Tire manufacturers have long been on par with automakers in terms of the speed at which new models are brought to market. Even specialists cannot immediately orient themselves in new products, and even more so, it is difficult for ordinary motorists.
To facilitate this task, this review-rating of common summer tire models has been prepared. Let's make a reservation right away, if some models are not included in this rating, this does not mean that they are worse than those mentioned. The fact is that some tires have not yet received sufficient distribution in our country and because of this they cannot yet enter the rating.The main struggle for leadership unfolded between the traditional market leaders Continental, Nokian and Bridgestone. And if the first two brands were long-time competitors, now Bridgestone has demonstrated an improvement in the characteristics of its products, approaching the recognized market leaders.
This assessment of summer tires is carried out on a hundred-point scale. We will evaluate, first of all, driving performance, comfort, as well as technical characteristics and price. We deliberately left aside the design assessment because, firstly, this question is rather an amateur one, someone likes one tread pattern, others another. Secondly, the ten-year-old fashion is now gone, when everyone wanted either low-profile treads or with a pattern “like on racing cars”. Now everyone is interested in more practical questions: how it rides, how it slows down, how long it will last on our roads, etc.
12th place Premiorri Solazo V.
The only serious advantage of this model is the low price achieved due to production in Ukraine. This became possible thanks to a contract between Premieri and the Ukrainian plant Rosava.
Primiorri Solazo has been produced since 2010, at the same time deliveries to the Russian market began.
The car “shod” in Solazo does not give a feeling of comfort, the steering wheel is extremely light, there is absolutely no feedback from the steering wheel. In order to clearly control the lane, you have to make a lot of unnecessary movements and twist the steering wheel at large angles.
With sudden changes, the reaction to the steering wheel is delayed, control over handling is reduced, up to a complete loss. Braking is equally uncertain on dry and wet pavement.
The softness indicators are very good, any irregularities are extinguished, but at the same time the rumble from the tread is very noticeable. The rolling quality is not up to par, in neutral the speed begins to drop rapidly. But when driving on the primer give a feeling of confidence.
+ Pros: Smooth, soft move. Clear movement on the primer.
- Cons: Poor road holding. Loses control during sudden maneuvering. Increase fuel consumption. Noisy.
These tires should be looked at by supporters of measured driving, who often have to travel to unpaved surfaces.
SCORE: 80.6/100 POINTS
11th place Viatti Strada Asimmetrico V.
The beautiful Italian name did not help the Nizhnekamsk producers much, although if we take the combination of price / quality, Viatti certainly gives good results here.
Braking is frankly weak, on a dry surface it outperforms only Premieri and Cordiant, on wet it is a clear outsider, perhaps a little better than Yokahama. In terms of the level of communication with the steering wheel and information content, it is very similar to the Premieri, it also needs constant steering. Although at low speeds the lane changes are quite clear, especially at the beginning of the maneuver, although at the end there is still a slight skid. On wet pavement, when changing lanes, the demolition of the front of the car is felt, requiring a quick reaction from the steering wheel.
Comfort from "Viatti" is also very doubtful, pulsating noise is constantly heard, the slightest bumps in the road are transmitted to the body by vibration and shocks. With equal inflation, the rear wheels feel stiffer. Good rolling contributes to fuel economy. On a dirt road, they hold confidently.
+ Pros: Confident control of the machine on the primer.
- Cons: Unsatisfactory traction and poor maneuvering on any surface. Lack of sufficient comfort.
This model is suitable for moderate driving on good roads, and for unpaved surfaces.
SCORE: 83/100 POINTS
10th place Yokohama C.drive 2 V.
Despite the average test results, the model made in the Philippines is not offered at the average price, which certainly does not speak in its favor. Appeared on the Russian market since 2010.
The braking performance is almost identical to that of the Viatti, and on wet roads it is an absolute outsider in the rankings.
At high speeds, they clearly hold the road, but when maneuvering, there is not enough information content and taxiing is required. With sharp changes, there is clearly not enough angle of rotation, which is why you have to turn the steering wheel at large angles.
At top speeds, it gives a deep skid, which can be corrected by a driver with good response.
On a flat road, the tread makes moderate noise, which increases noticeably on rough pavement and on small bumps. Vibrations from small bumps are clearly transmitted to the body.
Yokohama tires showed the best results in terms of rolling, at any speed they give good fuel economy. On a dirt road, they demonstrate not confident behavior.
+ Pros: Due to the good rolling saves fuel at any speed. Good stability.
- Cons: Very poor braking on wet roads, poor handling during emergency maneuvers.
These tires will be appreciated by those for whom fuel economy is important.
SCORE: 83.9/100 POINTS
9th place Cordiant Sport 2 (PS-501) V.
The model is a domestic development, with a good price / quality ratio.
"Cordiant-Sport 2" first appeared on sale in 2010, then it was replaced in 2012 by a modernized version.
The tires showed the worst dry braking performance. The difference in stopping distance between the leader of the test and Cordiant was almost 6 meters. At the same time, on wet surfaces, the performance is noticeably better and can claim a satisfactory rating.
At high speeds, they confidently keep a straight line, but the information content is still not enough, moreover, there is a delay in reactions.
On a dry road, extreme maneuvering at medium speeds is possible; attempts to do it at a higher speed are also very difficult due to low information content and increased steering angles. When maneuvering on wet pavement, at the beginning, the front wheels slip outward, as if straightening the trajectory, because of this, you have to twist the steering wheel to the desired angle, which again is not just because of poor information content.
Tires dampen large bumps well, but at medium ones, they transmit shaking to the body. And with small cracks or roughness, they begin to make a distinct noise.
They roll poorly, which negatively affects fuel consumption. Driving on a primer with Cordiant-Sport 2 is a dubious pleasure.
+ Pros: Quite tolerable handling and directional stability on dry surfaces. Pretty comfortable ride.
- Cons: Very weak braking on dry pavement and heavy maneuvering on wet pavement. Increase fuel consumption.
Suitable for city driving, with trips to the suburbs.
SCORE: 85.7/100 POINTS
8th place Goodyear Efficient Grip V.
The French model did not receive a higher rating in the first place due to the high price.
This Goodyear model has been produced since 2009, it entered the Russian market in 2010.
Braking ratings are very good. Both on wet and dry pavement, the average performance among the tested tires was obtained.
