Which sedan to rent is preferable: Renault Fluence, Volkswagen Jetta or Nissan Sentra?
Car rental without a driver will help us choose the most suitable sedan. Renault Fluence, Volkswagen Jetta or Nissan Sentra - let's find out!
Each of these class C representatives is widely popular among the consumer and has an extensive army of fans. But which of them is the most balanced in terms of consumer qualities?
Appearance
The French Renault Fluence attracts attention with its chaotic body shapes and non-standard design of the “front end” - a powerful “nose” of rounded headlights, a narrow slot in the radiator hole and a massive bumper looks menacing and aggressive in its own way. The stern looks less impressive, but its developers also tried to make it lightweight and fast.
"Nissan Sentra" is also not bad in terms of design. interesting view Japanese sedan attaches LED optics head lighting, chrome grille radiator and a bulging, powerful hood.
"Volkswagen Jetta" against the background of its opponents looks like a classic suit - without catchy elements in appearance, but well-tailored and solid. Ageless, slightly rectangular shapes bodies with strict lines and narrowed lamps give the impression of respectability. So the exterior design german sedan can be called neutral, which will appeal to a person of any age and gender.
Interior decoration
In terms of interior design, Renault seems to be the more interesting of the trinity. This was made possible thanks to the digital speedometer. dashboard and the screen of the multimedia complex towering above the center console. Volkswagen captivates with a laconic center console, informative instruments and black lacquered plastic trim. As for the Nissan, it has the most modest interior in the quartet - the silver console looks like a guest from the past, and the lever parking brake too bulky.
It is most convenient for the driver to sit in the Jetta - the seat pleases with a verified profile and a wide range of adjustments, while the Sentra and Fluence offer overly amorphous seats with weak lateral support. The back row is comfortable in all three cars - there is enough space in all directions, and the sofa configurations are good.
In terms of trunk volume and ease of use, Renault Fluence is the leader - 530 liters and the correct shape of the loading area. The French sedan is followed by the Volkswagen Jetta. At german auto for rent luggage compartment equal to 510 liters, but it is also convenient to use. The loading compartment of the "Centre" is larger than that of the "Jetta" - 511 liters, but the convex trunk walls make it difficult to load overall items.
Driving performance
Nissan Sentra is equipped with:
- 1.6 liter engine. Power is 117 hp.
- CVT.
Renault Fluence is aggregated:
- 1.6 liter engine. The power potential is 114 hp.
- stepless box variable speed drive.
"Volkswagen Jetta" in its arsenal has:
- Turbo engine 1.4 liters. Recoil - 122 hp
- Seven-speed robotic gearbox.
In terms of driving pleasure, the palm goes to Volkswagen. Elastic and tensile turbocharged engine paired with the "robot" DSG gives this sedan excellent dynamics. Handling is notable for its informative steering and slight rolls in corners.
Nissan takes second place. In the city, the capabilities of the power unit are more than enough, and the variator works quickly and synchronously. The steering here is even more sensitive than that of the "German", but the buildup discourages the desire to quickly go through turns.
Renault Fluence is not a fan of fast driving. The engine suffers from a lack of traction and does not like high speeds, and even an excellent variator is not able to correct the situation. In corners, it is worth noting large rolls and pronounced understeer, which discourage the desire to actively move in space.
But the French sedan turned out to be the most preferable in terms of smoothness - it is high even on large potholes. Nissan confidently works out only small irregularities, and breakdowns occur at high ones. Volkswagen Jetta boasts the most energy-intensive suspension, but it is also the most rigid in the trinity, so it shakes even on minor bumps.
Which car do you prefer?
Which sedan to choose? The golden mean is the Nissan Sentra - this car is moderately comfortable, dynamic and roomy, although a somewhat archaic interior can scare someone away. The Volkswagen Jetta is capable of delivering driving pleasure and captivates with a respectable appearance, but the low ride is tiring in long road. Renault Fluence is suitable only for calm people who value high driving comfort and practicality, but active drivers the French sedan will not be appreciated.
