Sources
Sources correspond to companies that independently compare tires based on a consistent methodology that includes as many tire quality criteria as possible, and provide unbiased test scores for a group of similar tires based on usage.
This database includes only those sources that meet these criteria. These criteria also apply for each source test.
Sources used to determine tire performance:
- Test results published in specialized publications.
- Data obtained in accordance with Regulation (EC) 1222/2009 on the labeling of tires in relation to fuel efficiency and other relevant parameters. Or Grades used in car tire labels (MOBS*) in the absence of official data.
- Data published by independent testing laboratories.
A detailed list of sources (with the exception of EU Regulation 1222/2009) used to assess the rating of each product is attached to the publication.
Grading Scheme
The final score consists of 9 benchmarks, which are supplemented by 4 other benchmarks for winter tyres.
The basic indicators are divided into 5 groups: 3 - for summer tires, 2 - for winter tires.
Each core indicator is given a different weight in its group based on its degree of importance in the category.
Below are the groups of indicators and their base indicators:
Calculation method
Each base indicator is evaluated according to the following principle:
- A score out of 10 points is given to the tire with the best result in a particular test.
- The score of other tires is reduced in proportion to the obtained standard deviation of the discriminant.
- All results greater than 9 times this standard deviation receive a score of 1.
If the source uses its own rating system (which is not based on a 10-point system), then linear recoding is performed.
The final baseline score will be based on the arithmetic mean of the scores obtained from the results of each test.
Note: Tests carried out by automotive magazines or specialized organizations are usually based on the most common sizes on the market. While tire performance may vary slightly by size, we have preferred to assign a score to the entire size panel of a particular tire model.
Tests, tests and expert evaluation of the Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 tire. Yokohama ice guard ig35 test
Yokohama ice guard ig35 test. Tests, tests and expert evaluation of the Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 tire
Add your review Yokohama Ice Guard IG35Japanese studded tire Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 for harsh winter: reviews, test, description.
Full description
Test results:
Test results:
More details about the test, as well as how the testing was conducted, can be found here.
Test results:
More details about the test, as well as how the testing was conducted, can be found here.
Add tire review
Winter Studded Tires Yokohama Ice Guard IG35: tests.
Tests, trials and expert opinion on the Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 tire. The rezulteo tire buyer's guide combines test results from various European sources. Rezulteo offers detailed information to help you make the best tire choice. More about tire test methodology
Methodology for assessing technical indicators
Sources
Sources correspond to companies that independently compare tires based on a consistent methodology that includes as many tire quality criteria as possible, and provide unbiased test scores for a group of similar tires based on usage.
This database includes only those sources that meet these criteria. These criteria also apply for each source test.
Sources used to determine tire performance:
- Test results published in specialized publications.
- Data obtained in accordance with Regulation (EC) 1222/2009 on the labeling of tires in relation to fuel efficiency and other relevant parameters. Or Grades used in car tire labels (MOBS*) in the absence of official data.
- Data published by independent testing laboratories.
A detailed list of sources (with the exception of EU Regulation 1222/2009) used to assess the rating of each product is attached to the publication.
Grading Scheme
The final score consists of 9 benchmarks, which are supplemented by 4 other benchmarks for winter tyres.
The basic indicators are divided into 5 groups: 3 - for summer tires, 2 - for winter tires.
Each core indicator is given a different weight in its group based on its degree of importance in the category.
Below are the groups of indicators and their base indicators:
Calculation method
Each base indicator is evaluated according to the following principle:
- A score out of 10 points is given to the tire with the best result in a particular test.
- The score of other tires is reduced in proportion to the obtained standard deviation of the discriminant.
- All results greater than 9 times this standard deviation receive a score of 1.
If the source uses its own rating system (which is not based on a 10-point system), then linear recoding is performed.
The final baseline score will be based on the arithmetic mean of the scores obtained from the results of each test.
Note: Tests carried out by automotive magazines or specialized organizations are usually based on the most common sizes on the market. While tire performance may vary slightly by size, we have preferred to assign a score to the entire size panel of a particular tire model.
Star rating system
Stars represent a graphical summary of the score for a group of metrics. They are assigned according to the following system:
*MOBS: Tire marking data obtained from publicly available sources of information on Internet sites. Learn more
www.rezulteo-shina.ru
From this article you will learn:
Model overview
Strengths
Weak sides
User Reviews
These tires are purchased mainly for two reasons - for the beautiful design of the tread and the affordable price. However, they do not have obvious advantages. Motorists note good balance, acceptable grip on ice and slush, as well as good acoustic comfort.
The resource is also not bad - the spikes may well last three seasons even with active use, and the tread is even longer. Among the reasons for concern are poor traction in the snow and hardening of the rubber below -20 degrees.
sp
website
Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 Reviews
Add your reviewJapanese studded tire Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 for harsh winter: reviews, test, description.
Japanese studded tire Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 for harsh winter: reviews, test, description.
Full description
Description Yokohama Ice Guard IG35
Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 is a new generation studded winter tire with a directional tread pattern.
According to tire manufacturer Yokohama Ice Guard IG35, they provide safety in the most dangerous conditions on snowy and icy roads. 3D lamellas securely hold the car on a given trajectory.
For high-quality removal of water and snow porridge from the contact patch, the Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 tire uses semi-radial directional grooves.
Improved tread compound securely holds the stud in place.
Independent tests of the Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 tire
Test of winter studded tires R14, "Behind the wheel - Sergey Mishin", 2012.
