Man is a conservative being. We all live, guided by stereotypes imposed from the outside. In particular, it is generally accepted that Toyota Camry is an ideal car for an official who, after a hard and stressful working day, must get into the car without incident and with a minimum amount of effort to get home. In fact, this image of the Camry is not far from the truth.
But many people associate Mazda with an example of a truly Japanese style, which manifests itself even in small things. And these cars have little in common. But times are changing, and today these midsize sedans have converged in many ways. So much so that the time has come for their detailed comparison: are the differences so great, or is what they inspire us with another myth (or fake, as it has become fashionable to say now)? Let's try to figure this out.
Technical features of the models
To get a first impression of these cars, it is worth considering their technical specifications. It is unlikely that this will help determine which is better, Camry or Mazda 6, but some potential buyers will probably be eliminated. There will be those who, on the basis of this comparison, will consolidate their preferences.
| Place of assembly | Russia | Japan |
| The volume of the power unit, l. | 2,495 | 2,489 |
| Max power, l. With. | 178 | 193 |
| Max speed km/h | 210 | 225 |
| Set time 100 km / h, sec. | 9,1 | 7,8 |
| Fuel consumption (AI-95) in the city | 11,0 | 8,7 |
| On the road | 7,8 | 6,5 |
| Length, cm. | 482 | 487 |
| Width, see | 182 | 184 |
| Height, see | 148 | 145 |
| ground clearance, see | 16,0 | 16,5 |
| Tire size | 215/60R16 | 225/45R19 |
| Weight in curb condition, t. | 1,51 | 1,41 |
| Full weight, t. | 2,16 | 1,98 |
| The volume of the fuel tank, l. | 70 | 63 |
Exterior
After a restyling carried out in 2017, the car has become much longer and wider, to please American motorists who prefer big cars. Well, given the volume of sales of the model in the North American market, such a step can be called justified.
But to say that the car has become more elegant is definitely impossible. There is simply nothing to catch the eye. Yes, the dynamics have increased, but it is impossible to judge this by appearance. Rather, on the contrary, the increase in dimensions made the car massive, heavy and clumsy. Looking from the side, this impression becomes prevalent. The massive air intake grille, which almost completely replaced the front bumper, does not save the situation either - it is not here. The rear view of the new Camry is no less depressing - the convex bumper does not harmonize with the sloping pillars, smoothly turning into a short trunk lid.
One would like to assume that the facade, profile and back of the model were developed by three different designers who were forbidden to communicate - they look so heterogeneous.
The Mazda 6 was restyled in the same 2017, but here the traditions were respected - resembling a sports car rather than a sedan with its proportions. Unlike the Camry, the image of the "six" is perceived as a whole, the car looks swift, like lightning. And what is interesting - with all its elegance, Mazda looks no less solid. Whichever side you look at, the advantage is on the side of this particular model, but the side view is especially impressive: the body tapering towards the front and raised at the rear harmonizes with the smooth lines of the pillars, and the perfect oval of the wheel arches completes the image. Experts even compare the model with Jaguar, which, of course, speaks of the talent of Japanese designers.
So, in terms of appearance, the question of which is better, Toyota Camry or Mazda 6, is inappropriate - Toyota residents still grow and grow in this indicator.
Salon and trunk
Leather interior is an indispensable component of cars of this class. This option is indeed present in both models. As well as the woodgrain panels, which actually look out of place, especially on the Camry. Spoils the impression and inexpensive plastic - it seems that Toyota engineers decided to save a little here. As for false wood, there has recently been a trend, a kind of trend - to paste over the torpedo and the central tunnel with a film that imitates carbon, which clearly indicates the imperfection of the interior. And even the multimedia system here, although it is present in all trim levels, has a monochrome display for budget options, which becomes color as the cost of the car rises, and eventually even acquires a touch screen.
The instrument cluster is easy to read, with a soft backlight that does not hurt the eyes in complete darkness. The front passenger seat in expensive trim levels is equipped with an ottoman - this level of comfort is extremely rare, except for executive class cars. The rear sofa is spacious, three passengers will be spacious here in all three dimensions. But if two people sit in the back, they can lower the central armrest with climate control buttons, seat ventilation and a music center. The distance to the front seats is large, working with a laptop from behind is a pleasure. What can not be said about the front seats, in which the back is not high enough, and the seat itself is so flat that it forces you to periodically change position. In a word, the interior of Toyota is far from ideal, although the obvious advantages should not be ignored either: this is the ability to adjust the front seats in three planes and six directions, and good quality leather, and the ability to turn on the memory drive option.