Day one: corporate
Imagine that you have the honor of being at a federal ministry corporate party. Not bad! It would be nice to drive to such an event in a solid car. Who is the most serious in our company? Definitely a Volkswagen Jetta! If the Polo and Golf hatchbacks with the design of Walter da Silva seem, for my taste, boring, then the Jetta is so serious. Recently settled in my yard white sedan VW and me for a long time thought it was a Passat B7. But it turned out - Jetta. My girlfriend completely mistook VW for Audi. And this chocolate color is the last squeak of the season!
It is spacious at the back, in terms of space, the Jetta among the test participants is second only to the Renault Fluence. But only in a German car rear passengers rely on such luxuries as a socket and air vents. And what a trunk! Huge, correct form, with a wide opening, with a mesh on the right and an elastic band on the left, allowing you to fix fairly large objects.
On the move, the Jetta is exactly the same as the Golf we tested over the summer. Technically, the sedan differs from the hatchback in that it is 9 cm longer, and wheelbase it has 7.5 cm more. So the smoothness of the Jetta is even higher. The car is not subject to buildup, most of the long waves of asphalt do not affect the position of the body in space at all. Suspension VW can not be called soft, but breaks through it infrequently. Only deep potholes with sharp edges shake the body and respond with blows in the suspension. In general, the handling of the Jetta, if it differs from the Golf, is only in nuances. The car is a little softer, a little more solid, a little less sporty. Here is a slightly different mood that perfectly matches the appearance. But only those who have traveled a lot on the Golf can catch these differences.
The downsides are just as well known. IN drive mode the box too quickly shifts to higher gears and then when sharp acceleration picks up too long desired gear. In addition, VW reacts to pressing the gas pedal with a delay: while the signal from electronic pedal gas will reach the engine until the DSG thinks, until the turbine spins up ... But then the Jetta jumps forward with a slip. If you already press the gas, then to the floor, after moving the DSG selector to the Sport position. Then the sedan pleases with both juicy traction and timely switching. Mid Jetta does not tolerate. She is like a clerk who lived a boring, measured office life, but once a year at a corporate party she comes off “to the fullest”.
For ergonomics, the same claims as the Golf: too frequent temperature control knobs and a straight DSG groove. But we also note the "know-how". So, the central armrest between the front seats is not adjustable either in height or length, it is located far away, and its shape is such that the hand slips off. And xenon, like on a real "American", is not available even for an extra charge. Another incomprehensible feature is the system keyless entry. Firstly, the key remains the same as on all Jettas - large and with a flip-out “sting”. Secondly, it was as if they were looking for a place for the engine start button at the last moment. Its location in the row of plugs in front of the DSG lever seems a little strange and not entirely logical.
And there is nothing more to scold the VW interior for. The plastic is soft even at the level of the knees, the interior lighting after the rejection of the blue color scheme pleases with optimal brightness and color, the seats are almost perfect. “Practically” only because the backrest is adjustable in steps, and comfort will not be 100, but only 99.9 percent. The adjustment ranges are huge, the buttons are optimally located, the multimedia system is arranged logically, the instruments are easy to read. Interestingly, the instrument panel on the Jetta is not the same as on the Golf. The tachometer and speedometer are devoid of deep wells and share a common area. Multimedia, on the one hand, pleased with the excellent work of the navigation system, which knows not only all the main highways of the country up to central Siberia, but is also well aware of the roads, for example, Krasnodar. On the other hand, Jetta was never able to recognize my iPod Nano either via USB or via the AUX input. Disorder! But Nano is one of the most popular models mp3 players in the US, in the main Jetta market.
Of course, nothing is free. And with the money that the Jetta that visited us costs (and this is not a car with the most powerful engine), you can already look in the direction of sedans of a higher class. However, I'm not sure if we compare Jetta with Passat or Mondeo for the same money, the sedan would look like a "whipping boy". But maybe in Russia it would still be more in demand american sedan with simple atmospheric engines, hard plastic, slow CAN bus and at a lower cost? Won and Polo Sedan while inferior to its competitors from Hyundai and Renault ... But something suggests that the Jetta will not have problems with demand. A car that can be confused with Passat and Audi cannot fail to be successful in Russia.