Test results:
9th place - Yokohama Ice Guard IG35
More details about the test, as well as how the testing was conducted, can be found here.
Winter studded tire test 2013, Car Program
Test results:
5th place - Yokohama Ice Guard IG35
More details about the test, as well as how the testing was conducted, can be found here.
Big test of studded tires 205/55 R16, "Behind the wheel", 2015
Test results:
12th place - Yokohama Ice Guard IG35
More details about the test, as well as how the testing was conducted, can be found here.
Reviews about the tire Yokohama Ice Guard IG35
Add tire review
oshinax.com
Yokohama Ice Guard IG35: very popular winter tires
Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 - these tires are considered relatively affordable, moreover, they attract with their big name. However, how good are their performance properties really?
From this article you will learn:
Model overview
These tires belong to the type of winter studded tires. Issued since 2010. On the market are presented in dimensions from R13 to R22. The possible tire width ranges from 145 to 325 millimeters, and the profile height is from 30 to 75.
Thus, Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 is suitable for a wide variety of vehicles - from a budget small car to a sports roadster or a large SUV. Positioned in the middle price category.
These tires have a nice design. The central part of the tread is in the form of a herringbone, which looks very impressive and suggests that the Ice Guard IG35 will perform well on wet paved roads and in slush.
The shoulder areas of the tire are notable for their pronounced blocks - they provide good grip on ice and snow, and also demonstrate stability in corners.
Strengths
The Yokohama Ice Guard IG35 performs well on icy roads, showing sufficient traction and predictable steering responses. Course stability is good. Braking performance is also good, as is traction.
Additionally, it is worth noting the low noise level, both on a snowy road and on asphalt. At the same time, on a wet asphalt surface, good resistance to hydroplaning is observed.
Weak sides
Despite the big name, the behavior of the tire on a snowy road is rather mediocre. Traction even on packed snow is not outstanding, and braking efficiency is relatively low.
In turns, early and sharp drifts can occur, while the steering wheel becomes uninformative. In regular modes, the steering wheel reacts to turns with some delay. It is better not to drive in deep snow on the Ice Guard IG35 - Japanese tires can dig even with a slight layer of snow and skid heavily.
As for the asphalt pavement, you should not expect anything special here either. When driving slowly, the behavior of the tires is predictable, but when actively driven, low steering sensitivity, strong yaw at high speed and drifts in corners can be noted. At the same time, braking may seem unimportant, as well as a smooth ride, even on small bumps.
By what parameters does an ordinary car owner choose winter tires? First of all, we are interested in good grip properties of the tire with snow and ice, tire durability and its price. It was for these parameters that I chose a set of tires Viatti Bosco Nordico size 225/65 R17.
The model, created at the Nizhnekamsk KAMA TIRES complex, was developed for quite specific tasks - to obtain a product with excellent consumer properties for reasonable money. It's no secret that Scandinavian-type tires, and those just reminded me of Bosco Nordico, which are just right for the harsh operating conditions in our country, from well-known world manufacturers are not just expensive, but very expensive.
Yes, of course, if you own a brand new Range Rover or Mercedes-Benz GLS, then for you there is no such word as budget. More precisely, it exists, but it is simply not limited to such trifles as the cost of new winter tires for your SUV.
For me, it was important to find reliable and inexpensive winter tires for the third generation Toyota RAV4, which would last at least 3-4 years. The car is operated in Moscow and the Moscow region in the "several days a week" mode.
Considering that under the wheels in the metropolitan area in most cases there is asphalt, at first the idea came to choose a non-studded option. However, taking into account the icy entrances and exits from the yard, as well as small out-of-town runs, it was decided in favor of Viatti Bosco Nordico studded tires.
I must say that the tires pleasantly surprised us with their powerful tread and high-quality studding. We previously wrote about the manufacturing process of these tires, so there is nothing surprising here - Viatti are produced on modern European equipment, and they are initially adapted to Russian operating conditions. I especially recalled the rubber mixing shop, which was put into operation in 2018. Everything is brand new, brand new!
Many car owners try to determine the quality of rubber by touch. If you use such a popular method, then Viatti Bosco Nordico tires showed their best side - the rubber compound is soft, which means that the tread will not “tan” at low temperatures, which often happens with European tires of the so-called alpine type. So there is confidence that the Viatti installed on the Toyota RAV4 will not lose their grip in any weather.
However, this was already tested in practice, when the first really severe frosts hit, and the tires on our crossover remained soft (winter models from Nizhnekamsk were originally designed to maintain grip and operation in the temperature range from -45 to +10 degrees Celsius ). Rubber showed good grip properties literally in the first days of operation, when a lot of snow fell, and the yards did not have time to clean. It was on this day that I was impatient to go out of town, so at first I slowly but surely made my way along a deep rut between tightly parked cars without even a hint of the demolition of the front or rear axle, and then drove no less confidently along the uncleared road to my summer cottage.
There was a fear that when driving on asphalt, the rumble of spikes would “get” me, but after the first weeks of running in new rubber, the clatter on asphalt decreased significantly. We can safely talk about acoustic comfort, moreover, the model seemed to me almost silent in relation to a studded tire. By the way, the spike in Viatti Bosco Nordico is traditional - with a cylindrical carbide insert, reliable and tested by the best manufacturers.
Surprisingly, Viatti Bosco Nordico are the type of winter tires that give you a feeling of confidence in your driving skills, although the price seems to be not high. Tires look impressive, and, as it turned out, have no less impressive grip. Especially worth noting is the effective braking on slippery surfaces, which I have managed to apply several times already, despite the fact that in general I drive extremely carefully.
