In the world of "parquet" SUVs, you can find a whole list of nationalities: Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, and so on. And they all try to take a worthy place in the sales ranking with their work. And this desire is perfectly explained by the increased over the past few years. In this article we will consider the confrontation between two very popular models famous trademarks- Mitsubishi and Nissan, which fall not only into the favorites of motorists, but also into one price range, and find out what is actually better: X-Trail or Outlander.
Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander - these cars are worthy representatives of their manufacturers
So different
Like any other means of transportation, these beauties differ in a number of parameters. Let's consider each of them in as much detail as possible. We hope that the information below will allow each reader to draw their own conclusions about the superiority of a particular model.
If some specifications And Nissan X-Trail can be called similar, then the fantasies of designers embodied in them differ radically. Nissan gives the impression of a car with a real masculine character. Straight body lines, high ground clearance, small overhangs and bulging wheel arches - all this seems to say that the car is able to guarantee the owner a little more than just a confident ride on the highway.
Mitsubishi, on the other hand, is more fluid in its own forms, as if smoothed, with narrow headlights and a protruding grille. It makes auto. However, from the very beginning, the manufacturers themselves did not hide this.
- Salon and trunk.
If we compare the Outlander and X-Trail in terms of the amount of free space inside, then the second of them is in the lead. There is plenty of space in it for both the front riders and their back row. Trunk volume is also larger in Nissan. The spare wheel hiding under the bottom freed up a lot of space in the luggage compartment. And despite this arrangement, it practically does not affect the volume and loading height of the model. Mitsubishi is lagging behind the competitor, even despite the possibility of adjustment rear seats. The trunk leaves much to be desired for a higher loading level and a wider door.
But if we touch on the quality of interior trim, then the first one wins in the confrontation between X-Trail vs Outlander. Its interior is made of soft but good-quality plastic and well-made leather. All this gives the car a certain "serious" look. The second copy is also partially trimmed with leather, but the plastic cannot boast of quality here. Maybe that's why the interior of the Outlander looks a little cheap.
The disadvantage of both one and the second test car can be called the inability to adjust steering column on departure. But this flaw stretches from previous versions of cars.
The almost complete absence extraneous noise can boast Mitsubishi Outlander. Nissan X-Trail in this matter trudges behind him at a decent distance. Here you have creaking details of the skin, and the noise of aerodynamics, and even the sobbing of the suspension. All in all, this set is not for the faint of heart.
- Control.
Although the X-Trail accelerates to hundreds a little faster than its opponent, the Outlander is different. While in Nissan it is too “smooth”, which indicates the likelihood of overshooting the desired mark. Mitsubishi also behaves more confidently and predictably on the road. Its stability, roll and steering response can be compared. Nissan is a bit more adrenaline-pumping in this regard. Its decent rolls at rudder speeds at soft suspension can make the heart beat faster. But the benefit of the steering response in it is instant, so you should not worry about losing control of the car at all.
The best prices and conditions for the purchase of new cars
Credit 9.9% / Installment / Trade-in / 98% approval / Gifts in the salonMas Motors
Also, those in the car will not feel discomfort. Unless the pits on it will be measured by height - from the foot and above ... Outlander, for all its rigidity, is rather unpleasant even on a shallow scattering of shallow potholes.
When the roads end...
Little weaknesses of big Japanese
But no matter how perfect the car may be at the exit from the assembly line, during operation, sooner or later a lot of questions arise. We will consider the most significant of them below.
- Body and its elements.
In terms of body corrosion resistance and durability paintwork Outlander comparison and X-Trail fails at all. And all because this item is absolutely the same for both cars - the metal of these cars is quite strong, but the paint coating in both the first and second cases leaves much to be desired, as it is too prone to chipping. Details with chrome and completely peel off quickly.
In the X-Trail, after winter swimming, the mechanism may break door handles, and as time passes, the power windows may start to stick. Outlander is sinful of skew rear windows. Over time, of course.
- Chassis.