Day two: traffic jams
Fluence was the first in a long time Renault sedan, whose appearance does not cause rejection. Here is what the head of the brand in Russia, Bruno Anselin, says: “We came up with a hatchback, so we have always succeeded in cars with this type of body. All attempts to create a sedan on their basis led to the appearance of freaks. Therefore, we immediately developed Fluence as separate model, not just a Megane with a trunk.” And, as they say, the result is in the face. Especially in the Sportway version with a sports body kit and large beautiful wheels, which increases the price of the car by 40,000 rubles.
Moscow, New Year's fuss and snowfall. If these ingredients are mixed together, the mixture will be explosive. It was under such conditions that I had to go home to Fluence. And to be honest, I was happy with this prospect. As befits the "Frenchman", the car takes its toll. stepless variator, soft suspension, comfortable soft seat, steering wheel, at low speeds, devoid of any feedback, - what else do you need in traffic jams? We need a driver, because in Renault, by the standards of the class, he is very large stock space, and even curtains on the windows. Central tunnel at french sedan almost invisible, so you can comfortably sit the three of us. Fluence also leads in acoustic comfort, because with a smooth ride, the variator simply does not allow the engine to reach high speeds. But if you really press the gas in a serious way, then the speed will hang at close to maximum. This is a cacophony, I tell you! It's good that Fluence does not provoke such accelerations.
How about in corners? It's far from the Jetta, although the general principles for setting up the power steering are similar. Looking ahead, I note that only chevrolet cruze has a different algorithm for the operation of the amplifier. The steering wheel is empty in the near-zero zone, but already at a deviation of 20 degrees, the force increases sharply. The difference is that in Fluence the difference in these efforts is greater than in Jetta, precisely due to the empty steering wheel. The silver sedan confidently goes in a straight line, only swaying on the waves, willingly dives into a turn, and at first with a slight drift, but then it starts working rear suspension, and the behavior of the car becomes neutral. I still don't want to be active. This car was not built to race. You slip out of the soft seat, the car itself sways, the engine roars - why all this? Where should we hurry in this city of traffic jams? It is much better to turn on louder Patricia Kaas from the one presented to me at the presentation new Megane CD of French music and roll yourself home.
I would like to talk about the Fluence radio tape recorder separately. On the one hand, it sounds very good for an inexpensive device. On the other hand, it is the main ergonomic puncture of the car. The radio is completely covered by the gear lever, the volume control button is right under the driver's hand, but, firstly, it is not available to the passenger, and secondly, the driver has a lot of buttons on the steering wheel! The layout of the buttons is chaotic and defies any logic. And I couldn’t get used to the fact that the volume is regulated not by a large “round” in the center, but by a small knob in the corner. In general, Fluence has enough French "tricks". Well, who came up with the idea to place the seat heating regulator on the end of these very seats? To see them, you need to open the door! Moreover, they do not have fixed positions, so it is impossible to select the intensity of heating by touch. But the plastic is so soft that, closing your eyes and relying solely on tactile sensations, you can mistake Fluence for a car of a higher class.
In general, Renault is very cozy car, its creators deliberately paid a lot of attention to improving comfort, rather than honing handling. The climate control has three automatic operating modes here: Auto (automatic), Soft (soft and silent) and Fast (for quick airing of the cabin after parking in the sun). Compartments for small items accumulated as much as 23 liters. And the wireless access is organized in Renault is better than in other premium cars. And now the card does not have to be inserted into the slot, as it was before: he approached the car, pressed the button on the handle, sat down, pressed the “start” button and drove himself! And thanks to the fact that electronic key It is made in the form of a card, it is convenient to carry it in a shirt pocket or in a purse. The Fluence is perfect as a taxi, fleet park car, for older buyers, or simply for those who have outgrown the Logan.
Day three: photo session
Constant thaws turned Moscow into a realm of mud, water and gray snow, so it was possible to shoot cars properly only outside the city. We were sheltered by "Park Drakino", near Serpukhov, so we had to make a short forced march along the roads of the Moscow region. My travel partner was Ford Focus 3. I really liked the Focus in the summer, and the only but most powerful argument against the novelty was the lack of dynamics of a car with a 1.6 liter engine. The more interesting for me was the meeting with a two-liter car. Maybe 150 liters. With. and "robot" PowerShift cure Ford of impotence?
