If you can hear it, then this is not a bike, but a fart. Or something with noise in your car.
this is a masterpiece :lol:
You would at least for the same Stepanna explain these expressions of "dull youthful" slang .... What is "crunch" and how does it differ from "fart" .... :lol:
Why do you deny the obvious things that lie on the surface I do not know ... :oops:
1. The sound background of a motorcycle is an order of magnitude higher than that of a car and a motorcycle can be HEARED on the road, unlike a car. Here, double-glazed windows of the windows of houses do not save
residents from motorcycle sounds, the noise of a car is not even close there ....
2. An accident on the opposite side of the road with corpses is a prison ... no options
Here is a comment on the video with which I agree one hundred percent
In any debriefing group, they will tell you that the speed of the motorcycle in this situation did not matter. The footage clearly shows that the headlight of the motorcycle was clearly visible even before this blind-eyed taxi driver began to turn. If a vehicle moving straight ahead was visible, it was obliged to yield to it, i.e. do not force to change the speed or direction of movement. And where in the requirement to give way is it written that it is necessary to give way only to those who drive exactly 60?
The taxi driver will be imprisoned 100%.
VPU can be understood - he is a former instructor specifically for training category "A", and he loves motorcycles and understands them. A motorcycle is a very convenient vehicle in summer. It is very mobile, convenient and quite comfortable, and even in the conditions of a metropolis, when driving in traffic jams, nothing better has yet been invented. But this is on condition that a person KNOWS how to manage it, and realizes that a motorcycle, as a rule, does not forgive mistakes that a four-wheeled car forgives. And sitting on a sportbike, which weighs over 200 kg, a drisch, weighing 50 or 60 kg, to which he was presented, exposes himself to mortal danger. If by car you can sharply turn the steering wheel in front of an unexpected obstacle, then this number will not work on a motorcycle and you will definitely run into this obstacle, therefore, speeding on a motorcycle is very dangerous - instead of airbags, you will be met by a concrete pillar, and it is somewhat harder pillows. I would ban people who have not undergone special training to ride sportbikes, that's it on heavy motorcycles, and I would punish very severely for speeding in the city, especially on heavy motorcycles.
the sad thing is that initially there are people whose eyes fill with blood and hatred at the word "motorcycle" hence this slang about crunches, farts, etc. comes from.
yes, I agree that in moto is not the same as in a car
cars up to 3.5 tons - one right and skills, more than 3.5 tons - everything is different (although the principle is the same)
reseeding from Java to Suzuka, you can kill yourself right at the very first turn ...
Modified June 4th, 2017 by VPUOn the night of September 28, a terrible accident occurred on the Astrakhan highway because of a cow, with two dead. The footage from the scene is shocking, one of the cars is literally run-down.
At 03:48, on the R-216 Astrakhan - Elista - Stavropol highway, a 28-year-old citizen of Kazakhstan, driving a Toyota Highlander, hit a cow that suddenly appeared on the roadway. From the impact, the car was thrown into the oncoming lane, where the foreign car collided head-on with the Daewoo Nexia.
The 57-year-old driver of the second car, who lives in Cherkessk, as well as his passenger, born in 1997 from Uzbekistan, died on the spot from their injuries before the ambulance arrived. Two more passengers of the Daewoo Nexia car, foreigners aged 27 and 29, were not injured. This was reported in the press service of the Astrakhan police.
Employees of the Separate DPS Battalion No. 2 identified the driver of cattle. A man born in 1971 was brought to administrative responsibility for violating traffic rules. Information about the fact of uncontrolled grazing was also sent to local governments.
On the fact of the accident, a procedural check is being carried out, during which an assessment of the actions (inaction) of the shepherd will be given. According to its results, a procedural decision will be made.
Hello, this is Ilya Kulik.
If people died in a road accident, this qualifies as death by negligence in an accident, that is, in fact, manslaughter. And for this, a significant period of time has been laid. But since this is a careless act, the punishment can be mitigated.
The specific punishment will largely depend on the relationship between the guilty and injured parties, and on the attitude of each of them to the process, since the trial concerns them directly.
Which article provides for liability for a fatal traffic accident
Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for criminal liability for crimes unwittingly committed on the road by car owners, including those with a fatal outcome. Specifically, deaths in road accidents relate to points 3 to 6.