The Mazda 6 also has a false tree, but there is a minimum of it here, only a strip on the front panel and only for top modifications. The center console looks solid thanks to the black plastic trim with a glossy surface. It has a climate system display showing its current settings, as well as a multimedia system control panel with a small display. The dashboard of the "six" corresponds to fashion trends - the wells of the scales are very deep, so there are no problems with reading the readings, even if the sun shines directly on the "tidy". But the backlight is too bright, in the dark it will take time for the eyes to adapt, which, of course, is a big minus. Leather trim raises no objections. The leather is perforated on the front to prevent slipping when the car enters sharp turns.
In general, a comparison of the interiors of Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 is again not in favor of the first model. But the "six" has certain disadvantages. For example, there is much less space in the back - both the smaller width of the car and the focus on a sporty silhouette with a low-set roof affect it. In a word, three adults on the couch will be cramped, especially obese and tall. But for two rear passengers, the level of comfort will be no less than in the Camry.
Engines and transmissions
As you can see, Toyota designers are not too keen on beauty, preferring to improve safety and comfort for the driver/passengers. So outside and inside Mazda 6 looks not just preferable - it is head and shoulders above the competitor. And after the last restyling, the long-awaited turbocharged engine appeared in the range of Mazda engines. The 2.5-liter Skyactiv-G justifies its appearance with the ability to develop 232 hp. With. The maximum torque is reached at two thousand revolutions and is 420 Nm.
On all modifications without exception, a six-speed automatic transmission is installed. We also note that the proven and well-proven atmospheric power units were also subjected to modernization, which made it possible to improve their performance. So, a two-liter four is now capable of developing 150 “horses”, with a maximum cr. torque of 215 Nm, achieved at 4 thousand revolutions / minute. The 2.5-liter engine, producing 195 hp, has also become more powerful. With. and 259 Nm at 4000 rpm.
Camry, unfortunately, did not appear under the hood after restyling. The pensioners remained - the time-tested two-liter 150-horsepower 6AR-FSE power unit, as well as a more powerful 2.5-liter fellow 2AR-FE, which develops 180 horsepower. Both engines are aggregated with a full-fledged six-speed automatic.
But there is also a novelty - a 3.5-liter six-cylinder aspirated, designated as 2GR-FKS. This engine is characterized by the presence of a modernized combined injection system, as well as a hydraulic phase shifter built into the intake tract, which can change phases dynamically in a fairly wide range. In the USA, this engine works to the maximum, giving out 305 “horses”, but a version with a power limit of 249 horsepower is supplied to Russia - this is more profitable from a tax point of view. An eight-band automatic works with such an engine.
As you can see, the range of engines Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry retain approximate parity, although much here depends on user preferences.
Dynamics, fuel consumption
Since the most popular options for both models are those equipped with 2.5-liter engines, it would be logical to compare Camry and Mazda 6, under the hood of which these powertrains are hidden:
As you can see, the comparison is again not in favor of Toyota. Camry and after the modernization, which marked a change of generations, remains a leisurely machine. Pressing the accelerator pedal has a corresponding return only after a certain delay. This effect is typical for turbocharged engines with a lack of traction at low speeds. But in this case, the culprit of the delays is the automatic transmission. The 3.5-litre variant has the same problems, since it uses almost the same box, upgraded to 8 ranges.
Although the gears here are long, this does not affect fuel economy - in urban mode, consumption can reach 15 liters, and you can’t count on indicators of less than 10 l / 100 km in the city, even if traffic jams are completely excluded.
Mazda is better in every way. In terms of dynamics, it will give odds to a competitor in any modes and conditions, whether it be a freeway or a racing track. Acceleration to “hundreds” in less than 8 seconds is an extra-class indicator more typical for a sports coupe than for a sedan, and even so large and heavy. Mazda's six-band automatic works much faster, and the motor reacts to the accelerator pedal almost instantly - many compare its dynamics with the times when motors were not limited due to strict environmental regulations. We add that the use of proprietary SkyActiv technology made it possible to make Mazda engines the most economical in the category of mid-size business class sedans - even with active city driving, a figure of less than 8 l / 100 km is more typical than surprising.