Well, that's a completely different matter! Now I'm learning in a rookie dashing cars first and second generations. Now the magnificent chassis has received a worthy accompanist! On country paths all the time I wanted to “light it up”. And not just rush fast, overtaking neighbors downstream, as in Hyundai Elantra, and attack the turns, enjoying the juicy effort on the steering wheel, the steering rear suspension, screwing the sedan into any turn, the perfect brake setting. The Focus isn't just good, it's great. If earlier Ford was inferior in something to the sweet couple of Golf / Jetta, then those days are in the past. And in terms of smoothness, the Focus beats the Jetta at all! Of course, this is not Fluence hovering over the road, but it does not allow breakdowns, like a German car. Flaws? The steering wheel could be a little heavier. However, the current settings are better combined with the slightly more relaxed nature of the new machine.
Thanks to the spot lighting of the interior with all the colors of the rainbow to choose from, you can choose the mood yourself. If you want to drive - choose red, if you want to roll along the autobahn in a relaxed way - blue or green. By the way, about the autobahn. The Focus's cruise control is active, so on a long journey you can relax and just hold the steering wheel. And do not be afraid that the sedan, according to the old "Focus" habit, will suddenly jump to the side on a rut - the third-generation car is spared from this ailment.
In terms of ergonomics, here Ford was in a somewhat more advantageous position than during the first test - I was already familiar with the operation of its systems, the location of the buttons that activate these functions, with the intricacies of its menus. If during the first meeting it seemed to me that the center console was overloaded with buttons, that not all buttons on the steering wheel were conveniently located, that you could get lost in the nooks and crannies of the menu, which is different for two LCD displays, then there were no problems when we met again. None. So, they will not be in everyday use. Ford finally reached the level of VW in terms of ergonomics. From obvious shortcomings it can be noted that the headrest and armrest are too pressing on the back of the head, which, if pushed forward, threatens to overturn drinks in cup holders. By the way, the Ford multimedia system perfectly dealt with my player, saw all the playlists and read all the Russian-language tags. The only puncture is the trunk. Small, sloppily finished, with a lid lacking a handle. And this is for a car that claims to be a national one!
But I remember something else. Focus was the first car with which ... nice to talk to! Our car was equipped with a voice control function that really worked. Moreover, the car just a couple of times could not make out my voice and the radio turned on 91.0 instead of the frequency of 91.2. And how convenient underground parking! When the windows and rear-view mirrors began to fog up rapidly, one had only to say "Climate, defrosting on", and the car began to fog up. At the same time, the hands continued to turn the steering wheel and change the gearbox modes. Voice control allows you to change the temperature, fan speed, turn on glass heating, select a radio frequency, track or playlist. At the same time, if you do not select any function, the polite lady will say possible options commands. Even if you do not know English, Focus will teach you to pronounce the necessary words yourself. Then I found out that in last years this option was also available for the previous generation car. Moreover, this option can be retrofitted even to those cars that did not have it initially. Moreover, both at official dealers and in any garage - this process is so simple.
I think you already understood that I liked Ford. Only now the design of the sedan personally scares me. It does not fit, in my opinion, the stern with the front. hatchback and more better station wagon– here is my choice.
Day four: MKADburgring
I recently wrote about new Hyundai Elantra, but then it was about a car with automatic transmission. Now I have in my hands a car with “mechanics” and in a simpler configuration. Even the “automatic” Elantra seemed to be a very sports car, so I expected a perky disposition and a cheerful character from a sedan with a manual transmission, and I was not deceived in my expectations. Some thoughtfulness disappeared, and sometimes the wheels began to slip even when switching from second gear to third! However, here it is more about disgusting tires, and not about power. As for the box itself, frankly speaking, it cannot be called exemplary. It seems that the lever is not long-stroke, and the gears are switched on clearly, but there is some kind of toy in the shifts, as if you are clicking the lever of an advanced steering wheel for computer games Logitech G25.
