What to choose mazda 6 toyota camry. Toyota Camry vs. Competitors - Comparison Test

21.09.2019

The prestigious Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry models are well-known representatives of the Japanese car industry. Both cars have won a whole army of fans since the first generations appeared on the market. The main task that manufacturers assign to them is tight competition with the leading models of automobile concerns from Europe and the USA. The Japanese mid-size "business class" combines cutting-edge technology, engine innovation and the latest design concepts. The final price is traditionally more affordable compared to similar products from European brands.

Mazda 6 is a 5-seater front wheel drive car. The car belongs to the roomy class "D". Available body layout options for the Mazda 6 are a 4-door sedan and a practical 5-door station wagon. The third generation of the model is presented on the market today, which has additionally gone through restyling. The updated version was presented in March 2015 at the Geneva Motor Show.

Toyota Camry is a 5 seater front wheel drive car. The model is traditionally offered in the only classic body layout 4-door sedan and is a representative of the "D-class". Already the seventh generation of the Toyota Camry in a restyled version was presented to the general public as part of the Moscow auto show in August 2014.

In this review, a comparative test of the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry was carried out on cars in top trim levels with the most extended package of options that are most in demand among potential and current owners of these cars. Both cars received 2.5-liter gasoline naturally aspirated powertrains and automatic transmissions. Mazda 6 Sedan under the hood has a high-tech SkyActiv-G engine and a 6-speed SkyActiv Drive torque converter transmission.Toyota Camry was equipped with a Dual VVT-i engine and a reliable 6-speed gearbox with a torque converter.

Mazda 6

The restyling of this model did not greatly change the appearance of the car, but the updated version received a number of notable innovations. Most notable from the front is the head optics of the latest Mazda 6, which has now become adaptive, LED and has received advanced functionality. The radiator grille was also slightly modernized, which received more thin “ribs” and got rid of the top chrome insert. Now only the large brand logo attracts all the attention.

The profile of the model has retained the swiftness and hint of "sport", while continuing to play with the muscles of the large front wheel arches and the sloping roof. The sedan looks businesslike and strict, while the dynamics in the image are deliberately emphasized. The rear of the car is modern and a bit aggressive. The narrowed long stoplights are slightly tinted and fit well into the design of the stern under a small “visor” of the overhanging trunk lid. A neat bumper at the bottom attracts attention with silver tailpipe trims spaced on both sides.

Toyota Camry

After the update, the current generation of the model has become even more presentable. Restyling affected the bumpers and the design of the grille, as well as the head optics of the model. The front part has a recognizable chrome edging at the bottom of the massive front bumper. Neat fog lights are now deliberately highlighted against the background of other body parts of the car. In the lower part, the large ribs of the black radiator grille attract attention.

The side of the Toyota Camry is simple and collected. The wheel arches are clearly drawn, but without accents. The glazing area did not receive too soft corners, but there were at least sharp sections in the design. Slightly stretches the stamping profile in the door area above the threshold. This solution visually "lightens" a large car. The stern of the sedan looks massive and modern, while maintaining the necessary restraint. The rear lights are large, conventionally they are divided into upper and lower parts by a silver insert located along the very edge of the wide luggage compartment lid.

The appearance of both models is fully consistent with the concept that competing auto giants from Japan profess in their advanced design. There is a clear bias towards the “pseudo-sportiness” of the Mazda 6, which the creators of the new model emphasized in every possible way. For better or worse, the sedan is moving further and further away from associations with a presentable mid-size car for serious business representatives. The car now looks aggressive, reliable and dynamic car. Behind the wheel you expect to see an active young man or a middle-aged driver who seeks to make himself known and prefers an active drive and a catchy exterior, while relegating presentability and practicality to the background. Toyota Camry turned out to be the complete opposite, remaining true to its focus on an established and self-confident audience. Potential buyers of this model will be exclusively middle-aged and elderly businessmen, for whom comfort, solidity and “classic” restraint in car design are above all else.

Interior

Mazda 6

High quality finishing materials are used in the interior of the car. The softness and smoothness of individual details in the interior are perfectly diluted with sharp corners and straight lines. Immediately I would like to note the possibility of implementing a combined color scheme of the cabin. The main tone is traditional black, but the chairs of different color, inserts on the door cards, the central tunnel and the dashboard can significantly revive the car from the inside. The only comment was the total area of such inserts on the central tunnel, as there were concerns about their wear resistance in this place. In terms of build quality and fit, the Mazda 6 demonstrates an unexpectedly high class.

