What is better Rav4 or Mazda CX 5. Which car is better: Mazda or Toyota

Only in comparison you can understand what is better, the same rule applies to cars. In this article, we will compare two crossovers of Japanese origin. Why are Toyota and Mazda so often compared? The answer is simple, everything is due to the fact that the pricing for cars for two companies will be approximately the same, so in the case of manufacturers producing cars of the same class, then why not compare them.

Toyota and Mazda - old favorites of Russians

Options and prices Mazda CX 5 and Toyota Rav4

First, let's talk about the equipment of the car. Immediately striking is the fact that Toyota on its SUV supplies only two types of engines to our market. The first of them is a two-liter gasoline unit for 146 forces, and a 2.5-liter gasoline unit also for 180 forces. Unfortunately, diesel versions are not available in Russia. But Mazda is ready to offer its customers a little more.

More specifically, versions with gasoline engines are available for sale, one with a volume of 2 liters, the second with 2.5. It is worth noting that Mazda's gasoline versions of engines are slightly more powerful compared to competitors. The Japanese automobile brand also supplies our market with one diesel engine with a volume of 2.2 liters, producing 175 hp. So at least in the choice of engines, Mazda definitely wins.

How to save the battery in winter and use it properly - see here.

Also here you will learn how to drag the ceiling of the car with your own hands.

However, in terms of technical and electronic equipment, Toyota immediately takes the lead. Rav4 are equipped with xenon optics, the cars also have an electronic clutch lock, which transfers torque to the rear axle, and has the ability to completely disable stabilization.

Appearance

If it comes to the appearance of Toyota rav4 2016, then earlier the design of this model was positioned as a female SUV. Because of this, many were skeptical of the model throughout the life of the crossover. Today, however, Toyota designers decided to fix this problem. They tried to add more strict forms and lines to the car. This work was done in order to attract a male audience, but the exterior of the car came out quite controversial. Perhaps the designers stretched the front of the car too much, namely the bumper, which makes it seem that the headlights are too set.

As for the design of Mazda, it can be noted that it was the CX-5 that became the first car of the company, which embodied a new design philosophy. From the very first glance, this SUV shows more aggressive body lines, which gives the impression that the car not only looks brighter and more expressive, but also more “driving”. What is one squint of headlights worth? However, there is one drawback, due to its swift forms, the car seems smaller and lower compared to a competitor.

Summing up the appearance, one thing can be said, the Mazda car has a brighter appearance. It is more suitable for a young person, while the buyer will receive a stylish design and all the same opportunities in terms of roominess. Rav4, in turn, is more suitable for calm drivers who appreciate the comfort and spaciousness of the car.

Salon Mazda cx 5 2016 and Toyota rav4 2016

Salons of cars cardinally wean off. Mazda has a more concise interior, without unnecessary details and shapes. However, the layout of the front panel itself is very similar to the decision of the German company, namely BMW. The multimedia screen in Mazda is slightly recessed into the torpedo itself, which protects it from glare, the interface itself is quite understandable, but today it is slightly outdated.

Rav4 is a completely different story. The designers decided to install an angular front panel, which gives the impression of massiveness and reliability. However, no matter how bold the decision was in the design of the panel itself, there are some details that clearly lack quality. For example, the entire torpedo is made of hard plastic, and the quality of the buttons and other parts of the front leaves much to be desired.

The design of the Rav4 devices looks weak, it seems that the design was borrowed from a budget car of a lower class. And at Mazda, the design of the dashboard is much more interesting and looks up to date.

The driving position of the cars is also strikingly different. In the Rav4, the seats are provided not only for the thin set of the driver and passengers, but also for the larger type of people, which is why Toyota is better suited in terms of comfort for more mature people. In the CX-5, the interior and seats are more compact, the seats have more pronounced lateral support. Therefore, this choice is suitable for young people or middle-aged people.

In terms of ergonomics, Toyota wins here again, the designers have placed more different shelves and cases for various items. Mazda, in turn, is more modest in this matter.

If you move to the back row, you can immediately notice that due to the fact that the Rav-4 has larger doors, landing back will be more comfortable. Also, the back row of Toyota has more space compared to Mazda.

Driving and test drives

If you compare both cars in motion, the driver will immediately notice the difference in the ideologies of the cars. Mazda will be faster and more dynamic, while its fuel consumption will also be modest. The car feels very confident in urban environments and is always ready for active driving. The suspension works great, the car itself is less rolly in corners, which is why it has more precise control. Just as informative will be not only the gas pedal, but also the brakes along with the steering wheel. What the car lacks in the case of the version with automatic transmission is paddle shifters, this would add more emotions to the driver in active driving mode. Toyota, in turn, is a bit heavy, in the dynamics of acceleration to 60 km per hour, the difference compared to the CX-5 will not be noticeable, but if we talk about higher speeds, then the car in this case picks up speed very lazily. Passing a turn is accompanied by rolls, from which the speed on such turns will be lower. But this is all only in urban areas. If you go on light off-road, then the Rav4 will look more solid than the competitor. The off-road potential of Toyota is much higher than that of Mazda, so overcoming any obstacles will be easier to pass on the Rav4

Comparison results

It is impossible to call any of the two presented cars better or worse. The manufacturers of these crossovers approached the issue of creating their cars from completely different positions. On the one hand, Mazda seems to be much more attractive and dynamic, on the other hand, the Rav4 is more spacious, roomy and has off-road potential. And that is why the target audience of the two SUVs will be different. In the case of the CX-5, its buyers will definitely be young people who care about style and driving emotions. And Toyota buyers will be family people above average age, who are primarily interested in practicality in use.

procrossover.ru

Comparison of Mazda CX-5 and Toyota RAV4 - logbook Mazda CX-5 Moby-Dick 2017 on DRIVE2

Having traveled a month on the new Mazda CX-5, a certain opinion has formed about the car. Now you can try to objectively evaluate it by comparing it with my previous Toyota RAV4. Cars of the same class are direct competitors, which makes the comparison even more interesting.

To compare:-Toyota RAV4 IV 2.0 AWD Multidrive 2014 Comfort plus is a fourth-generation Toyota RAV4 compact crossover equipped with a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine, a continuously variable variator and a plug-in all-wheel drive. Average equipment for RAV4 Comfort plus. Produced in 2014 in Japan.-Mazda CX-5 II 2.0 AWD AT 2017 Active is a second-generation Mazda CX-5 compact crossover equipped with a 2.0-liter petrol naturally aspirated engine with Skyactiv technology, a 6-speed automatic transmission and plug-in full drive. Average equipment for CX-5 Active. Produced in 2017 in Japan and already fully assembled in Vladivostok.

Full size

Mazda CX-5 2017vs Toyota RAV4 2014

I'll go through the more important criteria. And so, CX-5 vs RAV4.

Design The CX-5 has a more interesting design in my opinion, if only because it's newer than the RAV4. In general, the CX-5, both inside and out, in terms of design, was a success. Externally, the car is very beautiful, there are a couple of highlights like a radiator grille, optics, interesting body lines / bends. Sitting in the salon you are even more inspired, bravo Mazda, the salon is very pleasant, high-quality materials, excellent ergonomics. In RAV4, this is all a problem, it is more chopped, the nuances are not worked out.

Engine In RAV4 I liked unpretentiousness. No matter what oil, what kind of gasoline he fills, Ravchik will still go, it seemed to a couple that he just didn’t care. I can’t say the same about the CX-5 yet, let’s see what the operation will show. But what was not in the RAV4 was the acceleration dynamics, which, with the same engine size and power, is an order of magnitude better in the CX-5. And I’m also glad that there is no start-stop function (in both cars).