The lack of thrust of the 1.6-liter engine is noticeable only when you try to start off too smoothly at low speeds. The car starts shaking all over as soon as the speed drops to 1200. Therefore, in a traffic jam, it’s better not to switch to second at all. Generally up to 4000 rpm. the engine is sleepy, but if you spin the engine, then you don’t want to stop anymore - just have time to poke the gears so as not to fall out of revs. fast driving contributes and energy-intensive suspension. Turns can be safely attacked without fear of shaking on bumps. On small bumps. If under the wheels there are potholes or bare joints of the overpass, then Elantra starts to play Solaris. The sedan starts to sway and changes its trajectory. Moreover, sometimes the trajectory is distributed in breadth, and sometimes, on the contrary, it twists. Unpleasant! It's good that the stabilization system is on guard, and if you reduce the speed to the prescribed speed, then the problems will disappear.
Nevertheless, the Elantra is not easy to drive. Painfully mischievous design, and this old-school engine, which has its whole life at the top, and this steering wheel poured with effort ... I feel many Elantra owners will regularly exceed the speed limit and play checkers ... And most of the owners of these cars will be young. Especially in terms of practicality Hyundai problems: the trunk can only be opened from the key fob or from the passenger compartment, the roof presses the rear passengers on their heads, and the passengers themselves slide off the short seat cushion. Mature clients will not like excessive noise. In general, many vehicles designed for American market, sin with poor sound insulation, but here it is also multiplied by noisy tires. This is not the first time that Hyundai-Kia cars are equipped with not the best winter tires from Korean manufacturers. As a result, cars skid at starts, lock wheels when braking, make noise, and sometimes start to slip early.
Elantra can also be scolded for cutting the eye blue backlight, plastic of different textures on the front panel, an unsuccessfully located handbrake and a steering wheel adjustable only in height. But with the wheel in general came out interesting story. Despite the fact that it is adjustable only in one plane, neither I nor Denis Khalfin experienced any problems. Not in every car with all the adjustments you can sit down with such comfort! Good car sorry dear.
Day Five: Anniversary
Chevrolet Cruze in this company is a bit of a stranger. american car cheaper than the rest, technically simpler and positioned as more budget. Therefore, I was initially inclined towards the blue sedan indulgently. Chevrolet is a bizarre mix of GM units different generations. The platform here is the same as that of the Astra J, but the rear suspension is simplified - without the Watt mechanism. The engines are the good old Ecotec, which were installed on the Astra H. Here is the old 5-speed gearbox, the same fog lights and repeaters, as on the old Astra, but new steering column levers. In a word, the Koreans, and the GM DAT division was responsible for the development of the Cruze, tried to make the car cheaper, but if possible no worse than its competitors.
And they succeeded! The Cruze doesn't really demand any kind of indulgence. It has a stylish exterior and interior design, spacious salon, big trunk, almost perfect ergonomics, and handling and dynamics at a quite decent level. Sure, the Chevrolet's driving style lacks the polish of the VW and Ford, the car isn't as solid as the Renault, and it's not as sporty as the Hyundai, but it's by no means shabby. Moreover, the progress compared to Astra H, not to mention Lacetti, is obvious. From the point of view of handling, Chevrolet is emphatically safe: the car confidently keeps the road on a straight line, ignores ruts, turns out of the corner in a turn, and when speeding in a turn, the front axle slides outward. All this is much more like the previous Astra than the Lacetti! Only the settings of the power steering are upsetting: not only is the steering wheel empty at zero, like that of other test participants, but the force does not increase as the angle of rotation of the wheels increases. So you don't want to rush. Yes, especially and it will not work, even if you want to!
My old friend, the Z18XER engine, was on the test Cruze. At one time, he received the letter R after modernization in 2006, when the power increased from 125 to 140 hp. With. Only now it has become available almost at the very cut-off, so you will never see most of these “horses”. Our car was also produced in Korea, so its engine meets Euro 5 standards, which, as you understand, did not add dynamism to the car. The nature of the motor has really changed: there was a kind of pickup at 3500 rpm - it became more interesting to drive!
Main disadvantages of Cruze, in addition to not the best motor in the world, these are too long gearshift lever strokes and an unsuccessfully located air conditioner temperature controller. Tall and large people like Anton Borisenko and Khalfin managed to twist the temperature to a minimum with their right knee, after which a real cold set in the cabin. It is interesting that I did not have such problems, although I am only 7 cm shorter than Anton (186 vs. 193).