At high speeds, the car "floats" slightly, alignment is difficult due to the lagging steering.
What definitely should not be done on these tires is sudden changes of lanes. On dry surfaces, you have to limit the speed due to a noticeable drift of the front wheels at the beginning of the maneuver and skidding of the rear at the end. On wet surfaces, the situation is a little better, but the picture is spoiled by large turning angles and sharp breaks into a skid when exiting it.
Tires have demonstrated the traditional Goodyear level of comfort, soft and quiet movement. "Eficient" help to save fuel, especially in suburban traffic cycle. Departure to the primer without special need is not recommended.
+ Pros: Excellent level of comfort, fuel economy during country trips.
- Cons: Course stability is below average, heavy handling during extreme maneuvers.
Goodear Eficent Grip is well suited for lovers of comfortable and economical driving.
SCORE: 87.1/100 POINTS
7th place Dunlop SP Sport 9000 W.
This Japanese model has already become a veteran in our tire market, but at the same time, it is still in great demand.
Braking performance on dry roads is below average, and even less on wet roads. Only Yokohama and Viatti have worse performance.
Holds up well at high speeds. The main distinguishing feature of the Dunlop SP Sport is a clear reaction to the steering wheel, it is very easy to correct the course. On a dry surface, sharp maneuvering can be carried out at medium speed. Instantly reacts to the steering wheel at the beginning of the maneuver, though then there is a slight demolition of the front end, with a simultaneous drop in the information content of the steering wheel. On wet roads, maneuverability is improved and emergency lane changes can be made at higher speeds. However, when the speed limit is exceeded, a slide off the course occurs, and simultaneously on both axles. After drifting or skidding, traction is quickly restored.
The level of driving comfort with Dunlop is low, the tread rustles distinctly, on rough pavement the noise increases noticeably. Any small bumps in the road are transferred to the body.
Tires showed good rolling. Provides reliable movement on the primer.
+ Pros: High directional stability at high speeds, excellent movement on the primer. Provide economical driving.
- Cons: Poor comfort level. Poor braking performance on wet pavement.
These tires are perfect for long trips on roads with a smooth and hard surface.
SCORE: 87.6/100 POINTS
6th place Hankook Ventus Prime 2 (K 115) V.
The Hungarian tires showed good results and it is fair to say that it is from their 6th place that the elite group of very good tires begins.
Tires are a novelty in the Russian market, the start of sales started in 2012.
Ventus Prime demonstrated excellent braking qualities, they showed themselves especially well on wet roads, on dry pavements a little weaker, but still very good.
They hold their course well at high speeds, however, there is a slight lack of information content for direction corrections. Another "sin" is the delay in the reaction to the steering wheel. On dry pavement, maneuvers at speeds above average are permissible. Light skids at the exit of the maneuver are leveled out quite simply. A wet road has practically no negative impact on the nature of management and the success of rebuilding.
The tires are quite noisy, when driving at speeds above 80 km / h, it feels like riding on all-terrain treads. Ventus Prime behaves harshly on any surfaces and increases fuel consumption at any speed. Indicators of movement on the primer are average.
+ Pros: Good braking on any surface. Demonstrates stable handling.
- Cons: Increases fuel consumption. Notes on noise comfort and directional stability.
Good tires for paved roads.
SCORE: 89.9/100 POINTS
5th place Toyo Praxes Т1 Sport W.
This Japanese manufacturer has repeatedly proved the success of its brand, which is invariably present in the tops of many tire ratings.
The model has been presented in Russia since the end of 2009.
Dry braking performance is average and above average on wet pavement.
Road holding at high speeds is good, tires give ease in course corrections and smoothness when changing lanes. Reactions on the steering wheel are clear, the turning angles are small. Wet coating practically does not change the characteristics, only a slightly faster reaction is required at the maximum skid.
Toyo Praxes are quite quiet tires, only when driving on rough asphalt they become a little louder. Small bumps in the road are given to the body by vibrations. The fuel consumption readings are average, with an increase in speeds, the consumption also increases. Movement on the primer is average.
+ Pros: Stable handling on dry and wet surfaces.
- Cons: Increased fuel consumption during out-of-town trips. Minor complaints about ride and noise.
Good tires for mixed highway / city operation.
SCORE: 91.5/100 POINTS
4th place Michelin Primacy HP V.
The German brand, as always, is on top and, despite the sufficient age of the model of about 8 years, is still in demand.
The model demonstrates excellent braking qualities, approximately like the previous rating model. The performance is slightly weaker than that of the "Toyo" in the wet and slightly better in the dry.
The tires hold the direction well, with course corrections provide adequate reactions.
On a dry road, it shows clear behavior with clear reactions. On wet surfaces, the performance drops slightly. If you avoid sudden steering movements, drift will be minimized.
When driving on a good road, extraneous noise is not emitted. Irregularities and road joints are reflected on the body with sharp shudders.
With moderate driving, they help save fuel. When driving on the highway, they give average efficiency indicators. The primer is moderately tolerated.
+ Pros: Stable control. Fuel economy.
- Cons: Minor complaints about ride and noise.
Suitable for urban and suburban use.
SCORE: 91.7/100 POINTS
3rd place Pirelli Cinturato R7 V.
An excellent Romanian model, slightly losing its last year's position in front of the newcomers, but still remaining on the podium. In addition, this is the best model in terms of price / quality ratio. Pirelli Chinturato has been sold in Russia since 2010.
Tires demonstrate excellent braking performance, especially on wet surfaces.
There are no complaints about directional stability at high speeds. They allow you to make maneuvers at high speeds, on dry roads they allow you to make a sharp change in lanes.
By the nature of driving and the absence of surprises, they resemble Michelin and Bridgestone. They demonstrate high speed on wet pavement, only half a kilometer was not enough to reach the record level of this test. The reactions on the steering wheel are very clear, if not for the sharp skids at the exit of the turn, there could be a maximum score.
Pirelli Chinturato are a bit noisy, they slap at the joints. Small irregularities are transmitted to the body. Regardless of the driving mode, they do not have a particular effect on fuel consumption or economy. Not very suitable for primers.
+ Pros: Good braking on any surface. Provide good controllability.
- Cons: High noise level, not very smooth running.
An excellent choice for dynamic drivers, as well as for frequent country trips.
SCORE: 91.9/100 POINTS
2nd place Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 V.
A fresh French model on the Russian market with a good price / quality ratio.