The CVT gearbox on the RAV4 is a little humming. It did not bother me, after I got used to it and knew that it was him. The automatic transmission on the CX-5 kicks a little in traffic, which is typical for an automatic. In general, I am satisfied with the work of both units, although of course the classic machine is valued more.

Plug-in all-wheel drive The off-road capabilities of the CX-5 have not yet been evaluated. Let me just say that the RAV4 video test drives seem to be a car with slightly more developed off-road capabilities than the CX-5. However, I like that the CX-5 does not have a button for forced blocking of all-wheel drive, it connects itself if necessary. I like it more because in the RAV4, due to its unsuccessful ergonomics, pressing this button on the go at the right time is a whole story, it is out of sight and you must first grope for it.

Suspension Mazda's unconditional superiority is here. Suspension work is just perfect compared to Toyota. Small and medium road bumps are not felt. Large pits reach very deafly. On a country road, the suspension, as expected, does not give up either - the car goes confidently, without trembling and rebounds. In the RAV4, every bump was transmitted to the cabin very clearly. This, perhaps, was the most annoying thing in Ravchik.

Handling The CX-5, with its hereditary tendency towards sharper handling, as Mazda should be, steers much more interestingly. Heels less, enters the turn more confidently, reacts faster to the rotation of the steering wheel. The steering wheel is sedan-like. Ravchik just missed all this.

Complete set As for the complete set, the cars are approximately equal. What's more, today, at the same price, the RAV4 has a couple more options. Both cars have everything you need for comfortable operation and some nice bonuses, such as navigation, LED high and low beams, various assistants, and so on. I also note that Mazda is kinder in basic details. There are automatic closers for all windows and their illumination, glove box illumination, auto-locking of doors with a bunch of customizable locking modes, and other pleasant little things that, alas, are not in Toyota.

Noise Isolation This CX-5 is unbeatable. I suggest you read the post about soundproofing and everything will become clear. In RAV4, you can say they forgot about it.

Spaciousness I noticed earlier in the comments that spaciousness excites many. In general, RAV4 is close to the standard of spaciousness in its class. Plenty of space in both rows of seats, large trunk. The CX-5 is a little smaller in numbers, but in reality it's next. There is plenty of room for driver and passenger in front. I also sit behind myself quite comfortably. The wife in the back row with a child in a car seat does not feel embarrassed either. The trunk, due to the flat floor, more competent and ergonomic curtains and the absence of a grid, is more spacious and comfortable, although, in numbers, probably less. The same stroller, packages, bags fit without problems, which is actually required.

The quality of the RAV4 suited the quality of the parts, but the CX-5, in my opinion, made a better car both in general and in the nuances. The quality of the materials is excellent, the economy is not read in anything. In the cabin, pressing and twirling various buttons is generally a pleasure, which was not in the RAV4, from the word at all.

Toyota and Mazda The Toyota brand itself inspired more globality, it was felt that it was an auto giant. Mazda certainly isn't. There is no cheapness, it's just clear that this company is smaller. Yes, less, but from this and more exclusive. And one more nuance. Toyota, as a large corporation, has Toyota itself - the popular segment, and Lexus - the premium segment. Mazda has only one brand. As a result, Mazda turns out to be a little more premium, because. there is no way to breed models for different segments.

Summing up, I will say that having a RAV4 and there was no thought that the car was bad or something was not particularly successful. Rather, he went on it and did not know troubles. And I would have gone on for a few more years, if not a sad case. Moreover, choosing a new car blindly went to order a new RAV4, but did not grow together for reasons beyond my control. And Mazda did just that. And I'm very happy with what I have. Mazda did a good job on the new CX-5, the car turned out to be very worthy! Those who are trying to make a pragmatic choice are not to be envied. Of these cars, it is better to choose with your heart (or soul), in which car it is easier to breathe, chtoli. Both cars are good, without critical flaws and outstanding superiority. I will only add that I did not regret a bit that I took Mazda. Taking almost the same car twice in a row is at least boring.

That's all. I understand that absolutely all the nuances cannot be decomposed in one post, so leave comments, we will figure out what interests you or what you think is unfairly unmarked. Good luck to everyone!

www.drive2.ru

Which is better - Toyota RAV 4 or Mazda CX-5

So the turn has come to check the heavyweights, the so-called not only because of their own weight, but also because of the dynamic appearance and character of the cars. Crossovers, as they have been called for a long time, today there are two, but what! Combining amazing looks and practicality, these cars are a dream to test. And now we have such an opportunity. Let's conduct a comparative review of Toyota Rav 4 and Mazda CX-5.

Toyota Rav 4 car

Straight into battle

The fact that a car, of almost any size and class, should look bright, was introduced into a solid concept by Mazda manufacturers. It's no secret that driving their cars is a pleasure. Although over time, the unshakable philosophy of Mazda has changed and revised, its deep essence has remained the same.

As for Toyota, the manufacturers of this Japanese concern promised to return to the production of driver models a few years ago. And this intention of manufacturers was most clearly manifested with the release of the GT86 - a car in the style of a sports coupe. Although experts see a manifestation of the driver's character in the design of the modern Rav 4. In addition, this car has become something like a bestseller over the years, having accumulated a solid baggage of customer loyalty.

Toyota Rav 4 about the convenience of daily use is just perfect. The contours of the body and the strict “facial expression” of this crossover do not emphasize convenience as much as excellent ergonomics and trunk volume.

As for the front panel of the Rav 4, with a layered structure, it looks much nicer than the interior of the monolithic Mazda CX-5. Yes, and there are clearly more all kinds of shelves of a secluded type, back streets and similar things in Rav 4.

But, to be honest, to get used to them, you need a lot of time. For example, why do you need to put your phone in the tray under the ledge of the center console, as the manufacturers suggest to do, when it fits perfectly in the cup holder, which is located closer and you don’t have to reach out every time to get it? In addition, the block of buttons itself, including those that switch the mode to “Sport”, which sharpens the reaction of the car noticeably, is hidden somewhere deep under the center console. Why is it asked, it was done this way, especially if a passenger who wanted to turn on the heated seats should ask the driver about it, since he himself will not reach this button.

Mazda CX-5 car

As for the interior of the Mazda CX-5, it is tailored according to the classical tradition and all the buttons are in plain sight. A large niche is specially provided where you can store a thousand little things. It is located immediately below the climate control button, and so much free space is not wasted. I also liked the fact that the cup holders are moved back, and immediately behind the Mazda automatic transmission, or rather its selector, there is a multimedia control unit. Everything is convenient and close at hand. Although using this multimedia system is a bit complicated. A rather heavy metal washer is installed on the block, but in order to be able to use it, you need to remember the location of the buttons. And at first, in general, you need to look at the monitor and keys all the time.

As for the instrument panel, Mazda has it more successfully executed. Pleased with a large screen for additional information and three wells, made with designer taste. But the toolkit of Toyota Rav 4 looks, to be honest, much worse. But there are no special difficulties with reading information, and this, however, and most importantly, does not arise. Only now, again, they give out archaism in Toyota Rav 4 power window keys, which offer automatic control only to the driver. But in Mazda, on the contrary, to all passengers.

Video review of the car Toyota Rav 4:

The seats on the Mazda CX-5 are just superb. In particular, this applies to the modification of the Supreme car, where the seats are covered with delicate leather, and the side support rollers are made in a sporty way.

The seats of the top modification Toyota Rav 4 Prestige with roof rails are also good. True, the upholstery of Toyota's seats is much rougher.

On the test, we have two cars from these manufacturers with an equal engine size of 2.2 and with diesel engines, but the Mazda CX-5 has 25 hp. more. It is also interesting that the manufacturers of the Mazda CX-5 made sure to release a modification that would appeal to those drivers who are sick of excessive "bells and whistles". Mazda CX-5 Diesel, performed as Active, became such a modification. Such a car costs about 1,405 thousand Russian rubles. Parktronic is not installed here, there is no keyless entry and power driver's seat. But everything is upholstered with an expensive and pleasant to the touch fabric.

