Reno comparison. Nissan Terrano and Renault Duster: comparison, specifications, test drive

16.06.2019

Recently, crossovers have gained great popularity in Russia. Now many German, French and American manufacturers produce products of this class. The Japanese are not far behind. So, a couple of years ago they released an updated Nissan Terrano, designed to be the main competitor for the Duster. In today's article, we will try to compare the Nissan Terrano and Renault Duster and answer the question of which car is better.

Design

That "Terrano", which was produced in the 90s, is a thing of the past. The Japanese got rid of the dull rectangular shapes. Now attractive design is the priority. After all, it is the appearance that buyers now pay the most attention to.

The car was built on the famous Nissan B0 platform. This midsize crossover, which received a corporate, Nissan style. So, the front part strongly resembles the “Navara” of the late zero years. The car is distinguished by massive wheel arches, wide chrome grille and a pronounced side line of the body.

Now let's move on to Duster. It's no secret that the car was positioned as the most affordable crossover in your class. Therefore, Dacia Logan was taken as the platform. It was stretched in size, ground clearance was added and huge wheels were installed. From the front, the Duster is very attractive: multi-piece optics, tightened feed and a huge grille with corporate logo.

But the back of the car looks terrible. What is the design of the lanterns. These disproportionate forms caused a wave of bewilderment among many motorists.

Differences

If you compare these two SUVs externally, what are the differences worth noting? Renault Duster and Nissan Terrano, despite their similar size and class, are noticeably different in appearance. Terrano's design is more attractive and aggressive. What can I say, Nissan looks much more expensive than its French competitor. Many motorists agree with this. If speak about fundamental differences, then this is the shape of the bumper, wider wheel arches and pleasant rear optics. Although the front looks no less harmonious. If not for the design of the rear, the "Frenchman" could compete well with the Japanese "Terrano". In the meantime, Duster is losing to him in all respects.

Salon

Despite the fact that Renault Duster and Nissan Terrano cars belong to the budget class, inside they are very different. Take a look at what the interior of the French crossover looks like.

Since the platform was taken from Logan, many Romanian parts "migrated" to the salon. Among them - mediocre sound insulation, hard and rattling plastic. Yes, and the architecture of the front panel looks very dull. This is repeatedly confirmed by the reviews of the owners. Like it or not, the French saved a lot on interior design. Round deflectors, a rather simple steering wheel, a center console “studded” with plugs - all these are features budget crossover Renault Duster. Now let's move on to Japanese SUV.

Salon looks much richer. Steering wheel - three-spoke, with silver inserts. The center console has a climate control unit and a small radio screen. There is a glove box on top. There are also niches in door cards and on the passenger side (deep slot above the glove box). In light color scheme Nissan looks much more expensive than its price. The seats have pronounced support and are distinguished by an abundance of adjustments. The quality of sound insulation is an order of magnitude higher than that of the "Frenchman".

As for the volume of the trunk, in the standard version, up to 475 liters of luggage fit here. There is a function of folding the rear seats. This allows you to increase the usable volume to 1635 liters. If we compare the Nissan Terrano and Renault Duster, the trunk volume of the latter is an order of magnitude smaller. In the all-wheel drive version, it is 408 liters. And with the seats folded down - only 1570 liters.

Specifications

We have already compared the design and interior of SUVs. Renault Duster or Nissan Terrano - which is better? Bye positive impressions remain only from the "Japanese". However, in terms of the variety of power plants, the Nissan is noticeably inferior to the Duster. The last one on the list has as many as 8 engines, among which there are both diesel and gasoline units. However, for Russian market only four of them are available. The base is a 102-horsepower 1.6-liter gasoline unit. Naturally, this power is not enough for such a curb weight. And if Logan still somehow “digested” this torque, then things are different here. This motor is clearly not for active driving.