And a nice feature of our Cruze was a special performance - the Anniversary Series. Such a Chevrolet differs from the usual one in other bumpers, a spoiler on the trunk lid, chrome trim for foglights, door sills, a special blue color and blue fabric inserts on the seats and front panel. The price for such cars: 688,200 rubles for a sedan with a 1.6-liter engine and 722,400 rubles. for 1.8 liters. Hurry, the number of cars is limited!
SUMMARY
Ratings will help you rank the cars. They are subjective and competent only within the framework of precisely this comparative test. 10 points for the quality of the Jetta's interior does not at all put it on a par with the Maybach, it's just a benchmark against the background of the rest of the golf class. So, VW won on points, which was not a surprise. The car is closer than ever to the ideal. But what about Focus, which I praised so much? Look at the scores, the Focus lost out to the VW mainly because of the small and sloppy boot!
Renault breathes in the back of the Focus and only slightly loses to VW! And all because the French have relied on comfort, in which Fluence has no equal in this test. The final triumph was prevented by ergonomic punctures and a lack of dynamics.
Hyundai is the second from the end, and this is what I did not expect. Elantra loses because of the inconvenience of rear passengers, less quality trim materials and poor acoustic comfort. But at the same time, the “Korean” is such that he wants to forgive many shortcomings. What is the reason? In design? Mischievous temper? Most likely yes, although it is unusual to talk about Korean car. Chevrolet took last place, but it is not so much cheaper as it is worse. Honest car for your money.
Text: Automotive Magazine
The minimum price thus fell from 664,000 to 599,000 rubles. However, when the buyer starts buying desired options, the discount may not seem so significant. Of notable amenities basic equipment The Conceptline includes air conditioning and a music system. In the more expensive Trendline configuration (with the same engine), the list of equipment is supplemented by side airbags, as well as heated seats and mirrors. Let's look at the main Jetta competitors in the Russian market.
Ford Focus
The Ford Focus sedan in the basic version of Ambiente is equipped with a power unit of the same size and power (1.6 liters, 85 Horse power). The price of the car starts at 579,000 rubles. The equipment in this case is rather meager: there is no air conditioning, no "music" - you can only distinguish anti-lock braking system and front power windows. The most affordable configuration of the Ford Focus sedan with PowerShift automatic transmission costs from 729,000 rubles and gets a more powerful (1.6-liter 105-horsepower) engine.
Skoda Octavia
Another brainchild of VAG - Skoda Octavia - even outwardly similar to the Volkswagen Jetta. Minimum price configuration Active starts from 599,000 rubles, from 659,000 rubles - for a version with a seven-speed DSG. The basic equipment is naturally not rich, although the version with DSG has, for example, a Start-Stop system with the ability to turn it off and an uphill assistant. In addition, according to the manufacturer, the suspension is specially adapted "for bad roads." A significant advantage over the Jetta is more powerful motor in the minimum configuration - 1.2 liters and 105 horsepower.
Current Generation Lancer has been produced since 2007 and has not undergone noticeable updates for all the time, so today Russian buyers can purchase a Lancer at a rather attractive starting price - 549,000 rubles (subject to the purchase of a car manufactured in 2013). At the very available equipment Inform with a five-speed mechanics includes a music player, ABS, foglights, and a 1.6-liter engine with 117 horsepower is installed under the hood of the base Mitsubishi Lancer.
Toyota Corolla
Another Japanese - Corolla - due to its relatively recent update, costs more - from 659,000 rubles. The most budgetary power unit - with a volume of 1.33 liters - develops 99 horsepower. The package, despite the high price (compared to other VW Jetta competitors), cannot please with its equipment - you will have to pay well for options such as an audio system or, for example, side airbags: the cost of modification with such equipment starts from 754,000 rubles.
Citroen C4 Sedan andPeugeot 408
Upon closer examination, of course, you can find a whole mountain of differences in the single-platform C4 Sedan and 408 - body dimensions, interior ergonomics, appearance, after all. Everything is, as they say, the taste and color. Recently, even the initial price of the C4 Sedan slightly exceeded 408 (589 against 586 thousand rubles). Another difference lies in the possibility of purchasing a diesel version for Citroen buyers. In the basic configuration, the cars are offered with identical power units with a volume of 1.6 liters and a capacity of 115 horsepower, which are paired with a five-speed manual transmission.
