and pillows driver's seat compensates for a fairly good profile of the back, which has massive lateral pickups. Buttons were brought to the driver and passenger front side doors electric window. Finishing materials in Renault Duster do not differ in special quality, which explains the relatively low cost of the “SUV” in the domestic automotive market. It is worth noting that the interior of the Duster is almost identical to the interior of the Renault Sandero. The front panel is almost entirely plastic, but looks much more expensive. It is necessary to pay attention to the huge number useful gadgets in Czech cars, such as cup holders in the doors and armrest. There will be passengers on the back sofa of the seat, because there is plenty of room for both legs and head. In a duel Skoda Yeti vs Renault Duster regarding interior design and comfort, we assign the victory to the Czech car.
These cars are not randomly selected for comparison. Both vehicles are distinguished by a non-standard design solution. Over the years of its existence, these cars have gained considerable popularity among motorists in this price segment. This is due high reliability and good driving performance. Therefore, the question "Skoda Yeti or what's better?" quite relevant.
Pros of Skoda Yeti and Renault Duster
Understanding the main advantages of each car will help to make right choice: Renault Duster or Skoda Yeti. The table below will help you understand this, which discusses the key advantages of each car:
Skoda Yeti
- In the new body, noise insulation has been significantly improved
- good torque
- Relatively low fuel consumption
- Suspension energy intensity
- Affordable Service
- Design and interior trim is made in accordance with European quality standards
- Thoughtful and comfortable interior
Renault Duster
- Powerful engine suitable for any driving style
- Auxiliary chip tuning that has a positive effect on torque
- High design reliability
- Spacious interior and high-quality isolation of third-party noise
- Softness of movement with high traffic
- Easily feel the dimensions of the transport
- Large selection of kits
Interior of Skoda Yeti and Renault Duster
The interior of the Skoda Yeti is more conservative compared to the French competitor. Duster manufacturers can impress consumers with original trim elements that fit well with the overall style of the car. Also, Renault is distinguished by a better material for finishing the seats.
It is worth noting the gaps between the panels in the cabin. Both cars are small.
Benefits Interior Yeti You can select a lot of additional compartments for storing the necessary small-sized things. The advantage is also the ability to adjust the chairs in the angle of inclination.
Duster will pleasantly surprise with the comfort of the rear passengers due to the sufficient legroom.
Plastic Duster vs German Skoda interior
Salon Skoda Yeti is located on high level with classic style German cars. Leather seat tough but very comfortable. Summing up regarding the interior trim, it is worth paying attention that in the Yeti in the back row, passengers will be prevented from conveniently located by an air duct and a tunnel.
The Renault Duster car is wider, which allows you to comfortably spend long journey. And the quality of finishes is on a higher level.
Trunk of Skoda Yeti and Renault Duster
If we compare the volume luggage compartment, then the Duster has an undoubted advantage - 475 liters, while the Yeti can please the owner only with a volume of 322 liters. It is important to note that the Yeti's trunk is quite narrow. These volume indicators were achieved thanks to the high roof.
Supporters of the Czech should not be confused by this figure. If desired, the trunk is compensated by boxing.
It is also worth noting that with the rear seats folded down, the Yeti's trunk volume is 1665 liters, and the Duster's is 1660.
Design solution
When there is a choice between Skoda Yeti and Renault Duster cars, important role plays appearance transport. Both belong to the SUV category, but they have fundamental differences:
- Bumper
- clearance height
- Radiator grille
- Visual volume of the body
It is difficult to judge which of these cars has a better design. It depends on individual preferences.
Body and dimensions
A comparison of Renault Duster and Skoda Yeti would not be complete without an overview of the bodies. The body of both vehicles is galvanized. The thickness of the paint layer is also almost the same - 110-120 microns. However, Škoda offers customers a 12-year warranty for the repair of possible rust through.
It is worth noting the low threshold of the Czech car. When entering and leaving the transport, the legs do not get dirty, as is often the case with the French counterpart. Renault compensates for this shortcoming with a high ground clearance of 21 cm, which favorably affects the arrival angle of 36 degrees. The clearance of the Yeti is 18 cm, and the angle of arrival is up to 26 degrees.
In terms of dimensions, Renault Duster is significantly superior to the Czech counterpart.
