Comparative test Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry vs. Competitors - Comparison Test

Comparative test Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry vs. Competitors - Comparison Test

20.10.2019

Every driver dreams of a quality car that will reflect his financial well-being and serve him well for many years. Today, Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 are especially popular among business-class cars of the middle price category. Each car deserves attention. The Toyota Camry is a medium-sized sedan that, after the update, has acquired more impressive dimensions and retained a calm disposition.

Mazda 6 is the choice of those who seek a dynamic car with a sporty character, suitable for a standard family.

Design

The new Toyota Camry is large, but there is no need to talk about solidity and respectability either. In order to increase sales, Toyota manufacturers have tried to give the Camry a more luxurious and dynamic look. We can safely say that they did not quite succeed.

At the rear, the situation is also bad - narrow lights on a large bumper and sloping rear pillars are completely invisible. All this leads to the fact that the general appearance of the Toyota Camry is not uniform, since there is no combination of the front and rear views with the sides, as in the situation with the Corolla.

In comparison, the Camry or Mazda 6 the latter creates the impression of a real sports car - swift and dynamic. Comparing cars is a tricky business, but let's try anyway. The exterior design is complete and harmonious. All details fit together perfectly. To give a serious appearance, the engineers did their best - a low overhanging hood, narrow headlights directed towards the center, a complex geometric shape of the radiator grille.

The Mazda 6 is at its best when viewed from the rear and sides - the shifted interior lines, the smoothness of the roof pillar and wheel arches, the straight trunk lid - all this makes a lasting impression.

Salon

When comparing the interior of a Toyota Camry or Mazda 6, the first impression is the advantage of the interior design of the Camry - leather in the upholstery, wood panels. But upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that artificial materials and very inexpensive plastic were used in the decoration. Already after a short time of operation, car owners begin to look for options for ennobling the interior space of the cabin. However, it is worth noting the really important plus of the Toyota Camry - a modern multimedia system with a large and high-resolution display. In addition, the driver will appreciate the dashboard with high-quality backlighting.

The back row in the Toyota Camry, like in the Corolla, quite comfortably accommodates three adults with enough legroom. However, it is difficult for the driver and passenger in the front seat to talk about comfort - low seat backs and flat pillows. The advantages of the seats include soft leather upholstery, automatic adjustment to 6 positions, position setting with memory.

When comparing Avensis or Mazda 6, it should be noted that the interior design is more expensive and even the plastic is of better quality. The center console is framed in glossy black plastic and it is in it that the display is located, which displays the parameters of the climate system.

The front row of seats are trimmed with perforated leather for maximum comfort. There isn't a lot of space in the back row, but two adults will fit without a problem, especially if they have something to compare with.

Specifications

The Toyota Camry engine with the update increased its volume by 100 ml and received additional power, but there was no significant change - the car is still smooth and unhurried. The fuel consumption of this car is 13-15 liters per 100 km. The car moves so smoothly that small bumps in the road surface are not noticeable at all, and therefore the comparison is not in favor of the Mazda 6.

Mazda 6 is fast and dynamic - acceleration to 100 km / h takes 7.8 seconds. The 6-position gearbox responds quickly to any shift, and the engine responds beautifully when the fuel supply is increased. The average consumption is 10 liters per 100 km.

Mazda 6 is quite capable of competing with sports cars. The car behaves well on turns and changes in the roadway. Each turn is under the full control of the driver. The steering wheel responds to any movement and, despite the bulkiness, the car easily enters even the sharpest turns, which is worth noting when making a comparative analysis.

Soundproofing the Mazda 6 interior is the eternal problem of this car. Engineers from time to time are trying to amend and solve this issue. We can say that the updated version of the Mazda 6 is really almost soundproof. The cabin is comfortable and the soft sound from the rustling of gravel under the wheels will in no way spoil the mood of the driver and staying in it can be compared with luxury options.

If we talk about solidity in combination with technical characteristics, then the choice is obvious - Mazda 6 undoubtedly wins. Toyota Camry is more respectable, but significantly inferior to Mazda 6 in terms of content.

The price factor is commensurate, and therefore the choice of a Mazda 6 or a Toyota Camry is only yours - the solidity of a Toyota Camry or the high-quality sporty character of the Mazda 6. Whatever you choose, it is unlikely that you will go unnoticed driving any of these cars.

Mazda 6 vs Toyota Camry? The comparison is certainly quite arbitrary and there will always be those who will furiously prove the superiority of one brand over another, and everyone has their own arguments which is better. But if you want to get a family car with a dynamic character and economical fuel consumption, then choose the Mazda 6.

Comparing such well-known brands of Japanese car manufacturers as Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry cars, one must remember that this technique has many similarities and a minimum of discrepancies. Both cars are designed for the same segment of buyers.

It should be noted in advance that the most objective will be a comparison of cars that are equivalent in terms of equipment and belong to approximately the same production period. This comparison will involve models in the maximum configuration - Toyota Camry 7th generation of release in 2014 and Mazda 6 of the 3rd generation of 2015. Both cars are equipped with engines of maximum volume - 2.5 liters. To be more precise, the Camry for most markets, except for the domestic one, has a slightly larger engine size, but in 2013 it was reduced to meet the requirements of the toll rate. This move increased the competitiveness of the model.

Both models of cars are equipped with six-speed automatic gearboxes.

Appearance of cars

They have almost identical overall dimensions, but Camry or Mazda 6 cars cannot be confused, they look so different in appearance. Mazda's profile is more rapid, approaching a sporty one. The salon is somewhat shifted back, as a result of which the six is ​​a bit like a sports car.

Toyota looks completely different, having a massive, more rigorous and presentable body. Thanks to such details, it can be assumed that Mazda is more suitable for young and active people, and Toyota, on the contrary, for sedate and respectable businessmen who value comfort and rigor above appearance and speed.

Salon

The ergonomics of the controls in both cars are quite elaborate and therefore very difficult to compare. The controls for climate control, acoustics are easily accessible and intuitive.

The dashboard in Mazda is made in black and gray shades without any frills. In Toyota, many people complain about decorative woodgrain inserts on the dashboard, central tunnel and door cards.

It is impossible to say in which car the seats are better, since they are of very high quality in all versions. Softer in Mazda and tighter in Toyota, they do not cause discomfort on long trips, as they have a comfortable profile, developed lateral support and leg support.

Comparing rear seat space will not be in favor of the Mazda 6, as it has a lower ceiling, and a tall passenger in the back seat has a chance to get his head to the ceiling. At the same time, the dimensions of the cabin in width and length are sufficient to comfortably accommodate passengers of any height, even with the driver's seat fully extended.

Driving performance

The same engine power and the same number of gearshifts in the automatic transmission does not mean that the driving performance of the cars will be the same. Mazda 6 VS car Toyota Camry wins a little in this comparison, because it is characterized by noticeably better dynamics with lower fuel consumption.