Nissan front strut support bearings make you aware of their unsuitability with a creaking steering wheel when cornering. In addition, the predecessors of the X-Trail often failed the electric power steering in cold weather. It was even replaced under warranty at one time. Problems have also been observed. But in general, modern model there are no suspension issues.
front shock absorbers and wheel bearings turned out to be problematic for Outlander as well. But racks, stabilizer bushings, hub bearings rear suspension and other details are considered quite durable.
- Engine.
Nissan's risk group at this point includes:
- engine mounts;
- (or rather, the process of replacing them).
The opponent boasts a long good work the main elements of the motor. The only exception is the video drive belt aggregates. It wears out pretty quickly.
- Transmission.
The X-Trail initially has a weak variator, requiring the driver to be attentive to himself, including periodic, and not cheap. The bearings of the drive and driven shafts may also fail. But in general, careful driving helps to prolong the transmission days.
The Outlander variator is working flawlessly today. Although a few years ago it was he who was one of the weaknesses models then produced. They did not even undertake to repair it, but simply changed it under warranty. The only claim modern Mitsubishi can be considered a rapidly overheating clutch with a long slip.
Advantages and disadvantages
This list of the main and most costly breakdowns for both machines can be completed for each model.
So, Mitsubishi Outlander has the following advantages:
- The work of the automatic transmission is clearly and smoothly set, and the connection with the engine is simply fraternal.
- and with reasonable operation allows you not to remember the way to the service station for a long time.
- Excellent manageability.
- Thoughtful interior ergonomics.
- Reasonable off-road capability.
- Good soundproofing.
Flaws:
- Suspension stiffness.
- Not too much spacious salon and luggage compartment.
- Not too high quality interior trim materials.
Test Drive Mitsubishi car outlander:
Nissan X-Trail and his advantages:
- High cross-country ability on off-road.
- Large salon and
- Quality interior trim materials.
- Good interior fittings.
- Good handling and dynamics.
Flaws:
- Bad soundproofing.
- A sharp response of the steering wheel with a soft suspension and, as a result, decent rolls when cornering.
- Insufficient underbody protection for off-road driving.
Test Drive nissan car X-Trail:
Well, actually, that's all I would like to tell about these two. Conclusions are purely personal. But to do them on the basis of several read articles is probably the last thing. Much more informative will be the personal experience of driving a test drive, which will help you fully compare the X-Trail and Outlander and give preference to one of them for sure. The only thing that can be said with absolute certainty is that both of these handsome men have long found their audience. And it only grows every year.
Action: Sale of new cars of 2018-2019 of release At the Moscow Automobile House
Sale of new cars 2018-2019 release
Sale of used cars Trade-in
Credit from 9.9%
Thinking about buying Japanese SUV often people come to general question: Outlander or X-Trail? Below we will try to analyze their strengths and weak sides so that you can make the right choice for yourself.
Let's start comparing the Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X Trail, according to an established tradition, with “clothes”. External design both cars turned out to be very authentic and recognizable, while without extreme excesses. However, originality is the only thing that unites them. Outlander more than justifies its name, which translates as "foreigner".
The pointed front, turning into a sloping hood and completed by a narrow line of glazing, looks very unusual, even causing some associations with fantastic ships of extraterrestrial civilizations. Unlike the creation of Nissan, the Outlander is quite difficult to classify as an SUV at first glance. The swift outlines of the car suggest associations with sporty station wagons.
But the X-Trail, despite the mass of bold design decisions, at first glance makes it clear that it is the most real SUV without any compromises. Sufficiently sharp and even somewhat rough body lines, almost vertical front lines and massive (albeit not forceful) bumpers with plastic molding imitating additional protective elements - all this allows the X-Trail to look much more impressive and brutal with almost the same dimensions.
Nissan X-Trail or.
What's in the cabin?
So let's take a look inside these beauties. The brainchild of Mitsubishi engineers and designers offers us discreet and emphatically strict solutions without unnecessary “whistles”. However, even here there was a place for a creative streak, so the driver will be pleased with the stylish dashboard with a pair of separate visors in true sporty style. Plus stylish grilles for air conditioning ducts and an analog clock on the dashboard.