Specifications
To compare this indicator, cars of 2017 with an engine capacity of 1.6 liters were selected. Skoda is based on front-wheel drive, while Duster provides a choice between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
Power for both Vehicle about the same: 114 for the Duster and 110 for the Yeti. However, despite this skoda crossovers yeti lose in overclocking dynamics. It takes 11.8 seconds to reach 100 km/h, which is 0.9 more than the French competitor.
Cars renault duster and skoda yeti also differ in volume fuel tank: Renault - 50, Skoda - 55 with manual transmission and 60 liters with robotic gearbox.
Skoda Yeti and Renault Duster engine
The Skoda Yeti car can please the owner with an engine capacity of 1798 cubic meters. See French competitor has a whole line of engines.
According to the numerous reviews of the owners on the network, it can be concluded that Skoda engine somewhat more reliable than the French counterpart.
Steering and suspension
Suspension and steering systems for these cars are almost the same. All configurations of these cars have an electronic power steering.
The suspension of the Czech car is completely independent, while the French competitor has front-wheel drive has a rear suspension in the form of a semi-independent frame.
Transmission and chassis
Yeti and Duster cars have both mechanical and automatic transmission depending on the chosen configuration. The transmission and chassis in these cars has practically no fundamental differences. However, it is worth noting that one automatic transmission newer on Czech cars than on French cars.
Renault engineers compensated for this shortcoming downshift, which the Czech car cannot boast of. Its presence is a definite advantage, especially when it comes to an SUV.
Cars are equipped with front and all-wheel drive depending on the configuration. Rear drive can be connected by means of an electromagnetic clutch.
Complete set
In terms of the variety of configurations, the French representative is significantly ahead of his opponent.
Options and prices of the Frenchman
1.5 dCi MT 4×4 diesel all-wheel drive
- Expression 934 990
- Privilege 980 990
- Luxe Privilege 1 019 990
1.6 MT 4×2 petrol front wheel drive
- Authentic 639 000
- Expression 789 990
1.6 MT 4×4 petrol all-wheel drive
- Authentique 759 990
- Expression 845 990
- Privilege 906 990
2.0 MT 4×4 petrol all-wheel drive
- Expression 901 990
- Privilege 947 990
- Luxe Privilege 989 990
2.0 AT 4×4 petrol all-wheel drive
- Expression 949 990
- Privilege 995 990
- Luxe Privilege 1 029 990 (equipped with ESP stabilization system)
Options and prices of the Czech representative
- Active from 799 999
- Active Outdoor from 808 000
- Ambition from 881 000
- Ambition Outdoor 889 000
- Monte Carlo from 987 000
- Style from 1 019 000
- Style Outdoor from 1 027 000
The entry of the new domestic hatchback Lada X Ray to the market did not go unnoticed, especially considering how popular this model has become. However, the competitors did not doze off and were definitely not going to give away their piece of the market pie without a fight. One of the most titled rivals of the Russian car was liftback Skoda Rapid, which at one time took the place of Octavia, who moved to a more expensive segment.
And this means that the rivalry between the two models is very sharp, especially considering that the prices for cars, although they differ, but not by an order of magnitude (however, this is only at first glance).
And therefore, to find out which is better - Lada X Ray or Skoda Rapid - you must!
prestige and size
It is no secret that foreign cars are quoted in Russia higher than domestic models, with the exception, perhaps, of the "Chinese". However, Skoda has always been seen as " folk model”, which, although not as fashionable as Volkswagen or Audi, is technically not much inferior to them. Naturally, all this has a positive effect on the reputation Skoda Rapid raising its status in the eyes of the buyer.
Dimensions X Ray
As for LADA XRAY, then domestic hatchback, of course, is actively winning the audience's sympathy, but one cannot but admit that he has a long road to success ahead of him. So, Skoda is still preferable.
1470 kg (1565 kg)
From a comparison of the dimensions of X Ray and Rapid, it can be seen that the Czech liftback is much longer, but narrower. The wheelbase is about the same, but in terms of ground clearance Lada is far ahead - it has 25 mm more. On the other hand, Skoda puts its competitor on both shoulder blades with a trunk volume, which is not surprising, because it is the trunk that has long become the hallmark of cars from the Czech Republic.
The trunk of the Rapid is impressive
The different body type of both models largely predetermined the different exterior. Therefore, in this regard, everything will depend not only on taste, but also on the preferences of the body range.
Exterior Lada X Ray will definitely appeal to connoisseurs of aggression in the image. And this is not empty bravado, although, of course, in comparison with the concept, the hatchback does not look so expressive. Particularly impressive are the curves on the sidewalls, made in the shape of the letter “X”, capturing not only the doors, but also the bumpers and fenders.