A test drive shows that Mazda's automatic transmission changes gears smoothly and imperceptibly without signs of thoughtfulness, clearly responding to the position of the pedal, while Toyota behaves more confidently with a measured driving style. When you try to increase the dynamics, there are small delays in the reaction of the car to pressing the gas pedal. Yes, and fuel consumption, even when driving on the highway, is clearly not in favor of Toyota.

Handling of both cars is excellent at any speed, rolls in corners, of course, are present, but drifts are not observed.

If we compare the steering, then Mazda has it more informative, the steering wheel is clearer here. The brakes are crisp and confident, and there are no complaints in any of the compared cars.

The suspension is made in the usual way - an inexpensive MacPherson strut in front, and the usual multi-link in the back. Suspension tuning is better with Toyota. This is noticeable when driving on rough roads. At Mazda, most of the large irregularities are transmitted by unpleasant and well-distinguished blows to the body. The situation is also aggravated by the weaker sound insulation of the cabin, especially the wheel arches.

luggage compartment

Both cars have a good roomy trunk, with a standard volume for cars of this class - within 500 liters. The loading opening is large enough to accommodate bulky boxes or other oversized cargo. The luggage compartment can be enlarged by folding down the row of rear seats.

Safety

Competitors provide a high level of driver and passenger safety through the presence of a full range of airbags and careful design of body elements. According to the results of crash tests, both cars received the maximum number of points.

General advantages and disadvantages

In general, both cars are almost equivalent. Mazda's biggest drawbacks are poor sound insulation, low interior and stiff suspension. Advantages - excellent dynamics and control, efficiency, elegant appearance.

Toyota's disadvantages are sluggish steering, low efficiency, and flaws in the interior design. Advantages - roomy interior, soft suspension, excellent sound insulation.

The cost of maintenance at Mazda is slightly higher, but the cost of spare parts, on the contrary, is lower than that of Toyota. Therefore, the cost of a new and old car will be very different in both cases. This must be taken into account, given the age of the purchased car and the period that is expected for its operation.

conclusions

When comparing the external and internal qualities of cars such as Toyota Camry or Mazda 6 cars, you need to understand that, being in the same class, they are designed for different categories of owners. Bright and dynamic Mazda is more suitable for young and middle-aged people who love a dynamic driving style. Toyota, as a more representative car, is intended for solid, business consumers who value comfort and a prestigious look more, who are not in a hurry, preferring sedateness and regularity.

The prestigious Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry models are well-known representatives of the Japanese car industry. Both cars have won a whole army of fans since the first generations appeared on the market. The main task that manufacturers assign to them is tight competition with the leading models of automobile concerns from Europe and the USA. The Japanese mid-size "business class" combines cutting-edge technology, engine innovation and the latest design concepts. The final price is traditionally more affordable compared to similar products from European brands.

Mazda 6 is a 5-seater front wheel drive car. The car belongs to the roomy class "D". Available body layout options for the Mazda 6 are a 4-door sedan and a practical 5-door station wagon. The third generation of the model is presented on the market today, which has additionally gone through restyling. The updated version was presented in March 2015 at the Geneva Motor Show.

Toyota Camry is a 5 seater front wheel drive car. The model is traditionally offered in the only classic body layout 4-door sedan and is a representative of the "D-class". Already the seventh generation of the Toyota Camry in a restyled version was presented to the general public as part of the Moscow auto show in August 2014.

In this review, a comparative test of the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry was carried out on cars in top trim levels with the most extended package of options that are most in demand among potential and current owners of these cars. Both cars received 2.5-liter gasoline naturally aspirated powertrains and automatic transmissions. Mazda 6 Sedan under the hood has a high-tech SkyActiv-G engine and a 6-speed SkyActiv Drive torque converter transmission.Toyota Camry was equipped with a Dual VVT-i engine and a reliable 6-speed gearbox with a torque converter.

Mazda 6

The restyling of this model did not greatly change the appearance of the car, but the updated version received a number of notable innovations. Most notable from the front is the head optics of the latest Mazda 6, which has now become adaptive, LED and has received advanced functionality. The radiator grille was also slightly modernized, which received more thin “ribs” and got rid of the top chrome insert. Now only the large brand logo attracts all the attention.

The profile of the model has retained the swiftness and hint of "sport", while continuing to play with the muscles of the large front wheel arches and the sloping roof. The sedan looks businesslike and strict, while the dynamics in the image are deliberately emphasized. The rear of the car is modern and a bit aggressive. The narrowed long stoplights are slightly tinted and fit well into the design of the stern under a small “visor” of the overhanging trunk lid. A neat bumper at the bottom attracts attention with silver tailpipe trims spaced on both sides.

Toyota Camry

After the update, the current generation of the model has become even more presentable. Restyling affected the bumpers and the design of the grille, as well as the head optics of the model. The front part has a recognizable chrome edging at the bottom of the massive front bumper. Neat fog lights are now deliberately highlighted against the background of other body parts of the car. In the lower part, the large ribs of the black radiator grille attract attention.

The side of the Toyota Camry is simple and collected. The wheel arches are clearly drawn, but without accents. The glazing area did not receive too soft corners, but there were at least sharp sections in the design. Slightly stretches the stamping profile in the door area above the threshold. This solution visually "lightens" a large car. The stern of the sedan looks massive and modern, while maintaining the necessary restraint. The rear lights are large, conventionally they are divided into upper and lower parts by a silver insert located along the very edge of the wide luggage compartment lid.

The appearance of both models is fully consistent with the concept that competing auto giants from Japan profess in their advanced design. There is a clear bias towards the “pseudo-sportiness” of the Mazda 6, which the creators of the new model emphasized in every possible way. For better or worse, the sedan is moving further and further away from associations with a presentable mid-size car for serious business representatives. The car now looks aggressive, reliable and dynamic car. Behind the wheel you expect to see an active young man or a middle-aged driver who seeks to make himself known and prefers an active drive and a catchy exterior, while relegating presentability and practicality to the background. Toyota Camry turned out to be the complete opposite, remaining true to its focus on an established and self-confident audience. Potential buyers of this model will be exclusively middle-aged and elderly businessmen, for whom comfort, solidity and “classic” restraint in car design are above all else.

Interior

Mazda 6

High quality finishing materials are used in the interior of the car. The softness and smoothness of individual details in the interior are perfectly diluted with sharp corners and straight lines. Immediately I would like to note the possibility of implementing a combined color scheme of the cabin. The main tone is traditional black, but the chairs of different color, inserts on the door cards, the central tunnel and the dashboard can significantly revive the car from the inside. The only comment was the total area of ​​such inserts on the central tunnel, as there were concerns about their wear resistance in this place. In terms of build quality and fit, the Mazda 6 demonstrates an unexpectedly high class.

The overall design is dominated by classic solutions. An innovation can be considered the design of the center console and the multimedia and navigation system screen placed separately in the upper part of the dashboard. The second "highlight" is a small transparent projection display under the windshield. Neat airflow deflectors in the center were placed under the large color screen of the multimedia system. The interior climate control unit was partially combined with a CD slot. The climate control window turned out to be narrow and relatively small, but the information is read quite comfortably. Large round knobs trimmed with chrome were smashed around the edges of the information field. It is easy to interact with them, so changing the settings, choosing the right mode or blowing direction is not difficult.