The overall design is dominated by classic solutions. An innovation can be considered the design of the center console and the multimedia and navigation system screen placed separately in the upper part of the dashboard. The second "highlight" is a small transparent projection display under the windshield. Neat airflow deflectors in the center were placed under the large color screen of the multimedia system. The interior climate control unit was partially combined with a CD slot. The climate control window turned out to be narrow and relatively small, but the information is read quite comfortably. Large round knobs trimmed with chrome were smashed around the edges of the information field. It is easy to interact with them, so changing the settings, choosing the right mode or blowing direction is not difficult.

The seats in the car are comfortable, the filler is dense and elastic. Lateral support is developed at an average level, but the profile itself securely fixes the rider. The bottom cushion protrudes well forward, providing support for the legs. The high central tunnel is made almost flush with the wide armrest. This solution allows you to interact with the round regulator on the tunnel with maximum convenience. The steering wheel is covered with high-quality material, has a rim of medium thickness and does not slip in the hands. The diameter of the multifunction steering wheel is optimally matched. The dashboard has three familiar "wells" in a silver trim. The combination of bright illumination and scale markings makes it easy to perceive information.

Toyota Camry

In the interior of the sedan, everything is familiar and in its place. Designers did not introduce for this model those bold decisions that can be seen in other cars of the Japanese brand. Toyota Camry received the usual layout of elements. High quality finishing materials, assembly and adjustment of panels in terms of quality did not cause any comments. The main color of the key interior parts is black. Diversify the gamut, not the most successful from the aesthetic side, colored inserts “under the tree” on the dashboard, the armrest of the door cards and the central tunnel. The degree of their practicality and resistance to scratches can be assessed during operation.

The center console is the focal point for most of the vehicle's functional systems. Under a small visor hides a narrow monochrome display of an electronic clock. This is followed by strict rectangular airflow deflectors. The large screen of the multimedia system is placed in a strict black frame, and the block for the location of this element is emphasized by chrome-plated sidewalls. At the level of the upper corners of the screen, there are medium-sized round shiny controls and vertical rows of function buttons below them. A small narrow screen with direction indicators, temperature readings and airflow modes is surrounded around the perimeter by rows of modest black keys.

Seats in the car have a profile designed for ease and convenience of boarding / disembarking. Lateral support is available, but mediocrely developed. The seats are upholstered with good quality material, received a dense and neat stitching of the seams. The filler is soft, but you do not fall through in the chair. The steering wheel is multifunctional, three-spoke, with a pleasant-feeling skin material. The rim diameter is well chosen, and it is also quite convenient to control the car's systems using the joystick buttons on the steering wheel spokes. The instrument panel with convenient scale markings and powerful backlighting is standard. The speedometer is on the right side, the tachometer is on the left. The space between them is occupied by a large vertical on-board computer screen.

The interior of the survey cars turned out to be cozy, high-quality and stylish. As for the issue of ergonomics, the designers and engineers did a good job on both the Camry and the Japanese "six". The sporty spirit and youthful enthusiasm can be easily traced in every element of the Mazda 6 interior, which literally attracts hot riders with its impetuous message. The calm Toyota sedan turned out to be in no hurry at all and there was no need, so the electronic systems did not begin to be built in the interior of the model to the level of a cult. A peaceful mood reigns in the cabin, setting you up for an imposing and unhurried ride. Not without controversy in both sedans. It is noteworthy that color inserts received comments both in the Mazda 6 and in the Toyota Camry. In the case of Mazda, their practicality is doubtful, and in the case of Toyota, the aesthetics suffered a little. One way or another, but the difference in the target audience for which these cars were designed is clearly visible at the slightest attempt to compare the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry at this stage. The result of the rivalry is a very conditional, but still the victory of Mazda 6. The car won the duel due to a more “modern” design compared to the hackneyed motives performed by the opponent.

Driving performance

Mazda 6

It's time to put the cars on the road and test drive Mazda 6 vs. Toyota Camry. After starting, we immediately note the balance and silence when the Mazda 6 engine is running. We touch the gas pedal and enjoy the noticeable engine thrust in low-speed mode. The automatic transmission seeks to keep fuel consumption at a minimum level, does not drive the tachometer needle above 2-2.5 thousand rpm.

There is more than enough torque to get off to a strong start and maintain a set pace as you pick up speed. You can even play "traffic light racing" while remembering to turn off the useful i-stop system, which turns off the engine when you stop. If you put the box in manual control mode, then the car changes before our eyes. Peak speeds become fully available, reactions to the gas pedal are surprisingly sharp. The return from the motor in conjunction with a well-tuned automatic transmission was pleasantly pleased.