Narrow glazing provides surprisingly good visibility, while at the same time creating a feeling of comfort and security in the cabin. However, if we compare the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Nissan X Trail, then the second one will have better visibility - at least the traffic lights do not overlap with the roof line. For ease of setup seat for yourself, you can only find fault with the insufficient angle of deviation of the steering column up.
With the creation of Nissan, the situation is exactly the opposite, so from the inside you feel a huge difference where you ended up, in Ixtrail or Outlander. The wide windows, together with the hatch, which occupies almost half of the roof, provide excellent lighting. However, in bad weather it seems that the clouds are hanging right over your head, so in the fall it is better to close the hatch tightly with a curtain and not touch it until spring. The instrument panel in Ixtrail is not located behind the steering wheel, but in the middle of the panel, turned towards the driver, so this moment can be an important argument when choosing X Trail or Outlander, because not everyone likes this solution.
The dashboard also houses a pair of cup holders, a glove compartment and even two mini-fridges. In general, there are a huge number of shelves and compartments, but, oddly enough, there is nowhere to attach the phone. All niches are either too big or too small, and it’s not at all convenient to look for a mobile phone in the glove compartment. In this regard, open shelves on the panel in Mitsubishi look more convenient and practical. However, this is more of a nitpick than a serious argument in the dispute that better Outlander or X Trail. The Nissan seats are noticeably softer, which makes the seemingly powerful lateral support turn out to be frail, but in Mitsubishi, everything is better with a landing.
In the case of such big machines like the Mitsubishi Outlander or the Nissan X Trail, the convenience of getting in and out remains a pressing issue. Outlander in this regard was good. The chair is located just at such a level that the average person does not have to climb or squat, so that's a big plus for him. The X-Trail, with its high seating position and excellent visibility, requires more effort to get inside.
Which is better X Trail or Outlander in terms of ease of control?
Mitsubishi will appeal to those who prefer complete control over the car. The steering wheel responds with a pleasant feedback, the gear selector knob with a short stroke, the gears switch clearly, the pedals respond adequately. In general, connoisseurs of manual control will be very pleased. But Nissan is loved on the contrary for the presence of a soft steering wheel and an automatic transmission.
So, Nissan comparison X Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander here again turns out to be rather subjective and highly dependent on the preferences of the driver. Outlander suspension turned out to be noticeably softer, so road bumps on it are not felt at all, unlike Ixtrail, for that on high speed rigid suspension Nissan showed itself with better side. Nissan's ABS immediately panics when going off-road, so that with each press of the gas pedal, you can clearly hear a characteristic crack. The Outlander, on the other hand, provides the driver with much more freedom, and wedged in only in critical situations.
In general, the comparison of Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X Trail by off-road qualities pass with almost the same result. Especially on native road tires, which give in earlier than various blockages and other stray things can manifest themselves. However, true connoisseurs of hardcore mud shoes will be closer to the liking of Nissan. It provides the opportunity manual selection differential locks and torque transfer to the front axle, automatic locks are also included.
Mitsubishi has a permanent four-wheel drive with uniform distribution of torque, and with the lock on center differential transfers torque to the axle with the best grip. Compare Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X Trail is even easier - there is a complete draw. They both experience diagonal hanging with the same result.
lovers Japanese crossovers considering buying a car in price category$ 30-40 thousand, they have the opportunity to choose between two models similar in terms of equipment and a number of other parameters - Nissan X Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander. Both "SUVs" originate from Japan, are very similar in size and differ slightly in price. Although, if we compare all the indicators of these machines, there are much more differences. Having taken them into account and compared with their requirements for a car, each potential buyer can make a choice in favor of one of the models.
Rice. Rice. 1. Two models, side view.
Design Comparison
There are few similar details in the appearance of the two models. In fact, the only exact similarities are their dimensions– by placing the X-Trail and Outlander side by side, you can completely close one car with the other. Although Nissan is still a little taller and makes a more serious impression due to the straight lines of the body, high ground clearance and bulging wheel arches. These features give the impression of a real SUV, capable of overcoming not only small obstacles, but also real off-road.