However, the new Viatti Bosco Nordico now on my Toyota RAV4 makes me want to go faster. It is obvious that handling has become better - developed sidewalls perfectly hold the car in corners even on snowy roads.
Considering all the listed properties of the tested tires and the cost of a unit of size 225/65 R17 a little more than 5 thousand rubles, this product can be characterized very simply - good value for money. As for other parameters, such as durability and strength, it will be possible to talk about this only after the first winter months of Viatti Bosco Nordico operation.
It is not worth comparing the results of studded and non-studded tires, since they were tested on different days, in different weather conditions, and the ratio of the grip properties of those and other tires depends very much on the weather. At one temperature, “thorns” are in front, at another, soft “Velcros”. We figured this out a few years ago: ZR, 2009, No. 1
Now let's introduce the participants.
15" NON-STUDDED
The most expensive tires are Nokian at 4150 rubles, but they are also the best - Hakkapeliitta R (made in Russia) together with Michelin X-Ice 2 shared the first place. Value for money - 4.5.
A little cheaper, for 4100 rubles, you can buy ContiVikingContact 5. Our results suggest that these tires are in their place. True, in terms of price / quality ratio (4.6), this purchase is slightly less profitable.
But the Michelin X-Ice 2 in the price competition is in the best position: 3900 rubles. The price/quality ratio of 4.2 is the most attractive in the top three. We believe that the cost of this tire is underestimated on purpose, since there is already a new model on the market - the third generation Michelin X-Ice. It was officially presented last winter outside of Russia, postponing the official presentation of new items with us for almost a year.
In fourth place is Goodyear UltraGrip Ice + at 3560 rubles. per piece (we believe the price is too high - a fee for a high brand). Price / quality ratio - 4.1.
The fifth in the financial rating is Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ - 3520 rubles. The tire is a little cheaper. With a score of 892 in our tests, it came in fourth place with an even more attractive price/performance ratio of 4.0.
Very close in price (3500 rubles), but already in sixth place is the next tire - Pirelli Winter IceControl. In the final table, he also occupies the sixth place with 846 points. We believe that it should be sold a little cheaper: now the price / quality index is 4.1 - like that of the stronger Goodyear.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG35 for 3400 rubles. in seventh place, although in the test she showed the eighth result, gaining only 820 points. Since they buy, then there are those who are willing to pay for the inscription Made in Japan.
Nizhnekamsk Viatti Brina scored 816 points and took the ninth place. A tire with a foreign name at a price of only 2600 rubles. a piece should sell well, local marketers believe. We wish them good luck.
The cheapest tire is Cordiant Polar SL for 2500 re. And in the test, she took seventh place, even ahead of the Japanese product. In our opinion, 826 points with a price / quality ratio of 3.0 is a result worthy of attention.
All tables open in full size on a mouse click.
16" SPIDERS
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7 for 6600 rubles. ahead of the planet. Expensive but well deserved as these are the best tires in our test: 929 points. The price / quality ratio is also "leading" - 7.1.
In second place is ContiIceContact. The difference with the winner is 200 rubles. (“Konti” costs 6400 rubles) and 4 points give a decrease in the price / quality index to 6.9.
Third place is occupied by the new Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, which is fair, since the tire is clearly one of the leaders. You can buy it already for 5500 rubles.
Michelin X-Ice North 2 is sold a little cheaper - for 5400 rubles. The cost is even slightly underestimated, because in our tests XIN 2 scored 923 points, the price / quality ratio is the most attractive in the top three of the test: 5.9.
Another 100 rubles. cheaper than Gislaved NordFrost 5 (5300 rubles). According to the results of the test, the tire scored 905 points, taking sixth place. The price / quality ratio of 5.9 is equivalent to Michelin. “Gislaved” loves our people, and therefore does not spare money.
In sixth place is the Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000 for 5250 rubles. In our tests, this model was able to take only eighth place, gaining 855 points. The price / quality ratio is 6.1 - more than that of Michelin and Gislaved.
On the seventh position Pirelli Winter Carving Edge, which can be bought for 5200 rubles. We recommend these tires as they came in fourth place in the tests with 918 points. And with such a cost, the price / quality indicator is the most attractive in the first six of the test: 5.7.
Following Yokohama iceGUARD iG35 - and, as usual, with a small gap in price with the "bridge": sold for 5100 rubles. The place in the price list is close to the one taken in our test, but the price / quality ratio is too high: 6.1.
In a completely different price category (4500 rubles), they sell the new Hankook i-Pike RS. A decent tire that took a big step up from the previous model and scored 886 points. Almost came close to the 900 mark, which distinguishes very good tires from others. The price / quality index is 5.1 - worth a closer look.
Nearby, the no less worthy Russian-made Nordman 4 is offered for only 4400 rubles, that is, for two-thirds of the price of the leading older brother. Meanwhile, in our final list, Nordman occupies the fifth (!) position. The price / quality ratio and beckons - 4.8. Good offer.
For 4000 rubles. you will find Cordiant Polar 2. The place in the price rating corresponds to the alignment we received, although the price / quality ratio (5.0) is less attractive than that of Nordman.
Closes the parade of popular tires "Kama-Euro 519": only 3500 rubles, - the last place in our test. Buying a tire with a price / quality ratio of 4.3 will not be ruinous for the most modest budget.