Also in the lineup there is a 114-horsepower gasoline engine with the same displacement. But, as noted by the reviews, this power is not enough for the crossover. In order to somehow realize the potential, you need to choose a two-liter engine that develops 135 Horse power power. The diesel unit, officially supplied to Russia, has simply ridiculous characteristics. With a volume of 1.5 liters, it develops 90 horsepower. Naturally, with this motor, he does not go anywhere. Acceleration to hundreds - almost 16 seconds. Max speed- 156 kilometers per hour.

As the reviews say, Nissan Terrano and Renault Duster are very similar in technical terms. The Japanese has almost the same line of units. You're right, it's cut a little. There is still a 90-horsepower here diesel engine one and a half liters, as well as two gasoline units. The first with a volume of 1.6 liters develops 103 horsepower, the second - 137 with a volume of 2 liters.

checkpoint

As for transmissions, both cars have the same range of gearboxes. Among them, mechanics are five- and six-speed transmissions. automatic box here is one (both for the "Duster" and for the "Terrano") - a four-stage, with a torque converter.

Test drive: Renault Duster and Nissan Terrano

How do these crossovers behave on the go? From a technical point of view, this is the same car. The all-wheel drive scheme, motors and transmission are of the same type. As for the suspension, these are two absolutely identical crossovers. The suspension works out the pits quite hard. You also feel the heaviness of the steering wheel in the parking lot (although both have power steering). But at speed it gets easier. You have to trim periodically. In terms of acceleration dynamics, the cars have similar characteristics. True, the Nissan is almost 100 kilograms heavier. Therefore, he will slightly lose to Duster. Owner reviews do not recommend buying a diesel engine. And if for foreign market a 110-horsepower unit is available, which at least somehow rides, then in Russia you can only buy a motor for 90 forces. Due to the high curb weight, it can not cope with the loads. The same applies to low power gasoline engines. It becomes clear why the fuel consumption of the 1.6- and 2-liter versions is almost the same. As far as cross-country performance is concerned, both are not full-fledged SUVs. As the test drive showed, "Renault Duster" and "Terrano" on front wheel drive simply powerless off-road. Pluggable rear axle able to remedy this situation. But there are no hard blocks here. Therefore, the main element of crossovers is asphalt.

Price

So, we got to the decisive factor - cost. starting price for "Duster" in the minimum wage is 630 thousand rubles. It will be a front-wheel drive car with a five-speed manual and a 1.6-liter engine. "Terrano" with the same configuration will be 260 thousand more expensive. Concerning maximum configurations, "Duster" with all-wheel drive and a two-liter engine costs exactly 1 million rubles.

The same "Terrano" is available at a price of 1 million 167 thousand rubles. However, the cost of options from the Japanese is cheaper. For example, four-wheel drive costs 58 thousand rubles. At "Duster" - 8 thousand more expensive. Already in the middle configuration, Nissan is equipped with a stabilization system, which significantly improves cross-country ability. On Renault, this function is only available as an option (even in the maximum configuration).

Outcome

So, Renault Duster or Nissan Terrano - which is better? If your priority is beautiful design and interior, you should definitely choose Nissan. If you don’t see the point in overpaying for appearance, then definitely take the Duster. Otherwise, the Nissan Terrano and Renault Duster are very similar cars.

A new generation of the most popular state employee Renault Logan has been released, which is now assembled at AvtoVAZ. What did the French change in their brainchild? First, the design has changed radically: there is no trace of the former utilitarianism. The new Logan is cute, attractive and trendy. It turns out and inexpensive car might look nice! It has also grown in size: now it is 4346 mm long, 1517 mm high and 1733 wide.

In technical terms, there are few innovations. The platform of the sedan is the same B0, but modernized. The developers left the engines from the first Logan, but finalized them. These are gasoline 8- and 16-valve units of 1.6 liters, with a capacity of 82 and 102 hp. respectively. But there is data that the model will be available diesel units and automatic transmission.

Peak torque has increased to 134 Nm. The good old 5-speed mechanics will be offered as a gearbox. The car accelerates to 172 km / h, requiring 7.2 liters in mixed mode, shoots up to a hundred in 10.5 -11.9 seconds.