The Mitsubishi model has streamlined contours and a forward-facing grille. Because of this, the car seems both more sporty and better suited specifically for urban conditions than for a country trip. Although ground clearance And off-road performance both crossovers are about the same.
The interior space of crossovers
Comparing the Mitsubishi Outlander and X-Trail in terms of the amount of free space in the cabin, we can draw conclusions about the noticeable advantage of the second model. Inside the Nissan, both the driver and all passengers, including people on the second row, feel more comfortable. luggage compartment a little more with the Outlander - but only with normal position armchairs. Folding down the second row of seats again gives the X-Trail the boot size.
Considering the quality of the finish of the Nissan X Trail or Mitsubishi Outlander, you can once again give preference to Nissan. The use of expensive plastic and leather gives the cabin a more exclusive look. Whereas the Outlander, in the interior design of which were used less quality to the touch and in appearance plastic elements looks cheaper.
The characteristics of the steering column make me give a not too high rating for both Nissan and its opponent. Although this problem was also noted by the owners previous versions machines. To compare the parameters of the cabin, you can also evaluate the level of sound insulation. And in this category, Outlander confidently wins. When riding the X-Trail, you can hear a lot of extraneous noise, including the creaking of the skin and the “sobbing” of the suspension.
Handling and speed characteristics of the car
Through comparison speed characteristics crossovers, we can draw conclusions about more high quality"Automatic" Outlander. The same model accelerates faster to hundreds and reaches a maximum speed of 205 km / h against 191 km / h for Nissan. In addition, Mitsubishi is better on the road and easier to manage. The X-Trail model behaves more unpredictably, which can lead to a decent roll during the turn. Although you should not worry about losing control anyway - steering wheel X-Trail reacts very quickly to the actions of the driver.
However, it should be noted that when driving the Outlander on a rough road, there is noticeable discomfort. The X-Trail off-road situation is about the same. However, obstacles 1–2 cm high are most easily overcome by Nissan.
Technical parameters of machines
Modern Mitsubishi Outlanders are equipped with three power units. All of them are gasoline and have a volume of 2 liters (at 146 hp), 2.4 liters (167 hp) and 3 liters (230 hp). The maximum speed of the car with such power units reaches 205 km / h. And acceleration to 100 km / h, depending on the engine, is 8.7-11.7 seconds. Crossovers can be equipped with both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
The lineup powertrains X-Trail also consists of three engines: two petrol (2 l and 144 hp, 2.5 l and 171 hp) and one diesel 1.6-liter capacity of 130 Horse power. Up to a hundred, the car accelerates in 11-11.7 seconds. And the maximum speed is 191 km / h - a little less compared to the Outlander, although the owner of Mitsubishi is unlikely to appreciate this difference by personal experience. Most crossovers rarely cross the border even at 150 km / h. It is also worth noting that all X-Trail models equipped with all-wheel drive.
Tab. 1. Feature comparison latest generations crossovers.
| Parameter | Meaning | |
| outlander | X-Trail | |
| Number of seats/doors | 5/5 | |
| Power units (l / hp) | 2.0/146, 2.4/167, 3.0/230 | 2.0/144, 1.6/130, 2.5/171 |
| Maximum speed, km/h | 205 | 191 |
| Acceleration time to hundreds, sec | 8.7–11.7 | 11.0–11.7 |
| Estimated fuel consumption (combined mode) | 7.3–8.9 | 5,3–8,3 |
| Model dimensions | ||
| Length - width - height, m | 4,665–1,800–1,680 | 4.640–1.820–1.715 |
| Wheelbase, m | 2.670 | 2.705 |
| Ground clearance, cm | 21.5 | 21 |
| Tire sizes | 215/70R16 | 225/60R17 |
| Luggage compartment, l | 591/1754 | 550/1982 |
Repair Frequency
Another fairly serious indicator by which it is worth comparing crossovers is the frequency and cost of repairs. It depends on the frequency of breakdowns, and on the price of spare parts. And, if we consider the winner in this category a car with a minimum average level of consumption per Maintenance, the Outlander can be called the winner with 24.5 thousand rubles less. annual costs.