Punishment for fatal accident
As many as four points regarding accidents in which there are casualties are created to differentiate cases:
- in count dead;
- as of driver (sober/drunk).
Therefore, there are four degrees of punishment.
Upon conviction for any of them, a driver's license for up to 3 years is taken away as an additional punishment. Unless otherwise stated, the minimum term for each type of punishment is 60 days.
What are the penalties for each case?
If only one person died and the driver was sober, several punishment options are possible, namely:
- up to 4 years forced labor;
- up to 5 years deprivation of liberty.
If there are multiple deaths in an accident, the judge will choose one of the following measures to apply to a sober driver:
- for 5 years maximum - forced labor;
- up to 7 years- deprivation of liberty.
For persons who committed the same crime in the state, the punishment will be more severe. Since 2014, for drunkenness accidents, if people died, a lower limit of the duration of punishment has been set.
If one person died in an accident punishment for a drunk driver will be imprisonment for a period of 2 to 7 years.
With the death of several persons, the drunken culprit is supposed to the smallest term of imprisonment is 4 years, and the maximum is 9 years.
Peculiarities of criminal cases initiated on causing death due to negligence in an accident
Initiation of a fatal accident case is possible within 6 years. Therefore, if not later than six years later they find the perpetrator who fled the scene of the accident, he will be held criminally liable.
Note. In the event of the death of the perpetrator, a criminal case is not initiated.
Since causing death as a result of a traffic accident is considered an unintentional act (unless proven otherwise), caused by negligence. In fact, after all, no driver wants to become the culprit in the death of others. Therefore, even a violation of traffic rules while drunk, which resulted in the death of many people in an accident, is considered a crime of moderate gravity.
From this comes the possibility:
- probation;
- case closure by reconciliation of the parties.
Will the perpetrator be punished?
Many people think that pedestrians do not bear any responsibility, even if they violate traffic rules. But it's not. Yes, in most cases it is the driver of the vehicle who is found guilty, since he must always keep the situation under control, drive at a speed that allows him to slow down in time, etc.
But when it is proved that the driver did not have any technical or physical ability to prevent an accident, the pedestrian is recognized as the culprit. Recently, with the widespread use of video recorders and, most importantly, the acceptance of video recordings in court, it is becoming easier to find the truth.
What is the punishment for foot culprits?
So what will happen to the pedestrian if the court establishes that he is the culprit of the incident, in which there are human casualties? Article 264 cannot be applied to him, since it is only for the drivers of the vehicle. But there is another article in the Criminal Code - 268 for pedestrians, passengers and other road users who are not drivers.
Guilty of the death of one person maximum threatened with four years(one from the list):
- restriction of freedom;
- forced labor;
- deprivation of liberty.
When death because of the suspect two or more people, maximum the possible period of forced labor is increased to 5 years, and imprisonment up to 7 years, restriction of liberty will not apply. The state of alcoholic and other intoxication does not provide for a separate punishment, but may be recognized by the court as an aggravating circumstance.
Where is the perpetrator serving his sentence?
I think that many of you, when you hear the words “criminal term”, “imprisonment”, immediately imagine prison casemates. In fact, those convicted of unintentional crimes are serving time in colonies-settlements.
In such institutions there is no security and constant supervision, there are no restrictions on mail communication and personal visits. They live in dormitories, but it is also possible to provide a separate living space if the convict wants to live with his spouse. In some cases, it is allowed to live outside the colony. Labor is carried out and paid in accordance with the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Penalties are imposed for refusing to work, for example, a ban on leaving the hostel.
In general, the most significant difference from ordinary life is the need to be in a strictly defined territory and periodically report to the authorities, as well as the fact that the administration can at any time check, inspect things, etc.
The main disadvantage of settlement colonies is the likelihood that among the prisoners there will be real criminals serving time for serious crimes, but brought to the colony for good behavior or for other reasons. Such persons bring a prison atmosphere to the colony.
What is taken into account when sentencing
When deciding on punishment, the judge takes into account the various circumstances of the case, which can either reduce or increase the punishment.