The front end, with its grille and air intake merged together, edged with chrome moldings, in the same X shape, looks very advantageous and goes well with the headlights. Yes, and feed with a massive black overlay on rear bumper, and a rear wing on the fifth door, also fits well into the image.
The appearance of the Skoda Rapid, which was updated in 2017, clearly confirms the success of the policy of many car companies, including Skoda - if you need the model to be in the spotlight again, you should get by with minor edits and announce restyling, which, in fact, was done.
Updates are small, but they are, and so subtle that the restyled Rapid can easily be confused with a richer version. Indeed, how many will notice rear lights with diodes, updated fog lights And new optics equipped with diode DRL strips? But this is where the significant changes in the image of the Czech liftback end.
As you can see, in the question of what to choose, Lada X Ray or Skoda Rapid, you will have to focus only on your own preferences.
Specifications
In this case, it is worth recognizing that Rapid is better than X Ray. The fact is that there is a superiority of the liftback, as in part power units as well as for gearboxes.
However, more about everything ...
Here Rapid has an advantage, since the engine range of this model is wider. Nevertheless, diesel engines no, although Skoda often relied on “solar-eating” units.
The Czech line begins with a budget 1.6-liter aspirated. Its power is very small and is only 90 hp. s., although they are available at 4250 rpm. However, the thrust of 155 Nm at 3800 rpm helps a little. Thanks to this, the liftback exchanges a hundred in 11.4 seconds, with a limit of 185 km / h, which is not so bad. And the consumption of 7.8 liters in the city is small.
It is followed by a 16-valve valve of the same volume of 1.6 liters, but already 110-horsepower. Peak engine power at 5800 rpm, and the same as the previous engine, a moment of 155 Nm is achievable at the same 3800 rpm. The increase in power had a beneficial effect on the dynamics, which improved to 10.3 seconds, and the maximum speed, which increased to 195 km / h, while maintaining the flow rate by 7.9 liters.
The competitor to this motor was base engine Lada X Ray, with a volume of 1.6 liters and a capacity of 106 liters. with., which is combined with a torque of 148 Nm at 4200 rpm. It was created by the engineers of the Russian auto company, having reworked and improved the VAZ-21129 type. It is worth recognizing that the drawdown in power and torque, compared with the 110-horsepower Czech unit, led to a lag of 1.1 seconds. in acceleration and at 21 km / h in top speed– 11.4 sec. and 174 km/h, respectively. Yes, and the consumption of gasoline is higher - more than 9 liters.
1.6 HP X Ray motor
In the top, Skoda Rapid offers the buyer a unit that is very rare for segment B. This is a 1.4 liter turbocharged engine With direct injection fuel. Despite the fact that its volume seems modest, such an engine gives Rapid an explosive temperament, which is not surprising, from 125 hp. With. and 200 Nm of torque!
Weaving Rapid 1.4 TSI exchanges in just 9 seconds, which is just fine for class B. And the maximum speed of 208 km / h is almost unrivaled. Cherry on the cake - 7 liters in the city!
Lada X Ray responds with its own top-end engine. However, unlike the Czech, the hatchback has a simple aspirated engine under the hood, with a volume of 1.8 liters and a return of 122 liters. With. It is worth noting that this new development Russian company. Given the injection layout, the power is quite up to par, as is the torque of 170 Nm.
However, the absence of a turbine led to a loss in dynamics and maximum speed - 10.4 seconds to hundreds and 185 km / h, respectively. Consumption is also significantly higher - 9.3 liters. in the city.
122 HP X Ray motor
In general, it is worth recognizing that in terms of engines, the Skoda Rapid is better than the Lada X Ray. The engine range of the European model is wider, but its decisive advantage is provided by the presence turbocharged unit. On the other hand, the disadvantage of such an engine is its complexity (the presence of a turbine, intercooler, air ducts and other components) and, as a result, more expensive maintenance.
transmissions
If we consider the topic of which is better - Lada X Ray or Skoda Rapid - in terms of gearboxes, it will be impossible not to recognize the significant advantage of the Czech model.
However, in part mechanical transmissions there is an approximate equality. Both models are equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission. The Russian hatchback has a French box, while the Czech liftback has its own development.