FRICTION TIRES RATING 195/65R15
1–9_no_copyright
They were born in 2010, they participate in our test for the first time.
Weak on ice in all directions - in acceleration, in turns and braking. They are more accommodating on the snow: they hold turns worse than others, accelerate weakly, but brake well - on a par with Nokian! Course stability on a snowy road leaves much to be desired: the car roams noticeably, requiring steering. Keeping the right direction is hindered by low information content - the steering wheel is almost empty by force. In fast corners, the first reaction is good, although the corners of the steering wheel are a bit big. The transition to sliding is soft, the given trajectory is kept, however, even here the driver will be upset by an unnecessarily light, empty steering wheel.
They do not like snowdrifts - if necessary, it is better to overcome them on the move, without turns and stops. They refuse to change direction, starting is possible only with a pull. When slipping, they strive to dig in, they are reluctant to get back. On an asphalt straight line, the car goes smoothly only when accelerating. It floats at a constant speed, requiring relentless adjustments, to which it reacts with unpleasant steering of the rear axle.
Braking on a dry road is weak, on a wet road - the worst. Uncomfortable: loudly noisy, with increasing speed more and more. They transmit shocks from medium and large road bumps, vibrate on small ones. Fuel consumption is average at any speed.
2–9_no_copyright
3–8_no_copyright
Created in 2008, it appeared on our market in 2009, but it takes part in the ZR test for the first time.
On ice, lateral grip and acceleration are the weakest. Braking is average, and it pleases. But on snow, both braking and acceleration are worse than those of all other test participants, although they hold the road moderately in corners. On a snow-covered straight, they scour a little, take the car away from a given direction, dragging it into deeper snow. Handling is mediocre: the car does not obey the steering wheel well and strives to straighten the trajectory, slipping out of the turn. Skid occurs only if provoked, but is well compensated.
In deep snow, it moves uncertainly, and only with a certain degree of slipping. It refuses to turn, slips into a rut or where there is less resistance. It goes smoothly on the asphalt, but when adjusting the direction, it strains. At small angles, the steering is very sluggish, but as the steering angle increases, the car abruptly changes direction at a greater angle than required.
Braking is stable on both dry and wet pavement, the stopping distance is average. Quite comfortable: quiet on any road, only slightly itchy on the comb. They transmit shudders and small tremors from small irregularities. Excess fuel is not consumed, but they do not allow saving either.
4–8_no_copyright
5–7_no_copyright
Production and sales started in 2009.
On the ice, the behavior is unbalanced - average acceleration, poor grip in corners and the weakest braking. But on the snow everything is smooth, the grip is average in all directions. On a snowy road, they seem to carry the car evenly, and the steering wheel at “zero” is tight, understandable, but the back is walking from side to side, and this does not give confidence. In turns, the behavior is unstable. In the initial phase, an unpleasant skid occurs more often, which can be compensated by adding gas. When the steering wheel is turned, its information content sharply decreases, literally falls. How it will end, no one knows - you have to fight either with demolition or skidding.
The same uncertainty and in deep snow. They move well only on the verge of slipping. Slippage at the moment of starting is especially dangerous: it leads to burying. On the other hand, maneuvers are given without tension, the car is selected confidently in reverse. On the pavement they go smoothly, the reactions when adjusting the direction are clear. But even here, the rear axle does not allow the driver to relax, taxiing after steering. This gives the car a retarded oversteer.
Braking on both dry and wet roads is weak. Quiet tires can not be called - they emit an increased rumble. They transmit shocks to the body from medium and large irregularities, vibrate on small ones. Fuel consumption is above average at any speed.
8–7_no_copyright
6–6_no_copyright
Created in 2009, then it began to be sold in Russia, in 2011 it was modernized.
On ice, braking and lateral grip are average, and acceleration is weak. On snow, on the contrary, acceleration is average, braking is weak, and lateral grip is the lowest, on a par with the Viatti. They go smoothly along the snow-covered road, not reacting to different thicknesses of the snow blanket - Pirelli's directional stability is traditionally good. Manageability is also without comment: the steering wheel is tight, clear, the reactions are clear. The transition to sliding is soft, the trajectory can be set and corrected both by the steering wheel and by the gas. There is practically no skid, at the limit the whole car begins to slide outward.
They do not want to overcome deep snow. They move forward reluctantly, even in motion they try to dig in. Well, at least they get out in reverse. On asphalt, they resemble summer tires - a tight steering wheel in the near-zero zone, excellent information content and a clear adherence to a given direction.
Braking is surprisingly weak on wet pavement and weakest on dry pavement. The noise is increased, the vibration load is high - the company pays little attention to comfort. They roll not very willingly - fuel consumption is increased at any speed.
9–6_no_copyright
7–5_no_copyright
They were born in 2009 and have been on the market since 2010.
Deservedly included in the top five. They differ from those who were left behind in a good balance: all the characteristics, if not leadership, are even on any of the surfaces that you will meet in the winter on our roads. For example, on ice both in the longitudinal and transverse directions showed average results. Not so good on snow: acceleration and lateral grip are average, but weak braking is a little let down. At high speeds, they go smoothly in the snow, but there is not enough information on the steering wheel. Lacks confidence and when driving in a turn. At the entrance, a noticeable delay in reactions makes you turn the steering wheel unnecessarily. For this reason, in the initial phase of the turn, the car goes into a demolition, demanding to release the gas. And on the turning arc, it strives to break into a skid, which, fortunately, is easily parried.