What is the reason for reducing the punishment
Mitigating for a fatal accident will be:
- committing a crime for the first time;
- the fault of the victim(for example, in a collision of two cars, the passenger of the driver who did not violate the rules was not fastened. If the unfastened passenger was in the culprit's car, the responsibility for not using the seat belt lies with the driver);
- perpetrator is underage;
- the accused is a pregnant woman;
- the defendant has minor children;
- surrender, assistance in the investigation;
- the perpetrator provided medical assistance to the victim and voluntarily compensated for the damage (non-pecuniary damage).
If the defendant agrees with the prosecution, he may petition for sentencing without a regular trial if the victim is willing.
In such a special procedure, the judges take into account only the personality of the defendant and the aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Punishment in such a process is not assigned for a period greater than the maximum for the crime in question.
Note. Upon the death of a person who has been harmed, one of his close relatives is considered the victim.
Which makes the guilt worse
An aggravating circumstance in causing death in an accident can be attributed to the repeated commission of a crime. Causing death and drunkenness are themselves assessed as aggravating circumstances, but since they constitute a sign of the crimes described in Art. 264, as when sentencing they are not taken into account as aggravating.
Reconciliation of the parties
Formally, the legislation allows reconciliation of the parties in case of any crime of medium gravity. However, for a long time there have been disputes both among the legislative and judicial societies about the legality of reconciliation of the parties in cases related to the death of people.
Opponents of reconciliation argue that relatives and other representatives of the deceased, who are recognized as victims, do not have the right to reconcile with the culprit on behalf of the deceased.
In any case, the decision to terminate the case by reconciliation of the parties is taken by the court on a case-by-case basis, to terminate the case is the right of the judge, and not his duty. And since there is no final decision, depending on the region and even the specific court, a different solution to this issue is possible.
For example, the Sverdlovsk Regional Court considers it unacceptable to reconcile the parties if there was a loss of life, and the courts of Tatarstan, including the highest ones, almost always dismiss cases related to fatal accidents upon reconciliation of the parties.
Probation
Theoretically, since any death caused in an accident is considered a negligent act and is of medium severity, a suspended sentence is possible if the appointed term is not more than 8 years. A suspended sentence is assigned when the judge believes that a person can improve without isolation from the public.
The judge chooses the specific punishment. As practice shows, for accidents committed while drunk, a suspended sentence is not assigned. In some regions, judges refuse probation even for inflicting death while sober on one person.
In general, the culprit is likely to get off with a suspended sentence, but this will require significant mitigating circumstances, the absence of objections from the victims and accusers, and competent legal support. If the accident that led to death was committed while intoxicated, the real term cannot be avoided.
Compensation for moral damage
The death of a person is always grief for those to whom he was dear and an irreparable loss, so the question of compensation for moral damage to relatives naturally arises.
How much will the insurance company pay for OSAGO in case of death in an accident
Since 2015, insurance companies have been paying out 475,000 for every death. This amount is distributed among all beneficiaries, who are recognized not only as those who lost their breadwinner, as before, but also close relatives (spouse, children, parents, a person who supported the deceased as a dependent). If there are several persons wishing to receive payment, and the court recognizes each of them as a victim, the maximum amount will be equally divided between them.
If compensation for harm to health was paid before the death of the victim, then the amount paid is deducted from the death benefits.
Any person who submits documents evidencing burial expenses can receive up to 25,000 rubles in compensation.
Summing up
- punishment for the culprit a fatal accident is quite severe;
- to the judge's decision on the appointment of this or that punishment, the attitude of the perpetrator and the victims to the case, confirmed by the relevant statements, is significantly influenced;
- reconciliation of the parties and probation– possible, but not mandatory, resolution of the case;
- victims will receive payment from the insurance company and may require the perpetrator to compensate for non-pecuniary damage.
Conclusion
Causing death as a result of an accident, on the one hand, is a serious act, on the other hand, it always happens unintentionally, against the will of the culprit. Therefore, in making a decision, all the circumstances of the case will be taken into account so that the guilty person suffers a punishment that is sufficient, but not exceeding the gravity of the crime.
In conclusion, watch the video in which the judge of the Chelyabinsk Regional Court answers questions in criminal cases relating to an accident.