The seats in the car are comfortable, the filler is dense and elastic. Lateral support is developed at an average level, but the profile itself securely fixes the rider. The bottom cushion protrudes well forward, providing support for the legs. The high central tunnel is made almost flush with the wide armrest. This solution allows you to interact with the round regulator on the tunnel with maximum convenience. The steering wheel is covered with high-quality material, has a rim of medium thickness and does not slip in the hands. The diameter of the multifunction steering wheel is optimally matched. The dashboard has three familiar "wells" in a silver trim. The combination of bright illumination and scale markings makes it easy to perceive information.

Toyota Camry

In the interior of the sedan, everything is familiar and in its place. Designers did not introduce for this model those bold decisions that can be seen in other cars of the Japanese brand. Toyota Camry received the usual layout of elements. High quality finishing materials, assembly and adjustment of panels in terms of quality did not cause any comments. The main color of the key interior parts is black. Diversify the gamut, not the most successful from the aesthetic side, colored inserts “under the tree” on the dashboard, the armrest of the door cards and the central tunnel. The degree of their practicality and resistance to scratches can be assessed during operation.

The center console is the focal point for most of the vehicle's functional systems. Under a small visor hides a narrow monochrome display of an electronic clock. This is followed by strict rectangular airflow deflectors. The large screen of the multimedia system is placed in a strict black frame, and the block for the location of this element is emphasized by chrome-plated sidewalls. At the level of the upper corners of the screen, there are medium-sized round shiny controls and vertical rows of function buttons below them. A small narrow screen with direction indicators, temperature readings and airflow modes is surrounded around the perimeter by rows of modest black keys.

Seats in the car have a profile designed for ease and convenience of boarding / disembarking. Lateral support is available, but mediocrely developed. The seats are upholstered with good quality material, received a dense and neat stitching of the seams. The filler is soft, but you do not fall through in the chair. The steering wheel is multifunctional, three-spoke, with a pleasant-feeling skin material. The rim diameter is well chosen, and it is also quite convenient to control the car's systems using the joystick buttons on the steering wheel spokes. The instrument panel with convenient scale markings and powerful backlighting is standard. The speedometer is on the right side, the tachometer is on the left. The space between them is occupied by a large vertical on-board computer screen.

The interior of the survey cars turned out to be cozy, high-quality and stylish. As for the issue of ergonomics, the designers and engineers did a good job on both the Camry and the Japanese "six". The sporty spirit and youthful enthusiasm can be easily traced in every element of the Mazda 6 interior, which literally attracts hot riders with its impetuous message. The calm Toyota sedan turned out to be in no hurry at all and there was no need, so the electronic systems did not begin to be built in the interior of the model to the level of a cult. A peaceful mood reigns in the cabin, setting you up for an imposing and unhurried ride. Not without controversy in both sedans. It is noteworthy that color inserts received comments both in the Mazda 6 and in the Toyota Camry. In the case of Mazda, their practicality is doubtful, and in the case of Toyota, the aesthetics suffered a little. One way or another, but the difference in the target audience for which these cars were designed is clearly visible at the slightest attempt to compare the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry at this stage. The result of the rivalry is a very conditional, but still the victory of Mazda 6. The car won the duel due to a more “modern” design compared to the hackneyed motives performed by the opponent.

Driving performance

Mazda 6

It's time to put the cars on the road and test drive Mazda 6 vs. Toyota Camry. After starting, we immediately note the balance and silence when the Mazda 6 engine is running. We touch the gas pedal and enjoy the noticeable engine thrust in low-speed mode. The automatic transmission seeks to keep fuel consumption at a minimum level, does not drive the tachometer needle above 2-2.5 thousand rpm.

There is more than enough torque to get off to a strong start and maintain a set pace as you pick up speed. You can even play "traffic light racing" while remembering to turn off the useful i-stop system, which turns off the engine when you stop. If you put the box in manual control mode, then the car changes before our eyes. Peak speeds become fully available, reactions to the gas pedal are surprisingly sharp. The return from the motor in conjunction with a well-tuned automatic transmission was pleasantly pleased.

The chassis of the Mazda 6 has MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link rear suspension design. With such a chassis, various small cracks and small pits are obtained with maximum comfort, as the car tries not to remind its riders of these flaws under the wheels. More serious coating defects end in shaking in the cabin, while little depends on the dimension of the wheel disks. For a quiet ride on smooth asphalt, the suspension travel and softness are enough.

On the track, the picture is slightly different. The car presses to the asphalt, the steering becomes more informative. In turns, the sedan perfectly clings to the trajectory, only occasionally and at high speed it reminds of a possible drift along the axes. There are practically no significant rolls on the "arc". As for the brake system, this unit is well configured. The pedal tightly blocks the wheels closer to the middle of the stroke, leaving at the very “top” the opportunity for soft braking.

Toyota Camry

We turn to our opponent and compare which is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? We start the power unit. Noise isolation and vibration protection are clearly improved compared to previous versions of the model. The engine runs barely noticeable, with no "nervous tick" on the steering wheel. Pressing the gas pedal provides a smooth pickup. The dynamics are not racing, but the traction is confident, which ensures a completely predictable behavior of the car. The 6-speed Aisin is tuned for fuel economy. If you raise the speed above 3 thousand, then a decent supply of power is felt.

A large sedan noticeably comes to life both when picking up speed and in the process of further maintaining the speed limit. The automatic transmission works flawlessly. The solution is torque converter and reliable, no "robots". The moment of switching remains imperceptible to the driver in quiet modes, the engine thrust is distributed smoothly. The tandem of the power unit and gearbox provides a confident ride. Fans of active drive can also count on a light “light”, but in dynamic mode there are short pauses with a sharp blow to the gas pedal.

Running Toyota Camry has a MacPherson strut for the front and a multi-link rear suspension. Chassis settings are aimed at achieving total comfort. The car literally “floats” over small and medium bumps, while the cabin is quiet. Deeper holes shake the riders a little, but nothing more. Restyling has made a number of changes to individual chassis units, so the smoothness of the Toyota Camry is excellent.

The handling of the model is decent, there are rolls, but drifts in corners are minimal. The steering has retained a certain sharpness, although the information content at speed is far from the highest. But turning the steering wheel is easy, especially thanks to the successful settings of the electric booster. The only remark was that it is not very convenient to turn the wheels from one extreme point to another, since you need to make a little more than three full turns of the steering wheel. The brakes are reliable, the car slows down smoothly and without pecking with its nose from any speed.