The chassis of the Mazda 6 has MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link rear suspension design. With such a chassis, various small cracks and small pits are obtained with maximum comfort, as the car tries not to remind its riders of these flaws under the wheels. More serious coating defects end in shaking in the cabin, while little depends on the dimension of the wheel disks. For a quiet ride on smooth asphalt, the suspension travel and softness are enough.

On the track, the picture is slightly different. The car presses to the asphalt, the steering becomes more informative. In turns, the sedan perfectly clings to the trajectory, only occasionally and at high speed it reminds of a possible drift along the axes. There are practically no significant rolls on the "arc". As for the brake system, this unit is well configured. The pedal tightly blocks the wheels closer to the middle of the stroke, leaving at the very “top” the opportunity for soft braking.

Toyota Camry

We turn to our opponent and compare which is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? We start the power unit. Noise isolation and vibration protection are clearly improved compared to previous versions of the model. The engine runs barely noticeable, with no "nervous tick" on the steering wheel. Pressing the gas pedal provides a smooth pickup. The dynamics are not racing, but the traction is confident, which ensures a completely predictable behavior of the car. The 6-speed Aisin is tuned for fuel economy. If you raise the speed above 3 thousand, then a decent supply of power is felt.

A large sedan noticeably comes to life both when picking up speed and in the process of further maintaining the speed limit. The automatic transmission works flawlessly. The solution is torque converter and reliable, no "robots". The moment of switching remains imperceptible to the driver in quiet modes, the engine thrust is distributed smoothly. The tandem of the power unit and gearbox provides a confident ride. Fans of active drive can also count on a light “light”, but in dynamic mode there are short pauses with a sharp blow to the gas pedal.

Running Toyota Camry has a MacPherson strut for the front and a multi-link rear suspension. Chassis settings are aimed at achieving total comfort. The car literally “floats” over small and medium bumps, while the cabin is quiet. Deeper holes shake the riders a little, but nothing more. Restyling has made a number of changes to individual chassis units, so the smoothness of the Toyota Camry is excellent.

The handling of the model is decent, there are rolls, but drifts in corners are minimal. The steering has retained a certain sharpness, although the information content at speed is far from the highest. But turning the steering wheel is easy, especially thanks to the successful settings of the electric booster. The only remark was that it is not very convenient to turn the wheels from one extreme point to another, since you need to make a little more than three full turns of the steering wheel. The brakes are reliable, the car slows down smoothly and without pecking with its nose from any speed.

A test drive of review models allows you to answer which car is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry. The excitement of the engine and the knockdown of the Mazda chassis provide an active and even aggressive ride. At the same time, comfort suffered a little. The soundproofing of the wheel arches also reminded of itself with the rustle of tires in the cabin. Toyota Camry turned out to be restrained and soft, with a supply of "horses" under the hood. If we take into account that these cars are initially focused on business representatives, then the advantages of Toyota at this stage of the comparison are obvious. The improved handling and outstanding dynamics of the "six" pales against the background of the reference smoothness and improved protection of the floor, doors and arches from external noise in the Toyota Camry. A business car should be imposing, quiet and solid, and also have the ability to confidently accelerate. Toyota engineers coped with this task to the fullest. Mazda 6 is able to surprise with its accelerating dynamics and sharp steering, but the comfort in this car turned out to be noticeably less against the background of a solid competitor.

Cabin and trunk capacity

Mazda 6

In the front row of seats there is enough space in width and height. Even the powerful and wide central tunnel does not constrain the widely spaced feet of riders. Low landing in the chairs allows you to feel quite free, there is a supply of space above your head. The driver will need a minimum of time to adjust the seat for complete seating comfort and comfortable interaction with the pedal assembly. The departure of the lower pillow does an excellent job of supporting the legs, and the back literally merges with the back of the chair.

In the back row of the Mazda 6, the width of the place is quite enough for three passengers. It turns out a little tight, but acceptable. The angle of inclination of the backrest and the sofa cushion itself leaves a little “air” above the head of tall people, but the margin is scanty. The sloping roof in this case makes itself felt, although with an average height, the rear passengers have no problems. The wheelbase allows us to say that the inhabitants of the sofa will not rest their knees on the backs of the front seats.

The trunk in the sedan is a standard solution for this class. The loading opening is wide, it is also worth highlighting a sufficient height. Lid hinges partially take up useful space, but there were no significant problems when loading tall boxes. For everyday use, such indicators of the capacity of the luggage compartment are quite enough.