Record braking results on all types of asphalt. The difference in stopping distance between the outsider of the test "Cordiant" and "Conti Premium" was about 6 meters, with "Yokohama" more than 5 meters.
The tires allow you to perform extreme maneuvers at high speeds, the steering wheel gives clear and precise reactions. A characteristic feature of the "Continental" are large steering angles, which decrease with the heating of the tires.
Wet coverage does not adversely affect speed.
Tires have demonstrated excellent comfort, perfectly dampen bumps and noise from the road. They give a good combination of soft and at the same time elastic driving.
The rolling level is average, approximately comparable to the Pirelli. Not suitable for ground cover.
+ Pros: The best braking performance on any road, excellent comfort.
- Cons: Notes on handling during extreme driving on dry roads.
The average price in Russia is 4800 rubles.
The best tires in terms of braking performance.
SCORE: 93.5/100 POINTS
1st place Bridgestone Potenza S001V.
Deserved place of the Japanese model.
Demonstrates excellent braking on all types of asphalt. True, it slightly loses to the “Continental” in the dry, only a little, and in the wet, 1 meter.
"Bridgeson Potenza" shows good directional stability, the same as the "Dunlop". A characteristic feature of this model is a very clear response to course corrections. The absolute winner of the competition for extreme maneuvering speed, on dry and wet pavement. It should be noted a high degree of information content of the steering wheel, especially on wet roads.
Unfortunately, the comfort does not live up to the high level of driving performance. Irregularities and joints are given by noise, rustling is clearly audible on rough asphalt.
The rolling performance is the same as that of the Continental and Pirelli, there is no particular savings, but it does not add to fuel consumption either. Not very suitable for primers.
+ Pros: Very good braking. Clear course stability, high speed maneuvers.
- Cons: Tires are noisy and harsh.
Great for country driving, on quality paved roads. Will appeal to fans of extreme driving.
SCORE: 93.6/100 POINTS
Summer tires are divided into models designed for driving on paved road surfaces and off-road. Off-road tires have their own characteristics depending on the type of rough terrain. It could be:
dirt road (any dry earthen surface, after rains it becomes mud);
gravel road;
soil with grass and small shrubs;
mud cover;
sand cover.
Ground coating ("primer", soil, etc.)
Such a pavement can be described as any earthen pavement with a minimum presence of stones. After heavy rains, the dirt road sags and becomes muddy.
Features of tires suitable for unpaved surfaces:
presence of marking "M+S",
a significant negative profile (i.e. there are a large number of drainage channels with significant depth),
sharp edges of the tread blocks.
Can plain road tires be used? Yes, but only dry.
Suitable MICHELIN tires for use: .
Suitable tires for BFGoodrich: , .
gravel cover
("gravel road", rocky pavement, mountain roads without asphalt pavement, etc.)
This is a coating, which is based on stones of various sizes and shapes, fixed with sand or earth. Even after heavy rains, the "gravel road" remains a hard surface.
Features of tires suitable for gravel:
presence of marking "M+S",
high resistance to abrasive wear,
increased protection of the tread and sidewalls of the tire from cuts.
Can plain road tires be used? Limited, while it is worth being prepared for increased wear, as well as partial destruction of the tread.
Suitable MICHELIN tires: Latitude Tour HP, Latitude Cross.
Soil with grass and/or small shrubs
This surface is less stable than gravel, its density is low, and fresh vegetation prevents normal adhesion to the surface. The smallest rain will significantly complicate the passage of such an off-road section.
Features of tires suitable for soil:
presence of marking "M+S",
significant tread depth.
Can plain road tires be used? Very limited, if absolutely necessary.
Suitable tires for BFGoodrich: Urban Terrain, All Terrain KO2, Mud Terrain KM2.
mud cover
The most difficult coating to pass, is characterized by low stability of the top layer and will change its qualities depending on the amount of water. Dirt is able to "blur" the tread pattern (i.e., clog drainage channels), reducing its cross-country characteristics.
Features of tires suitable for mud:
presence of marking "M+S",
small tread blocks should be massive and strong,
maximum negative profile and significant tread depth,
increased protection of the tread and sidewall from any damage.
Can plain road tires be used? Not recommended due to low technical equipment.
Suitable tires MICHELIN: Latitude Cross.
Suitable tires for BFGoodrich: Urban Terrain, All Terrain KO2, Mud Terrain KM2.
sand cover
This coating is the most unstable of all of the above, especially insidious when dry. Requires not only special tires, but also certain driving skills!
Features of tires suitable for sandy pavement:
presence of marking "M+S",
significant negative profile,
a large number of independent tread blocks,
the ability of the tire structure to be used at particularly low pressure (about 0.5 bar), which allows the tread to fit an unstable coating on a maximum area with a minimum pressure in the contact patch, which allows you to work on sand.
Can plain road tires be used? Not recommended as the tire carcass is unable to withstand low pressure deformation.
Suitable tires for BFGoodrich: All Terrain KO2, Mud Terrain KM2.
In conclusion, it should be noted that in addition to special tires, active driving on the above surfaces also requires a specially prepared and equipped car, and sometimes special driving skills.
Attention! The inscription "M + S" stands for "MUD + SNOW" and translated from English means "DIRT + SNOW". Tires with this marking are designed to provide better traction in slush and fresh or melting snow than conventional road tires. Its presence on the sidewall indicates that the tread has a greater number of tread blocks and sipes than a summer tire, as well as a greater width and depth of drainage channels. This feature helps the tire to overcome snowy or muddy areas more effectively. However, this marking does not indicate a reliable level of grip in harsh winter conditions, such as on ice or snow, at low temperatures. The marking is voluntarily put by the tire manufacturer and does not have to be confirmed by tests. Therefore, the marking "M + S" is just an additional sign of the "off-road" tire.
There is very little time left before winter, so it's time for every motorist to think about winter tires. After all, it is on the type of rubber chosen with the onset of cold weather that not only the safety of the driver during icy conditions and heavy rainfall will depend, but also comfortable driving on domestic roads. Considering many important factors, we have compiled a rating of the best winter tires 2020 for Russian roads.
Before settling on any particular brand, you first need to figure out the type that is right for your situation.
There can be two varieties:
- Studded. Suitable for areas where the driver regularly needs to deal with ice and heavy rainfall in winter. The spikes on the tires are designed to cut into the road surface and thus allow the driver to avoid slipping. The disadvantage of such tires is that they greatly harm the asphalt.