The suspension as a whole has not changed, only it has become a little stiffer. Comfort has not suffered at all, as the engineers assure, but the handling and maneuverability have become better. great attention was given to the safety of the car: child seat mounts, side airbags and a stabilization system appeared, albeit optionally. Special deformation zones appeared on the body, which absorb side and frontal impacts.

So, how much will this miracle cost? Basic version will cost only 355,000 rubles. Price Logan Confort ranges from 408,000 to 428,000 rubles, and Privelege from 456,000 to 476,000 rubles. The price of the top-end Renault Luxe Privelege, stuffed to capacity, is 495,000 for the 82-horsepower version and 20,000 more for the 102-horsepower version.

What will competitors offer?

Class budget cars, of course, not the ideal of luxury and grace. But that's not what it's meant for. All models of this class are distinguished by their own individuality and easily cope with their tasks. It is inexpensive, spacious and comfortable cars behind acceptable price. It was Renault Logan who opened the fashion for budget sedans, and now he has more than enough rivals.

Lada Priora

Priora, like Logan, has a single 1.6-liter engine with 98 or 106 hp. And only with mechanics. Prices range from 365 to 460 thousand rubles. In terms of dimensions, Lada is slightly inferior, having 4350 mm in length, 1680 in width and 1420 in height. The luggage compartment is less voluminous: only 430 liters. As for the dynamics, the Lada engines are a little faster and more economical. In 11.5 seconds, the car accelerates to hundreds, consuming an average of 6.8-6.9 liters per 100 kilometers, and the maximum declared speed is 183 km / h.

The most complete Priora differs much more richly equipped, in addition, there is a choice of bodywork (station wagon, hatchback). Logan in the expensive option will cost over half a million rubles, but it will still be poorer than Lada.

However, Lada is not so perfect. First of all, reliability and safety are in question. Of course, Lada cannot be called a bucket of bolts, but it is less reliable. According to statistics, Frets break almost 30 percent more often. Renault is a more refined and polished car with fewer annoying little things. Its production is of higher quality, which allows you to turn a blind eye to a higher price.

Peugeot 301

You can buy this sedan at a price of 462,000 rubles. More serious versions will cost much more - 572 and 632 thousand rubles. At the price of the most packaged Logan, you can only get a version with a weak 72-horsepower engine, manual transmission and rather modest equipment. Peugeot is 4440 mm long, i.e. slightly larger than Logan. Trunk volume at the proper level - 506 liters.

Benefits include attractive design and the choice of checkpoint. The exterior design is seriously worked out and sustained in the general style. brands PEUGEOT- He is very memorable, original and beautiful. In the line of engines, in addition to gasoline engines of 1.2 liters and 1.6 liters with a capacity of 72 and 115 hp. accordingly, there is also a 1.6 liter diesel engine with 92 hp. The choice of the buyer is a 5-speed manual or automatic, which Logan cannot yet offer. The maximum speed is from 160 to 188 km/h. Peugeot consumes an average of 4.5 -7.3 liters per hundred, and accelerates in 9.4 - 14.2 seconds, depending on the engine and transmission.

Chevrolet Cobalt

Judging by the size and spaciousness of the car, the Cobalt is the clear leader among the presented cars. Its length reaches 4479 millimeters, its height is 1514 mm, and its width is 1735 mm. Such royal dimensions make it the most spacious and wide. There is also enough space in the luggage compartment - as much as 545 liters.

The cabin is comfortable and spacious, it will not be cramped even for tall passengers. Thanks to the increased glass space, the car has excellent visibility. The seats are comfortable with height adjustment, and ample space between the steering wheel and pedals adds to the comfort and convenience of driving.

Everything you need is at hand, the multimedia system control buttons are on the steering wheel, but you have to reach for the center console, as it is located far away. Others do not see flaws in ergonomics and consider it an indisputable advantage of Cobalt.

The basic version for 483 thousand rubles does not shine with an abundance of equipment. Of course, there is power steering, central locking and air conditioning, but power windows and airbags only for a surcharge. More stuffed versions will cost 542 or 572 thousand rubles.

performance, like dynamic characteristics, Cobalt and Logan are approximately on the same level. The 1.5-liter 105-horsepower Chevrolet engine accelerates to hundreds in 11.7 seconds, burning an average of 6.5-7.6 liters per 100 km. The maximum speed is 170 km/h. The engine is paired with a 5-speed manual or 6-band robot.