Renault Fluence
And another French, replaced in due time Megane sedan is the Renault Fluence. In Russia, the car has been sold since 2010. Most affordable Fluence version Authentique costs from 648,000 rubles and is equipped with a 1.6-liter engine with 106 horsepower. The list of standard equipment does not allow to name minimum equipment"raw" - there is an audio system with Bluetooth, and air conditioning, and an on-board computer in Russian.
Hello everyone!
A year has passed. Passed this year by local standards, a lot - 33 thousand km "Helped" the war that is going on in our Donbas. I had to travel a lot on various matters, from which I would be glad to be spared. But the review is not about the war, but about the car. Flusha this year showed itself with the most better side. Never failed, always started and did not break. Even despite the disgusting fuel, which in these conditions had to be filled. And everything that burned was flooded, as they say.
The suspension has withstood the hardships of shell-beaten roads and is in good condition. Although I caught a few holes on the way to Izvarino, from which I should have fallen apart. MOT was carried out with an oil and filter change. On the last diagnosis, a foggy right front shock absorber was caught. Protective corrugations are torn - this is a disease, they are made in one element with chippers and cannot withstand our operation. I climbed on the forums, they advise me to change to eight and forget about this problem. The master - very, by the way, sensible and skillful - advised the same thing at the service. Well, the silent blocks of the lower levers are not critical, but crawled. Let's get together and change. It is problematic with s\h under the conditions of the blockade - in terms of choice. But everything is on order. It's a pity that online stores have stopped working. On existential everything is cheaper and there is a choice. Changed the front brake pads- It's time. Blocks 2500 rubles, work 270 rubles. I write the price in rubles, so that everyone would understand it better. As for maintenance, the prices are as follows (I took more through existential):
Strengths:
- Omnivorous comfort suspension
- High ground clearance
- Economical reliable engine
- Spacious comfortable lounge
- Good corrosion protection and body painting
- Reasonable price for a car with good options
- Anti-theft
Weak sides:
The engine is weak on overtaking. Especially if after the Jaguar XJ.
Hi all!
The evening turned out to be boring, I decided to dash off a couple of lines about Fluence. I have been trying to write a review for a long time, but the muse still did not attend).
At the end of winter, the Peugeot 308 was unexpectedly sold, which my wife bought without my participation. The car was not the most well-groomed, I would not buy this copy. But to the credit of the car, I must say that for almost two years of using large investments, it did not require. Release bearing, one hub, a couple of sets of pads — and that's it. Sold with a run of 80 tkm with a completely native suspension, even the links were still factory. I didn’t like that the engine ate oil and the front doors sagged, the latter circumstance was most likely the result of not the best body repair. Disgusting sounds were made by the rear beam when driving through pits with sharp edges, somehow not at all in French. I was going to eliminate this trouble with silent blocks from the station wagon, but I didn’t have time .. In general, I liked the car, I don’t exclude that we will buy it again.
Strengths:
- Chassis
- Comfort and spaciousness
- Convenient keyless entry system (option)
- Huge trunk
Weak sides:
- Trunk lid hinges
- Ergonomic Features
- Sensitivity to turning on the air conditioner
- Too light pedals
Review Renault Fluence 1.6 (Renault Fluence) 2012
And again, good day to all!
I also want to remember about the previous car models in our family, after the “pyatnaha” (review here) there was also an Audi A4 (did not write a review). Year of operation of the German 163-horsepower "four" American assembly did not cause me any special feelings, experiences and pleasure. The only pleasure is the engine, quite powerful and turbocharged plus, which made it easy to overtake, rebuild and generally move around in the city and on the highways. The constant pumping of funds killed me. The machine was produced in 2003, and “feeding” it in terms of replacing all sorts of different sensors, of which there are a great many in it, became too wasteful for me. And not only sensors. Thermostat, fuel pump, front suspension assembly ... Probably, this is how fate decreed that it was during my operation that the simultaneous aging of many nodes of this actually began reliable machine. Therefore, after a year of being in my hands "Audyuhi" I decided to remember my youth, as they say, and cast my eyes on the Renault concern, which I had already dealt with in terms of Logan, my first typewriter. And today I don’t regret at all that I didn’t work out with the German-American auto industry ...