- Friction or Velcro. They do not have studs, but are distinguished by a greater sipe of the tread blocks. Velcro grip on dry asphalt is worse than studded rubber.
Other selection criteria
There are some important tips that drivers should not forget:
- If a driver decides to give preference to all-season Russian R14 tires, instead of getting even inexpensive winter tires, he must understand that such a decision can be very risky. All-season tires harden faster because they are not made from the same flexible rubber as winter tires. Subsequently, "all-weather" badly adhere to the road surface, and it will be more difficult to drive on ice or snow.
- In order not to get confused when choosing, you need to pay attention to the designations that are on the side of the tire. They will help determine what weather conditions are optimal for a given type of tire.
- It is necessary to pay attention to the tests and reviews of experienced motorists, they conduct tests for rubber in various areas, including wet and dry pavement. The tests are characterized by measuring acceleration, fuel consumption and noise. The braking properties and comfort conditions for a certain type of tires are also determined.
winter roads
Before thinking about which company is better to choose tires for the winter season, you need to decide what type of road prevails in the area where the car is constantly located, for example, icy or snowy asphalt, slush or ordinary dry coverage.
If rubber is selected for a car that constantly drives in mild winter conditions in a city where road services work stably and well, then friction tires will come in handy, the ride will be more comfortable with them, and the road surface is safer.
But in the conditions of the northern winter, with poorly cleaned roads and frequent driving on unpaved and off-road surfaces, it is better to opt for studded tires, and of the best quality, because the safety and ease of use of the vehicle depend on this.
driving style
For drivers who prefer a quiet slow ride, friction tires are suitable, but for reckless drivers with an aggressive driving style, frequent abrupt starts and choosing high-speed modes, it is definitely better to take studded tires.
Experience
For beginners driving, it is better to look at studded tires, they are safer and will help to avoid many critical situations on the road. And for drivers who are confident in their professionalism with good driving experience, Velcro will be just right.
Size
After the type of tires you need is determined, you need to start choosing the size for your car and wheels. In order not to guess for a long time, you can use the recommendations of the manufacturers, they are usually displayed on the tires themselves next to the indices.
Indices
There are two indexes that you need to determine for yourself before buying winter tires.
- Speed index. For each type of tire, it is determined at the test drive stage and later marked on the rubber itself. This is the maximum allowable speed setting for safety and gentle operation. If, while driving, the speed is exceeded above the parameter value, there is a risk of an accident, as well as early wear and deformation of the tires.
The speed indices assigned to different types of rubber can be as follows:
- T (up to 190 km / h) - typical for studded tires.
All other indices are assigned, as a rule, to different types of Velcro:
- S - up to 180 km / h;
- R - up to 170 km / h;
- Q - up to 160 km / h;
- H - up to 210 km / h;
- V - up to 240 km / h;
- W - up to 270 km / h.
- Next to the first index, an index is usually indicated that determines the allowable load. It is calculated based on the indicator of the maximum possible weight of the car. For passenger cars, this indicator is not as important as for crossovers or SUVs.
By price
When all other selection criteria are determined, you can pay attention to the cost of the most suitable brand in all respects.
Sales statistics
According to the indicators of past years, it can be seen that motorists for the winter period largely prefer studded models - almost 75%. Velcro typically accounts for about a quarter of total sales each year.
average price
Popular models of winter tires can be divided into three classes according to pricing policy:
- Budget - inexpensive, with different functionality and quality level, can do within:
- R14 up to 2500 rubles;
- R15 up to 3000 rubles;
- R16 up to 4000 rubles;
- R17 up to 6000 rubles.
- Middle class. Here, the minimum cost starts from 3000 rubles and can reach up to 8000 rubles.
- Premium class - these are the most expensive and high-quality tires from well-known brands, the range of their pricing policy can be in the range of 4000-10000 rubles. influenced by the country and the popularity of the models of the manufacturer.
Video tips on how to make the right choice of winter tires:
Rating of quality winter tires
NOKIAN HAKKAPELIITTA R2 SUV
A new product from the Finnish manufacturer for SUVs and crossovers. In this model, good braking properties can be emphasized on almost any road surface. All the advantages of a similar product for cars are present, but other properties are noticeably improved. They are distinguished by a symmetrical tread with crystal particles in rubber, the number of sipes is increased, ideal for driving in any winter conditions.
How much does it cost - 10800 rubles.
NOKIAN HAKKAPELIITTA R2 SUV
Advantages:
- Good road holding;
- you can not be afraid of falling into a rut;
- confident braking on any type of asphalt;
- excellent handling;
- practically silent;
- quite soft;
- the sidewall is durable;
- reliability;
- long service life.
Flaws:
- There is a slight yaw on the asphalt;
- price;
- designed more for urban conditions.
Professional review of tires of this brand - in the video:
GOODYEAR ULTRA GRIP ICE 2
Considered ideal based on the ratio of the two parameters, an affordable price for good quality. Production - Poland. Excellent braking properties are noted for Velcro.
They have proven themselves on the world market as a reliable, wear-resistant and safe product. Upgraded technologies that have been successfully used in previous models and innovations have made GOODYEAR ULTRA GRIP ICE 2 tires in demand among motorists throughout Russia.
GOODYEAR ULTRA GRIP ICE 2
Price - 5600 rubles.
Video review of characteristics:
Advantages:
- Directional tread pattern;
- thoughtful arrangement of hybrid lamellas;
- excellent self-cleaning;
- optimized tread pressure;
- sure acceleration.
Flaws:
- Acoustic discomfort due to unevenness on the road surface;
- Side thickness.
Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ
One of the most popular models among domestic motorists, with above average quality at an affordable price. When creating, a modern rubber compound was used, as a result of which the rubber has a microporous structure that is able to break a thin water film, thereby increasing the grip of wheels on wet surfaces.
The unique pattern on the tread has an asymmetric structure. Due to the small grooves, excess water cannot reach the contact patch and thus the effect of hydroplaning is prevented, which means more safety when driving on wet roads.
The average price is 6500 rubles.
Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ
Advantages:
- Excellent traction and grip on wet roads;
- good directional stability in different driving modes, including high-speed and maneuvering;
- comfort with low noise and vibration;
- short braking distance, regardless of environmental conditions and the quality of the road surface;
- modest fuel consumption during high-speed driving.