Volkswagen Polo

The initial Polo with a 105-horsepower unit is offered for 474,000 rubles. If you want air conditioning, a stabilization system, multimedia, parking sensors, an automatic machine and other tricks, get ready to shell out up to 688,000 rubles. Inside it is a classic German: boring, collected, but thoughtful. Buttons and switches in their place, ergonomics for five, good visibility, the seats, although without frills, are comfortable with big amount adjustments. Compared to the Frenchman, the cabin is a little cramped, and the trunk is 50 liters smaller.

The steering wheel of the “German” is a little sharper, so the car feels more confident when cornering. Polo's suspension is stiffer than Logan's. And if this is not felt on small irregularities, then large pits make themselves felt. But here the fans have disagreements. Some argue that thanks to its suspension, the Polo can safely ride on our bumpy roads.

Polo also cannot boast of excellent dynamics. Approximately the same 10.5 -12 seconds for acceleration, but the maximum is able to squeeze up to 190 km / h. For a hundred "eats" about 6.4 liters.

The new Logan is an exceptionally interesting offer! Perhaps some will be confused by the assembly of AvtoVAZ, but whether it turns out to be not of very high quality, time will tell. The disadvantages include the lack of an automatic transmission and a more powerful motor, but this is not so important. For the amount of the top Logan, you can buy only basic configurations presented competitors, with the exception of Priora. Renault Logan- reliable, affordable, durable model with a modern fashion design and worthy characteristics, ready to conquer the car market again and again.

The Russian car market has many brands and models different cars. But the most massive segment is budget cars. There are also many players in it, but there are also leaders here. Today we will analyze one of them and compare two creations of this manufacturer at once. So, which is better: Renault Logan or Renault Sandero? These cars are noticeably different, but we compare them for the reason that many car enthusiasts consider these two models before buying.

Which is better: Renault Logan or Renault Sandero

It is clear that there is no direct answer to the question posed and simply cannot be. For every motorist in each model there are both pluses and minuses.

The most frequent "Logan" on our roads has a 1.4-liter engine under the hood, which is paired with a manual gearbox. If we talk about the equipment of this car, then there is usually a simple climate control, a classic ABS system and two airbags.

Renault Sandero usually has an engine with a displacement of 1.6 liters, the box on this machine is often automatic. If we talk about off-road modification Sandero Stepway, then it is even more serious. But if we compare Logan and Sandero, then with all the similar equipment they will cost about the same (maybe Sandero will be ten to twenty thousand more expensive).

Trunk

Which is better: Renault Logan or Renault Sandero, if we compare the luggage compartments? In general, Renault Logan has a trunk, the volume of which is about five hundred liters, while the Sandero's trunk is a modest three hundred liters or so.

But not everything is so simple. The Sandero hatchback has the ability to quickly and easily increase the volume luggage compartment by folding down the rear seatbacks. This manipulation increases the volume by about four times. At the Logan, the trunk can be increased if the row of rear seats is completely dismantled, since their backs do not fold. This operation will require special tools: in addition to the seats themselves, it will also be necessary to remove the metal cross members of the rear row of seats.

If we compare the trunk closing system on these two cars, then it is better implemented on the Renault Sandero. He has a handle for closing the tailgate has a plastic lining, at Logan the cargo compartment is closed by hand. In this case, you have to touch bare metal, which also has a sharp edge. In the luggage compartment, the Logan has a full-size wheel, in the Sandero it is brought out, under the bottom.

Interior equipment and interior

Renault Logan or Sandero Stepway: which is better if we compare interior decoration? It is difficult to say, since these are cars from the same manufacturer and both from budget segment. To be honest, there is nothing interesting and attractive to the eye inside them. These are working machines that transport a person from one point to another. Inside, everything is modest and ordinary in both machines. Plastic is not the most High Quality, there is no escape from squeaks and other things.