Manageability and safety
We have already noted that outwardly Camry seems heavy, slow and clumsy. In general, such characteristics correspond to reality, but what cannot be taken away from Toyota is an unprecedented smooth ride. If you have not previously encountered business class cars, you will definitely feel a huge difference. Camry does not feel minor defects in the roadway either when driving fast or when driving slowly. You will only be able to feel soft jolts when the wheels of the car hit serious bumps such as speed bumps or large potholes.
But, as you know, controllability and comfort are antagonistic concepts. So the handling here is not so good. As we have already noted, Camry reacts belatedly to pressing the gas pedal, but the same story with the steering wheel - beginners need a lot of time to adapt to this behavior of the car.
Mazda has a much stiffer suspension, thanks to which the image of a car with sports inclinations has firmly entrenched in this model. You will not see roll on high-speed corners here, which allows the car to feel confident on tracks with complex geometry and terrain.
Of course, serious irregularities will not go unnoticed - in terms of comfort, the Mazda 6 is not the best sedan. Another noticeable drawback is the increased noise of the car. Although attempts were made in this direction to correct the situation, the “six” is still considered a noisy car today. To such an extent that after driving 300-400 kilometers, you will want to stop and rest your ears.
Comparing the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry by this criterion shows that if you like a comfortable ride, then the Camry is a clear leader, and if speed is your prerogative, then Mazda will be clearly preferable.
Maintenance cost
In connection with well-known circumstances, such a characteristic of a car as takes on great importance. If you are a responsible car owner and do not miss visits to authorized dealerships for routine maintenance, then Mazda service will definitely cost you more.
The fact is that the cost of a standard hour and the cost of most consumables for the "six" are higher. But if serious repairs are required, and you prefer to use only original spare parts, then the situation will change not in favor of Toyota, and significantly - by an average of 10 percent.
Options and prices
Both models represent the same price group. Of course, there are differences in configuration, and it is they who can tip the scales in one direction or another.
Mazda 6 in the minimum configuration with a two-liter engine costs 1.45 million rubles, the corresponding "Standard" package from Camry will cost the buyer 1.52 million.
In total, the Toyota Camry range includes 7 trim levels. The top is Executive Safety, equipped with an 8-speed automatic transmission and a 3.5-liter power unit. It costs from 2.43 million rubles.
Already in the basic version, Camry is equipped with LED head optics and foglights, also on LED lamps, alloy wheels, electrically adjustable exterior mirrors, power windows for all windows with the Auto function, a rain sensor, and an engine start button. The list of passive safety equipment and electronic assistants is also extensive - 4 PB (front / side), curtain airbags, slope start assistant, ABS / EBD systems.
Mazda has 4 configurations, three of them are equipped with atmospheric engines, and the 2.5-liter turbocharged unit is available only in the top modification Executive Plus 2019, the price tag for which is 2.17 million rubles.
In the basic configuration, you will receive LED optics, 2-zone climate control, front / rear electric windows, electric heating of the front seats, front curtains / airbags, full power accessories for external mirrors, ABS / EBD and a tire pressure monitoring function.
Which model to prefer
Being in the same price category is perhaps the only thing that unites these cars. In all other respects they are very different. And it's not so much about the technical characteristics, but about the philosophy of the models, each of which is far from new to the market. The Toyota Camry is perceived as a strict, reliable car ideal for the middle age group, and the Mazda 6 has a reputation for rebellion, which is preferred by active youth. Of course, such maxims can be called rather conditional, but you can’t argue with statistical calculations.
What to choose in terms of reliability, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? The Toyota brand is generally considered the undisputed leader in this indicator, and this model is no exception. Yes, its dynamics and speed capabilities are not so good, but if you belong to the category of responsible drivers who prefer to avoid all sorts of risks, then your choice is clear.
As for the cost, according to many experts, Toyota's price tags are a bit overpriced, and a similar trend is observed from year to year. Considering the car's speed and fuel consumption, Mazda, which costs a little less, looks more preferable.