A test drive of review models allows you to answer which car is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry. The excitement of the engine and the knockdown of the Mazda chassis provide an active and even aggressive ride. At the same time, comfort suffered a little. The soundproofing of the wheel arches also reminded of itself with the rustle of tires in the cabin. Toyota Camry turned out to be restrained and soft, with a supply of "horses" under the hood. If we take into account that these cars are initially focused on business representatives, then the advantages of Toyota at this stage of the comparison are obvious. The improved handling and outstanding dynamics of the "six" pales against the background of the reference smoothness and improved protection of the floor, doors and arches from external noise in the Toyota Camry. A business car should be imposing, quiet and solid, and also have the ability to confidently accelerate. Toyota engineers coped with this task to the fullest. Mazda 6 is able to surprise with its accelerating dynamics and sharp steering, but the comfort in this car turned out to be noticeably less against the background of a solid competitor.

Cabin and trunk capacity

Mazda 6

In the front row of seats there is enough space in width and height. Even the powerful and wide central tunnel does not constrain the widely spaced feet of riders. Low landing in the chairs allows you to feel quite free, there is a supply of space above your head. The driver will need a minimum of time to adjust the seat for complete seating comfort and comfortable interaction with the pedal assembly. The departure of the lower pillow does an excellent job of supporting the legs, and the back literally merges with the back of the chair.

In the back row of the Mazda 6, the width of the place is quite enough for three passengers. It turns out a little tight, but acceptable. The angle of the backrest and the sofa cushion itself leaves a little “air” above the head of tall people, but the margin is scanty. The sloping roof in this case makes itself felt, although with an average height, the rear passengers have no problems. The wheelbase allows us to say that the inhabitants of the sofa will not rest their knees on the backs of the front seats.

The trunk in the sedan is a standard solution for this class. The loading opening is wide, it is also worth highlighting a sufficient height. Lid hinges partially take up useful space, but there were no significant problems when loading tall boxes. For everyday use, such indicators of the capacity of the luggage compartment are quite enough.

Toyota Camry

The front row of seats provides an acceptable margin of space in width and height. There is not the slightest hint of tightness in the shoulders, the width of the tunnel noticeably separates the front seats. For tall drivers, there will not be so much headroom, but the seat lowered as far as possible solves the problem. It is convenient to reach the pedals with any cushion and backrest settings thanks to the excellent ergonomics of the pedal assembly.

Three passengers are comfortably seated in the back row. It is noteworthy that the margin is sufficient in height, even riders with growth above average do not rest against the ceiling. Such an indicator became available thanks to a relatively flat roof and a well-chosen backrest. There is enough legroom, an impressive wheelbase allows you not to prop up the front row of seats with your knees.

The trunk of the Toyota Camry has sufficient depth, the overall capacity in the class is average. The loading opening of the sedan is acceptable in width and height. Without significant difficulties, it is possible to place bulky luggage in the form of boxes or other equipment.

Economy

Safety

Both cars demonstrated a high level of protection for their passengers. To answer the question of which is better, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry, let's take a look at the crash test results. Mazda 6 according to the European Euro NCAP system received the maximum rating of 5 out of 5 possible stars. Toyota Camry was not tested by EuroNCAP, but the car took part in a series of crash tests NHTSA (American National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). American tests revealed shortcomings, which provided Toyota with only four stars. It may seem that the Toyota Camry is much inferior to the Mazda 6 in terms of safety, but it is worth considering separately the increased demands of American tests for certain points compared to those in the EuroNCAP system. We will allow ourselves to put these machines on one level.

Model cost

  • The price of a review Mazda 6 in the maximum configuration without mileage: about 36,700 US dollars.
  • The price of a review Toyota Camry in the maximum configuration without mileage: about 38,000 US dollars.

Comparison results

Mazda 6

Advantages:

  • Stylish and sporty appearance;
  • Acceleration dynamics and steering;
  • Economical power unit;
  • Unusual design solutions in the interior;

Flaws:

  • Insufficient soundproofing of wheel arches;
  • Doubtful wear resistance of interior trim materials;
  • Rigidity of the suspension on large irregularities;
  • Weak paintwork and the rapid appearance of scratches in some places;

Toyota Camry

Advantages:

  • Soft and smooth suspension operation;
  • Significantly improved sound insulation;
  • Well-chosen bunch of motor and box;
  • Solid interior trim materials;

Flaws:

  • Lack of steering sharpness;
  • Too simple design in interior design;
  • Relatively high fuel consumption;
  • Slightly overpriced model;

Next, we will try to answer another important question: what is more expensive to maintain, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? If you turn to official sources and analyze the cost of maintenance at official dealerships, then Toyota's scheduled maintenance is a little cheaper compared to Mazda. This statement is true for the cost of a standard hour of work and the price of basic consumables, as well as technical fluids. If we talk about more serious repairs and the purchase of original spare parts, then the Toyota Camry turns out to be a little more expensive (10-15%) for a number of common items.

Now let's sum up and choose the winner. In terms of the combination of preferred qualities, the Toyota Camry leads by a small margin. Among the main arguments in favor of such a choice, it is worth noting the settings of the chassis of the car, a fairly powerful power unit and silence in the cabin. Such advantages in the process of daily operation come to the fore in comparison with the striking exterior and handling of the Mazda 6.

For many years, well-known models of the Japanese automobile industry, Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry, have been seriously competing. And there is a reason! Both cars look not only prestigious and expensive, but also have outstanding technical characteristics and a comfortable ride. In this regard, many people have a question: "Mazda 6" or "Toyota": what to choose?

I would like to note that the cars themselves are quite different. Therefore, it is not easy to determine which of the machines is the best. To do this, we will analyze various factors: the technical characteristics of the machines, the cost of their spare parts, resistance to operation, appearance, user ratings according to criteria, and much more. It is possible that after a detailed analysis you will decide for yourself which is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry?

The comparison of the two cars will take place in their maximum configurations with the most top-end feature set.

Appearance "Mazda 6"

The updated "Mazda 6" began to look even better than the previous version. The last changes in the appearance of the car took place in 2014.

Manufacturers have made changes to the exterior of the car. The Japanese have modified the radiator grille. They added one rib to her and made them all in the same style. Now only the corporate logo of the car remained chrome-plated there, which stands out favorably against the general background of the car.

The manufacturer has also made changes to the appearance of the bumper. Thanks to this, the shape of the car has become even more streamlined and sporty. In addition, the Mazda 6 has changed taillights: they have become more elongated. Plus, they have changed the pattern.

The length and width of the car itself has slightly increased, due to which the look of the Mazda 6 has become even more powerful and menacing. It is worth noting that this car has become a representative of the third generation of this brand.

The new model "Mazda 6" outwardly began to resemble a sports car even more. Which, of course, significantly reduced the demand from serious businessmen. "Mazda 6" is the choice of brave, active guys who love life in all its manifestations.

"Toyota Camry"

In 2017, the updated Toyota Camry appeared on the Russian market. I would like to note that despite all the changes, its price has remained the same. Updates "Toyota" also touched the bumper, optics and grille.

Especially bright on the car began to stand out LED fog lights. The manufacturer focused on them and now they look favorably on the car body. And at the bottom of the car, a jet-black grille stands out brightly.

The headlights at the rear of the car have become larger, and a silver strip conditionally divides them into 2 parts. In general, I would like to note that the appearance of the car has become even more serious and presentable. Unlike Mazda 6, Toyota will be happy to be operated by middle-aged and older businessmen who value the comfort and prestige of a car.