As for the developers of Rav 4, they also thought about picky customers and released a modification called Toyota Rav 4 Comfort Plus, which is not so electrified. The modification is practically devoid of various auxiliary systems, such as blind spot monitoring, for example.

Do the hearts of cars beat in unison

On the video test drive of the Mazda CX-5:

We press the start button and Toyota Rav 4 comes to life. True, in cold weather, at idle, the engine rumbles like a tractor, but as it warms up, it becomes much quieter. 150 horsepower Toyota Rav 4 in urban driving, and on country roads is enough for a comfortable move from one point to another. That being said, it's nice to always overtake on this car, as the 6-speed automatic transmission works just perfect. In addition, if necessary, it will be possible to use the manual mode, and the gears can be forced to switch with the selector. This situation may become relevant in the winter season.

Interestingly, the Rav 4 with the popular 2.5 liter petrol engine does not have paddle shifters, but our model has them. In addition, which is also noteworthy, on the gasoline version of Rav 4, by nodding the lever in S mode, you can only limit the switching range, setting the upper limit above which the automatic transmission will not rise.

The Skyactiv diesel engine of the Mazda CX-5, which is endowed with a reduced compression ratio, as mentioned above, is 25 hp more powerful than the Toyota one. This is immediately felt when the cars accelerate. In addition, the Mazda CX-5 has a stiffer suspension, which explains the thrill when driving. But the sound insulation of the Rav 4 is made in a manner higher than that of the Mazda CX-5.

As for the corners, it is a pleasure to pass them on the Mazda CX-5. Banks are practically not felt, and the Mazda steering wheel is “short”, which is intellectually done brilliantly. But the speed bumps that are often found on city streets, the Mazda CX-5, to put it mildly, does not digest. It is advisable to pass these obstacles carefully, otherwise the stiff suspension will make itself felt, and distinct blows will clearly be felt in the cabin. And at high speed, the noise from tires rubbing against the road surface easily penetrates the Mazda CX-5.

Luggage compartment of the car Toyota Rav 4

But in Toyota Rav 4 it is quieter. Maybe this is due not only to high-quality sound insulation? After all, the suspension on the Rav 4 is made much more relaxed than that of the Mazda CX-5, although attempts were made by the manufacturers of the current generation to give the new model more brutality. Rulitsya this car is quite transparent, without having an obsessive artificial effort in the near-zero zone.

Gearbox and all-wheel drive

The transmission work of the Mazda CX-5 is also amazing. The automatic transmission quickly changes gears and the feeling is that the wheels are connected to the motor with iron. Such a feeling, in particular, develops due to the fact that the torque converter in the Mazda box is blocked in a wider rev range. In addition, the European I-stop system is installed on the Mazda CX-5, which automatically turns off the engine in traffic jams. The option allows not only to take care of the environment, but also allows you to significantly save fuel.

But Rav 4 does not have such a useful option.

It is worth noting that both crossovers today are equipped with diesel engines with automatically connected all-wheel drive, which does not become such an advantage off-road. It's just one thing to drive along a muddy suburban country road to your dacha or park in a snowdrift, and another thing to show miracles on the roads, like our Niva (and why not?).

The moment when the Mazda CX-5 clutch works is difficult to catch, and for a beginner who first got behind the wheel of this vehicle, it may seem that the drive here is permanent, not plug-in.

Rav 4 is not like that. The rear axle is connected to the case much more tangibly, and if desired, the clutch can also be blocked. As for the blocking of the cross-axle differentials, this is imitated in this case by the brakes.

Mazda CX-5 car trunk

All-wheel drive is automatically activated in Sport mode as well. In this case, up to half of the total number of revolutions of torque is transferred to the rear axle.

Here, the luggage compartment of Toyota Rav 4 is arranged in the same way as the interior - it is complicated and incomprehensible. For example, in order to place a spare tire under the floor, Japanese engineers came up with pure Asian meticulousness to build a real podium surrounded by such nooks and crannies that losing something valuable there is tantamount to loss.

The Mazda CX-5, although the floor is flat, but the loading height is doubtful, which is too big.

Judging in general, both crossovers are well equipped and behave quite decently on the road. Their price is comparable, and the choice will depend on individual preferences. We can say that the question of these two crossovers becomes philosophical, where there can be no better or worse option. After all, in fact, accumulating advantages along the distance or showing them at the finish line is the same thing.

Advantages and disadvantages

Specifications Mazda CX-5

Car model:	Mazda CX-5
Manufacturer country:	Japan
body type:	station wagon/5/5
Number of doors:	5
Engine's type:	diesel, R4, turbo
Engine capacity, cc:	2191
Power, hp / rpm:	175/4500
	420/2000
Acceleration to 100 km/h, s:	9.4
Type of drive:	full
Checkpoint:	6 automatic transmission
Consumption per 100 km:	7,0/5,3/5,9
Dimensions, LxWxH, mm:	4555/1840/1670
Base, mm:	2700
Curb weight, kg:	1629
Fuel tank capacity:	58
Trunk volume, l:	403-1560
Price, Russian ruble:	1 366 000

Let's start with the pluses of the Mazda CX-5:

• Mazda is equipped with a sunroof, on some versions;
• start-stop system installed;
• powerful engine;
• good maximum speed;
• relatively low price;
• a fresh look at the interior, tailored according to classic patterns;
• devices hidden in sports in wells;
• convenient location of the center console and a niche for small things;
• the absence of any secret nooks and crannies;

And now about the cons of the Mazda CX-5:

• a complex multimedia control unit, although conveniently located;
• equipment with parking sensors only expensive versions;
• unnecessary value of the loading height of the trunk;
• lack of electric drive in the tailgate.

Now Toyota Rav 4, which has its advantages:

• numerous shelves and niches;
• electrically adjustable driver's seat;
• automatic power windows, however, only on the driver's side;
• solid division of the front panel into conditional horizontal layers;
• concise instrument panel;
• a convenient screen under the speedometer, where you can display the pointer of the marking tracking system;
• convenient manual transmission mode with great capabilities;
• equipment with a rear-view camera in almost all versions;
• spacious and comfortable rear sofa, divided into sections that deviate at different angles;

And there are some downsides:

• incomprehensible podium in the luggage compartment;
• too many niches and nooks and crannies, where it is not long to get lost;
• too soft suspension;
• seat upholstery looks comparatively worse.

Specifications Toyota Rav 4

Car model:	Toyota Rav4
Manufacturer country:	Japan
body type:	station wagon/5/5
Number of doors:	5
Engine's type:	diesel, R4, turbo
Engine capacity, cc:	2231
Power, hp / rpm:	150/3600
Max. cool moment, Nm at rpm:	340/2000-2800
Acceleration to 100 km/h, s:	10
Type of drive:	full
Checkpoint:	6 automatic transmission
Consumption per 100 km:	6.5
Dimensions, LxWxH, mm:	4570/1845/1670
Base, mm:	2660
Curb weight, kg:	1715
Fuel tank capacity:	60
Trunk volume, l:	577
Price, Russian ruble:	1 405 000

What to say? Toyota Rav 4 has experience, reliability and impressive sales runs, which affects the standard in its class. But is this the only sure way to reach the heights? It is doubtful if you look at the Mazda CX-5, which, so to speak, clearly shows that a technological breakthrough is in no way inferior to evolution.