They overcome snowdrifts without tension, go forward confidently, do not dig in when starting off, but do not like to skid much. On the asphalt, they scour slightly on transverse irregularities, they respond to taxiing with a slight delay. In terms of noise, there are no complaints, even on rough pavement they roll quietly. But on convex bumps, they decently shake the car and transmit vibrations from seams, cracks and micro-roughnesses of the road.
They brake moderately, showing no preference for dry or wet surfaces. At a speed of 60 km / h they help save fuel, at 90 km / h they look average from this point of view.
10–5_no_copyright
11–4_no_copyright
The model is the same age as Goodyear, created in 2009, it has been sold on our market since 2010.
Good on ice in acceleration, braking properties and lateral grip are only average. On snow, acceleration and lateral grip are average, and braking is weak. Only Yokohama stops worse. On the snowy road go smoothly. The experts noted not only the confident direction keeping, but also the informative rudder, as well as immediate reactions to course corrections. In fast corners, the speed is limited by the soft drift of the front axle, which is eliminated by turning the steering wheel or a slight decrease in speed. The information content of the bagel is high.
Snowdrifts are reluctant to overcome, move forward uncertainly, turn poorly. Reverse move more confidently, allow you to get out of the snow trap. On the asphalt they go almost smoothly, they scour a little on transverse irregularities, and when adjusting the direction they are a little late.
They brake well on wet surfaces, and on dry surfaces they stop best of all. They are quite comfortable - they walk on any surface softly and quietly, except for a little hiss on a snowy road. Fuel consumption is average at 60 km/h and higher at 90 km/h.
13–4_no_copyright
12–3_no_copyright
They have been produced since 2008, at the same time they began to be sold on the Russian market.
During this time, the mixture has been modernized more than once. On ice, they show average results in braking and lateral grip, and they accelerate well. But they cling to the snow better than anyone: they were in the lead in the corresponding exercises. But the exchange rate stability let us down a little: slight difficulties appear when trying to adjust the direction of movement. With each small turn of the steering wheel, the driver is a little strained by the delayed reaction and a shallow, but prolonged skid. In fast turns, delays in reactions and low information content of the steering wheel interfere, which leads to an increasing skid with prolonged stabilization.
In deep snow they turn the car into a tractor. They move, move and maneuver very confidently in any mode, without fear of slipping. On the pavement, they float slightly, are affected by crosswinds, and are noticeably late for corrective actions by the steering wheel. They transmit vibrations from small irregularities, pass road joints hard, causing the car to shudder. They make noise, unpleasantly crunch and buzz in slippery turns when they find something to cling to.
Brake on wet pavement is the best. And on dry show good results. At a speed of 60 km / h, the most economical (along with Goodyear, Michelin and Nokian), at 90 km / h, they also do not require too much.
14–3_no_copyright
15–2_no_copyright
Created in 2008 and sold ever since.
A good balance of grip properties on all surfaces that can be found on a winter road. On ice, the grip properties are even, regardless of actions and modes - in a turn, during acceleration, during braking. On snow, lateral grip and acceleration are good, but braking is average. They go straight in a straight line, without a hint of a desire to evade from a given direction, they accurately react to the steering wheel when adjusting the course. In corners they behave clearly, without problems and surprises. Turns are clearly prescribed, they allow you to adjust the radius with the steering wheel or by changing the fuel supply.
In the snowdrifts feel at home. Feelings are similar to those you get from the "Continental". Confidently row, get under way in any mode, maneuver without difficulty. On the pavement they go smoothly, they bribe with clear reactions comparable to the behavior of summer tires.
They brake well, regardless of whether the pavement is dry or wet. Comfortable: only slightly voice the tractor trail and rough ice. There are no comments about the smoothness of the ride either. Economical at city speeds, do not abuse fuel even at 90 km / h.
17–2_no_copyright
16–1_no_copyright
Created in 2008, since then they have been modernized almost every year.
On the ice - grip properties inaccessible to rivals in the test in all disciplines: in braking, during acceleration and on a circle. On snow, grip is very good: when accelerating and turning, it is the best, on a par with the Continental, in braking efficiency it is slightly inferior to it - the second result. On a straight "white" road they go smoothly, without requiring adjustment. In terms of handling, they are similar to Bridgestone and Pirelli: equally clear reactions, the car just as obediently changes its trajectory when manipulating the steering wheel or gas. The same good stabilization after slips provoked by the driver.
Deep snow is best overcome by sinking the gas pedal to the floor. True, in this mode you run the risk of climbing into such a snowdrift, from where you cannot get out without a shovel or outside help. Although during the tests it was not needed - the car always drove in reverse. They go smoothly on asphalt, but experts noted slight delays in course correction.
Braking is good on wet pavement and average on dry pavement. As for comfort, there are small comments - the noise level on rough roads is slightly increased, vibrations from small bumps are transmitted. At any speed, fuel consumption is the lowest in the test.
18–1_no_copyright
RANKING OF STUD TIRES 205/55R16
19–11_no_copyright
Established in 2008, since then sold. In 2010, the composition of the rubber compound was modernized.
Nevertheless, against the background of other winter tires, Kama-Euro 519 looks weak. On ice, the grip properties are very low, only Cordiant has worse. On snow, grip is also more than modest. The only consolation is that the balance of grip properties is quite even in all directions: it slows down, accelerates and holds the road weakly in corners. On a snowy road, it is better to drive slowly: the car scours from side to side. In a slippery turn, the behavior is torn: the car breaks into a demolition, then into a skid. More or less obeys the steering wheel only on rolled snow. On ice, even at low speed it breaks into a skid. Slides on any surface for a long time. Very large steering angles and significant delays in reactions interfere with keeping the car under control.