Comparing the corrosion of the body, it is almost impossible to give preference to any of the models. However, if we consider damage due to severe frosts, it can be noted that the X Trail often jams the mechanism of door handles. And with Outlander, when used in the northern regions of Russia, glasses may warp over time.
Comparison of the frequency of engine repairs is not in favor of the Nissan model - the risk of breakdown is highest at the supports power unit and his candles. And Outlander is different long work all engine parts. The only exception is the drive belt roller, which needs to be replaced more often than the competitor.
If we are talking about gearboxes, in favor of Mitsubishi, you can see that Nissan has a much lower quality “automatic”. Most often, the X-Trail fails the driven shaft. The Outlander variator is much more stable and requires less repair. Although the picture was completely opposite on the models of the previous generation of Mitsubishi - the gearbox of the old Outlander is one of its weak points.
Model cost
Enough important parameter any car is its price. And in this sense, the situation looks ambiguous. When comparing Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X Trail on secondary market you can see that both cars cost about the same. If you look at the price tags of previous versions, the first place was confidently occupied by Outlander, maximum equipment which cost 75 thousand rubles cheaper (1.82 million versus 1.895 million rubles).
Now the ratio of prices for crossovers has changed a bit. When you try to make a comparison in the form of Nissan vs Mitsubishi, you can notice an increase in the price of the most expensive Outlander. Now it costs 150 thousand rubles more than the top version of the competitor. And this difference makes many potential buyers choose the X-Trail.
Comparison of pros and cons
Summing up, we can conclude that the main advantages of the new Mitsubishi crossovers include:
- coordinated operation of the gearbox;
- good controllability;
- good soundproofing.
Among the minuses of the same model, a rather cramped interior and low quality finishes. In addition, in car dealerships you can now buy an X-Trail much cheaper than a Mitsubishi. And the Outlander's suspension is noticeably firmer when compared to its competitor.
At Nissan, you can notice such disadvantages as an interior that is not sufficiently isolated from noise and a decent amount of roll when cornering. And the advantages include a spacious interior, a large (with the seats folded) trunk and good off-road patency. Another plus is that it is smaller than outlander price- a serious argument in favor of buying a Nissan for cash and not on credit.
Purchase
As soon as the transition from a family sedan to a SUV was ripe, the budget in the region of 1 million (to the sanctioned ruble exchange rate) began to study a possible circle of contenders for the purchase. considered updated Mitsubishi Outlander, Kia Sportage, Skoda Yeti, traveled for test drives. Even for the sake of formality looked classmates Opel, Chevrolet and the French. And then there was the opportunity to exploit the work and the Yeti and a little Tiguan. Doubts intensified even more, but not because of the quality of the Czechs and Germans, but because of the necessary need for just such a car. All the same, Yeti and Tiguan are urban COMPACT crossover. In which teenage bike to shove is already a problem. In general, for some time the issue of purchase was postponed. And again, an accident. I went like that with my wife, having nothing to do, in the Nissan salon. We looked at the X-Trail. Outwardly not bad. The seller offered a 1.5-year-old trade-in option for 990t.r. In a good configuration and with 2.5 liter engine and variator. Spontaneously fell for it and bought it.
Strengths:
There are no birth pains.
Weak sides:
Pure marketing car.