In fairness, let's say that despite the fact that these machines are unremarkable inside, their interior cannot be called unsuccessful or outdated. It's budget friendly, not bad. These are different things. In addition, everything is known in comparison, and everyone has their own taste for such things.

Comparison of standard motors

And what is better to choose from Renault: Logan or Sandero, if the question concerns the motor? All power plants both on Logan and Sandero have long been tested by the buyer. This pleases, since frankly “childhood diseases” are no longer there. And the weakest base 1.4-liter engine and a 16-valve engine with a volume of 1.6 liters easily and without harm to themselves work on Russian AI-92 gasoline.

If we talk about the 1.4-liter engine, which is most often put on the Logan, then it is quite peppy when you are alone in the car, and if you have passengers, then its agility immediately goes into the void. With passengers to overtake on the highway, you will have to prepare for almost a kilometer.

If you are driving as a family, then look towards the engine with a volume of 1.6 liters (at least for an engine with 8 valves and a power equal to 84 horsepower). Such a motor is more expensive, but it is more powerful and pulls better. On the move, the Renault Sandero with a 16-valve engine will not give any chance to the Logan with a 75 horsepower engine.

Suspension

The Sandero with a sixteen-valve engine turned out to be faster and noticeably tougher on the go than the Logan with a 1.4 engine. But the excellent energy intensity of the Sandero suspension still remained the same. The suspension of both cars in the cabin responds loudly, the insulation is also very lame. Renault Logan is 23 centimeters longer than Sandero. In theory long cars noticeably softer, but in Logan the increase in length is realized not by lengthening the base, but only by the rear overhang.

The suspension of both cars can be called harsh. This is a tribute to their "budget". On not too expensive cars there are no very soft suspensions. Yes, no doubt soft suspension walks longer and it’s more difficult to “kill” her, but both Logan and Sandero have fairly durable suspensions without any frankly weak points and childhood illnesses. Nevertheless, the manufacturer has focused on these machines for our roads, which are far from ideal. This moment cannot but rejoice.

"Automatic" or "mechanics"?

Let's compare Renault Logan and Renault Sandero by analyzing their gearboxes. If it’s important for you to have an “automatic”, then without question, consider models with a sixteen-valve engine with a volume of 1.6 liters. But this is not the answer to the question of which Renault is better to choose Logan or Sandero. This question is your own business.

By the way, it must be said that both the manual gearbox and automatic transmission are sufficiently reliable. You need to choose a gearbox from personal preferences, you should not look for some kind of catch from the manufacturer in this node, because it simply does not exist.

Body

What is better to choose Renault Logan or Renault Sandero? Which model has the best body? They are about the same in terms of ergonomics (although it's just a disaster), the quality of the metal is similar, the quality of the metallic paint is also the same. If something starts to rust, then it is better to resolve the issue immediately and not run it. The same applies to chips, they are quickly seized by rust. gaps between body elements look acceptable, everything looks smooth.

Some body spare parts can be easily found both new and at car “dismantlings”, due to the fact that cars are not uncommon. Most body parts are inexpensive, especially for secondary market.

Optics

It makes little sense to talk about the design of optics, since these are cars from the budget segment, and the main thing here is functionality, not beauty. Headlights are well designed on both machines. The light from the headlights is enough for a trip at any time of the year and day. It is gratifying that the lamps that are used in the headlights do not cost space money. There are no weak points with regards to optics. All without frills, but at a sufficient level.

Of course, there is not as much light as from modern LED headlights or headlights with but agree that the price of optics is appropriate. This budget class, and the fact that the manufacturer awarded the cars with acceptable optics should please rather than cause envy in the headlights of cars from the premium segments.

Sales

In question Renault sales Logan vs Renault Sandero leader there will be "Logan", but is everything objective? "Logan" is a favorite among taxi drivers. Cheap car to maintain roomy interior and trunk. With Sandero, everything is not so simple, taxi drivers do not favor such body shapes.