Flaws:
- Low lateral grip on ice;
- weak braking on wet pavement.
Michelin Alpin 5
The novelty from the French brand is focused on use in regions with mild winters. The main emphasis is made to ensure increased driving safety, these tires are not suitable for riding on ice, but they will perform well on wet and snowy asphalt.
The Michelin A5 features a high directional tread pattern that helps create your trail in the snow and provides increased stability. The location of the lateral grooves in the shoulder areas contributes to the effective removal of water and reduces the risk of aquaplaning. And multiple sipes help improve traction in the snow.
The average price is up to 9000 rubles.
Michelin Alpin 5
Advantages:
- Good grip;
- Rubber compound with a high content of silicon-containing components, providing elasticity at low temperatures;
- The increased number of tread blocks provides excellent grip when driving on snowy roads;
Flaws:
- Not designed for driving on ice;
- noisy;
- Price.
Overview of winter tires Michelin Alpin 5 - in the video:
Michelin X-Ice Xi3
It is valued for the stability of indicators according to all criteria in any winter conditions. The manufacturing company is located in France and deservedly occupies a place among the leaders in the manufacture of car tires. This model is a novelty, which included a complex of innovative technologies. Manufacturers have managed to realize the concept of "Smart Spike" and have created a truly unique product.
The inner tread layer consists of a thermosetting rubber compound that can change elasticity under the influence of the environment. The removal of ice crumbs takes place according to the Ice Powder Remover technology, which is a system of 6 wells around each spike, which absorb the crumbs into themselves. The spike is designed in the form of a cylinder with a cone-shaped tip on a wide base, which provides a more secure fixation of the spike.
Price - up to 8500 rubles.
Michelin X-Ice Xi3
Advantages:
- Performed well on snowy pavement;
- Excellent handling;
- Braking performance at a high level;
- exchange rate stability;
- Comfort in operation;
- Good permeability;
- Quiet work.
Flaws:
- Coupling properties and directional stability on ice are still rather weak;
- Increased fuel consumption.
Professional assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of these tires - in the video:
Hankook W419 iPike RS
The manufacturer of these tires is one of the top companies in this area from South Korea. Tires of this model have a V-shaped directional symmetrical tread, it consists of three longitudinal rows, which provide directional stability and grip on winter road surfaces.
Also on the tread on each side are separate shoulder blocks, which are responsible for flotation on a snowy road. The rubber compound used in this model does not lose its elasticity even at fairly low temperatures; it contains silicon, which improves grip with asphalt.
The average price is up to 6000 rubles.
Hankook W419 iPike RS
Advantages:
- Excellent braking on any road surface;
- Good grip when driving on rolled and light snow cover;
- exchange rate stability;
- Long service life.
Flaws:
- Not suitable for driving in slush or deep snow;
- there is an annoying noise.
Dunlop SP Winter Ice02
This English brand is the oldest in the tire industry. It is famous for constant innovation in this segment and therefore the new development will no doubt please many car enthusiasts.
The first thing you notice is the unique bizarre tread pattern, which consists of a large number of drainage grooves located against the movement and at an acute angle. Tires guarantee slip resistance on slush, and studs, which are arranged in 16 rows, provide optimal grip on ice.
Price - up to 7500 rubles.
Dunlop SP Winter Ice02
Advantages:
- Excellent braking on snowy roads;
- Normal permeability.
Flaws:
- On ice, grip leaves a lot to be desired;
- Not very good braking when driving on wet asphalt;
- Noticeable fuel consumption.
Video review of Dunlop SP Winter Ice02 tires:
Continental ContiIceContact 2
This is a modernized model of one of the most popular products from manufacturers from Germany. The number of spikes in a new tire reaches almost two hundred. The studs are thoughtfully smaller to minimize disruption to the road surface.
Also, in the manufacture of spikes, an even more reliable adhesive was used, which is able to withstand a greater load than the previous model of the brand. The rubber compound is also of improved quality, which allows the tire to maintain elasticity in an extended temperature range.
Price - up to 11,000 rubles.
Continental ContiIceContact 2
Advantages:
- Excellent braking in all conditions;
- Good grip when driving on ice and snow;
- Comfort in management;
- patency;
- Noiselessness.
Flaws:
- Price.
A detailed video review of this rubber:
What winter tires did you choose?
Tires for driving on the ground. Their features and differences. Design nuances of tires MT and AT
The first cars were SUVs. All without exception! There were simply no other options then. But the asphalt surfaces that appeared later gradually divided the cars into “parquet”, all-terrain and completely off-road. Tractors, mining dump trucks and other agricultural and special equipment fell into the category of “completely off-road”. Their rubber has powerful lugs, a reinforced sidewall and is not suitable for driving at high speeds. True, they don't need it. After all, their purpose is to move around and perform a variety of work on the ground, allowing not only to drive, but also to maneuver confidently. This rubber most often has a pronounced directional herringbone pattern and, when slipping, throws adhering clods of earth out of the tread, preventing the tire from “blurring”, turning into a slick. The same or very similar tires are used by athletes participating in dirt car races.
The design and construction of the MT tires allows you to ride
on them on serious off-road and on paved roads
For snow and swamps, there is a different design of rubber - the so-called ultra-low pressure tires. They not only easily overcome any swamps, but even give the car buoyancy. Wide “dutiks” create such a low pressure on the ground that they allow you to move, leaving almost no traces. Impressive! Why aren't ordinary SUVs equipped with such tires? The fact is that special off-road tires, firstly, are badly controlled on asphalt, secondly, they are not designed for high speed and, thirdly, they wear out very quickly on hard surfaces. Therefore, for cars that often move down to the ground, they make a special, so-called "mud" rubber, which in the name has the abbreviation MT, which literally means Mud Terrain - for mud coverage. Its construction and design allow you to make both long runs on asphalt and fairly confident maneuvers on the ground. Such tires are most often produced in large sizes, because they are usually put on lifted cars. So the standard size of MT rubber may not be found.
Consider the design features of the tread of such tires using the popular Toyo Open Country MT mud tire as an example. First of all, the pattern is very aggressive, the blocks have a hook-shaped profile that allows you to literally bite into any soil with your teeth. The open, almost rectangular shoulder sipes work like gears, sink into ruts and allow you to drive out, even if these ruts are very deep and slippery. But that's not all! The tread pattern of this MT tire does not end at the shoulder but continues further into the sidewall of the tyre. What is it for? Few people know that with high suspension articulation, the tire is often only in contact with the ground with its sidewall. And, of course, a tire with lugs on the sidewall will work much more efficiently in such a situation.