Be that as it may, there are no complaints about the nodes - the gears turn on clearly, the shortness pleases, there are no sorties at all, etc. It is only worth noting that the XRAY has mechanics available for any engine, while for Rapid it is only paired with 90-horsepower and 110-horsepower aspirated.
But in part automatic transmissions Skoda has a complete advantage. The fact is that X-Ray is equipped only with a 5-speed AMT-type robot, developed on the basis of the mechanics of the MT 21826 series. The transmission is generally not bad, but there are still delays in switching.
5-band AMT LADA XRAY
Rapid offers a choice of 2 boxes. The first is 6-band classic machine, which is available with a 110-horsepower engine. The quality of his work is beyond doubt - clear switching, quick response to kick-down, etc.
But there is a better option. This is a 7-band DSG preselective transmission that works in tandem with 1.4 TSI. No wonder DSGs are recognized the best checkpoints on this moment! Switching instantaneous, impressive efficiency, peppy dynamics and other pluses.
As you can see, the Czechs did not stint on gearboxes for their model. But there are also some reservations. X-Ray is equipped with a robot, and not a conventional machine gun, in order to reduce the price of a car. And yet, the advantage of AMT is its unpretentiousness. Relatively DSG Skoda, then, for all its merits, this transmission does not differ in reliability, while repairs, due to the extreme complexity of the assembly, are very expensive. In addition, during a long drive in traffic jams, the DSG starts to twitch when shifting due to overheating.
Unlike transmissions, the design of the Lada X Ray and Skoda Rapid suspension is the same. Completely independent multi-link scheme there is no modification. Both machines are equipped with semi-dependent undercarriage, With torsion beam on rear axle. In general, competitors have no problems with handling.
But the character is a little different. Suspension LADA XRAY stands out for its energy consumption, due to which even broken roads you can roll without worrying too much, because to break through the racks you still need to try! And about small irregularities on Russian hatchback and completely forget. However, there is also a minus - these are rolls in corners. Yes, the chassis is set up well, but the height of the car and considerable ground clearance do their job.
Skoda Rapid rulitsya as a whole more recklessly, and the owners do not complain about excessive rigidity. However, this is only true for 1.6-liter versions. The 1.4 TSI engine is quite heavy, plus the weight of the DSG takes its toll. As a result, driving on such a modification is noticeably tougher, although you can’t name an “oak” car either.
In terms of cross-country ability X Ray better than Rapida, and significantly! After all, not every SUV has a clearance of 195 mm. In addition, the switchable ESC system helps a lot - with it, the domestic hatchback easily leaves places where you can’t drive at Rapid at all. Naturally, with all-wheel drive, XRAY's capabilities would be much greater, but even with ESC, Lada's advantage is obvious.
And in the plot of “Okay Mechanics”, representatives of AvtoVAZ clearly showed everything that a hatchback is capable of outside the asphalt.
Inside the competitors, a completely different approach to style can be traced. That is why it will not be easy to determine the winner between Lada X Ray and Skoda Rapid in this round.
Salon XRAY created to match the exterior. The seats are very decent, as for their segment, with the exception of the basic configurations, where the lumbar support is too low. In addition, plastic of different textures, which, although it does not affect comfort, is not to the liking of all car owners.
The dashboard flaunts beautiful wells and backlighting. A large screen is located on the center console, and the elongated air vents look very good. In general, the interior of the hatchback is designed for active driving.
The Czech approach is completely different and, for them, traditional. Salon Rapid strict and correct, to some extent even pedantic. Not surprisingly, he has both ardent fans and opponents who believe that the interior is too boring.
Yes, inside the liftback you feel like in an office where only a table lamp and a secretary are missing. On the other hand, many people like high-quality materials and impeccable ergonomics. The seats are good, but you can order optional ones with integrated headrests.
Options and prices
LADA XRAY offers customers 3 trim levels - Optima, Luxe and Exclusive. Skoda Rapid also has 3 versions - Entry / Active, Ambition, Style. The price of Lada X Ray is lower than for Skoda Rapid. In the database, it starts at 599,900 rubles against 611,000 rubles for Rapid. IN maximum configuration the difference is much more significant - 830,900 rubles for Lada and 956,000 rubles for Skoda.
Prices and equipment Lada X Ray
Optima - from 599,900 rubles. up to 710900 rub.
Luxe - from 710,900 rubles. up to 798900 rub.
Exclusive - from 805900 rubles. up to 830900 rub.