In deep snow, it does not move quite confidently. At the time of starting, it is better not to slip. With the wheels turned out to the side, it starts off better than straight. Reverse is selected without problems. On asphalt, it scours a lot along the road. Very large steering angles, significant delay and low information content, as well as unpleasant steering of the rear axle, interfere with correcting the direction.
Braking on wet pavement is weak, on dry pavement - the weakest. On ice and asphalt, the tread howls loudly. Very rigid - they transmit shocks from medium irregularities and vibrations from small ones.
22–11_no_copyright
20–10_no_copyright
They saw the light in 2009, but appeared in our test for the first time.
Excessively deep spikes make the tire practically helpless on ice - neither accelerate, nor turn, nor stop. Holds a little better in the snow. Lateral grip is closer to average, although acceleration is weak and braking is the weakest. The course on the snow is quite even, there are only slight yaws with a change in depth. On ice, grip properties are subjectively assessed as very poor. Do not turn the steering wheel sharply, otherwise the car refuses to turn. If you still managed to turn, a skid awaits on the arc. On snow, speed is limited by a sharp stall into a skid. To fend it off is the lack of information content of the steering wheel and small delays in reactions.
In deep snow they move not quite confidently. There are no pronounced preferences in driving modes, they pull the car well with little slipping. They walk backwards with confidence. They go smoothly on the asphalt, but when adjusting the direction, easy steering of the rear axle and insufficient information content of the steering wheel interfere.
Braking is average on both dry and wet roads. They don’t indulge in comfort: they buzz annoyingly loudly, shake the body on convex bumps, push on medium ones, transmit vibrations on small ones. Fuel consumption at 60 km/h is higher than average at 90 km/h. The spikes are not held very securely: during the tests, the protrusion value has changed by three “tens”.
23–10_no_copyright
21–9_no_copyright
Quite fresh tires, created in 2010, have been sold in Russia since that time.
But in our test they lit up for the first time. On ice, traction in all directions is average. They behave less confidently on snow: braking and lateral grip are weak, acceleration is the most sluggish, on a par with the Bridgestone. On a snowy road, they scour a little. In corners, insufficiently high coupling properties affect - the car completely slides outward.
Snowdrifts are not for these tires: they get stuck in deep snow, as they say, out of the blue. When starting, they fail, strive to dig in. Reverse move uncertainly. They drive smoothly on ideal asphalt, but this is not often found on our roads. Therefore, constant directional correction is required, which is complicated by delays in reactions and unpleasant steer of the rear axle.
On a dry road, the car stops reluctantly, and braking on wet roads is the weakest. Very hard: shocks from bumps are transmitted to the floor and seat, vibrations occur on the steering wheel. They make loud noise and buzz with spikes. Fuel consumption is average at any speed. The spikes hold securely, there are no losses, but the size of the protrusion is more than modest: they will not be able to reliably hook on ice and dense snow with such spikes.
24–9_no_copyright
25–8_no_copyright
Created in 2009, but appeared on the Russian market belatedly, in 2010.
On ice grip properties: average and in braking, and in turns, and in acceleration. They ride less confidently on snow than on ice. Braking is weak, acceleration is the most sluggish, like in Yokohama, lateral grip is also the lowest. On a snowy road, they scour a little, but do not leave the trajectory. Slow reactions to steering. In fast corners, speed is limited by long drift. In sliding the front axle, the car does not respond to steering turns.
In deep snow confidently starts and moves, but only tight. As soon as the wheels turn a little, traction is lost and the car immediately stops. On the asphalt they go smoothly, keep the set course. But when it is necessary to correct the direction of movement, the driver is strained by the steering of the rear axle and the insufficiently informative steering wheel.
When measuring the braking distance, the “Yokohama” blew again. Like hers, braking is weak on both dry and wet surfaces. Not comfortable enough: they transmit shocks from bumps to the body, make loud noise with the tread and spikes, even at high speed. Fuel consumption at 60 km/h is higher than average at 90 km/h. The protrusion of the spines and the rate of protrusion increase are normal. There are no losses during the test.
28–8_no_copyright
26–7_no_copyright
New on the Russian market. As they say, piping hot.
On ice, the grip is high, the balance is reasonable. Braking and lateral grip are good, acceleration is average. They are pretty strong on snow too. Longitudinal grip is good, transverse - medium. On a snowy road, they scour a little, but do not leave the trajectory. Insufficient information content of the steering wheel and a slight delay in correcting the direction of movement were noted. Slips are harsh in corners, the car slides longer than we would like, but traction recovery is soft and smooth.
In deep snow, they move not quite confidently; when slipping at the time of launch, they show a tendency to self-burrow. They walk backwards with confidence. On asphalt, they make the car float along the lane. A wide “zero”, delays in reactions, steering of the rear axle and insufficient information content interfere.
They brake weakly, both on dry pavement and on wet. Comfort notes: small vibrations from small bumps and increased overall noise typical of studded tires. At a speed of 60 km / h, fuel consumption is below average, at 90 km / h - the most economical. The amount of protrusion of the spines and the rate of protrusion increase are normal. During the test, there was no loss of spikes.