AT tires are designed for high mileage on asphalt
and confident movement on the ground, except for extreme off-road
Yes, but all this serves for confident work on the ground, but what about on asphalt? How are things with handling, wear and noise? For long service life on hard surfaces, as well as reliable handling of the machine, such a tire has a construction of three layers of polyester with a high inversion of the edges (two layers in conventional tires), which also gives high strength (significantly strengthens the entire tire carcass). And for excellent grip on wet pavement (the main problem of all mud tires), there are deep sipes in the tread blocks. And to reduce noise and get rid of resonant hum, all tread parts have different sizes. But it is important to remember that such tires are still for those who often move out into real mud, that is, for real fans of off-road driving and even racing. For example, the Open Country MT model is actively used in the Dakar.
And for those who have a calmer temperament, who prefer to go around serious dirt, but still move off the asphalt, there is a special class of rubber, which is denoted by the abbreviation AT, or All Terrain, which literally means "for all surfaces". This rubber has a less aggressive tread pattern than MT and is designed for long-term use. But at the same time it allows you to confidently move on the ground. On the ground, not extreme off-road! And the dimensions allow you to install it instead of regular tires on a regular unprepared SUV or crossover. The design and construction of such tires are dictated by the specifics of their application. Consider AT tires using the example of the same Toyo Open Country, but this time with the designation A / T plus. Since these tires are driven a lot on asphalt, gravel, rolled grader roads and primers, the tread design is also quite aggressive, but far from the aggressiveness of MT. The tread pattern of the A/T plus is made asymmetrical, allowing the outer side of the tire to work as a sidewall in off-road conditions. The aggressive outer shoulder, typical for mud work, allows you to confidently cling to the ground in a rut. And the inner side of the tread is used for reliable grip on asphalt, providing excellent braking, handling and high wear resistance, while reducing noise levels. The edges of the central tread blocks are stepped, which allows you to increase the forward and reverse grip on all types of soil. Well, and, of course, high technology and a special composition of the rubber compound were also involved here. Thanks to the addition of silicon dioxide, wet performance is improved and rolling resistance is reduced, which in turn reduces fuel consumption and increases service life. It's clear? Well, let's move on.
High inversion of the carcass ply gives excellent handling and stability
REGULAR QUESTIONS
Very often the question arises of how to choose the right wheels for MT rubber when installing on a lifted car. The general rule is that the disc should be two inches narrower than the tire. This allows the tire to work correctly with a tread at different pressures and not be disassembled.
Another question is whether large size mud tires need to be balanced. Our opinion is that if the imbalance of a tire with a dimension of 33 or more inches fits into 100 grams, it makes no sense to balance the MT. It is very heavy in itself, and besides, driving along the side of the road and catching a large piece of dirt on the sidewall, you will immediately break the balance, and significantly. As a general rule, wash your tires and rims after every trip in the mud, and don't go over 110 km/h on MT tires. Then there will be no strong imbalance, and the tires will last a long time. Another thing is AT tires. They are much lighter and do not tend to carry dirt on themselves, and most importantly, they drive at much higher speeds. Here they, of course, need to be balanced.
How to choose the size of disks for mounting rubber
oversized, and do the big wheels need to be balanced?
Another important issue is the choice of pressure when driving on asphalt. If we are talking about tires of standard size, the answer is simple - see the manual. But when installing large tires on a lifted SUV, the answer is no longer so obvious. The general rule is that the larger the tire size in relation to the regular one, the lower the working pressure in it on asphalt should be. If the tire is overinflated, then the central track wears out quickly, the car easily breaks into a slip and bounces unpleasantly at every asphalt junction. An under-inflated tire heats up noticeably and wears out quickly. It slows down reactions when steering, and it flexes horribly in corners. Determining the optimal pressure is not so difficult. If you have driven a dozen or two kilometers and the rubber tread is warm to the touch, the tire pressure is normal. If it is hot, and it is obviously felt by hand, increase the pressure, it is too low. If the protector is completely cold, you can safely reduce the pressure by a couple of tenths of the atmosphere and measure again. But we will talk about what tire pressure to use when driving on the ground in the next lessons.
Fourteen-inch tires in Russia are gaining more and more popularity, and new items in this size appear much more often than 13-inch ones.
Today we introduce you to the test results of summer tires of dimension 185/60R14 with speed index "H" (210 km/h). But first, a few words about the equipment, without which full-fledged tests would not have been possible.
The magazine wrote more than once about the features of light-alloy wheels (more correctly, wheels, but tradition!) Now let's look at them from the point of view of tire testers. For ten years we have been mounting test tires on aluminum alloy rims. First produced by K&K, then by Vikom, and now RW brand wheels came into our field of vision. But why do we prefer light alloys?
Try several times to mount and dismount the tire on a regular steel disk. Even on professional tire changers, scratches on the edges of the rim cannot be avoided. Over time, corrosion will adorn these places, and every year or two the disks will have to be cleaned, primed and painted.
The second reason is that light-alloy wheels are usually made much more accurately, so they have less measurement error when testing tires.
The third reason: light-alloy wheels better remove heat from the brake mechanisms through the hub part - therefore, with repeated braking on the verge of skidding or using ABS, the results are more stable.
The next criterion is that discs are more convenient for washing. It's one thing to wash four wheels and quite another sixty.
The fifth trick is to choose discs with a flat hub part or with the smallest wells for mounting bolts - otherwise it is inconvenient to bait them. And although now on the carrier vehicle we replace the bolts with studs with nuts, we still avoid deep wells.
Over the years of intensive use, we have not found any flaws in the K&K and Vicom discs. We hope that RW will be on top. In any case, at the first, summer stage, there were no complaints against them.
The test methodology has also undergone minor changes. First, to the traditional braking with locked wheels (domestic cars, unfortunately, do not yet have ABS), we added braking on the verge of skidding: on dry pavement - from a speed of 100 km / h, on wet - from 80 km / h.
The second addition - at the request of readers, they introduced an assessment of the operation of tires on a dirt road. This indicator is not included in the overall standings, it serves only as additional information for those whose routes pass not only on asphalt.