In a word, the summary is this: if you need a frisky and dynamic car, then the Mazda CX-5 is more suitable, and if you need more comfort, then look at the Toyota Rav 4.

rating-auto.ru

Toyota Rav 4 and Mazda CX5 - comparative analysis

Comparison of cars Rav4 and Mazda CX 5 is one of the favorite pastimes of motorists in recent years. Both cars are typical "Japanese", both are reference crossovers, both have similar characteristics and even appearance. All this creates rich ground for disputes. Let's try to be clear. So, Mazda CX 5 or Toyota Rav 4 - which car is better?

Toyota Rav 4

If we have to compare Toyota Rav 4 vs MazdaCX5, then it is better to start with Toyota, as a more traditional participant in our car market. The first generation Toyota Rav 4 was positioned as a car for young people. That is why the crossover scheme was taken as the basis.

A car that is as comfortable as possible in the city, fast on the highway, on which, however, at any moment you can wave “to hell with it” - this is the approach that most closely reflects the philosophy of a youth car from Toyota.

And although the representative of the first generation of the family left the factory assembly line back in 1994, the car retained and developed the general concept, leaving the shortcomings of “childhood illnesses” in the past.

Engine and chassis

We will agree right away - we will discuss only the configuration options that are officially supplied to the territory of Russia. In the Russian Federation, the Toyota Rav4 crossover comes with two engine options that differ in their volume: 2 and 2.5 liters, with a capacity of 140 and 180 horsepower, respectively.

Important! In both cases, the engine is gasoline. Toyota Rav4 in the diesel version, unfortunately, is not officially imported to Russia.

The car has permanent all-wheel drive, which is reflected in the name (RecreationActiveVehicle4 - the number means four driving wheels). Speaking about the chassis of the Toyota Rav4, one cannot fail to note the possibility of blocking the electronic power take-off on the rear axle, which almost turns the crossover into an honest SUV. Almost - apart from a rather modest (by the standards of SUVs) engine.

Exterior

Although the appearance of the car was conceived by the designers as a youth one, the first generation of Rav 4 at first firmly “stuck” the definition - female. And no wonder: against the backdrop of the brutal jeeps characteristic of the era of the 90s, the elegant “SUV” looked, at best, like the little sister of a diesel off-road conqueror.

Working on Rav4 2017, the developers decided to radically change the situation - and, I must say, they succeeded. In many ways, this was facilitated by the spirit of the times - the voracious all-wheel drive giants that occupied one and a half parking spaces, if not gone, then certainly no longer dominate the urban landscape. This is due to fluctuations in fuel prices or an increase in the consciousness of drivers who have begun to think more about the world around them and the people around them - a topic for a separate discussion. But the fact remains - crossovers have ceased to be "undersized" among the giants.

Plus, the designers themselves did their best: the more forward-facing Rav4 bumper of the latest generations resembles the powerful chin of a Hollywood superhero. Recessed headlights began to look more aggressive. Too much, according to some. In general, the redesign to attract a male audience can be considered a success, as evidenced by the dynamics of sales.

Interior

The interior of the Toyota Rav4 demonstrates the continuation of the exterior ideas: the angular front panel with all its appearance shows a resemblance to land cruisers from the 90s, which were probably once the ultimate dream of current crossover owners.

The interior designers were probably guided by the principle “more toys for big boys”, the abundance of controls for various systems, all kinds of “twists”, “switches” and “pressers” are emphasized and protruded in every possible way. The driver's "interface" of the car declares loudly and confidently that a woman's place in this cabin is on the right seat (in a European left-hand drive cabin, of course).

Toyota designers clearly made sure that even a fairly large driver feels comfortable driving a Rav4. The old-fashioned design of the devices also speaks of an orientation towards a more mature audience. The main message is that Toyota grows and develops together with its owner. A young and promising driver Rav4 1994 became a wealthy and respectable owner of the fourth generation Rav4 2017.

Reference! The basic equipment of Toyota Rav 4 2016 will cost a buyer from Russia 1,459,000 rubles.

MazdaCX5

And what can oppose the nearest competitor?

Mazda CX-5 went into production in 2011, a decade and a half later than its competitor from Toyota. The car has already been developed taking into account the experience of analogue crossovers, which made it possible to bypass many of the "rakes" that the predecessors managed to step on.

So, the designers managed to reduce the mass of the main components and assemblies without loss of functionality. The fact that the car was clearly a success is already evidenced by the fact that the Mazda CX-5 became the car of the year in Japan twice in a row - in 2012 and 2013.

Engine and chassis

Toyota Rav4 and Mazda CX5 have the same volumes of petrol engines - 2 and 2.5 liters, but Mazda CX-5 is presented on the Russian market with a 2.2-liter diesel engine. Diesel power - 175 horsepower.

Chassis scheme - permanent all-wheel drive. Drivers' reviews note the excellent work of the torque converter, which allows you to use the "automatic" even off-road.

The European version of the Mazda CX-5 (namely, it is supplied to Russia) is equipped with a rather controversial i-stop system - “intelligent stop”, which automatically turns off the engine when the car stops for a long time, for example, in a traffic jam, at a traffic light, railway crossing.

This is interesting! Curiously, the Mazda CX-5 cars sold in Japan do not have an i-stop system. What conclusions follow from this is an open question.

I-stop allows you to reduce noise and emissions into the atmosphere, while the engine resource is noticeably wasted, which is not justified by cheap fuel economy. Many attribute the i-stop system to Mazda's unambiguous disadvantages, although there are no good reasons for this - the i-stop can always be turned off.

Exterior

When looking at the silhouette of the CX-5 Mazda, it is impossible not to notice the swiftness of the car, emphasized by the numerous contours. It seems that it was not the designers and constructors who gave the shape to the body, but the oncoming air itself “licked out” the streamlined liquid metal profile.

But everything has a downside: thanks to the swift forms, the Mazda crossover seems relatively more compact and low, which may not appeal to convinced “jeep drivers” for whom the car is an indicator of status and significance.

Interior

The first word that comes to mind when looking at the interior of the 2016 Mazda CX-5 is concise. The controls on the driver's panel seem to be kept to a minimum. However, with a more detailed study, it becomes clear that the driving functionality has not suffered in any way, the designers simply did not consider it necessary to flaunt it.

The multimedia screen is recessed into the panel, which, firstly, favorably reflects the style chosen by the designers, and secondly, it protects well from sun glare and reflections of other people's headlights.

In general, the interior of the Mazda cx5 2017 is more “modern”, futuristic, but at the same time respectable, which is reminiscent of the recognized style icon in the auto world - BMW.

Reference! A Russian who decides to become the owner of the official Mazda CX-5 will have to fork out at least 1,349,000 rubles. If you choose by price, Mazda is your option.

The results of comparing cars in dimensions are presented below:

Toyota rav4 or Mazdacx 5 - which is better? It is difficult to give a definite answer to this question.

Mazdacx 5 and Toyota rav4 are typical representatives of the modern crossover class. If you basically share the philosophy of a car for all occasions, then in any model you will find pros and cons for yourself. Well, the final choice is yours!

Toyota RAV4 2.2 D (150 hp) 4x4 AT (1,562,000 rubles) and Mazda CX-5 2.2 D (175 hp) 6AT Supreme + options (1,668,000 rubles)

Represented

This year, the RAV4 is celebrating its 20th anniversary since the launch of the first generation. Today, the fourth generation, introduced in 2012, is already running on the roads. Compared to its predecessors, it has grown significantly in size, power-to-weight ratio and level of equipment. And most importantly, it has changed its orientation: if once the RAV4 had a reputation as a youth fun car and ladies' man, now it is a full-fledged unisex and even with a claim to the role of a family car.