A terrible fatal accident, the alleged culprit of which was a drunk traffic police inspector who grossly violated traffic rules, occurred in the Crimea on the evening of May 21. According to the press service of the Russian Investigative Committee for the Republic of Crimea, it all started with the fact that
the senior inspector of the traffic police for the city of Yalta, while drunk, got behind the wheel of his expensive Mercedes premium car in his spare time, and drove along the Yalta-Sevastopol-Gaspra highway.
At some point, the inspector lost control and drove into the oncoming lane. There, at full speed, he rammed a small yellow Kia Picanto city hatchback, and after the impact flew off into a domestic VAZ car that was driving nearby.
As a result of an accident, a 64-year-old woman, the driver of a Kia car, as well as her passenger, a one-year-old child, died.
In addition, a 40-year-old female passenger of a Kia car, as well as an eight-year-old child who was driving in a VAZ, received serious bodily injuries. In the photographs from the scene of the accident, not all of which can be published due to ethical considerations, it is clear that the frontal impact was of terrible force - both cars were seriously damaged. At the same time, the airbag did not seem to work for Kia and the woman simply did not survive the impact.
At Mercedes, in spite of the broken hood, both pillows fired and the interior of the foreign car was practically not damaged. It is not surprising that the drunk traffic cop who was driving was not seriously injured.
Immediately after the incident, eyewitnesses who were traveling in the same direction as the police officer shared footage from the DVR. From the moment of the first meeting with the violator to the most tragic accident, 22 minutes passed. One of the videos shows that
despite heavy rain, poor visibility and a rather narrow mountain road, the driver of the premium sedan is moving at a speed much higher than the flow and makes risky overtaking, including in forbidden places across a solid line.
At the same time, a motorist who allowed dangerous driving overtook eyewitnesses on the road several times, but they, apparently, did not report the offender to the police, but only honked after him. Another whole Mercedes can be seen for the last time when it overtakes the bus, leaving through a continuous lane into the oncoming lane. Just a few seconds later, on the footage you can see the terrible finale of the accident - the broken Mercedes and Kia and the damaged silver VAZ pulling to the side of the road. “Take pictures on the phone, call an ambulance,” the man says off-screen, after which the recording ends.
According to eyewitnesses, the Mercedes driver himself tried to escape from the scene of an accident after an accident, but he was caught.
After the accident, the girl, who received minor injuries, was sent home. And the Kia passenger is in the Yalta city hospital in a stable serious condition.
Currently, the police officer has been detained, investigative actions are being carried out with him, aimed at establishing all the circumstances of the incident. In the near future, an autotechnical forensic examination will be appointed by the investigation, and the issue of bringing charges and choosing a preventive measure will be resolved.
Although law enforcement agencies have not yet named the name of the drunken reckless driver in uniform,
eyewitnesses claim that they recognized the driver - they suggest that the violator may be a Yalta traffic police sergeant named Rosik. An inspector with the same surname more than once became the star of videos that were filmed by local activists fighting against arbitrariness even before the annexation of Crimea to Russia.
“This is a traffic police officer of the city of Yalta named Rosik. He killed people and ran away, ”Andrey Sikoev claims on social networks. Several other people are also sure that they recognized Rosik. “We need as much publicity as possible! The driver of the Mercedes, according to eyewitnesses, is a traffic police officer Rosik, who was intoxicated, ”wrote.
On his behalf, employees of the Control and Preventive and Personnel Divisions of the Central Office went to the scene to conduct an inspection and study all the circumstances of the incident.
“If the fault of an employee is established, he will be dismissed from the internal affairs bodies for negative reasons and will be held liable in accordance with the law. Its immediate supervisors will be brought to strict disciplinary responsibility, ”the press service of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs said.
This is the second high-profile accident in recent days involving a drunk driver who grossly violated traffic rules. at high speed, at a red traffic light, I drove in the opposite lane to the intersection of Komarov and Salyutnaya streets. There he rammed three cars: Skoda Octavia, Lada Vesta and GAZ-31029. When the 23-year-old driver found out that a person had died in an accident, he demonstratively began to drink beer right at the scene of the accident, and tried to blame the faulty brakes. The motorist was taken into custody, despite the presence of a pregnant wife. He faces up to seven years in prison. The deceased left children with disabilities.