Car interior: "Mazda 6"

Salon car "Mazda 6" is made at a very high level. Inside the car you feel like a king. There are smooth lines in combination with sharp corners. The main color in the cabin is black, which favorably sets off the gray upholstery of seats, doors and dashboard. This successful combination demonstrates the good taste of the manufacturer. Beautiful and expensive fabric at the steering wheel cover. It does not slip in the hands and is very pleasant to the touch.

In the center of the dashboard, we see a navigation and multimedia screen, thanks to which you can not only conveniently drive along the route, but also watch movies and cartoons on the road.

I would like to dwell on the capacity of the cabin and trunk. It is very comfortable to be inside the car. Pleased with soft comfortable chairs. But in the back, only 2 people can fit comfortably on the sofa, but purely theoretically, three people can sit there. In this regard, the interior of Toyota, of course, is more spacious.

The trunk capacity of the Mazda 6 is 480 liters. There is quite enough space for things here, but the hinges on which the lid is attached slightly “eat up” the space at the inner compartment. Despite this, you can safely load even a high load into the trunk of the Mazda 6.

"Toyota Camry" - salon

Inside the Toyota Camry, everything is also very decent. Black predominates here, but unlike the Mazda 6, the Camry's cabin has a small twist: some parts can boast wood-like trim. As far as this is a good decision, everyone decides for himself. But this detail is definitely very unusual and memorable. On the dashboard, like the Mazda 6, a multimedia screen reigns, edged with a black frame. But the clarity and image quality in this car is much higher.

The steering wheel and seats of the car are also covered with a very high quality fabric. It is worth noting that the chair can be placed in six positions. If you're a passenger and you're driving long distances, you'll likely find a seating position that makes you feel most comfortable.

Even three people will feel great in the rear seats. Enough space in the back seat and for the legs of passengers.

To understand which is better: Mazda or Toyota, it is worth comparing cars in operation. To do this, it is very important to compare the driving characteristics of the two cars.

Operation "Toyota Camry"

Let's start with Toyota. When accelerating, the car does not immediately rush into battle, but accelerates smoothly and leisurely. Toyota Camry is equipped with a six-speed automatic transmission. Its consumption in the city is about 13-15 liters, which is quite a lot. Unfortunately, it can hardly be called economical.

The handling of the Toyota Camry is not ideal either. The car reacts belatedly to steering movements, which can confuse an inexperienced driver a little.

Despite this, the car is comfortable in motion. Its ride is quite smooth, even if the driver accelerates strongly. There is no jerking or jerking while driving. It is also not scary to drive a car on uneven Russian roads. They will not shake you like in a bank. And the car simply ignores small asphalt potholes, thanks to the soft suspension.

Mazda 6 on the road

Mazda, like a true sports car, accelerates much faster than Toyota. You just start her, and she will already be eager to fight. This warhorse also has much more economical fuel consumption: only about 9 liters for about a hundred-kilometer distance. In comparison with the Toyota Camry, it "eats" less than one and a half times.

But not too good for a car with soundproofing. Therefore, this should be taken into account when traveling by car over long distances. After many kilometers, both the driver and the passenger can get tired of the sounds from the street and the roar of the engine. In addition, the car also has a rather stiff suspension, which gives it better maneuverability, but you will feel all the pits and bumps on yourself.

Of course, to understand which car is more reliable: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry, only those who have used two cars and tested them for strength for a long time can honestly say. But this question cannot be answered unambiguously. Yet these machines are used for different purposes.

Driving performance

I would like to talk a little about numbers. If much has been said above in words, now we will compare the driving characteristics of Mazda and Toyota using specific examples to make the picture a little clearer.

  1. Overclocking He has "Mazda" is much faster than the opponent. This car accelerates to 100 kilometers per hour in just 7.8 seconds, while Toyota takes as much as 9 seconds.
  2. Maximum speed. "Mazda 6", as almost a sports car, reaches a speed level of up to 223 kilometers per hour. The Toyota Camry is slow. Its maximum is only 210 kilometers per hour.
  3. Engine power. Mazda 6 is more powerful. It boasts 192 horsepower. The Toyota Camry has only 180 hp. With.

I would like to note that at this stage, in the question of which is better: "Mazda" or "Toyota" - the first car won an undoubted victory. It is more powerful, picks up more top speed and accelerates much faster.

Specifications

Let's move on to the technical specifications and clearly show the comparison of the two cars.

Let's start with Mazda 6:

  • body - sedan;
  • engine capacity - 2488 cubic centimeters;
  • front-wheel drive;
  • fuel - 95 gasoline;
  • fuel consumption - about 8.7 liters in the city, 6.5 liters - outside the city;
  • car width - 184 centimeters;
  • length - 487 cm;
  • height - 145 cm;
  • tire size - 45 radius 19;
  • ground clearance - 16.5 centimeters;
  • car weight - 1978 kg;
  • tank volume - 62 liters.

Well, now let's consider the same characteristics using the Toyota Camry as an example:

  • body - sedan;
  • engine capacity - 2493 cubic centimeters;
  • front-wheel drive;
  • 95 gasoline;
  • car width - 182.5 centimeters;
  • car length - 487 cm;
  • height - 148 cm;
  • Weight - 2160 kg;
  • tire size - 60 radius 16;
  • ground clearance - 16 cm;
  • tank volume - 70 liters.

Comparison of cars by the cost of spare parts

The time has come to compare the cost of auto parts for the car models in question. Let's start with Toyota. After analyzing the prices in several online stores, it becomes clear that in the event of a breakdown or replacement of a part, you will have to pay a lot.

Only one dipped-color lamp will cost the owner 930 rubles, and the left and right headlights for a car cost about 32,000 rubles. A spark plug, which avid car enthusiasts often change as needed and without which the car may simply not drive, in Toyota costs about 650 rubles or more. And the prices for such filters as oil, cabin, air and not only start from 330 rubles and up to 1800 rubles.

The original battery, which often breaks down in the winter, for Toyota will cost you about 7,700 - 8,000 rubles. And in the event of a brake breakdown, you will have to pay not only a significant amount for car service services, but also about 3,500 rubles for brake pads.

Thus, I would like to conclude that any breakdown, even a very minor one, on this car will cost you quite a lot. This is because auto parts for Toyota Camry are not a budget option. What about a competitor?

However, the prices for Mazda 6 parts turned out to be about the same. The brake pads of the car cost, like the Toyota Camry, about 3,500 rubles. A spark plug is more expensive than in Toyota - about 980 rubles. Filters in Mazda 6 cost from 550 rubles for an oil filter and above. Thus, I would like to conclude that spare parts for Mazda 6 cost either about the same or a little more.

Maintenance cost

When choosing a car, every driver wants to know how expensive it is to maintain this car. If we compare Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry, then according to a user survey, the second model comes out slightly cheaper. But this is data that is taken into account when servicing them at official dealerships for scheduled maintenance.