But you need to take into account not only the current value of the car, but the cost of maintaining it. If the car is new, then here the advantage is on the side of Camry - the price tags in official car services speak in favor of this particular model. But with age, the situation changes - spare parts for the sixth Mazda are cheaper on average by 10-15%, and this should also be taken into account, especially if you practice frequent car changes.
Is it possible to draw conclusions based on the above? Yes, definitely. Toyota is considered a model of reliability, but Mazda is strong in this component. And the comparison is clearly not in favor of the Camry, and for many potential buyers this is a fundamental factor. In terms of handling, the “six” is also one step ahead, but Toyota is better for Russian roads - it is much more comfortable. Finally, it is impossible not to note the differences in the exterior. If it is important for you to be the owner of a bright car, then Camry is clearly not your choice. And one more thing: Mazda is positioned as a car designed for people who love speed, drive. This is true, but no one forbids you to ride it the way you are used to.
In a word, we would prefer the "six". But you, of course, may have other preferences, so we are not going to impose our opinion - the final conclusions are up to you.
13.03.2017
Japanese auto giants have been fighting for a domestic buyer for decades. The main confrontation today is observed in the segment of "business class" cars. Potential motorists have to choose which is better and more profitable - Toyota Camry or Mazda 6? In fairness, we note that each of them managed to win a huge army of adherents, even from the moment the first models entered the market.
What is special about these vehicles? Experts note a number of features, thanks to which they manage to successfully compete with the best representatives of European companies:
- full compliance with advanced technologies in the field of automotive industry;
- first class design solutions
- innovations in the engine building segment;
- affordable cost.
These features are common to cars from Japan. They also have marked differences. But let's go over the surface of the two models in order to clearly imagine what we are dealing with.
- Toyota Camry- a modern 5-seater vehicle, presented on the market mainly as a 4-door sedan. One of the best representatives of the "D-class". The latest seventh generation to date was introduced in August 2014. This is a restyled version.
- Mazda sixth model- a car with front-wheel drive, 5-seater, roomy (meets D-class standards). The sale includes a 5-door station wagon, as well as a 4-door sedan. These are the third generation models that entered the market in 2015.
Japanese exterior
New Generation Toyota Camry looks massive and solid enough. At the same time, respectability here is highly questionable. It is felt that the designers had to experiment with the design of the new model in order to take into account market trends. As a result, we got a traditional luxury car, but with a claim to dynamics.
Distinctive features of the vehicle:
- the bumper is complemented by massive cutouts, visually echoing the complex shape of the headlights;
- heavy profile that does not go well with fast driving;
- a convex and large rear bumper covers a narrow lamp base.
What is the result? From a design point of view, the car looks disharmonious and ambiguous: if you look at the vehicle from the side, one picture is formed, and if you look at the back or front, then the car is perceived completely differently.
Video review Toyota Camry
So which model is better - Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? To draw an unambiguous conclusion, it is necessary to consider the features of the nearest competitor.
Mazda 6 designers have taken a huge step forward compared to their opponents. Visually, the six is perceived as a real lightning - swift, dynamic, athletic, solid and complete. If you choose solely in appearance, then the choice would be obvious and expected. What is it about this model?
- Narrow headlights filigree complement the low-hanging hood.
- The radiator grille is inclined towards the central part, thanks to which the car acquires additional purposefulness.
- The roof pillars captivate with smooth lines that visually correspond to the wheel arches.
- The interior, slightly recessed back, resembles that of the Jaguar.
In terms of design and aesthetic completeness, the "brainchild" of Mazda looks an order of magnitude more successful than the model from Toyota, and don't go to a fortune teller.
Video review of Mazda 6
Organization of the internal space
Having cast a cursory glance at the interior of the 6-ki and Camry, it may seem that the latter is better implemented - beautiful and massive wood panels, leather upholstery. That's just the case when the essence lies in the details. Natural elements in the interior of Toyota Camry cannot be found during the day with fire. They have been replaced with cheap plastic.
In the process of prolonged operation, artificial "pomp" can get bored. It is not surprising that many of our compatriots practice decorating part of the front and central tunnel with carbon stickers. But designers from Toyota pleasantly surprise in another way:
- Large display that supports high resolution, so the picture is clear and detailed.