The tests were carried out on the Kalina hatchback (VAZ-11193), which should go on sale this year.
General impressions about the transition from 13 inches to 14 are as follows: handling has improved - it is no coincidence that its scores are generally higher than in last year's 175/75R13 tire test. However, there is also a minus - tires of an increased dimension are stiffer and noisier - a low (less energy-intensive) sidewall and a wide contact patch affect. However, it is thanks to the latter feature that braking on these tires is more efficient.
Those who only plan to put 14 instead of 13 inches for the summer should keep in mind that they will pay for improved traction with a decrease in comfort, first of all, in smoothness. In addition, tires and wheels "by 14" are significantly more expensive.
Let's summarize the obtained results and, on their basis, we will try to analyze the situation on the tire market. An interesting observation is that Bridgestone is starting to lag behind well-known brands such as Michelin, Continental and Pirelli. Even "Yokohama" and "Toyo" are gradually overtaking the eminent countryman. It is also obvious that the Finnish "Nokian" comes to the forefront. Russian manufacturers are slowly but surely improving their summer products. Amtel is the leader in the "home" market.
Imported tires are mainly focused on cars with ABS, therefore they are less likely to brake with skid. Nevertheless, there are those that effectively slow down in any way.
All tire manufacturers, including Russian ones, are fighting for the stability of grip properties and their proximity on dry and wet surfaces. But the achievements are not the same for everyone. There is another trend noted last year as well. Improving traction on asphalt leads to their deterioration on dirt roads and grass. Mushroom pickers, berry pickers and summer residents living in the outback should take a closer look at tires of the “m + s” category.
Nokian NRHi ecosport
1st place
Producer - Finland
922.1 points
Tread depth - 7.4-8.7 mm
Tire weight - 6.8 kg
Price in Moscow - 2600 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.82
Finnish manufacturers of very good winter tires have achieved their goal] - 2590 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.81
Summer "Michelin" is a little short of the first place. It is surprisingly well balanced - no bright bursts, no obvious dips. Profitability - excellent, in terms of comfort - the best (sharing this place with the "Bridge"). Handling is good on wet pavement, and even better on dry pavement! Exchange rate stability - no remarks. The brakes are especially good in the wet, although it's great in the dry - but here and there on the verge of blocking. Alas, ABS-oriented tires by Russian standards are a weak link! They break into a block especially sharply in the most harmless situation - on dry pavement. The primer, as for Pirelli, is allowed in limited doses.
Excellent brakes on the verge of blocking, a complex of lateral grip properties and driving characteristics, high efficiency and comfort.
Weak skid braking.
Highly recommended for asphalt roads for lovers of comfortable and economical driving. Brakes are most effective with ABS.
Pirelli P6
3rd place
Producer - Spain
918.5 points
Tread depth - 8.5 mm
Tire weight - 7.5 kg
Price in Moscow - 2500 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.72
Like Yokohama, Pirelli gravitates toward sports.
For such tires, efficiency is not the main thing, apparently because here they go in the middle.
Ride and noise are also sacrificed for handling and road holding. Record holder for speed on the "rearrangement". The difference from Yokohama is that grip and behavior are more stable, regardless of the condition of the coating.
The brakes are excellent on the verge of blocking, although they break into a slip and stop the car quite well. It is noteworthy that the blocking edge feels very good on dry and wet pavement.
The deep tread will provide long-term stability of operational parameters.
You can move along the dirt road, but carefully and in the absence of rain.
The best brakes on the verge of stall in sliding, excellent handling and directional stability on any surface.
Low comfort.
Highly recommended to fans of a sporty style of driving on asphalt in any weather.
Continental ContiEcoContact 3
4th place
Manufacturer - Germany
911.3 points
Tire weight - 6.9 kg
Price in Moscow - 2300 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.52
Eco Conti are not particularly economical, although in last year's test the same tires in the 13-inch version were in the lead here, and the overall results were better.
In terms of comfort, "Conti" is very similar to "Toyo". Small remarks only to the smoothness of the ride.
There are no complaints about handling. "Kalina" clearly performs the "rearrangement". True, on wet pavement there is a little lack of information content - for this reason alone they could not develop a higher speed.
The brakes are great! The best in gliding, but on the verge of skidding they are second to none.
The primer is not for these tires, good asphalt is more suitable for them.
The best in skid braking on any pavement, very good and on the edge, good handling and directional stability.
Small remarks on the smoothness of the ride.
Especially recommended for asphalt roads with various driving styles.
Yokohama A539
5th place
Producer - Japan
908.8 points
Tire weight - 7.4 kg
The price in Moscow is 2395* rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.64
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
A539 - tires of sports orientation. That's what you get the most out of active driving! Somewhat more economical than the "Toyo", but deprived of comfort - very hard, shaky and noisy. But all this can be forgiven for excellent handling and excellent directional stability. "Rearrangement" on dry pavement "Kalina" performs just fine! Even in gliding, the car is very predictable. Behavior in the wet is not so perfect, but without comment. Dry brakes are probably the best. It is noteworthy that any method of braking gives an excellent result. True, in the wet - only the average level.
There is some deterioration in grip on wet pavement.
The best brakes on dry pavement for any type of braking, best handling on dry pavement, very good directional stability in a straight line.
Medium brakes in the wet, low comfort.
Especially recommended for fans of fast driving on dry pavement.
Toyo Proxes CF1
6th place
Producer - Japan
903.3 points
Tread depth - 6.9-7.6 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
Price in Moscow - 1920 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.13
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
Unlike "Bridgestone", these "Japanese" have crossed the threshold of 900 points - an excellent result for the "second line" brand.
In terms of fuel efficiency, "Toyo" is average, and in terms of comfort it is similar to "Kleber" ("Japanese" seemed quieter).
Handling is good and stable on any surface. The brakes in the wet are even a little better than in the dry (on the “rearrangement” the same alignment), and the spread with different braking methods is less than that of the “Bridgestone”.
In general, fairly smooth tires, without dips and splashes.
On the primer, as well as on the "Kleber", we advise you to move out only where there are no steep climbs and humidity.
Best wet brakes with locked wheels, very good on any surface when braking on the edge, handling is good and stable on any surface.
Modest escape.
Especially recommended as an all-weather tire for good asphalt roads.