The "off-road" architecture of the front panel is designed to emphasize that the RAV4 is no longer a ladies' man, but a car that is quite suitable for a serious man. The quality of finishing materials to match the cost

The CX-5 can't boast of such a rich history - its debut took place in 2011. This is Mazda's first experience in creating a "global" compact SUV and, judging by the fact that a separate production facility has been organized for Russia in the Far East, it is very successful. The CX-5 is the company's first vehicle to be built using Mazda's latest unique technologies, collectively known as the SkyActiv. Motors can be considered the main breakthrough. Gasoline atmospheric and turbodiesels of this series have the same compression ratio - 14:1.

Looked

Outwardly, both cars leave no doubt about their Japanese origin, but it is impossible to confuse them - each has its own family design. The same is true in salons. Toyota has a heavy “off-road” front panel hanging over the legs of the driver and front passenger with a missing “beard” and, as it were, a separate tunnel. The CX-5, on the contrary, has a “light” architecture - a sloping dashboard surface with a pronounced center console flowing into the tunnel.

Otherwise, the difference is not particularly noticeable, except that the Mazda driver's seat is a little more comfortable due to more pronounced lateral support. The second row of RAV4 seats consists of two unequal parts with individual longitudinal adjustment. In the SH-5, the sofa consists of three separate chairs (40:20:40), but they do not move back and forth. Toyota's trunk is a hundred liters more, even despite the "hump" that covers the spare tire on a regular alloy wheel. In general, all this is a matter of taste and needs, but there is enough space in the interiors of both cars.

swept

The diesel modification of the RAV4 makes a good impression with a high-torque engine with quite moderate gluttony. True, it is difficult to get rid of the feeling that you are driving a large and heavy car. It is created by a not very responsive gas pedal, combined with slurred feedback on the steering wheel and body roll. But with a smooth ride, everything is fine - small irregularities do not bother the crew, and there is almost no body buildup.

Driving the CX-5 is different. Here, the diesel engine is more willing to follow the gas pedal, and the “automatic” adapts faster to the driving style. Mazda is both objectively and subjectively more dynamic than Toyota, it steers more transparently and practically does not fall in corners. However, this is natural - the suspension of the CX-5 is shorter and stiffer than that of the RAV4. But this difference has little effect on cross-country ability: the geometry of both is decent, and a similar all-wheel drive system (multi-plate clutch between the axles) with electronic assistants allows both not to get stuck when diagonally hanging or wheel slip. By the way, the RAV4 has a center clutch lock button, while the CX-5 has its control completely at the mercy of the electronics.

asked the price

Of the thirteen versions of the RAV4 offered in Russia, three are diesel. They are all all-wheel drive, with a 2.2 liter engine (150 hp) and a 6-speed "automatic". The most affordable is "Comfort Plus" for 1,366,000 rubles. with a full range of security systems, dual-zone climate control, cruise control, a leather steering wheel, an audio system and a multifunctional central display (6.1 inches), power accessories, a rear-view camera and xenon. "Elegance Plus" for 117,000 rubles. expensive. There, in addition, there is an engine start button and electric drives for the driver's seat, folding mirrors and a fifth door, parking sensors and leather upholstery. The top "Prestige Plus" (another 79,000 rubles from above) - on 18-inch wheels (the rest have 17 inches), with navigation, Blis and lane control.

The diesel CX-5 also has one 2.2-liter engine (175 hp), “automatic” and all-wheel drive. There are two complete sets - Active (1,405,000 rubles) and Supreme (1,530,000 rubles). The more expensive one has leather upholstery instead of fabric upholstery, there are electric driver's seats, parking sensors and a rear-view camera. But xenon, navigation and other options are in packages of additional equipment. In general, more expensive than RAV4 will be ...

Outcome

Ilya Pimenov, editor:

Diesel Mazda CX-5 pleases first of all with “drag” torque: 420 “Newtons” already at two thousand revolutions! Hence the feeling of incredible ease behind the wheel. It only enhances the "passenger" interior design. The exterior is also completely devoid of corners. RAV4, on the contrary, is emphatically brutal both externally and internally. If it weren't for metal-look plastic and multi-colored displays... In my opinion, they spoil the RAV4. In the CX-5, everything is more organic.

Andrey Kochetov, editor:

Despite the equal score, my sympathy in our comparison is on the side of Mazda. Let it be a little inferior to Toyota in practicality (transformation of the interior, trunk volume), driving, especially on asphalt, is almost more pleasant than a “tank” car. And the declared economy is much closer to the truth than that of the RAV4. The CX-5 will cost, however, with an equal configuration it is more expensive, but the price difference of 7-10% today scares a few.

In the compact crossover segment, you can’t push through, but the appearance of the new Mazda CX-5 did not go unnoticed: the second generation turned out to be painfully spectacular! In the corporate color Soul Red Crystal looks incomparable - such lines, such a look ... But will beautiful eyes help in the competition? And can the Mazda CX-5 withstand the onslaught of the super-popular Toyota RAV4?

Beauty or practicality?

The starting positions are clear: Mazda takes beauty and emotionality, Toyota - price and practicality

It is not clear whether the golden section has already been found in this segment, from which it makes no sense to deviate, or the engineers of Toyota and Mazda create their crossovers with an eye to each other. If you remove the stylistic nuances, you get almost twins: similar sizes, similar design. Basic front-wheel drive, all-wheel drive for an extra charge, manual or automatic transmission, 2 or 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engines. The difference is only in the nuances: Toyota also has versions with a CVT, and Mazda engines are not ordinary aspirated engines, but the Skyactiv line with a high compression ratio of 14:1. And, of course, prices differ.

Crossover from Toyota does not shine with sophisticated design, but many people like this style

Toyota RAV4 can be either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive. It offers two atmospheric gasoline engines of 2 and 2.5 liters (146 and 180 horsepower) and as many as three types of transmissions: 6-speed manual, CVT or 6-band automatic. And six options to choose from.

The most affordable RAV4 "Standard" with a manual transmission, a two-liter engine and front-wheel drive costs 46,695 rubles. In the same configuration, but with a CVT, it will cost 49,038 rubles, and with a CVT and all-wheel drive - 51,480 rubles.

Well, if you need 2.5 liters under the hood, "automatic" and good equipment, the prices will be different. In the Prestige version, an all-wheel drive 180-horsepower RAV4 costs 66,396 rubles, in the Exclusive version it costs 68,871 rubles, and the most expensive RAV4 Prestige Safety costs 70,422 rubles.

The new Mazda CX-5 is very spectacular - from some angles it is simply mesmerizing. Although it is noticeable that the overall architecture of the body has been preserved from the previous generation

The price list for the Mazda CX-5 is very similar: in the basic Drive version, it is also front-wheel drive, two-liter (150 “horses”) and with a manual transmission. And it costs 47,307 rubles, which is quite comparable to the price of the base Toyota RAV4. However, if you also need an “automatic”, then this will be the second Active package, and it costs 53,957 rubles, and with all-wheel drive - 57,249 rubles.

The 190-horsepower 2.5-liter version is equipped with all-wheel drive and an automatic 6-speed gearbox by default. But the prices are different: in the Active version, the price is 62,648 rubles, and in the top version of Supreme - 68,311 rubles. However, the test car is also equipped with a package of additional equipment, which includes several electronic assistants, a BOSE audio system with 10 speakers and a projection screen on the windshield, so the total cost of the car is 73,446 rubles.

The interior of the CX-5 is unimpressive in terms of design, but pleases with a “premium” feel. There are no economical solutions typical of the "Japanese"

So, Mazda in the top version is slightly more expensive. Why? This is clear at first sight: although the interior design does not have the same emotionality as the outside, but there is a sense of quality. Moreover, this quality is expressed not in some ostentatious premium elements, which individual manufacturers often sin, but in a careful study of small details.