In case of a serious breakdown, the cost of repairs is still higher for Toyota, auto parts are expensive, given the price of the most sought-after parts.

Ratings

Based on numerous reviews on a 10-point scale, users rated the appearance of the Mazda 6 at 9.1, the interior at 8.7, the engine also at 8.7 and the chassis at 8.5. The average score in the ratings of "Mazda 6" came out at 8.7.

The surveyed users of Toyota Camry were much larger - about 35,765 people. They rated the exterior at only 8.5, the interior at 8.4. It is worth noting that it was the aesthetic part of the Toyota Camry that received average ratings much lower than the Mazda 6. But drivers rated the engine of the first car at 8.8, and the chassis at 8.7. Thus, the rating of Toyota Camry won on the technical side, but the overall score was slightly lower - 8.6.

It's time to take stock and remind readers of the best and worst moments in these two cars.

"Mazda 6": pros and cons

Auto benefits:

  • improved sporty look;
  • nice modernized interior;
  • fast acceleration;
  • fuel efficiency;
  • good handling.

Flaws:

  • expensive spare parts;
  • poor sound insulation;
  • rigid suspension.

Toyota: advantages and disadvantages

Pros and cons of "Toyota" below. So the benefits:

  • comfortable ride;
  • soft suspension;
  • high-quality interior finish;
  • spacious salon;
  • high quality multimedia.
  • not very good handling;
  • high fuel consumption;
  • long acceleration.

Outcome

Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 are two completely different cars. Each of them has its own target audience. And their cost is not quite budgetary, that is, not all motorists can afford them.

Having learned about cars in theory, it is impossible to decide which is better: Mazda or Toyota. Indeed, for the right choice, you must see the car, sit in it, drive, feel it in motion on different roads. On business trips, meeting an important boss or mother-in-law from the airport, you will definitely feel more confident and comfortable in the Toyota Camry.

However, if you want to enjoy the speed, feel like a real drifter, drive through the night streets of the city, feel free to choose Mazda 6.

However, in general, the comparison between Mazda and Toyota is not entirely correct. Both cars are good.

In the class of mid-size sedans, there is no smell of democracy. Monarchy in its purest form! Everything is like in a textbook: a form of government in which all power is concentrated in one hand and is inherited. Yes, this is the story of the Camry! Each of its generations dominated our market - in other years, all competitors taken together fell short of the Camry in terms of sales. Therefore, special attention is paid to the new generation car (factory index XV70).

How about a comparison with the Kia Optima, which smashed the old Camry (XV50) to smithereens in a recent comparison test (SR, #12, 2017)? Since Toyota paid attention to handling, comparison with the reference Mazda 6 for this part suggests itself. The third sparring partner was the Ford Mondeo sedan, a recognized favorite of corporate parks. It is the only one with a turbo engine. The rest of the cars have aspirated 2.4–2.5 liters at their disposal. Power range 181-199 hp I declare the fight for the throne open!

Toyota Camry

Came to Russia last spring - serial production at the plant in Shushary was launched in April. The machine is built on a new platform. As before, there is only one body option - a sedan.

ENGINES:
gasoline:
2.0 (150 hp) - from 1,399,000 rubles.
2.5 (181 hp) - from 1,623,000 rubles.
3.5 (249 hp) - from 2,166,000 rubles.

Ford Mondeo

The representative of the fourth generation entered the Russian market in 2015. Assembly - in the Leningrad region. Among the cars of past generations, we offered hatchbacks and station wagons, from this generation - only sedans.

ENGINES:
gasoline:
2.5 (149 hp) - from 1,385,000 rubles.
2.0 (199 hp) - from 1,799,000 rubles.
2.0 (240 hp) - from 2,070,000 rubles.

Kia Optima

The world premiere took place in 2015, but Optima reached us only a year later - but in a localized version. For the first time, a turbo engine was proposed, but the station wagon version is not available with us.

ENGINES:
gasoline:
2.0 (150 hp) - from 1,209,900 rubles.
2.4 (188 hp) - from 1,529,900 rubles.
2.0 turbo (245 hp) - from 1,879,900 rubles.

The current generation debuted in 2012. During this time, the Japanese carried out two restyling, but the “six” has not yet reached us after the last update.

ENGINES:
gasoline:
2.0 (150 hp) - from 1,336,000 rubles.
2.5 (192 hp) - from 1,509,000 rubles.

Throne room

Why did you love the past generation Camry? For the feeling of extra space! There is so much space behind that you can not envy the executive S-class too much - of course, adjusted for the trim level. The XV70's body is 25mm lower than the XV50's, but the Toyota's roominess is still just fine, except that the feet are a little cramped - provided the front seats are in the down position. Space enough with a margin in all directions. Even the roof does not press - it's not without reason that the Japanese installed seat cushions 30 mm closer to the floor. It is especially good for the right rider: he can move the front seat away from himself with a servo drive, freeing up additional space, like a real VIP passenger.



When it comes to services, the Camry is head and shoulders above the competition. Only it allows you to adjust (by means of an electric drive!) The angle of the backrest, adjust the "weather" (only Toyota offers three-zone climate control), control the audio system - the remote control from all this economy was attached to the armrest.

Against this background, seat heating, window blinds and two USB connectors are perceived as something natural.

In Optima, you will not find such "luxuries" - there is only heating, side curtains and a socket for a flash drive. But in some ways, the Optima even wiped the nose of the Camry. Firstly, the Kia is a little more spacious in the shoulders, and our measurements confirm the subjective impressions. Secondly, the seat profile is the most comfortable in the quartet. Finally, it is more convenient to sit in a Korean sedan - the doors open at a larger angle. So for the second row of seats, these two cars were given equally high marks.




The Mondeo has the longest wheelbase in a quartet, but that doesn't mean anything. The stock of space for the knees is surprisingly modest - as if you are sitting in the Focus, and not in a solid, almost five-meter sedan. And if three of us drive behind, then the heads of the extreme riders touch the racks - this was not the case in other cars. And the stuffing of the seats is too dense - you need to be softer with the passengers, softer! But Mondeo also has strengths: not only a 12-volt outlet is available, but also a high-voltage one. Competitors also do not have convenient punching slots in door pockets, tailored as if specifically for a tablet.

In the second row of the Mazda, too, you can’t clear up: the legroom is back to back, there are no media connectors, and only a half-liter bottle enters the door pockets. But the central passenger is comfortable here - he does not sit on a hard hump, but on a soft ottoman. C Mondeo - parity. But, as they say, not a single expanse!



Mazda is noisy. Moreover, it is not easy to identify the dominant: the rumble of tires, the whistle of a headwind are heard equally well. On acceleration, the growl of the motor shuts them up. The ride quality also leaves much to be desired. Mazda does not notice small potholes shod in 19‑inch tires, but it shakes pretty much on bumps with a larger caliber. And if your region has mediocre roads, then you won’t be able to move in relaxation style. Dignitary passengers are unlikely to like this. So in this discipline Mazda is an outsider.