- Organic and beautiful dashboard lighting. Everything is worked out and matched to the smallest detail - nothing distracts the driver in the process of movement.
3 adults can fit on the back sofa without much difficulty, but only 2 passengers can feel comfortable. The internal space is sufficient for comfortable work with a laptop. From the front, the situation does not look so rosy - the backs of the seats are low, the pillow is flat, you have to constantly adjust the position of the body while driving.
As for the advantages of seats, Toyota has them:
- tactilely pleasant and soft skin;
- you can install a drive with memory;
- chairs are adjustable in 6 positions.
What to choose - Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? A balanced conclusion can be drawn, taking into account the “arguments of the opponent”.
Japanese designers in the case of the six decided to distance themselves from wood imitation. Corresponding elements are found, but rather rarely. The central high panel is supplemented with black plastic, inside there was a place for a small screen, which displays information about the current climate control settings of the car.
Somewhat disappointed multimedia system in Mazda 6- it is frankly simple here with a small diagonal of the display and without high detailing of the picture. The dashboard is divided into 3 deep niches, so that even in bright light, you can easily read the available information. At night, excessively bright illumination puts pressure on the eyes, this is an omission. mazda 6 there is not enough space behind - whatever one may say, and the dynamic silhouette imposes certain restrictions on free space. Salon is not wide, the roof is low. Three adults will no longer fit here, only people of not very tall stature and full build will feel comfortable.
Much more attention is paid to the front seats. They are magnificent - decorated with perforated leather, thanks to which the landing of the passenger and driver is reliable and does not change even with aggressive driving. Even in tight turns you can fit without problems.
6-ka is a real find for drivers, which is suitable for both businessmen and young entrepreneurs.
Driving performance or how cars feel behind the wheel
Most of our compatriots choose Camry or Mazda 6, taking into account, first of all, the driving performance of cars, so the last comparison will be devoted to this important criterion. So what do we get as a result? The restyled Toyota Camry boasts slightly more power, but in motion the car feels unhurried and overly smooth. Pressing the gas does not lead to lightning acceleration, for this the car takes some time. This effect is mainly due to a smooth six-speed "automatic", which, in addition, overuses fuel when driving around the city - 13-15 liters - it will be a bit much.
Aggressive Camry
Toyota has obvious advantages:
- smooth running even when moving fast;
- small potholes and bumps in the roadway go unnoticed;
- maximum driving comfort.
The car, with all its advantages, has a significant drawback - a mediocre level of controllability. The delay is observed not only when the gas pedal is pressed, but also when the steering wheel is turned. For an inexperienced driver, this is fraught with loss of nerve cells and a slight sweat on the forehead.
If we draw a comparative parallel between the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry in terms of dynamics, then it is the 6-ka that will come to the finish line, regardless of the road and driving style. Mazda gains 100 in less than 8 seconds, which is already typical for cars made with a sporty touch.
Note! The use of proprietary SKYACTIV technology makes it possible even with aggressive driving - consumption does not exceed 9 liters per 100 km. The power unit reacts almost instantly to the “commands” of the driver, and in this regard, before the wizards from Mazda, you want to take off your hat and bow.
The rigid suspension only complements the sporty image of the car. When making sharp turns, the car does not heel. And even on domestic roads, it easily gives odds to other vehicles. But far from all drivers can feel comfortable in a sedan, since excessive rigidity makes itself felt, and its noise is decent.
Many men dream of having a lot of money, the best wife and the fastest car. In a car, he primarily looks at design, interior, performance, safety, equipment and cost. Both of these cars are very popular among the middle class population. The competition in this market is very strong and the developers had to work hard to combine all the qualities together.
Machine safety
The Mazda 6 has on-board computers, satellite navigation with a touch screen. The Toyota Camry has airbags for the driver, more expensive models also have airbags to protect the legs.
Interior models
Both models are developed at a high level. Not a big drawback is that a tall person will be uncomfortable in it, we hope that this will be fixed in the future. The Toyota cabin is comfortable, and a mirror is also provided for the driver, which will not allow the driver to be blinded by the headlights of cars driving behind.