Review Nissan X-Trail 2.0 CVT 4WD (Nissan X-Trail) 2013
I bought an Xtrail in the summer of 2013. Before him there were many domestic cars, then 4 years Toyota Auris (which left the most tender memories), but in the spring it took an urgent change to the car. at that time like a SUV, so as not to be embarrassed by curbs in the city, roadsides on the highway and loose ruts in the village. realizing that I could not afford Rav4, I was aiming at kia sportage or Hyundai ix35. but, once I saw Ixtrail in the cabin and sat behind the wheel, I just took it and bought it. brutal handsome, excellent review, spaciousness is beyond praise, again Japanese (after Toyota for me, the Japanese are the guru of reliability, which is critically important in a family without a man :). well, small noises, squeaks, about which so much was written in the reviews - yes, we ladies are not capricious.
over the past 8 months of operation met all expectations — both good and different.
the machine never broke down, it obeys the steering wheel like a Toyota, nimble — it turns on a patch as long as itself. stable: it clings to the track like a cat, especially on all-wheel drive, it simply ignores rain and ice, it does not sway on bends (I'm used to this trouble on lightweight cars). the review is excellent, including mirrors, " dead zones" No. the seats are comfortable and are adjusted to the specifics of the spine at a time, you can change it right on the road on the highway - as a result, 8 hours of driving do not affect your back. the basic music is not bad, the radio buttons on the steering wheel, like in Toyota - I like it (someone wrote that it was inconvenient for him - I didn’t understand, because it’s really convenient!). heated seats raskochegarivaetsya slowly, but then roasts on the floor-back is quite worthy. in general, the interior heats up quickly enough in winter, which I did not expect, looking at the dimensions. here the condo in the summer is a little less convenient: no matter how you direct it, the air flow still catches the driver, which turns into a constant light cold.
Strengths:
- accelerates to 100 km quickly and easily: from traffic lights, if necessary, you can easily overtake the stream. but after 120 - see the shortcomings :)
- the softest suspension, even too much — it relaxes so that sometimes it is alarming for the machine, flying into another pothole.
- cross-country mud, not to mention urban, is excellent: spring mud, puddles, potholes and curbs do not exist for the 4x4 mode. after the hatchback, it is especially pleasant to climb over the curbs smoothly, calmly, without a roar or acceleration :)
- spaciousness.
- reliability.
- good soundproofing.
- warm lounge.
- comfortable seats.
Weak sides:
- eats well: full tank takes off for 400 km. I understand that there are traffic jams in the city and on the highway, that the air conditioner plows in the summer, and the stove in the winter, but still, the SUV that eats like an SUV is unexpected.
- Not speed car. 120 km - and it is already difficult for her to pick up speed even unloaded. I understood this when I took the automatic transmission at 2.0, and deliberately sacrificed power for economy and my mother’s dream of an automatic (she also drives), but still it can be annoying to drag in the right lane on the highway. besides after getting used to speed.
- As for weak clutches, I'm afraid it's true. I have not yet flown, tk. the car is almost new, but the smell has already been felt more than once.
Review Nissan 2011 in 137 l with 4 in d variator right hand drive (Nissan X-Trail) 2011
I've owned the x-trail for one year. For a year, the car has recommended as reliable crossover with high ground clearance and good cross-country ability. Electronic stuffing- above all praise. Ice, descent, ascent, mud, snow — I tried everything, electronics help out everywhere. X-trail has more pros than cons.
From the pros:
- brutal appearance
- Cross-country ability - four-wheel drive 4 vd
- Seats fold out to full floor
- Cold start in cold weather
- Warm salon
- Low fuel consumption
- Stability on the road
- Noise isolation
- Sharp acceleration
Before moving on to the cons, I'll tell you about fuel consumption. The consumption is not more than its competitors and fits into the declared by the manufacturer. Consumption initially depends on the quality of gasoline, and then on driving style and vehicle loading. At first I went to different gas stations, the result is 16-18 liters in the city in winter, then only ROSTNEFT began to refuel and the consumption and acceleration pleasantly surprised - 12-14 liters in the city in winter and 9-11 liters in summer with a conditioner with a moderate driving style, outside the city 8-10 liters. So pour good gasoline.