The dense chassis of the Mondeo resiliently and silently fulfills potholes, except that the buildup on the waves could be smaller. If the passenger is used to working with a laptop or tablet, it will be hard. The Optima's suspension does not like bumps with sharp edges, but otherwise does its job perfectly. But the mass is spoiled by unexpectedly strong road noise. On the rough pavement in the cabin there is such a buzz that talking on the phone without raising your voice will not work - the Ford is noticeably quieter.




Well, Toyota surprised me. Thanks to additional mats on the floor and in the engine compartment, it is very quiet in it. Is that after a hundred you can hear the wind entangled in the mirrors. And here's what's amazing: Camry was already known as the standard of smoothness, but it has become even better! Pits, potholes, rough patches, it passes completely unnoticed by the crew. No knocks, no shaking. But we still could not give the highest rating - the energy intensity of the suspension failed. On the missed "speed bump" it still struck. We took a ride here on the Mondeo and Optima - the running gear worked flawlessly. To be fair, the "policeman" was unformatted, and we were driving too fast.

Crusade

The Camry has always been criticized for its conservative interior. A huge old-fashioned steering wheel, ridiculous electronic clock, absurdly large buttons and an abundance of "plastic wood" turned away the young advanced clientele from the sedan. Finally, the Japanese plucked up courage and stepped on the throat of their own song.

The new Camry interior is a revolution. The atmosphere of bureaucracy and stylistic asceticism is rejected. The salon is executed in an avant-garde key. The center console deployed to the driver, whimsically curved decorative overlays. The compact steering wheel is electrically adjustable over a wider range than before. Progress, as they say, is evident. It's a pity that there is still no happy smile on this face - the primitive graphics of the displays upset (gentlemen from Toyota, look at the screens of competitors! It will immediately become clear what's what). And why is there only one USB port? After all, 2018 is just around the corner. Finally, we lack the range of vertical movement of the driver's seat - we want to "land" another centimeter or two. But these are all quibbles. Like it or not, the Toyota interior creates a sea of ​​​​positive.






The unequivocal leader in driver seat comfort is the Mondeo. A little harsh, with a well-adjusted profile and distinct lateral support. Moreover, its degree can be adjusted. Which competitor offers this? Nobody! The massage function is also exclusive. Too bad it's cramped in the driver's seat. A massive steering wheel, an impressive center console and an overhanging front panel give rise to claustrophobia - it is clearly out of place in a large sedan. In addition, Mondeo has the worst visibility in the quartet. The driver can not even see the middle of the hood, the side mirrors shamelessly distort reality, and swing wipers leave solid uncleaned sectors. As a result, in my yard, I took a long time to take a free place (I hope the neighbors didn’t laugh), until I thought of using the parking assistant. The electronics did everything themselves.

There is no negative on the left front seat of Optima. At all. The steering wheel cut along the lower chord lies pleasantly in the hands, the logic and interface of the head unit of the multimedia system are transparent, and the seat with increased lateral support (we have the GT Line version) firmly holds the body. And I perfectly understand the Koreans, who, updating the Optima, limited themselves to only touches. The refreshed car will arrive in Russia in the fall.





The restyled “six” is about to appear with us, and its interior has been updated much more seriously. There was every reason for that. Don't misunderstand me: the current car is well built and has a nice design, but the little things still show age. The screen of the multimedia system is too compact, the seats are unprepossessing and do not offer ventilation. All these mistakes on the updated "six" will be corrected. And Mazda also “edited” the chassis, making it more comfortable. I don't even know if I should be happy. Did amazing handling get lost in the course of alterations? I would not want to, because the “six” of the 2017 model for a person with gasoline in his blood is a real outlet. Reinforced concrete stability on a straight line, sensitive steering, amazing stability and accommodating in turns - a delight for a fan of active driving. And the dynamics are good: right off the bat, Mazda confidently breaks away from Toyota and Kia. The ardor is especially noticeable in the sports mode of the machine - fire!




The handling of the Mondeo is also fighting, it flutters easily and effortlessly through turns. The steering wheel is filled with a tight effort, the reactions are precise and understandable. And how cool the rear suspension plays along! On a winding road, driving a Ford is very interesting. And yet, for the handling of the Mondeo, we rated it lower than the Mazda - the buildup on a gentle wave is too noticeable, nervousness is felt in the ruts.

The “blue oval” has the most powerful and torque motor in the quartet, but this does not give much advantage: the “six” is no less dynamic. At the same time, the Mondeo is the most voracious in the test: for a hundred “versts” it requires an average of 12 liters of gasoline, while rivals drink a liter and a half less.






Against the background of opponents, the Optima's handling is insipid and average. No, the car does not "stupid", but it does not charge, like Mazda or Ford. Just rides without spark and excitement. For a leisurely ride, the motor is enough, but it’s worth giving up all the money, as the delays of the machine come out - after the apex of acceleration you wait for ages. Nothing will change even the choice of a sport mode in the Drive Mode system. The machine will become more agile only by an iota, and the steering wheel will become slightly heavier at “zero” - and nothing more. You expect more from a car with a GT Line nameplate.

Toyota? She broke all patterns! Numerous Camrys of different years, on which I had a chance to ride, were absolute “vegetables”: an empty steering wheel, flabby suspensions ... Now everything is different: the rolls have noticeably decreased, the buildup has disappeared when driving with oncoming trucks, and understeer was almost managed to be defeated - there are more Camry turns you don't have to pull it by the collar. The steering wheel has found a solid reactive connection. Previously, it was not only lacking, but not at all! Now the responses are accurate and fast. The 2.5 motor is the same, but the upgraded machine works more quickly, smoothly, somehow “seamlessly”. Toyota became interesting to drive!






The results of the test will upset Mazda fans. The beauty does not turn around to its fullest due to poor sound insulation, modest ride, cramped interior and trunk. But if you crave first-class handling, you won't find anything better than the "six" in this segment.

Ford's chances of succession to the throne are also small. Mondeo brings a simple interior, bad visibility and cramped back row. And for the target audience, this is more important than incendiary handling and a comfortable driver's seat.

Second place for Kia. Optima has an airy and ergonomic interior, a decent ride and the most affordable price. And the cost of ownership is low: our corresponding composite CAR-INDEX is 14.01 rubles / km - the most attractive in the quartet. To take the car up a notch, it would be good for the Koreans to work on soundproofing and add controllability to the spark.

And what about our crowned lady? Your Majesty, the dynasty's reign is not in danger. The traditional trump cards - incomparable smoothness, spaciousness and silence in the cabin - were added by an interesting design, progressive equipment that competitors do not offer, and cool handling. The transfer of the throne to the heiress was successful. Long live the Camry, long live the queen!

Kar-index takes into account operating costs for a mileage of 70,000 km: registration and technical inspection fees, transport tax, costs for OSAGO, fuel and scheduled maintenance, as well as losses during the resale of the car.