So find good copy"Sandero" in the secondary market is simpler than a competitor in the form of "Logan". After all, if you do not prevaricate, then no one would want to buy a car that was mercilessly exploited before by a taxi driver who loves to work and does not like to rest.

The growing demand for cars in the SUV segment is pushing for the release of new models not only of Skoda, which presented one after another, but also of its competitors. So Renault is working hard to replenish the line of crossovers of all sizes and colors. Moreover, they not only release absolute novelties, but also try to revive not entirely successful old models. This happened with Koleos, which had not been in great demand before, but after a generational change, it will definitely become one of the serious competitors of the Skoda Kodiak.

Exterior and dimensions of Kodiaq and Koleos

Renault Koleos - compact crossover which appeared in model range french brand in 2008 and became her debut SUV. The first generation, produced before 2016, turned out to be, frankly speaking, unsuccessful - the sales results were not encouraging, especially in comparison with related models. Nissan X-Trail And Nissan Qashqai, as well as those released later Duster crossovers, Kadjar, Captur and purely Russian Kaptur.

Poor design is one of the main reasons for the failure of the first generation Koleos in the market.

The car looked, frankly, too budget. As a result, they even wanted to curtail the project, and instead of the second generation of Koleos, release a crossover with a different name, so as not to transfer the negative to the new product. But still, the model retained the name, but the design received a completely new one. And this work of the team of Lawrence van den Acker inspires respect and makes you believe in the excellent prospects for the second generation of Koleos on the market.

Despite the fact that Koleos is built on the same platform as the Nissan X-Trail, it does not look like its Japanese “brother” at all.

IN Renault novelty are positioned as premium, and you can’t argue with that - in comparison with the previous generation and with “ younger brothers According to the brand, it really looks solid. Impressive dimensions, slightly slanted rectangular optics with LEDs, a chrome-plated radiator grille in the new Renault corporate style, an interesting shape rear lights(by the way, also LED) and 18-inch alloy wheels Argonaute make the look of the car bright and memorable.

As for the Kodiaq, compared to Renault, it looks a little lighter and more dynamic. The reason for this is a narrower radiator grille, a slightly more energetically pulled up line of windows, a branded “faceted” optics format.

Which car do you like more?

In dynamics, Kodiak gives the impression of a less massive machine than Koleos. And this is quite strange, because in almost all dimensions the Czech surpasses its French “colleague”: it is 25 mm longer, 39 mm wider, 3 mm higher, and weighs as much as 88 kg more. Wheelbase Kodiak is larger than Koleos by as much as 86 mm! True, in terms of clearance and rear / front track french crossover nevertheless surpassed the Czech "bear". It makes no sense to talk about the size of the trunk - almost no one in the class can argue with Skoda here. In the 5-seater version, the Kodiak holds almost 100 liters more cargo(almost 300, provided the second row seats are folded), and this, for a minute, as many as 2 suitcases of a standard volume of 55/40/20 cm!

Comparison of overall dimensions

Kodiak is slightly larger than the new Koleos

Koleos has only 8 body colors, of which red and blue are bright. For Kodiak, according to official data, 14 colors are available, but, as practice shows, in reality, not all of them are available for order, at least before the start local assembly. The maximum (and only) wheel size for Koleos is 18 inches. Kodiaq also has 19-inch ones, however, you can only buy them for a fee, since they are optional.

Which car is better: Skoda Kodiaq, Renault Koleos or KIA Sorento Prime? Test Auto Review.

Interior of Skoda Kodiak and new Renault Koleos 2017

If we talk about interior Kodiaq and Koleos, the main advantage of the first is, of course, the possibility of ordering a 3rd row of seats. The Czech is somewhat more spacious, pleasantly surprising with a lot of “smart solutions”, but the Frenchman also has its advantages, for example, leather trim is already in the base in the expensive Premium version. At Skoda, the upper Style Plus equipment boasts only a combination of leather and Alcantara, and for a completely leather interior you will have to pay extra 12,900 rubles in the top-end configuration and 81,100 rubles in Ambition Plus. But Kodiaq has 3-zone climate control, which Koleos does not even see on the list. additional options, as well as the ability to order the front seats not only with heating, but also with ventilation.