Toyota Camry

The front row of seats provides an acceptable margin of space in width and height. There is not the slightest hint of tightness in the shoulders, the width of the tunnel noticeably separates the front seats. For tall drivers, there will not be so much headroom, but the seat lowered as far as possible solves the problem. It is convenient to reach the pedals with any cushion and backrest settings thanks to the excellent ergonomics of the pedal assembly.

Three passengers are comfortably seated in the back row. It is noteworthy that the margin is sufficient in height, even riders with growth above average do not rest against the ceiling. Such an indicator became available thanks to a relatively flat roof and a well-chosen backrest. There is enough legroom, an impressive wheelbase allows you not to prop up the front row of seats with your knees.

The trunk of the Toyota Camry has sufficient depth, the overall capacity in the class is average. The loading opening of the sedan is acceptable in width and height. Without significant difficulties, it is possible to place bulky luggage in the form of boxes or other equipment.

Economy

Safety

Both cars demonstrated a high level of protection for their passengers. To answer the question of which is better, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry, let's take a look at the crash test results. Mazda 6 according to the European Euro NCAP system received the maximum rating of 5 out of 5 possible stars. Toyota Camry was not tested by EuroNCAP, but the car took part in a series of crash tests NHTSA (American National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). American tests revealed shortcomings, which provided Toyota with only four stars. It may seem that the Toyota Camry is much inferior to the Mazda 6 in terms of safety, but it is worth considering separately the increased demands of American tests for certain points compared to those in the EuroNCAP system. We will allow ourselves to put these machines on one level.

Model cost

The price of a review Mazda 6 in the maximum configuration without mileage: about 36,700 US dollars.
The price of a review Toyota Camry in the maximum configuration without mileage: about 38,000 US dollars.

Comparison results

Mazda 6

Advantages:

Stylish and sporty appearance;
Acceleration dynamics and steering;
Economical power unit;
Unusual design solutions in the interior;

Flaws:

Insufficient soundproofing of wheel arches;
Doubtful wear resistance of interior trim materials;
Rigidity of the suspension on large irregularities;
Weak paintwork and the rapid appearance of scratches in some places;

Toyota Camry

Advantages:

Soft and smooth suspension operation;
Significantly improved sound insulation;
Well-chosen bunch of motor and box;
Solid interior trim materials;

Flaws:

Lack of steering sharpness;
Too simple design in interior design;
Relatively high fuel consumption;
Slightly overpriced model;

Next, we will try to answer another important question: what is more expensive to maintain, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? If you turn to official sources and analyze the cost of maintenance at official dealerships, then Toyota's scheduled maintenance is a little cheaper compared to Mazda. This statement is true for the cost of a standard hour of work and the price of basic consumables, as well as technical fluids. If we talk about more serious repairs and the purchase of original spare parts, then the Toyota Camry turns out to be a little more expensive (10-15%) for a number of common items.

Now let's sum up and choose the winner. In terms of the combination of preferred qualities, the Toyota Camry leads by a small margin. Among the main arguments in favor of such a choice, it is worth noting the settings of the chassis of the car, a fairly powerful power unit and silence in the cabin. Such advantages in the process of daily operation come to the fore in comparison with the striking exterior and handling of the Mazda 6.

Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 are representatives of the Japanese automotive industry, which is considered one of the leading in the world. Both cars are quite popular among motorists, so they compete quite successfully in the world market with European and American models. Japanese cars are traditionally distinguished by advanced developments and technologies, as well as bold design solutions, but at the same time their price remains at a quite adequate level, which distinguishes them from many similar cars from the same Europe.

But inside the Japanese car industry there are many cars of approximately the same price category, so it is often very difficult for motorists to make a choice in favor of a particular model. In particular, many are wondering which is better - the Mazda 6 series or the Toyota Camry. Let's try to understand this issue in more detail, evaluating their main technical characteristics.

The appearance of both cars is at a high level, which in itself is understandable, because they are the brainchild of the Japanese car industry. But if we compare them with each other, we can say with confidence that they have very little in common.

Toyota Camry is traditionally presented in the form of a kind of monumental image, which at first glance seems discreet, but meanwhile it is functional and reliable. The solidity of the body is combined with smooth lines, as well as a small amount of chrome trim. Also on the car there are 17-inch wheels. For many, this design will seem rather unpretentious, but such a strict style is perfect for middle-aged motorists who love comfort and restraint in everything.