Specifications
Toyota has a 2.4 liter four-stroke engine that consumes 9.5 liters of gasoline per 100 kilometers, which produces 181 horsepower. Mazda 6 has a 2.5 liter engine that is equivalent to 192 horsepower. Consumption per 100 kilometers 10-11 liters of gasoline.
Mazda 6 accelerates in 10.6 seconds to 100 km / h, and Toyota Camry in 9.
In the class of mid-size sedans, there is no smell of democracy. Monarchy in its purest form! Everything is like in a textbook: a form of government in which all power is concentrated in one hand and is inherited. Yes, this is the story of the Camry! Each of its generations dominated our market - in other years, all competitors taken together fell short of the Camry in terms of sales. Therefore, special attention is paid to the new generation car (factory index XV70).
How about a comparison with the Kia Optima, which smashed the old Camry (XV50) to smithereens in a recent comparison test (SR, #12, 2017)? Since Toyota paid attention to handling, comparison with the reference Mazda 6 for this part suggests itself. The third sparring partner was the Ford Mondeo sedan, a recognized favorite of corporate parks. It is the only one with a turbo engine. The rest of the cars have aspirated 2.4–2.5 liters at their disposal. Power range 181-199 hp I declare the fight for the throne open!
| Toyota Camry Came to Russia last spring - serial production at the plant in Shushary was launched in April. The machine is built on a new platform. As before, there is only one body option - a sedan. ENGINES: | Ford Mondeo The representative of the fourth generation entered the Russian market in 2015. Assembly - in the Leningrad region. Among the cars of past generations, we offered hatchbacks and station wagons, from this generation - only sedans. ENGINES: | Kia Optima The world premiere took place in 2015, but Optima reached us only a year later - but in a localized version. For the first time, a turbo engine was proposed, but the station wagon version is not available with us. ENGINES: | The current generation debuted in 2012. During this time, the Japanese carried out two restyling, but the “six” has not yet reached us after the last update. ENGINES: |
Throne room
Why did you love the past generation Camry? For the feeling of extra space! There is so much space behind that you can not envy the executive S-class too much - of course, adjusted for the trim level. The XV70's body is 25mm lower than the XV50's, but the Toyota's roominess is still just fine, except that the feet are a little cramped - provided the front seats are in the down position. Space enough with a margin in all directions. Even the roof does not press - it's not without reason that the Japanese installed seat cushions 30 mm closer to the floor. It is especially good for the right rider: he can move the front seat away from himself with a servo drive, freeing up additional space, like a real VIP passenger.
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | When it comes to services, the Camry is head and shoulders above the competition. Only it allows you to adjust (by means of an electric drive!) The angle of the backrest, adjust the "weather" (only Toyota offers three-zone climate control), control the audio system - the remote control from all this economy was attached to the armrest. Against this background, seat heating, window blinds and two USB connectors are perceived as something natural. In Optima, you will not find such "luxuries" - there is only heating, side curtains and a socket for a flash drive. But in some ways, the Optima even wiped the nose of the Camry. Firstly, the Kia is a little more spacious in the shoulders, and our measurements confirm the subjective impressions. Secondly, the seat profile is the most comfortable in the quartet. Finally, it is more convenient to sit in a Korean sedan - the doors open at a larger angle. So for the second row of seats, these two cars were given equally high marks.
The Mondeo's wheelbase is the longest in a quartet, but that doesn't mean anything. The stock of space for the knees is surprisingly modest - as if you are sitting in the Focus, and not in a solid, almost five-meter sedan. And if three of us drive behind, then the heads of the extreme riders touch the racks - this was not the case in other cars. And the stuffing of the seats is too dense - you need to be softer with the passengers, softer! But Mondeo also has strengths: not only a 12-volt outlet is available, but also a high-voltage one. Competitors also do not have convenient punching slots in door pockets, tailored as if specifically for a tablet. In the second row of the Mazda, too, you can’t clear up: the legroom is back to back, there are no media connectors, and only a half-liter bottle enters the door pockets. But the central passenger is comfortable here - he does not sit on a hard hump, but on a soft ottoman. C Mondeo - parity. But, as they say, not a single expanse!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Every driver dreams of a quality car that will reflect his financial well-being and serve him well for many years. Today, Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 are especially popular among business-class cars of the middle price category. Each car deserves attention. The Toyota Camry is a medium-sized sedan that, after the update, has acquired more impressive dimensions and retained a calm disposition.