29–7_no_copyright
27–6_no_copyright
The "oldest" tires in our test.
Produced since 2006, from the same time sold in Russia. On the ice, they can boast of a good balance: they brake and turn well, they accelerate moderately. On snow, traction in any direction is average - also good. On a snow-covered straight they go smoothly, without requiring taxiing. In turns on ice and packed snow, they delight with clear reactions and a very soft transition to slips. However, on loose snow, a sharp skid occurs on the arc, requiring clear parrying actions from the driver.
They do not favor deep snow, they confidently move only on freshly fallen powder. If the snow is a little denser, packed, you can only drive in tension, without slipping. The car goes smoothly along the asphalt straight line, the reactions to the course change are immediate, except that the information content on the steering wheel is almost not enough.
Braking is just brilliant: both on wet and dry pavement, the tires stop perfectly. The noise background is increased, like most "studs", but there are no complaints about the smoothness of the ride - all road bumps are smoothed out well. The most voracious at any speed. The amount of protrusion of the spikes and the rate of its growth during the tests are optimal. Lost a couple of spikes from the front wheels.
30–6_no_copyright
31–5_no_copyright
Produced since 2009, sold since the same time.
The tread pattern is the legacy of the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 4 tire. They differ from it in the composition of the mixture and round-core studs. In our tests participate for the first time. On ice, braking and lateral grip are average, acceleration is good. On snow, the behavior is more confident: the longitudinal grip is good, and the lateral grip is the most reliable. On a snow-covered straight line, they scour both the front axle and the rear, reacting to the density of snow. At small angles of rotation of the steering wheel, its insufficient information content was noted. You can drive fast in corners - the reactions are clear, the behavior is understandable. The speed is limited to a slight skid, which is easily compensated by the steering wheel or the addition of gas.
They are not afraid of snowdrifts: it is enough to add gas, and the car will go where the steering wheel is turned. Reverse is selected without problems. They go smoothly on asphalt, but when adjusting the course, there is a noticeable delay in reactions and an empty steering wheel.
They brake on dry pavement moderately, on wet pavement - well. They make a loud noise with the tread and spikes, especially from 40 to 60 km / h. The smoothness of the ride can be called good, do not be small vibrations from small irregularities. Fuel consumption is average at any speed. The amount of protrusion of the spikes and its growth during the tests are close to the optimum. There are no missing spikes.
34–5_no_copyright
32–4_no_copyright
They were born in 2007. Since 2008 they have been sold in Russia.
Periodically, they update the design, spikes and composition of the mixture, leaving the "face" unchanged. Recent innovations have allowed Carving to join the leading group. On ice, longitudinal traction is average, and lateral traction is the highest. On snow, traction is good in all directions. On a snowy road, they hold their course perfectly. The car goes like an arrow and reacts sensitively even to small turns of a dense, highly informative steering wheel. Turns are prescribed with a twinkle. Clear, understandable control, sensitive reactions to the slightest turn of the steering wheel. At the limit, the speed is limited to a soft and smooth skid, which can be extinguished by a small addition of gas or turning the steering wheel. The glide is fast but gently stabilizes.
Snowdrifts are easily overcome, they do not dig in at the start, they drive both under tension and with slipping, they easily maneuver. On asphalt they go smoothly, a clear “zero” helps to correct the direction.
Wet braking is moderate, dry is good. Traditionally, they do not indulge in comfort: they make noise, as if the plane is flying by, shake on any irregularities, as if pumped over. Most likely, the low level of comfort is a kind of payment for the pleasure of driving a car on a winter road. Fuel consumption is average at any speed. The amount of protrusion of the spikes and the rate of their growth during the tests are optimal. There are no losses.
35–4_no_copyright
33–3_no_copyright
Offered on the Russian market since 2009.
The only leaders today use round-core pimples. On the ice, the longitudinal grip is average, the transverse grip is good. On the snow, the alignment is slightly different: the longitudinal grip is good, and the transverse grip is average. On a snow-covered road, the car is carried smoothly and stably. Reactions during course correction - no remarks. In turns, the behavior is clear and understandable. The speed is most often limited to a soft drift, but the car responds well to turning the steering wheel and tries to keep the given trajectory.
Even in slips, it does not get out of control of the driver. You can not only pierce snowdrifts through and through, but also easily maneuver in them, stop and start off again. If you stopped the car - just backed up and drove on. It is always possible to get out in reverse. On the pavement, the directional stability is good, the “zero” is clear, the steering wheel is tight - the tires are almost like summer tires.
They brake well on dry pavement, moderately on wet pavement. The noise level is increased, on a hard surface, the rumble of spikes is clearly audible, especially in the range of 60-90 km / h. Smooth running without remarks - well extinguish any irregularities. Fuel is saved in all speed modes - both at 60 and at 90 km / h. The protrusion of the spines and the rate of change in the magnitude of the protrusion are normal. During the break-in and tests, not a single spike was lost.
36–3_no_copyright
37–2_no_copyright
Relatively recent model, introduced in 2010.
Since the same year, it has been sold in Russia. Differs from other tires in the "diamond" shape of the spikes. On ice, traction is good in all directions. On the snow, the same thing - both longitudinal and lateral grip are at a high level. On a snowy road, they allow you to drive quickly, carry the car smoothly. But the information content on the steering wheel is insufficient. In turns, the drift of the front axle prevails. Skid, if any, appears softly and smoothly and is eliminated without much difficulty.