The Mazda 6 is characterized by a more dynamic image, as well as sporty body lines. The exterior is quite original, the body has a spectacular chrome finish. 19-inch wheels look quite aggressive, which once again emphasizes the overall sporty image. Mazda cars have always looked quite flashy, with a defiant exterior, but there is nothing superfluous here, so the design of the sixth model is quite organic. It's safe to say that the Mazda 6 is an excellent choice for young and ambitious car enthusiasts who want to be visible in the general lane.

Austerity or modernity - which is better for the interior of a car?

Comparing the interior of the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry, you can start with the fact that the interior trim of these cars is consistent with their exterior. Toyota Camry has a fairly strict interior, which is dominated by minimalism and simplicity of lines. Meanwhile, the finishing material is of high quality, so the interior decoration is quite consistent with a business person. The interior is dominated by black, but there are also colored inserts that imitate wood - not the best move in our opinion.

The real advantage of the Camry is a modern multimedia system with a high-definition display, which allows you to get a high-quality picture. The interior of the car is quite spacious, the rear sofa also has sufficient capacity. By the way, it is very comfortable to ride behind, because the distance to the front seats is sufficient not only for driving itself, but also for working on laptops and tablets. This once again confirms the thesis that the Camry is an excellent car for business people.

With the front seats, things are not so rosy. Owner reviews indicate that the seat back is quite low, which reduces ride comfort. But there are certain advantages:

The seat upholstery is very comfortable and pleasant to the touch. It is made of genuine leather, which adds gloss to the overall look.
The chair can be adjusted in six directions.
You can install a drive with memory.

As for the Mazda 6, the interior of this car has a more modern finish and design. This can be seen even in the design of the control levers and buttons on the panel, as well as the appearance of the chairs. There is also a lot of black in the cabin, but there are several light inserts - on the seats, doors, etc. A pretty good solution that allows you to slightly dilute the lack of interior colors.

The multimedia system turned out to be quite simple when compared with the Toyota Camry. The display resolution is small, so you can forget about a clear picture. But there is one very interesting solution here - the center console is designed in a rather original way, as well as the navigation and multimedia systems placed in a separate part.

What to choose if each salon has its own disadvantages and advantages?

From the point of view of driver comfort, in our opinion, the Mazda 6 looks preferable, but the rear sofa of this car is quite small, so it is hardly possible to fit more than two adults there. Toyota in this regard looks like a more spacious model, but the interior does not differ in some refinement and originality. Therefore, if you prefer fast driving and drive, then the Mazda 6 series is best for you.

Main technical characteristics

The interior and exterior of a car are important, but most car enthusiasts value them for their performance and road behavior. A test drive of these models showed that they almost completely showed the correspondence of their appearance and driving on the track.

Toyota Camry still confirms its reputation as a leisurely and measured car. It seems that even this slowness is more than the situation requires. After pressing the gas, the car does not immediately start its movement - one gets the feeling that it simply lacks traction at low speeds. At the same time, such slowness absolutely does not affect fuel economy.

But there are some definite positives as well. Toyota Camry features an exceptional ride, so you will not notice the flaws in the road surface when driving this car. This sedan holds the road perfectly, so only very deep pits or open sewer manholes can unbalance it. This advantage also has a downside - the handling of the Camry leaves much to be desired. The car not only responds late to pressing the gas pedal, but also to turning the steering column, which makes you worry when entering a turn.

Video test drive 2.5 Mazda 6 with speed measurements

Camry under the gun of video cameras with analysis of shortcomings

Comparing the running characteristics of these models, a rather interesting situation emerges:

Acceleration to 100 km per hour - Mazda 6 (7.8 seconds), Toyota Camry (9 seconds).
Maximum speed - Mazda 6 (223 km per hour), Camry (210 km per hour).
Engine power indicator - 192 hp Mazda 6 and 180 hp at Toyota Camry.

Based on these figures, it is safe to say that the Mazda 6 version will win the race against the Camry by an inveterate advantage. This is also evidenced by acceleration to 100 km, which for the "six" is only 7.8 seconds, which is more in line with a sports car, not a sedan. At the same time, Mazda's fuel consumption is much less - about 8.7 liters in urban conditions, 6.5 liters outside the city. This became possible thanks to the use of SKYACTIV technology.

Also, this car is characterized by a fairly stiff suspension. This circumstance allows you to safely enter even the steepest turns and turns. Again, the stiffness of the suspension feels when hitting any obstacles. At the same time, everyone feels it - both the driver and the passengers themselves. Mazda 6 version looks more perfect than other equipment of this brand, but it also has rather poor sound insulation. Therefore, after 300 kilometers of the road, you can simply get tired of engine noise.