Tactile sensations are no worse than in BMW or Audi, ergonomics too. Comfortable chairs with pronounced lateral support, wide adjustment ranges, large mirrors, a convenient and intuitive menu of the multimedia system - there are no questions. Well, maybe only the glossy finish of the center console has complaints: we would prefer something else so as not to admire our fingerprints.

What's outside, what's inside, Toyota RAV4 looks peculiar

The first thing you notice in the Toyota showroom is a radically different atmosphere. It is lighter here, the driver's seat can be lowered much lower, and in general there is more space around the driver - this will certainly be appreciated by large people. However, the design is as unique as the appearance - at first glance, it is even impossible to remember this seemingly chaotic set of lines, edges, angles ...

However, this did not affect ergonomics in any way - the fit is comfortable, visibility is excellent. There are questions only to the key layout system: it would be logical to place all the off-road function control buttons in one place. But no, the locking of the center clutch is on the left under the steering wheel, the activation of the hill descent assistant is on the right. And the buttons and keys themselves are made of assorted plastic, as if they were collected from the world one by one.

Behind the Mazda CX-5 is slightly cramped than the rival, but it has a more comfortable seat

Hey, where's the backrest angle adjustment? The price list of the Mazda CX-5 indicates that it is, but in fact ... Let's just say, in fact, it is vanishingly small: the back can be folded back literally by 2-3 cm. But on the other hand, the rear sofa itself is almost as good , like the front seats - installed at the optimum height, perfectly distributes the load. The stock of space is sufficient for passengers of average height, but if more dense or tall people are sitting in front, there is very little room in the knees. But the feet are not crowded - there is enough space under the front seats.

Almost a minivan! Rear Toyota is more spacious, and the backrest adjustment range is greater here.

But in Toyota in the back row there is a lot of space in all directions - this is not a crossover, but some kind of minivan! Even opening the door, you realize that it is unusually far from the back of the front seat, and when you sit down, you feel like you are in a limousine. The back of the rear seat here is also adjustable in tilt angle, and in a wide range. In general, passengers will definitely like Toyota more.

No one asks for an opinion on luggage, but he will obviously also “like” Toyota more. When the electric rear door opens the "subsoil" completely, associations with a minivan arise again - the widest opening, the minimum loading height, the volume of 577 liters. The practicality of this crossover is manifested even in small things: the upper edge of the rear bumper is covered with a plastic lining - so you can’t scratch it with a suitcase. In general, RAV4 confirms its status as a comfortable family car. The only negative we found is that the rear seat backs fold only from the passenger compartment.

Mazda has a smaller trunk, but the curtain is very comfortable. You simply do not notice it - it rises along with the door. All three parts of the rear sofa can be folded directly from the trunk - just pull the handle, and part of the back itself will lean forward. Comfortable! But there are also disadvantages: there is no lining on the bumper, the lower edge is noticeably higher, the opening is narrower. Smaller and volume - 442 liters. Hmm, practicality is clearly not Mazda's forte.

On asphalt. Toyota just rides, Mazda delights

G-Vectoring Control is not an invention of marketers, the system really works. And that's why the Mazda CX-5 is simply incomparably driven!

Skate Mazda CX-5 is emotionality. Striking design is paired with an equally flashy and reckless handling that becomes especially brilliant in extreme conditions. And the “fault” is the proprietary G-Vectoring Control system, which, by controlling the brakes and traction, helps to minimize the effect of understeer. On turns that the driver clearly wants to go at the limit of traction (holds the gas), G-Vectoring Control provides an effect similar to a steered rear axle - sometimes there is a feeling that the rear wheels deviate a few degrees in the direction opposite to the turn.

Mazda CX-5 gives no less positive emotions in quiet modes. As promised in press releases before the release of the model, Japanese engineers took into account all the wishes of the owners of the CX-5 and the new generation retained its excitement, but at the same time it became quieter and smoother. To eliminate the first drawback, literally the entire bottom of the car, including the wheel arches, was covered with a soundproof mat - and now aerodynamic noise and the sound of "sandblasting" are minimized. Although the sound of the motor during active acceleration can still be called loud.

To eliminate the second drawback - a stiff suspension - the settings were revised. The chassis became less sensitive to bumps, but retained its ability to "start" the driver on a winding path. And in combination with G-Vectoring Control, the Japanese beauty really turns on in earnest!

Manage dream? RAV4 behavior is neutral and predictable, which is quite natural for a family car.

Toyota's behavior is radically different: even if you press the gas in every turn, it will cause nothing but amazement of family members. Both in normal and in extreme modes, the RAV4 is an absolutely “insipid”, but at the same time a neutral and predictable car. Soft, but without frightening rolls. As fast as Mazda, but cool, not reckless. But at the same time, he is approximately soft and quiet - in general, a typical family man. And this is also a virtue - there are not so many crossovers in this segment that are configured correctly for all types of roads and light off-road. Although, why only light? Since we have all-wheel drive crossovers, why not test them at least on “beach” off-road?

Who will go next?

Oops! All-wheel drive Mazda CX-5 in the sand quickly turns into a front-wheel drive

And for this we have a "calibrated" sand pit - all four-wheel drive vehicles that have been on site tests have definitely demonstrated their abilities here. Although we usually do not require anything particularly complicated from our subjects - sand allows us to check the effectiveness of the auxiliary electronic systems, and since we have to pass obstacles on the move, we also evaluate the energy intensity of the suspensions.

With the energy intensity of the suspensions, the Mazda CX-5 is doing well, you can not dump the gas in front of the pits. Another reason not to do this is the strange algorithm of the all-wheel drive system. Firstly, the CX-5 does not have any off-road modes, and secondly, an assault on even a 20-meter stretch of loose sand can take an hour or more.

Why all of a sudden? Yes, from the fact that it is worth moving into the sand and skidding for 20-30 seconds, as the all-wheel drive CX-5 turns into a front-wheel drive. The message "High load on the four-wheel drive system" lights up on the panel, and the rear axle is disengaged. The car instantly digs in, and if there is no cable and another four-wheel drive car at hand, you need to put the box in the “parking” and wait 5-7 minutes for the clutch to cool down. After that, you will have another 20-second attempt - and this time we advise you to accelerate faster and do not let go of the gas, because until the wheels are slipping heavily, the clutch does not heat up so much. Well, if it gets hot, you already know what to do.

Compared to its rival, Toyota is simply the off-road king - it rides very confidently! However, we were able to overheat the “Toyota” clutch, although not so quickly

But what else the owner of a Toyota RAV4 needs to know before going off-road is the exact amount of ground clearance. Since this data may surprise him greatly: specifically in the 2.5-liter version, the exhaust system runs under the engine, leaving only about 160 mm to the ground! So be careful.

But in the sand, where there is no way to damage the exhaust, the RAV4 felt like the king of off-road. Having preventively blocked the center clutch, we plowed the quarry for an infinitely long time - while Mazda was cooling down, Toyota was driving up and down without signs of "fatigue". So if the off-road capabilities of a crossover are as important to you as its other performance parameters, keep in mind that even two very similar crossovers in design can behave completely differently.

For such a quick overheating of the Mazda CX-5 clutch, we found one excuse. Perhaps in this way the manufacturer is insured against the risk of critical overheating by turning off the clutch in advance. Well, or if in a simple way - "protection from a fool."

Beautiful, expensive and reckless Mazda or practical, roomy and passable Toyota?

Despite all the similarities, the buyers of the Mazda CX-5 and Toyota RAV4 are still different. By nature, Mazda is a windy beauty that can turn heads with its incredible design, almost premium interior and very reckless handling. But this will have to put up with a tighter trunk and limited off-road ability. But who cares when emotions run high?

But Toyota RAV4 - on the contrary, the choice of prudent and rational people. A design that has been run for years, a spacious interior, a large trunk, balanced driving performance - only the design can confuse it. But if you don’t care about it, but off-road qualities are important at least to a minimal extent, then definitely Toyota RAV4.