In deep snow, they go well only with intensive slipping, but this mode is uninformative. You dig in - and the reverse gear will not help. They go smoothly on the asphalt, the steering wheel is tight, the “zero” is clear, the reactions when adjusting the direction are immediate.
They brake on wet pavement better than others, on dry pavement they show average results, on a par with Gislaved. They make a loud noise with spikes on a hard surface - both on ice and on asphalt, especially loudly from 70 to 90 km / h. Pretty tough: they transmit vibrations from road bumps to the body floor, seat and steering wheel. Fuel consumption is average at any speed. Protrusion of spikes within the optimal value. The spikes are held in rubber very securely.
40–2_no_copyright
38–1_no_copyright
Introduced at the end of 2008, sold since 2009.
They are constantly updated, which allows them to stay in the lead. On ice, they demonstrated the best longitudinal grip properties, transverse - medium. On snow - the best acceleration, good braking and grip in corners. On the snow-covered road they go smoothly, without remarks. The steering wheel is tight, the reactions are clear. In corners, speed is limited to a gentle, assisting skid that is most easily remedied with a little throttle. Even in slips, the car is obedient to the driver's commands, restores the trajectory gently and smoothly.
In deep snow they move confidently, maneuver well, start off without the desire to dig in. Any mode: from professional movement of tightness, without turning the wheels, to “blonde” “gas to the floor”. Very well selected in reverse. On asphalt, the movement is smooth, but when adjusting, the rear axle taxis unpleasantly.
Braking on dry pavement is weak, on wet pavement - average. Comfort is not perfect: the distinct noise of spikes on asphalt and smooth ice, jolts from road bumps, primarily convex ones. Economical at all speeds. The protrusion of the spikes is close to the reasonable limit. However, the average protrusion during testing has changed by only 0.1 mm, which means that the spikes in the rubber hold securely.
41–1_no_copyright
39–0_no_copyright
A novelty, preparing for sale this year.
We could not calculate the final scores, because in snow braking Ice Arctic beat the best serial tire, which we took as the “base” in the calculations. On the ice, there are high longitudinal traction properties, and transverse ones are medium. On snow - super braking, very good acceleration and medium lateral grip. On a snowy road, they scour slightly, reacting with a delay to a direction correction. In fast corners, the behavior is ambiguous. In the initial phase, at the stage of entering the turn, there is a noticeable delay in reactions, leading to the drift of the front axle. After the clutch is restored, already on the arc, there is a high probability of skidding, which has to be compensated by both the steering wheel and the addition of gas at the same time. After sliding, the recovery of adhesion occurs quite abruptly, provoking a shooting skid in the other direction.
The concept of "deep snow" for these tires does not exist. The help of the car to get out of the snow captivity was never needed. On asphalt, they noticeably float from side to side, requiring constant adjustment. Very wide "zero", delays in steering actions.
They brake well on wet pavement, averagely on dry pavement. They push on average irregularities, they buzz strongly with a tread and spikes. The amount of protrusion of the spikes is at the limit. However, the change in protrusion during the tests by only one “ten” indicates that the spikes are fixed firmly.
42–0_no_copyright
You can learn more about the designations and classification of tires
Vadim KORABLEV, Yuri KUROCHKIN, Evgeny LARIN,
Anton MISHIN, Andrey OBRAZUMOV,
Valery PAVLOV and Dmitry TESTOV.
Thank you for the technical support of the employees of the AVTOVAZ test site,
Togliatti company "Volgashintorg",
as well as tire manufacturers,
submitted their products for testing.
Also included in the test were:- Avatyre Freeze - domestic development
- Gislaved Nord Frost 100
- Toyo Observe GSi-5
- Hankook Winter I*Pike RS+
On each set of tires 205/55 R16 before the tests, the pilots drove 500 km to break them in. After that, the organizers checked the protrusion of the spikes and the hardness of the rubber.
To assess the longitudinal and lateral grip on the ice, the organizers measured the acceleration time, the length of the braking distance and the lap time along the track. Each set was tested at least 7-10 times to identify errors in the results. For a more accurate calculation of the transverse adhesion, a twelve-meter rearrangement was used. This maneuver is also called the "elk test" - a quick detour of a sudden obstacle (moose on the road).
To avoid the subjectivity of the pilot's assessment, several people tested the same tires. They rated for directional stability and handling. Course stability was tested at a speed of 90-110 km / h. The pilot rotated the steering wheel at small angles and observed the behavior of the car on the test tires.
In another test, patency in the snow was checked, the ability to overcome snowdrifts, maneuver, move off and move in reverse. The organizers of the test considered that this is as important for winter tires as all of the above. Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic performed best in this test. According to the organizers, with these tires, a front-wheel drive car turned into a real all-terrain vehicle!
Ride and noise in the cabin were evaluated on different surfaces and at different speeds. After testing the tires on ice and snow, the experts assessed how protruding the studs were in the tires.
On asphalt, tires were tested for such an indicator as fuel consumption. All tires were tracked in both directions to compensate for the effects of road inclines or light breeze. The length of the braking distance on dry and wet pavement and directional stability were also evaluated.
And the very last test was to inspect the tires and count the spikes that had come out. Bridgestone tires lost the most - 18 studs. In second place were Toyo tires, which lost 7 studs.
As a result, Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 became the winner of the test according to the results of all tests. In second place, with a margin of just half a percentage point, were Continental ContiIceContact 2 tires.
The test results for winter studded tires 205/55 R16 are shown in the tables below.