Let us consider in more detail the technical data that allows us to compare these models of the Japanese automobile industry.

Specifications Mazda 6:

Body type - Sedan.
The volume of the engine is 2488 cm3.
Drive type - front.
Gearbox - 6 automatic transmission.
Fuel type - 95 gasoline.
The average fuel consumption is 8.7 liters in urban conditions, 6.5 liters outside the city.
The length of the car is 487 cm.
Width - 184 cm.
Height - 145 cm.
Ground clearance (ground clearance) - 16.5 cm.
Tire size - 45 R19.
Weight - 1978 kg.
Tank (volume) - 62 liters.

Now consider the similar characteristics for the Toyota Camry:

Body type - Sedan.
The volume of the engine is 2493 cm3.
Drive type - front.
Gearbox - 6 automatic transmission.
Fuel type - 95 gasoline.
The average fuel consumption is 11 liters in urban conditions, 7.8 liters outside the city.
The length of the car is 482.5 cm.
Width - 182.5 cm.
Height - 148 cm.
Ground clearance (ground clearance) - 16 cm.
Tire size - 60 R16.
Weight - 2160 kg.
Tank (volume) - 70 liters.

Summing up

It is safe to say that these two cars are completely different models, albeit produced in the same country. Not only the dimensions, technical data and interior are different, but also the very philosophy of these cars. If the Toyota Camry is seen as a strict, measured and reliable car for middle-aged business people, then the Mazda 6 looks like a real rebel and a driving car against its background. Of course, this is very conditional, but there is such an impression.

What is more reliable? If we consider from this side, then most likely it is a Camry. The car has rather low speed data, so it is perfect for pragmatic people who do not like to take risks once again. The cost of this car is slightly higher - about 38 thousand dollars, while the Mazda 6 costs about 37 thousand. In our opinion, Toyota is somewhat overpriced, given the speed tests, as well as high fuel consumption.

But the question of benefit is formed not only on the basis of the cost of the model itself, but also on further maintenance costs. So, the operation of the Camry is more profitable, judging by the maintenance at official dealerships. However, repairs and the purchase of original components will cost Toyota more - by about 15 percent. In any case, the question of choosing one or another car is a rather subjective moment, so our task was only to make a general comparison of these models.

Video comparison of Toyota Camry and Mazda 6

The shoals of the new Camry

Feedback from a real Mazda 6 owner

Comparing such well-known brands of Japanese car manufacturers as Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry cars, one must remember that this technique has many similarities and a minimum of discrepancies. Both cars are designed for the same segment of buyers.

It should be noted in advance that the most objective will be a comparison of cars that are equivalent in terms of equipment and belong to approximately the same production period. This comparison will involve models in the maximum configuration - Toyota Camry 7th generation of release in 2014 and Mazda 6 of the 3rd generation of 2015. Both cars are equipped with engines of maximum volume - 2.5 liters. To be more precise, the Camry for most markets, except for the domestic one, has a slightly larger engine size, but in 2013 it was reduced to meet the requirements of the toll rate. This move increased the competitiveness of the model.

Both models of cars are equipped with six-speed automatic gearboxes.

Appearance of cars

They have almost identical overall dimensions, but Camry or Mazda 6 cars cannot be confused, they look so different in appearance. Mazda's profile is more rapid, approaching a sporty one. The salon is somewhat shifted back, as a result of which the six is a bit like a sports car.

Toyota looks completely different, having a massive, more rigorous and presentable body. Thanks to such details, it can be assumed that Mazda is more suitable for young and active people, and Toyota, on the contrary, for sedate and respectable businessmen who value comfort and rigor above appearance and speed.

Salon

The ergonomics of the controls in both cars are quite elaborate and therefore very difficult to compare. The controls for climate control, acoustics are easily accessible and intuitive.

The dashboard in Mazda is made in black and gray shades without any frills. In Toyota, many people complain about decorative woodgrain inserts on the dashboard, central tunnel and door cards.

It is impossible to say in which car the seats are better, since they are of very high quality in all versions. Softer in Mazda and tighter in Toyota, they do not cause discomfort on long trips, as they have a comfortable profile, developed lateral support and leg support.

Comparing rear seat space will not be in favor of the Mazda 6, as it has a lower ceiling, and a tall passenger in the back seat has a chance to get his head to the ceiling. At the same time, the dimensions of the cabin in width and length are sufficient to comfortably accommodate passengers of any height, even with the driver's seat fully extended.