Bridgestone Turanza GR-80
7th place
Producer - Japan
898.8 points
Tread depth - 7.5 mm
Tire weight - 8.4 kg
The price in Moscow is 2490* rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.77
Features - directional tread pattern
Something strange has been happening with tires of this brand lately. And not only in formula 1. The most voracious and the most difficult. Perhaps they are very durable and are not afraid of road pits and rubbing on curbs. However, comfort is one of the best. Handling on dry pavement is better than on wet pavement, where a quick turn of the steering wheel is fraught with a breakdown of the wheels. Brakes on dry surfaces are noticeably better than on wet ones. The same regularity and on "rearrangement".
A feature of tires is a decrease in grip on wet pavement.
Driving on a dirt road is acceptable, but not recommended.
Excellent brakes on dry (on the verge), excellent handling on dry pavement and good on wet pavement, high level of comfort.
High fuel consumption at low and medium speeds.
Recommended for lovers of a comfortable ride for asphalt roads.
*Price recommended by the manufacturer.
Kleber Dynaxer HP 2
8th place
Manufacturer - France
882.2 points
Tread depth - 7.6 mm
Tire weight - 6.8 kg
The price in Moscow is 2200 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.49
On flat roads, small errors in ride and noise are unlikely to appear, on mediocre surfaces, the low ability of tires to smooth out small bumps annoys.
Handling without remarks and preferences for coverage - good and stable both in dry and wet.
Brakes are effective only on the verge of skidding. On dry pavement, its edge is felt very well, but on wet tires they break off sharply, in addition, they noticeably lose in stopping distance to their closest competitors.
It is better not to leave the asphalt] - 2400 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 2.72
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
These tires will not help set a record in fuel economy, but they will not ruin you with increased consumption. Comfort is quite decent, especially the smoothness of the ride. Somewhat annoying squeaking at the beginning of tire slippage when starting and braking. However, some people might like it. On asphalt flooded with water, Kalina handles better than on wet or dry. Brakes on the verge of skidding on dry asphalt are the best, on wet in the same mode they are also good. By the way, the edge of the wheel lock on wet pavement is felt just fine. Driving on the dirt road is possible only in dry weather.
The best brakes on the edge of the block on dry pavement, very good in the wet with any method of braking, good ride, handling in the wet.
Low set of lateral grip properties and slip characteristics on dry pavement, high rolling resistance at low speeds.
Recommended only for asphalt roads.
Amtel Planet 2P
10th place
Manufacturer - Russia
855 points
Tread depth - 7.7 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
Price in Moscow - 1250 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 1.46
Amtel is the leader among post-Soviet tires. What is remarkable about it?
In fuel efficiency, he won over everyone, but on this, except for a good ride, the advantages of Amtel end. Noise rating - mediocre.
Handling at a modest level, the speed at the “rearrangement” is low, on any surface the car behaves “smeared”.
It is possible to brake reliably, as well as on the Kama, only on dry pavement, and only in skidding. On wet roads, it is better to keep a longer distance, since you have to calculate the braking distance with a margin.
You can drive off the asphalt only in dry weather.
The best in terms of economy, decent braking on dry pavement (in the block), good ride.
Bad brakes on the verge of slipping on any surface, and skidding on wet pavement. Loud noise.
Recommended for lovers of economical driving.
Kama Euro 224
11th place
Producer - Russia (NkShZ)
842.4 points
Tread depth - 7.0-8.2 mm
Tire weight - 7.5 kg
Price in Moscow - 1250 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 1.48
Nizhnekamsk also lack stars from the sky, although in the overall standings they slightly broke away from MShZ and Rosava.
Profitability "Euro" - at an average level, which can not be said about comfort - the tire is hard and noisy.
There are no serious complaints about handling, but there are no enthusiasm either. The lack of information content on the steering wheel did not allow to achieve high speed on the "rearrangement".
Brakes are good only on dry pavement, but only skidding. Emergency braking without blocking gives a very modest result.
But in terms of cross-country ability - the best. Of course, they don’t turn Kalina into an all-terrain vehicle, but they drive both on a damp primer and on wet grass.
Good brakes on dry pavement with locked wheels, good flotation.
Bad brakes in the wet with any type of braking and in the dry when braking on the verge of blocking, high rolling resistance, hard.
Recommended for all roads.
Rosava BC-49
12th place
Producer - Ukraine
804.5 points
Tread depth - 6.4-6.9 mm
Tire weight - 7.4 kg
The price in Moscow is 950 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 1.18
Summer "Rosava" for the first time participates in the tests of the ZR. The level of Ukrainian tires is very modest - a little better than the "Leader", but in general both outsiders are on the same level. It will not be possible to save fuel on these tires - the consumption is too big. The level of comfort is noticeably better than that of the Taganka - the ride is the same, but the Ukrainians are much quieter.
Manageability ratings are the lowest. The Kalina, shod in Rosava, on dry pavement has a slow reaction to turning the steering wheel, and on wet pavement you have to turn it very smoothly, otherwise you risk losing traction.
The brakes are only effective when the wheels are locked.
Dirt roads can only be driven on dry land.
Low noise level, good brakes "on the block", decent cross-country ability.
Poor handling in extreme conditions, poor brakes on the verge of blocking the wheels, low directional stability.
Recommended for all roads with careful driving.
Taganca M-238 Leader
13th place
Producer - Russia (MSHZ)
793 points
Tread depth - 7.5 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
The price in Moscow is 900 rubles.
Price / quality ratio - 1.13
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
The only tire that did not score 800 points in the test. Showed only good fuel efficiency. With comfort, the situation is contradictory - the ride is almost good, but the noise is the strongest, like from winter studded tires. Handling is tolerable only on dry pavement, on wet Kalina unexpectedly breaks into a deep skid, which only a well-trained driver can handle. The brakes are frankly weak.
A feature of these tires is a sharp drop in traction on wet surfaces. Drive off the asphalt with care - the "Leader" can slip into a slip even on a dry primer.
Good fuel economy, decent ride.
Poor grip on wet surfaces, poor brakes and directional stability, loud noise.
Recommended for economical leisurely driving - and be careful in the wet!
Grade table
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Magazine "Behind the wheel", March 2006
author: Sergey MISHIN. Together with the author, Anton ANANEV, Yuri KUROCHKIN, Evgeny LARIN, Anton MISHIN, Andrey OBRAZUMOV and Valery PAVLOV conducted the test.