We remember

Toyota RAV4

Different textured buttons are scattered in a chaotic manner
In the underground is stored "dock" and a simple set of tools
The geometric cross is limited by the protruding pipe of the exhaust system
Graphics and color display resolution leave much to be desired. In addition, the screen is not bright enough.
On the instrument panel, you can display a graphical display of the mode of operation of the all-wheel drive

Mazda CX-5

The sport mode changes the algorithm of the “machine”, raising the tachometer needle by 1000 rpm. But even in manual mode, the automatic transmission automatically switches “up” upon reaching maximum speed
The bottom without protruding elements allows you to move bolder in a deep rut
To remove the spare tire, you must first unscrew the subwoofer
The display responds to finger presses, but in motion you can control multimedia only with a puck on the center console

Only careful comparison helps to determine which is actually better. This rule also applies to cars, so today we will try to compare the Rav 4 and Mazda CX 5. The comparison of these two Japanese crossovers is due to the fact that they are in approximately the same price category, and they are quite comparable in their other characteristics, so it will be interesting find out which of these cars is still more reliable and in what conditions.

The automobile concern Toyota sells only two of its engines on the Russian market. The first 2-liter gasoline engine includes 146 horsepower, and the second engine is slightly larger - 2.5 liters at 180 hp. Diesel units are not available in Russia, which cannot be said about Mazda, which introduced a wider category of possible options on our market.

The following engines from Mazda are presented on the Russian market:

• Two liter petrol.
• 2.5 liter petrol.
• 2.2 liter diesel engine with 175 hp

If compared in this component, then Mazda wins a landslide victory, because in addition to a wider range of units presented, the gasoline engines of this brand are also more powerful than those from Toyota.

However, if you look at the technical equipment, then Toyota is more preferable. Toyota Rav 4 has xenon optics in its configuration, and the cars are also equipped with an electronic clutch lock function. This circumstance allows you to transfer torque to the rear axle of the car.

car exterior

The exterior of the car Rav 4 was perceived by many with a considerable amount of skepticism, because the body, and the rest of the elements of the appearance of the car, clearly lacked some kind of brutality. Now this problem is practically solved, because the designers added more strict forms in 2016, which noticeably attracted the interest of the male half of the buyers. But the efforts of the developers cause a lot of controversy, because the front of the crossover turned out to be unnaturally elongated, which affected the appearance of the headlights - they became quite strongly planted.

As for the CX-5, its appearance is much more aggressive, which will certainly appeal to fans of sports cars and "drive". However, the improved exterior played a cruel joke on the car - outwardly it seems a little smaller and lower when compared with Toyota. Yes, and the reliability of the body of Toyota is higher.

Generally speaking, Mazda looks more colorful and modern, so it is often chosen by young people who value the appearance of a car almost above all. Toyota Rav 4 also looks decent, but a certain conservatism slips in the exterior, so it is generally accepted that this car is intended for business people and middle-aged people. Although all these categories are too subjective to speak with 100% certainty.

car interior

When choosing which is more reliable and better - CX 5 or Rav 4, it is very important to pay attention to the interior of these cars. There are a lot of interesting things here, because the salons of these Japanese crossovers are absolutely different from each other. Salon Mazda is made somewhat minimalist, without any frills. There is a standard set of functions and buttons that are within the driver's reach.

Under the climate control button there is a fairly roomy niche where you can store various small things. Behind the automatic transmission selector is the multimedia system control. In a word, everything is located here so that the driver can freely reach the main control systems without making any special efforts.

The front panel looks more harmonious with Toyota. In addition, the Rav 4 has many different shelves in the cabin where you can store your personal belongings, etc. However, it seems that the developers overdid it a bit with such functionality, because it takes some time to figure it out. Also raises questions about the functionality of the cabin. The seat heating button is available only to the driver, i.e. the passenger must ask the driver to turn on this function, because he himself simply does not reach it. Yes, and other buttons are located under the center console, which greatly complicates access to them.

In addition to conservatism and archaism in the exterior of the Rav 4, the same can be seen in some elements of its interior. In particular, we are talking about the power window keys, which again are available only to the driver, and not to passengers. Mazda has no such problems.

I would like to continue the comparison of the interior with a description of the car seats. In principle, the seats of both crossovers are very high quality, but here again Mazda has a slight advantage. Purely tactile, their seats are a little softer, while the upholstery of Toyota looks quite rough.

On the other hand, Toyota wins in terms of the comfort of staying in the cabin. Due to the fact that its side doors are larger, the space between the rear and front seats is also larger, so passengers are more comfortable in the back.

Crossover test drive

The picture would be incomplete if we did not try to compare these cars directly in action, i.e. test drive required. Toyota responds quickly enough to the start button, but if this happens in the winter season, then its engine roars loudly enough. But as it warms up, this problem disappears, so don't be too picky about this fact. 150 horsepower of the engine is enough for normal driving around the city, as well as on country roads.

Test video, from Infocar

I would especially like to note that overtaking cars on Toyota is carried out just fine. This is due to the stable operation of the 6-speed automatic transmission. The Mazda diesel engine is slightly more powerful than the Toyota engine, but on the road this difference is quite noticeable. The suspension on the CX-5 is also stiffer, which affects the ride, making it more aggressive. It should be noted that the consumption of gasoline does not increase from this, remaining within reasonable limits. With all these advantages, it is worth noting that Mazda has much worse sound insulation, so Toyota wins in this regard.

The stiffness of the Mazda suspension, unlike Toyota, is manifested during the passage of speed bumps, so you need to be very careful about this maneuver. Otherwise, all passengers will clearly feel the impact of contact. Often this leads to problems with the suspension, so the repair of this unit is quite common for this car.

Specifications

When choosing between the Mazda CX-5 or Toyota Rav 4, you need to pay attention to the technical characteristics of the crossovers. Let's take a look at Mazda data first:

• Manufacturer - Japan.
• Body type - station wagon.
• Number of doors - 5.
• The volume of the engine is 2191 cubic centimeters.
• Power rating - 175 hp
• Torque - 420 Nm.
• Acceleration to 100 km per hour - 9.4 s.
• Gearbox type - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel consumption - 7 liters per 100 km.
• Dimensions (LxWxH) - 455.5 cm / 184 cm / 167 cm.
• Weight - 1629 kg.
• Clearance - 215 mm.
• The volume of the fuel tank is 58 liters.
• Trunk volume - 403 liters.
• The average cost is 1.366 million rubles.

Consider similar characteristics for Rav 4:

• Manufacturer - Japan.
• Body type - station wagon.
• Number of doors - 5.
• The volume of the engine is 2231 cubic centimeters.
• Power indicator - 150 hp
• Torque - 340 Nm.
• Ground clearance - 197 mm.
• Acceleration to 100 km per hour - 10 s.
• Gearbox type - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel consumption - 6.5 liters per 100 km.
• Dimensions (LxWxH) - 457 cm / 184.5 cm / 167 cm.
• Weight - 1715 kg.
• The volume of the fuel tank is 60 liters.
• Trunk volume - 577 liters.
• The average cost is 1.4 million rubles.

Based on the above data, we can say that the technical side of these cars is largely similar with only minor differences.

Pros and cons of cars

Based on the information obtained during the tests, you can make a summary. Let's start with a description of the advantages of the Mazda CX-5:

• In the configuration there is a start-stop system.
• There is a sunroof.
• Pretty good engine power.
• The maximum speed is quite decent for this class of car.
• Mazda is cheaper than Toyota.
• Despite the classic style of the salon, some of its elements look quite original.
• Convenient arrangement of the dashboard and buttons.