Driving performance

The same engine power and the same number of gearshifts in the automatic transmission does not mean that the driving performance of the cars will be the same. Mazda 6 VS car Toyota Camry wins a little in this comparison, because it is characterized by noticeably better dynamics with lower fuel consumption.

A test drive shows that Mazda's automatic transmission changes gears smoothly and imperceptibly without signs of thoughtfulness, clearly responding to the position of the pedal, while Toyota behaves more confidently with a measured driving style. When you try to increase the dynamics, there are small delays in the reaction of the car to pressing the gas pedal. Yes, and fuel consumption, even when driving on the highway, is clearly not in favor of Toyota.

Handling of both cars is excellent at any speed, rolls in corners, of course, are present, but drifts are not observed.

If we compare the steering, then Mazda has it more informative, the steering wheel is clearer here. The brakes are crisp and confident, and there are no complaints in any of the compared cars.

The suspension is made in the usual way - an inexpensive MacPherson strut in front, and the usual multi-link in the back. Suspension tuning is better with Toyota. This is noticeable when driving on rough roads. At Mazda, most of the large irregularities are transmitted by unpleasant and well-distinguished blows to the body. The situation is also aggravated by the weaker sound insulation of the cabin, especially the wheel arches.

luggage compartment

Both cars have a good roomy trunk, with a standard volume for cars of this class - within 500 liters. The loading opening is large enough to accommodate bulky boxes or other oversized cargo. The luggage compartment can be enlarged by folding down the row of rear seats.

Safety

Competitors provide a high level of driver and passenger safety through the presence of a full range of airbags and careful design of body elements. According to the results of crash tests, both cars received the maximum number of points.

General advantages and disadvantages

In general, both cars are almost equivalent. Mazda's biggest drawbacks are poor sound insulation, low interior and stiff suspension. Advantages - excellent dynamics and control, efficiency, elegant appearance.

Toyota's disadvantages are sluggish steering, low efficiency, and flaws in the interior design. Advantages - roomy interior, soft suspension, excellent sound insulation.

The cost of maintenance at Mazda is slightly higher, but the cost of spare parts, on the contrary, is lower than that of Toyota. Therefore, the cost of a new and old car will be very different in both cases. This must be taken into account, given the age of the purchased car and the period that is expected for its operation.

conclusions

When comparing the external and internal qualities of cars such as Toyota Camry or Mazda 6 cars, you need to understand that, being in the same class, they are designed for different categories of owners. Bright and dynamic Mazda is more suitable for young and middle-aged people who love a dynamic driving style. Toyota, as a more representative car, is intended for solid, business consumers who value comfort and a prestigious look more, who are not in a hurry, preferring sedateness and regularity.

13.03.2017

Japanese auto giants have been fighting for a domestic buyer for decades. The main confrontation today is observed in the segment of "business class" cars. Potential motorists have to choose which is better and more profitable - Toyota Camry or Mazda 6? In fairness, we note that each of them managed to win a huge army of adherents, even from the moment the first models entered the market.

What is special about these vehicles? Experts note a number of features, thanks to which they manage to successfully compete with the best representatives of European companies:

full compliance with advanced technologies in the field of automotive industry;
first class design solutions
innovations in the engine building segment;
affordable cost.

These features are common to cars from Japan. They also have marked differences. But let's go over the surface of the two models in order to clearly imagine what we are dealing with.

Toyota Camry- a modern 5-seater vehicle, presented on the market mainly as a 4-door sedan. One of the best representatives of the "D-class". The latest seventh generation to date was introduced in August 2014. This is a restyled version.
Mazda sixth model- a car with front-wheel drive, 5-seater, roomy (meets D-class standards). The sale includes a 5-door station wagon, as well as a 4-door sedan. These are the third generation models that entered the market in 2015.

Japanese exterior

New Generation Toyota Camry looks massive and solid enough. At the same time, respectability here is highly questionable. It is felt that the designers had to experiment with the design of the new model in order to take into account market trends. As a result, we got a traditional luxury car, but with a claim to dynamics.

Distinctive features of the vehicle:

the bumper is complemented by massive cutouts, visually echoing the complex shape of the headlights;
heavy profile that does not go well with fast driving;
a convex and large rear bumper covers a narrow lamp base.

What is the result? From a design point of view, the car looks disharmonious and ambiguous: if you look at the vehicle from the side, one picture is formed, and if you look at the back or front, then the car is perceived completely differently.

Video review Toyota Camry

So which model is better - Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? To draw an unambiguous conclusion, it is necessary to consider the features of the nearest competitor.

