilated | disc, ventilated |
| Tires | 255/60R18 | 265/70 R16 | 255/65R17 |
| Maximum speed, km/h | 180 | 170 | 175 |
| Acceleration time 0—100 km/h, s | 12,8 | 13,2 | 11,5 |
| Fuel consumption, l/100 km | |||
| urban cycle | 13,2 | 13,3 | 11,5 |
| suburban cycle | 8,7 | 8,8 | 7,6 |
| mixed cycle | 10,4 | 10,5 | 9,0 |
| Capacity fuel tank, l | 82,3 | 90 | 80 |
| Fuel | diesel | diesel | diesel |
| Some measurement results Autoreview | |||
| Automobile | Land Rover | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| discovery | pajero | Pathfinder | |
| Maximum speed, km/h | 177,1 | 175,0 | 173,6 |
| Acceleration time, s | |||
| 0—50 km/h | 4,50 | 4,14 | 3,83 |
| 0-100 km/h | 13,71 | 13,49 | 13,34 |
| 0-150 km/h | 37,86 | 37,64 | 38,25 |
| on the way 400 m | 19,23 | 18,97 | 18,74 |
| on the way 1000 m | 35,27 | 34,98 | 35,05 |
| 60—100 km/h (III)/(IV) | 8,20/10,05 | 7,86/7,81 | |
| 80—120 km/h (V)/(VI) | 16,36/— | 10,97/14,39 | |
| 60—100/80—120 km/h (D) | 8,23/11,12 | 8,19/11,31 | —/— |
| Run-out, m | |||
| from 50 km/h | 623 | 600 | 607 |
| 130—80 km/h | 1011 | 1028 | 958 |
| 160—80 km/h | 1513 | 1568 | 1458 |
| Braking distances | |||
| from a speed of 100 km/h, m | 42,1 | 46,5 | 41,7 |
| Deceleration, m/s2 | 9,2 | 8,3 | 9,2 |
| from a speed of 150 km/h, m | 91,1 | 104,8 | 93,5 |
| Deceleration, m/s2 | 9,5 | 8,3 | 9,3 |
| Curb weight, kg | 2561,0 | 2364,0 | 2281,0 |
| Front axle, kg (%) | 1258,0 (49,1) | 1181,0 (50,0) | 1166,0 (51,1) |
| Rear axle, kg (%) | 1303,0 (50,9) | 1183,0 (50,0) | 1115,0 (48,9) |
| Speedometer Accuracy | ||||||||
| Speedometer readings, km/h | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 120 | 140 | 160 | 180 |
| True speed, km/h | ||||||||
| Land Rover Discovery | 39 | 59 | 78 | 98 | 116 | 135 | 154 | 173 |
| Mitsubishi Pajero | 38 | 57 | 76 | 95 | 113 | 132 | 152 | 171 |
| Nissan Pathfinder | 36 | 56 | 76 | 94 | 113 | 133 | 153 | 172 |
| Expert assessments Autoreview | ||||
| Parameter | Max. score | Land Rover | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Design | 160 | 130 | 125 | 120 |
| Appearance | 80 | 65 | 60 | 55 |
| Interior | 80 | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| Ergonomics | 160 | 135 | 130 | 135 |
| Driver's workplace | 80 | 65 | 60 | 60 |
| Visibility | 80 | 70 | 70 | 75 |
| Driving properties | 330 | 255 | 250 | 255 |
| Accelerating dynamics | 80 | 50 | 60 | 60 |
| Braking dynamics | 100 | 80 | 75 | 80 |
| Controllability | 80 | 65 | 55 | 60 |
| patency | 70 | 60 | 60 | 55 |
| Driving comfort | 180 | 140 | 135 | 125 |
| Smooth running and vibration protection | 70 | 55 | 50 | 45 |
| Acoustic comfort | 60 | 50 | 45 | 40 |
| Microclimate | 50 | 35 | 40 | 40 |
| Interior comfort | 170 | 155 | 140 | 150 |
| Passenger seats | 70 | 65 | 60 | 60 |
| Trunk | 50 | 45 | 40 | 45 |
| Salon transformation | 50 | 45 | 40 | 45 |
| Total | 1000 | 815 | 780 | 785 |
Alexander DIVAKOV, Oleg RASTEGAYEV
Photo by Stepan Schumacher and Oleg Rastegaev