More details with prices and trim levels LADA XRAY you can see at the link
Prices and equipment Skoda Rapid
Entry / Active - from 611,000 rubles. up to 871000 rub.
Ambition - from 770,000 rubles. up to 916,000 rubles.
Style - from 911,000 rubles. up to 956000 rub.
Also have optional equipment in several categories
More details with prices and Skoda trim levels Rapid you can find on the link
As you can see, there is certainly a price difference between Lada X Ray and Skoda Rapid. And if it is almost invisible in the database, then in the top it reaches an impressive amount of 125,000 rubles, and this is a lot when buying a class B car. DSG box. Therefore, with technical side the overpayment is justified.
But with the complete sets, everything is far from being so simple. The fact is that AvtoVAZ and Skoda have a completely different approach to price lists. When buying an X Ray, 3 fixed configurations are offered, as well as an additional payment of 12,000 rubles for a metallic color.
If you buy Rapid, then a lot more is added to the equipment in the trim levels themselves. additional options, and even top Style version can be completed very well. In addition, options can be selected both in packages and individually. Naturally, the advantages of this approach are obvious, because you can order a car "for yourself" by selecting all desired options. On the other hand, the price of Rapid, if it is equipped “in full”, just skyrockets and easily exceeds 1,000,000 rubles!
As you can see, it is most advisable to compare Lada X Ray vs Skoda Rapid with 1.6-liter engines, since prices are approximately the same with them. Yes, the Czech liftback can be retrofitted, but the configuration Russian model and so quite generous, because the owner of X Ray is unlikely to feel deprived.
look interesting video on this topic
A wife is like this: if anything, you can get a divorce, but a car is for life. A similar saying was invented when cars were made soundly. And if by the word "quality factor" we mean the thickness of the metal, then the Czech liftback Skoda Rapid can be placed in the first place. The VAZ Lada Vesta loses in this parameter, but in reality everything is not so simple ... In addition, sales of new generation Rapids will begin in June 2017, and there the metal may turn out to be thinner. And the Vesta sedan from the Skoda Rapid may differ in better side The question is how to compare them.
Video attempting to compare prices: calling a dealer, etc.
Recall the words from the West sedan advertisement: “a car for Russian roads". There is some truth in these words: it's just that all competitors create cars for "greenhouse conditions". The body metal of the Skoda Rapid almost does not deform - it does not spring. On the one hand, we get a plus - an indestructible body, for which you have to pay with a high probability of chipping.
But chips on the paint do not appear by themselves. And if the car is operated carefully, everything should be in order.
Rapid - asphalt car?
Liftback Rapid should not go to the primer. Causes:
- LCP is prone to chipping;
- Suspension made for asphalt, it's tough (front - from Fabia, rear beam- from the Octavia sedan);
- The plastic in the cabin does not creak at all, but it is easily scratched (at the VAZ, everything is just the opposite).
Let's add to this that the 90-horsepower engine on the Rapid is much "accelerating" than the 106-horsepower on the West. In general, Skoda releases good cars for the city.
Why is Skoda better?
The Lada Vesta sedan before the Skoda Rapid is still growing and growing ... Skoda will have many parameters better, even if we compare the basic versions.
It seems that gasoline is suitable for the Skoda engine even with less octane rating than for the VAZ-21127 engine ... It is recommended, however, to pour only AI-95.
If 90 "forces" seems a little, you can buy a liftback with a 110-horsepower engine. True, you will have to pay 706 thousand for this, and not 574.
Two unconditional pluses remained on the side of AvtoVAZ: low price And affordable price maintenance. It must be carried out every 15 thousand km.
The external dimensions and interior volume of the two cars in question differ little. But the center of mass of the liftback is pushed back. Bulk feed and reduced wheelbase- This is an argument in favor of poor cornering stability. That's right: Vesta must at least be no worse in some way!
The trunk volume of the Skoda Rapid is 530 liters. If you add up rear seats, it will increase. Lada Vesta loses here - its value is 480 liters. But if the Rapid's trunk is properly loaded, the car goes into a skid in corners.
Why discs are different
IN basic version stamping is in progress on Rapid liftbacks 5J x 14 ET35. For Vesta, 15-inch and 16-inch wheels are provided. It all looks somehow uneconomical. just for basic configuration they buy tires in Belarus - the Belshina plant supplies tires with a diameter of 15 inches.
Belshin tires for casting 15''
Large-scale review-comparison on one video