Mazda 6 designers have taken a huge step forward compared to their opponents. Visually, the six is perceived as a real lightning - swift, dynamic, athletic, solid and complete. If you choose solely in appearance, then the choice would be obvious and expected. What is it about this model?

Narrow headlights filigree complement the low-hanging hood.
The radiator grille is inclined towards the central part, thanks to which the car acquires additional purposefulness.
The roof pillars captivate with smooth lines that visually correspond to the wheel arches.
The interior, slightly recessed back, resembles that of the Jaguar.

In terms of design and aesthetic completeness, the "brainchild" of Mazda looks an order of magnitude more successful than the model from Toyota, and don't go to a fortune teller.

Video review of Mazda 6

Organization of the internal space

Having cast a cursory glance at the interior of the 6-ki and Camry, it may seem that the latter is better implemented - beautiful and massive wood panels, leather upholstery. That's just the case when the essence lies in the details. Natural elements in the interior of Toyota Camry cannot be found during the day with fire. They have been replaced with cheap plastic.

In the process of prolonged operation, artificial "pomp" can get bored. It is not surprising that many of our compatriots practice decorating part of the front and central tunnel with carbon stickers. But designers from Toyota pleasantly surprise in another way:

Large display that supports high resolution, so the picture is clear and detailed.
Organic and beautiful dashboard lighting. Everything is worked out and matched to the smallest detail - nothing distracts the driver in the process of movement.

3 adults can fit on the back sofa without much difficulty, but only 2 passengers can feel comfortable. The internal space is sufficient for comfortable work with a laptop. From the front, the situation does not look so rosy - the backs of the seats are low, the pillow is flat, you have to constantly adjust the position of the body while driving.

As for the advantages of seats, Toyota has them:

tactilely pleasant and soft skin;
you can install a drive with memory;
chairs are adjustable in 6 positions.

What to choose - Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? A balanced conclusion can be drawn, taking into account the “arguments of the opponent”.

Japanese designers in the case of the six decided to distance themselves from wood imitation. Corresponding elements are found, but rather rarely. The central high panel is supplemented with black plastic, inside there was a place for a small screen, which displays information about the current climate control settings of the car.

Somewhat disappointed multimedia system in Mazda 6- it is frankly simple here with a small diagonal of the display and without high detailing of the picture. The dashboard is divided into 3 deep niches, so that even in bright light, you can easily read the available information. At night, excessively bright illumination puts pressure on the eyes, this is an omission. mazda 6 there is not enough space behind - whatever one may say, and the dynamic silhouette imposes certain restrictions on free space. Salon is not wide, the roof is low. Three adults will no longer fit here, only people of not very tall stature and full build will feel comfortable.

Much more attention is paid to the front seats. They are magnificent - decorated with perforated leather, thanks to which the landing of the passenger and driver is reliable and does not change even with aggressive driving. Even in tight turns you can fit without problems.

6-ka is a real find for drivers, which is suitable for both businessmen and young entrepreneurs.

Driving performance or how cars feel behind the wheel

Most of our compatriots choose Camry or Mazda 6, taking into account, first of all, the driving performance of cars, so the last comparison will be devoted to this important criterion. So what do we get as a result? The restyled Toyota Camry boasts slightly more power, but in motion the car feels unhurried and overly smooth. Pressing the gas does not lead to lightning acceleration, for this the car takes some time. This effect is mainly due to a smooth six-speed "automatic", which, in addition, overuses fuel when driving around the city - 13-15 liters - it will be a bit much.

Aggressive Camry

Toyota has obvious advantages:

smooth running even when moving fast;
small potholes and bumps in the roadway go unnoticed;
maximum driving comfort.

The car, with all its advantages, has a significant drawback - a mediocre level of controllability. The delay is observed not only when the gas pedal is pressed, but also when the steering wheel is turned. For an inexperienced driver, this is fraught with loss of nerve cells and a slight sweat on the forehead.

If we draw a comparative parallel between the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry in terms of dynamics, then it is the 6-ka that will come to the finish line, regardless of the road and driving style. Mazda gains 100 in less than 8 seconds, which is already typical for cars made with a sporty touch.

Note! The use of proprietary SKYACTIV technology makes it possible even with aggressive driving - consumption does not exceed 9 liters per 100 km. The power unit reacts almost instantly to the “commands” of the driver, and in this regard, before the wizards from Mazda, you want to take off your hat and bow.

The rigid suspension only complements the sporty image of the car. When making sharp turns, the car does not heel. And even on domestic roads, it easily gives odds to other vehicles. But far from all drivers can feel comfortable in a sedan, since excessive rigidity makes itself felt, and its noise is decent.