Comparison of salons Kodiaq and Koleos

In general, both Kodiak and Koleos are quite modern comfortable crossovers, which have everything that an average and even somewhat picky driver and his passengers may need - from keyless system access and multimedia system from a large screen to a variety of driving assistance systems and safety devices.

Technical equipment: engines and gearboxes, drive

For Renault Koleos 3 options for combinations of engines and gearboxes are available in Russia:

2.0 l. 144 HP CVT X-Tronic;
2.0 l. dCi 177 hp CVT X-Tronic;
2.5 l. 171 HP CVT X-Tronic.

Kodiak also has 3 options so far, but after localization in 2018, their number should expand:

1.4 TSI (150 hp) 6DSG 4x4;
2.0 TDI (150 HP) 7DSG 4x4;
2.0 TSI (180 hp) 7DSG 4x4.

As you can see, both crossovers have 2 gasoline engines and one diesel. Despite the fact that in terms of engine size Czech car inferior to the Frenchman, he has more horses.

As for the gearbox, here both manufacturers act simultaneously, without offering their customers mechanical boxes gear shifting (for Kodiaq, manual transmission is provided after localization in 2018). AND CVT variator X-Tronic, and DSG robot not particularly loved by Russian motorists. But, as practice shows, in practice, new gearboxes turn out to be not as terrible as they are painted, and often serve as faithfully and for a long time as classic mechanics and automatic transmissions.

Engine data is applicable to the Russian market.

Skoda Kodiak
Engine	1.4 TSI 150 hp	2.0 TSI 180 hp	2.0 TDI 150 HP
Drive unit	4x4	4x4	4x4
Transmission	DSG-6	DSG-7	DSG-7
Fuel	Petrol	Petrol	Diesel
Max. power, kW (rpm)	110 (5000-6000)	132 (3900-6000)	110 (3500-4000)
	250 (1500-3500)	320 (1400-3940)	320 (1750-3500)
New Renault Koleos 2017-2018
Engine	2.0 l 144 hp	2.5 l 171 hp	2.0 L DCI (177 hp)
Drive unit	4x4	4x4	4x4
Transmission	CVT X-Tronic	CVT X-Tronic	CVT X-Tronic
Fuel	Petrol	Petrol	Diesel
Max. power, kW (rpm)	106 (6000)	126 (6000)	130 (3750)
Max. cool torque, Nm (rpm)	200 (4400)	233 (4000)	380 (2000)

Video review Renault Koleos 2017

Driving performance

If we compare Renault Koleos and Skoda Kodiak in terms of key running parameters, it turns out that cars, in general, are not inferior to each other. In some indicators, the Czech is ahead, in some the French, but basically the difference looks insignificant.

Dynamics, consumption (gasoline)

Dynamics, consumption (diesel)

Video test drive Skoda Kodiak 2017

Prices for Skoda Kodiaq and Renaut Koleos

Renault Koleos in Russia is available at prices ranging from 1,699,000 rubles (2.0 l. 144 hp CVT X-Tronic in Executive configuration) to 2,169,000 rubles (2.0 l. dCi 177 hp CVT X-Tronic in configuration Premium). Kodiaq is decently more expensive - its prices start at 1,990,000 rubles and end at 2,500,000 rubles. But keep in mind that the Czech has more complete equipment, and there is much more optional equipment - Skoda has a list of several pages, Renault has the entire price list on a couple of sheets.

We must not forget that Skoda Kodiaq in 2018 it will be localized in Russia and will inevitably fall in price by several hundred thousand rubles. The “exclusive” trim levels Ambition Plus and Style Plus will be replaced by standard ones, and the range of engines will expand. But the new Koleos is brought to us from South Korea, so that its price tag can change downward only during the action of promotions and special offers from Renault.

Conclusion

Both the new Koleos and Kodiaq are solid "middle peasants" in the SUV segment. They are comfortable, reliable, moderately attractive and modern machines at a relatively affordable, though not a small price. The best thing is for those who used to drive a Yeti or a Duster and want to change the car to a more solid and presentable one.