TOYOTA CAMRY KIA OPTIMA MAZDA 6 FORD MONDEO
16,55 14,01 14,04 16,38

MANUFACTURERS DATA

FORD MONDEO

KIA OPTIMA

MAZDA 6

TOYOTA CAMRY

Curb / gross weight

1475 / 2210 kg

1575 / 2050 kg

1410 / 2000 kg

1625 / 2030 kg

Acceleration time 0–100 km/h

8.7 s

9.1 s

7.8 s

9.9 s

Max Speed

218 km/h

210 km/h

223 km/h

210 km/h

Turning radius

5.7 m

5.45 m

5.6 m

5.8 m

Fuel / fuel reserve

AI-95 / 62.5 l

AI-92, AI-95 / 70 l

AI-95 / 62 l

AI-92, AI-95 / 60 l

Fuel consumption: urban/extra-urban/combined

11.6 / 6.0 / 8.0 l / 100 km

12.0 / 6.2 / 8.3 l / 100 km

8.5 / 5.1 / 6.4 l / 100 km

11.5 / 6.4 / 8.3 l / 100 km

CO₂ emissions

187 g/km

194 g/km

149 g/km

187 g/km

ENGINE

Type

petrol

petrol

petrol

petrol

Location

front, transverse

front, transverse

front, transverse

front, transverse

Configuration / number of valves

R4 / 16

R4 / 16

R4 / 16

R4 / 16

Working volume

1999 cm³

2359 cm³

2488 cm³

2494 cm³

Compression ratio

10,0

11,3

13,0

10,4

Power

146 kW/199 hp at 5300 rpm

138 kW/188 hp at 6000 rpm

141 kW/192 hp at 5700 rpm

133 kW/181 hp at 6000 rpm

Torque

345 Nm at 2700-3500 rpm

241 Nm at 4000 rpm

256 Nm at 3250 rpm

231 Nm at 4100 rpm

TRANSMISSION

type of drive

front

front

front

front

Transmission

Gear ratios:
I / II / III / IV / V / VI / z.h.

4,58 / 2,96 / 1,91 / 1,45 / 1,00 / 0,75 / 2,94

4,21 / 2,64 / 1,80 / 1,39 / 1,00 / 0,77 / 3,39

3,55 / 2,02 / 1,45 / 1,00 / 0,71 / 0,60 / 3,89

3,30 / 1,90 / 1,42 / 1,00 / 0,71 / 0,61 / 4,15

main gear

3,21

2,89

4,06

3,82

CHASSIS

Suspension: front / rear

McPherson / multi-link

McPherson / multi-link

McPherson / multi-link

McPherson / multi-link

Steering

rack, with EUR

rack, with EUR

rack, with EUR

rack, with EUR

Brakes: front / rear

disc, ventilated / disc

disc, ventilated / disc

disc, ventilated / disc

Tires

235/50 R17

235/45 R18

225/45 R19

235/45 R18

SERVICE IN FIGURES

Frequency of maintenance

Guarantee

Dealers (STOA)

FORD MONDEO

15,000 km or 12 months

3 years or 100,000 km

KIA OPTIMA

15,000 km or 12 months

5 years or 150,000 km

MAZDA 6

15,000 km or 12 months

3 years or 100,000 km

TOYOTA CAMRY

10,000 km or 12 months

3 years or 100,000 km

EXPERT ASSESSMENT OF CARS


Ventilated front seats, power passenger seat, cornering headlights, hill start assist, full-size alloy wheel spare, Supervision color instrument panel, 17-inch alloy wheels.

FORD MONDEO

KIA OPTIMA

MAZDA 6

TOYOTA CAMRY

Driver's workplace

Ford's driver's seat delights with a verified profile, an abundance of adjustments and the presence of a massage function. The most uncomfortable "chair" is Mazda's. All four cars have controls without obvious punctures. The worst visibility is at Mondeo, the leaders in this part are Camry and Optima.

10

9

8

9

Governing bodies

8

8

8

8

7

9

8

9

Salon

The most crowded in the Ford, both in the first and second row. Mazda's gallery is also not very spacious. The rear seats of Toyota and Kia are most hospitable. The most modest trunks are from the "Japanese". Moreover, we lowered the Camry rating not only for the volume, but also for the non-folding (for the car in the test configuration) back of the second row.

Front end

8

8

8

8

Rear end

8

9

8

9

Trunk

9

9

8

8

Driving performance

Leadership in accelerating dynamics belongs to Mazda and Ford - with a parallel start, they leave their opponents behind. The "six" received ten points for handling, active drivers will be delighted with its chassis. Ford and Toyota handle a little worse, and the Optima generally doesn't like pushy driving. The Camry has the best brakes.

Dynamics

9

8

9

8

8

8

8

9

Controllability

9

8

10

9

Comfort

Soundproofing is best done in the Mondeo and Camry. In Mazda, the engine hums especially strongly; in Optima, road noise dominates. In terms of smoothness, the “six” is lagging behind, the rest of the three are not afraid of broken roads. The Camry gets an extra point for three-zone climate control, which competitors don't even offer at extra cost.

9

8

7

9

Smooth running

9

9

8

9

8

8

8

9

Adaptation to Russia

In the test quartet there is not a single puzoterka - with their clearance in our country you can drive without problems. Kia and Toyota scored extra points for their extensive dealer network, as well as for the suitability of engines for AI‑92 gasoline. We penalized the Camry for the smallest service interval, and the Mondeo and the "six" - for the lack of a full-size spare tire.

Geometric patency

8

8

8

8

1739 000 rub.


Eight-speaker audio system, head-up display, power panoramic roof, power steering column, projector lighting with Geely logo, eight-way power seats, 18‑inch wheels.

1769 900 rub.


Heated steering wheel, windshield and washer nozzles, three-zone climate control with anti-allergic filter, eight-inch touch screen, start-stop system with regenerative braking function, ergoComfort driver's seat with adjustable angle and length of the cushion.

1797 000 rub.


Distance control system Front Assist, storage box under the front seat, flashlight in the trunk, ice scraper, digital clock in the back, 16‑inch wheels.

PULP FICTION

Maxim Gomyanin

Business-class sedans in our country are popular not only among buyers, but also among dishonest people. We used the data of insurance companies and the traffic police and found out which of our four models are the most stolen. The previous generation Toyota Camry (XV50 body) takes the first place by a wide margin. The model has been popular with hijackers for more than a year, and there is a strong feeling that the new product will follow in its footsteps. Mazda 6 also attracts criminals, although it lags behind the leader by a three-fold margin. Camry and the "six" are regularly included in the top 20 most stolen cars in the country. So, last year Camry took the third place in the overall standings, and the "six" - the twelfth. Ford Mondeo is an order of magnitude less attractive to car thieves, and Kia Optima owners can sleep peacefully at all. Among the reasons for the sad popularity of "Japanese women", experts note the high liquidity of Camry and Mazda 6 in the secondary market. It is not difficult to quickly realize the stolen goods, as well as to sell them for spare parts.

Theft statistics by year

2017

2016

2015

2014

Toyota Camry

Mazda 6

Ford Mondeo

Kia Optima




© 2023 globusks.ru - Car repair and maintenance for beginners