I will also write about the cons:
Strengths:
Weak sides:
Review Nissan 2.0 l 141 hp 6 st manual transmission (Nissan X-Trail) 2013
Owner this car I happened to be at a time when they (meaning X-trail) began to be assembled already here, in Russia. Before this event, I already had experience operating X-trail 2.5 l, gasoline, 6-speed manual transmission. Impressions were only positive. With a run of 170,000 km, there were simply no breakdowns. Regularly, consumables changed on time (filters, oils and brake pads) and EVERYTHING … Therefore, I decided to purchase the same.
The car purchased in 2013 is no longer distinguished by such build quality (Already russian edition). The day before the scheduled maintenance 1, the airbag indicator on the instrument panel came on, provided that no one climbed anywhere (I mean the wiring and connectors). In short, I contacted the service with this problem 3 times, and after the first two times, the indicator started flashing a day after the error was reset. Also, the russian edition sins with the quality of the supplied spare parts. A friend of mine has the same trailer from 2012. Clutch worn out at 7800 km. And the service refused to replace for free. The question naturally arises - what is the guarantee for then ???
Pleasant sensations arise from the trip. When you sit behind the wheel, you do not notice how hundreds of kilometers of the road are flying. I want to go and go. Driving this car gives you the pleasure of relaxation and the comfort of the cabin. high rise and quiet engine do not give a sense of speed. The speedometer readings and (or) the striped baton of the traffic police officer are returned to the ground.
Strengths:
- Interior comfort
- Engine silence
- Moderate appetite for fuel
- Decent exterior and interior
Weak sides:
- Overcharge
- Slightly inferior quality of components + Russian assembly
X trail or ?
The appearance of the X Trail car and model does not quite match the behavior of cars on the road. , featuring an aggressive design, is more pleasant to drive. Feels softer on roads with poor coverage thanks to excellent suspension. This car is suitable not only for lovers of the original exterior, but also for drivers who value comfort. X Trail - model, suitable for owners conquering off-road and loving ride with the wind.
Exterior and interior
X Trail, like, has a rather extraordinary appearance. The Outlander looks like an "alien" thanks to a sharp front end, a sloping hood line and narrow glazing. The peculiar exterior of the car does not allow it to be classified as an off-road vehicle. The body of the car is swift, more like a station wagon with increased capacity and cross-country ability.
X Trail attracts with its bold design, typical for classic SUVs. The body is characterized by rough and sharp edges; the front end has almost sheer lines. Bumpers made of plastic resemble protective elements. Although the X Trail and Outlander are the same size. X Trail looks more massive, however, the car is shorter by a few centimeters.
Salon Outlander is characterized by rigor and restraint. The original addition to the car was the design of the front panel with sports separate visors above the tidy, rounded air vents and the same clock in the central part of the dashboard. narrow glass car provide a sense of security. The only drawback of the interior is the too low roofline, which impairs visibility.
The Nissan X Trail interior has a larger glass area. A huge sunroof is built into the roof, thanks to which a lot of light enters the car. The main advantage of the interior of the car - dashboard located in the middle of the panel. Instruments are turned towards the driver. Torpedo has the form of a shelf, equipped with two cup holders, a hidden glove compartment, mini-refrigerators and a compartment for storing documents.
Nissan will please with softer seats than. Externally, the Outlander seats seem less sporty, however, the body of the passengers is held securely. Since both cars are quite high, the question of landing comfort arises. If the seats in the Outlander are positioned so that they are comfortable to sit on without having to jump or crouch, getting into the X Trail cabin is more difficult.
Management difference
Considering the control system, it immediately stands out as a car designed for connoisseurs of control and clear reactions. Power steering, responsive pedals and precise short-travel shifting make driving a pleasure. Nissan attracts light steering and the presence in the line of cars with automatic transmission gears.
When driving in the city automatic transmission Nissan X Trail is only enough for lovers of a quiet ride. To make the car move more actively, you have to switch to downshifts with the overdrive turned off and the selector switched to the second or first stage. Start X trail faster Outlander, although the cars have equal power. The fact is that the Nissan torque is sixteen Newtons more, and the car reaches it earlier. At equal power, Outlander has top speed thirty kilometers more due to improved aerodynamic characteristics.