Mazda 6 is the choice of those who seek a dynamic car with a sporty character, suitable for a standard family.
Design
The new Toyota Camry is large, but there is no need to talk about solidity and respectability either. In order to increase sales, Toyota manufacturers have tried to give the Camry a more luxurious and dynamic look. We can safely say that they did not quite succeed.
At the rear, the situation is also bad - narrow lights on a large bumper and sloping rear pillars are completely invisible. All this leads to the fact that the general appearance of the Toyota Camry is not uniform, since there is no combination of the front and rear views with the sides, as in the situation with the Corolla.
In comparison, the Camry or Mazda 6 the latter creates the impression of a real sports car - swift and dynamic. Comparing cars is a tricky business, but let's try anyway. The exterior design is complete and harmonious. All details fit together perfectly. To give a serious appearance, the engineers did their best - a low overhanging hood, narrow headlights directed towards the center, a complex geometric shape of the radiator grille.
The Mazda 6 is at its best when viewed from the rear and sides - the shifted interior lines, the smoothness of the roof pillar and wheel arches, the straight trunk lid - all this makes a lasting impression.
Salon
When comparing the interior of a Toyota Camry or Mazda 6, the first impression is the advantage of the interior design of the Camry - leather in the upholstery, wood panels. But upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that artificial materials and very inexpensive plastic were used in the decoration. Already after a short time of operation, car owners begin to look for options for ennobling the interior space of the cabin. However, it is worth noting the really important plus of the Toyota Camry - a modern multimedia system with a large and high-resolution display. In addition, the driver will appreciate the dashboard with high-quality backlighting.
The back row in the Toyota Camry, like in the Corolla, quite comfortably accommodates three adults with enough legroom. However, it is difficult for the driver and passenger in the front seat to talk about comfort - low seat backs and flat pillows. The advantages of the seats include soft leather upholstery, automatic adjustment to 6 positions, position setting with memory.
When comparing Avensis or Mazda 6, it should be noted that the interior design is more expensive and even the plastic is of better quality. The center console is framed in glossy black plastic and it is in it that the display is located, which displays the parameters of the climate system.
The front row of seats are trimmed with perforated leather for maximum comfort. There isn't a lot of space in the back row, but two adults will fit without a problem, especially if they have something to compare with.
Specifications
The Toyota Camry engine with the update increased its volume by 100 ml and received additional power, but there was no significant change - the car is still smooth and unhurried. The fuel consumption of this car is 13-15 liters per 100 km. The car moves so smoothly that small bumps in the road surface are not noticeable at all, and therefore the comparison is not in favor of the Mazda 6.
Mazda 6 is fast and dynamic - acceleration to 100 km / h takes 7.8 seconds. The 6-position gearbox responds quickly to any shift, and the engine responds beautifully when the fuel supply is increased. The average consumption is 10 liters per 100 km.
Mazda 6 is quite capable of competing with sports cars. The car behaves well on turns and changes in the roadway. Each turn is under the full control of the driver. The steering wheel responds to any movement and, despite the bulkiness, the car easily enters even the sharpest turns, which is worth noting when making a comparative analysis.
Soundproofing the Mazda 6 interior is the eternal problem of this car. Engineers from time to time are trying to amend and solve this issue. We can say that the updated version of the Mazda 6 is really almost soundproof. The cabin is comfortable and the soft sound from the rustling of gravel under the wheels will in no way spoil the mood of the driver and staying in it can be compared with luxury options.
If we talk about solidity in combination with technical characteristics, then the choice is obvious - Mazda 6 undoubtedly wins. Toyota Camry is more respectable, but significantly inferior to Mazda 6 in terms of content.
The price factor is commensurate, and therefore the choice of a Mazda 6 or a Toyota Camry is only yours - the solidity of a Toyota Camry or the high-quality sporty character of the Mazda 6. Whatever you choose, it is unlikely that you will go unnoticed driving any of these cars.
Mazda 6 vs Toyota Camry? The comparison is certainly quite arbitrary and there will always be those who will furiously prove the superiority of one brand over another, and everyone has their own arguments which is better. But if you want to get a family car with a dynamic character and economical fuel consumption, then choose the Mazda 6.