Advantages of Skoda Kodiak in comparison with Renault Koleos:

richer equipment;
a wide range of additional equipment;
more powerful, but less voluminous engines;
planned localization in Russia.

Advantages new Renault Koleos before Skoda Kodiaq:

the presence of a variator;
lower price;
3 year manufacturer's warranty (or 100,000 km).

Which is better - Logan or Symbol?

Cars can be compared in many ways. The main, perhaps, for any motorist will be the comfort and convenience of driving, the quality of parts and the cost of maintenance. Also, for many, the appearance of the car, its dynamic characteristics and cross-country ability are important. Moreover, which of these will come first, everyone decides for himself - everything is very individual.

Compare Renault Simbol and Logan

It is difficult to unequivocally answer the question of which is better - Renault Simbol or Logan. We will try to compare the presented models according to certain characteristics, and also consider the reviews of those who had experience driving each of the cars.

Renault Logan

The car is a budget subcompact sedan, which was designed specifically for the developing countries of the third world. The main production is located in Romania at the Dacia plant. From 2005 to 2015, Logan was produced in Moscow at the Avtoframos plant, since 2014 AvtoVAZ has also joined its production - the second generation of cars is being produced there.

Logan was created on the basis old version Renault Clio and became the successor of its main features. The main thing he inherited is the K7M engine. As a checkpoint was taken old box Megan. In fact, Logan is a mixture of outdated technological solutions from Renault. In many ways, therefore, the price for it is very democratic. Average consumption fuel is 6.8 liters per 100 km.

Reviews say that Logan is quite suitable for novice drivers, it is strong, reliable and has good cross-country ability. Compared to the second model, Logan has big wheels and feels better in off-road conditions, moves smoothly and makes little noise.

Renault Symbol

This model can be called the successor of Clio 2. Technologically, it is more advanced than Logan. The machine has a lightweight body, which is fully galvanized.

Symbol can safely claim the title of one hundred percent European sedan, and it is produced for European countries. Production has been established in Turkey at the Oyak-Renault plant, so the final price of the car is not so high.

Those motorists who had the opportunity to compare both models say that the Symbol is more comfortable, easy to drive, has better sound insulation and has better dynamics. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds. (which Logan is far from). Average fuel consumption - 7 liters per 100 km.

Everyone else agrees that Logan is definitely inferior in terms of appearance both outside and inside though back seat it is wider than the Renault Symbol, so passengers can sit on it with more comfort. By the way, the front of Logan is also more comfortable and spacious, the driver is freer to sit in it.

Feedback from car owners and service masters suggests that in the entire Renault lineup, Simbol receives the fewest calls to the service, while breakdowns for Logan are not uncommon.

Dimensions of Symbol and Logan

Renault Logan

Renault Symbol

Model similarities:

Both are based on the B-Platform.
Both the one and the other have options with the K7J 8 class engine. 75 HP
Suspension front independent.
Suspension rear semi-independent.

Differences between cars:

Logan was created for third world countries, Symbol for European countries.
The symbol is lighter by 200 kg and a little more modest in size.
Logan has slightly less fuel consumption.
Logan is partially galvanized, Symbol completely.
Rear seat Logan does not fold.
The maximum engine capacity is Logan - 1.6 (90 hp), Symbol - 1.4 (98 hp).
The drag of the Symbol is lower, which improves dynamics.

From the foregoing, we can conclude that both options are suitable as a first car. Choosing which is better - Renault Simbol or Renault Logan - it is worth recognizing that the second model is inferior to the first in terms of workmanship, durability and design, however, the price of Logan is lower. Therefore, it is difficult to unequivocally answer the question posed - it all depends on what is a priority for you.

If you are planning to buy a car for a long time and are not going to change it in the foreseeable future, you should give preference to Renault Simbol. If you are looking for workhorse, in which it will be comfortable for the whole family to ride, and the key factor is the price - you can safely make a choice in favor of Logan.