But there are also disadvantages that are also worth mentioning:

• Sophisticated multimedia system control system.
• Parktronic is present only in the elite versions.
• There is no electric drive in the tailgate.

Here are the main advantages of Toyota Rav 4:

• The presence in the cabin of a large number of different shelves.
• The driver's seat is electrically adjustable.
• The dashboard is made quite concisely.
• The presence of a rear view camera.
• Comfortable seats in the back for passengers.

There are also disadvantages:

• It is not clear why there is a podium in the trunk.
• The suspension is not strong enough.
• The seats don't look as good as Mazda's.

Before buying this or that thing, we, as a rule, evaluate it according to various parameters and, of course, compare the product with analogues. Obviously, if we are talking about a low-budget purchase, a global approach in this matter is not relevant, however, if you have to buy a car, you should compare it with analogues in as much detail as possible. We offer you a comparative description of such cars as Mazda CX 5 or Toyota RAV 4. Both of these models belong to the category of Japanese-made crossovers and are compared quite often, as they belong to the same class. We have prepared for you a detailed analysis of the characteristics of these crossovers according to the main aspects.

Suggested configurations and price tag on the model

First of all, it is worth talking about the equipment of the considered analogues. The Toyota brand offers potential buyers of the RAV 4 model only 2 options for the power plant:

• a gasoline engine with a volume of 2 liters and a power of about 146 horsepower;
• a more powerful version, also running on gasoline, having 180 horsepower and 2.5 liters of volume.

As part of the world market, this Toyota is also presented with a diesel engine, however, the brand did not bring this equipment to the Russian market.

In this matter, the Japanese brand Mazda has prepared a much wider choice for its customers. Of course, petrol engines with a volume of 2 or 2.5 liters are offered. However, Mazda's power plants are much more powerful. In addition, a diesel version with a 2.2-liter volume and 175 horsepower is also available in Russia.

In terms of electronics and technical equipment, Mazda undoubtedly loses to the RAV 4 model. The latter is pre-installed with xenon optics, and there is also a system that blocks the electronic clutch, which, by completely transferring torque to the rear axle, gets the ability to turn off the stabilization in full.

Such a factor as the price of a car is quite often decisive, because some characteristics of a car can be sacrificed if you have to pay an exorbitant price for a model. The cost of Toyota starts from 1.459 million rubles, while Mazda in a similar configuration will cost from 1.349 million.

Exterior models

In comparing the exteriors of models, it is worth starting with Toyota. Previously, it was designed in the form of a SUV, intended mainly for women. This determined the form and general character of the design, and therefore the public was rather skeptical about the model. Meanwhile, the brand eliminated the problem by incorporating strict and clear lines and classic geometry into the exterior in order to interest the male audience as well. It is fair to say that the exterior of the RAV 4 turned out to be ambiguous. The hood and bumper of the crossover are quite elongated, and therefore the headlights look quite deep set.

The result of the brand's work on the exterior of Toyota is ambiguous

In turn, the brainchild of Mazda - the CX 5 model - is the brand's first step towards the implementation of a new design concept for all products. The car seems "driving" due to the presence of aggressive lines and strict details in the exterior. Since the overall shape of the car looks very swift, purely visually it seems to be less overall than the Toyota brand counterpart.

Mazda CX 5 - the embodiment of a new concept of exterior design from the Japanese brand

Salons with nothing in common

The interior of the Mazda is laconic, without any frills. However, it uses very effective elements:

• the front panel is designed in the style of modern BMWs;
• so that the screen of the multimedia system does not reflect glare, it is slightly recessed into the torpedo;
• effective lateral support on the chairs;
• the dashboard of the model looks quite modern and prestigious;
• specially designed compact seats.

Unfortunately, Mazda's simple, intuitive multimedia interface is still a bit dated.

In connection with the installation of an angular dashboard, the interior of the RAV 4 gives the impression of a very reliable and massive one. Meanwhile, many elements in the interior definitely lack the quality of workmanship. We are talking about buttons and a torpedo made of low quality plastic. By the way, Mazda with its compact seats loses to Toyota in terms of landing the driver and passengers. Seats in RAV 4 are equally well suited for both thin passengers and people of a larger build. The level of ergonomics is also higher for Toyota, since the cabin has a sufficient number of shelves and pockets designed for a wide variety of little things.

All this means that, considering the interiors of the Mazda CX 5 or its analogue, the Toyota RAV4, we can conclude: Toyota is more spacious, ergonomic and comfortable.

Management and test drive results

If necessary, compare RAV 4 and Mazda CX 5 cars, it is also important to pay attention to how crossovers perform on the road. An experienced driver feels the difference in the management of each model even in the first minutes of a test drive. So, within the framework of this question, Mazda can be characterized as follows:

• sharpness and sensitivity to driver manipulations;
• pronounced dynamism;
• very modest fuel consumption;
• good handling when cornering;
• the car responds perfectly not only to the gas pedal, but also to the use of the brake system.

In general, the crossover from the Mazda company showed itself perfectly in the city. Unfortunately, the automatic transmission package does not compare with the "mechanical" counterpart in terms of control, as it lacks paddle shifters.

Speaking of Toyota, I must say that this car is quite heavy to lift. If at low speeds the difference between the crossovers is practically not felt, then after exceeding the mark of 60 km per hour, the differences become apparent. Toyota is designed mainly for light off-road, but in urban conditions it is rather weak:

• low speed on bends;
• strong roll on corners;
• tight acceleration and so on.

Thus, Toyota will reveal its potential in off-road conditions, but Mazda will show itself perfectly in the city.

Differences in crossovers are subjective

So, comparing the Mazda CX 5 and Toyota RAV four, we came to the following conclusions:

• Mazda offers potential buyers a wider choice in terms of powertrains, but Toyota's equipment is much more solid.
• The exterior of the Mazda is brighter and more memorable, and therefore this crossover is perfect for young people who want to buy a stylish car. Toyota will be the best solution for those who prioritize the comfort and spaciousness of the car.
• Mazda is suitable for young people with a thin physique, while the RAV4 will be ideal for older passengers in the body. In addition, due to the large doors, Toyota has a much more comfortable fit and allows passengers to place all the little things in special drawers and pockets, which the more modest Mazda interior cannot offer.
• For urban driving, the Mazda is best suited, while the Toyota will open up beautifully off-road.

Advantages and disadvantages

Specifications Mazda CX-5

Car model:	Mazda CX-5
Manufacturer country:	Japan
body type:	station wagon/5/5
Number of doors:	5
Engine's type:	diesel, R4, turbo
Engine capacity, cc:	2191
Power, hp / rpm:	175/4500
	420/2000
Acceleration to 100 km/h, s:	9.4
Type of drive:	full
Checkpoint:	6 automatic transmission
Consumption per 100 km:	7,0/5,3/5,9
Dimensions, LxWxH, mm:	4555/1840/1670
Base, mm:	2700
Curb weight, kg:	1629
Fuel tank capacity:	58
Trunk volume, l:	403-1560
Price, Russian ruble:	1 366 000

Specifications Toyota Rav 4

Car model:	Toyota Rav4
Manufacturer country:	Japan
body type:	station wagon/5/5
Number of doors:	5
Engine's type:	diesel, R4, turbo
Engine capacity, cc:	2231
Power, hp / rpm:	150/3600
Max. cool moment, Nm at rpm:	340/2000-2800
Acceleration to 100 km/h, s:	10
Type of drive:	full
Checkpoint:	6 automatic transmission
Consumption per 100 km:	6.5
Dimensions, LxWxH, mm:	4570/1845/1670
Base, mm:	2660
Curb weight, kg:	1715
Fuel tank capacity:	60
Trunk volume, l:	577
Price, Russian ruble:	1 405 000

Thus, it cannot be argued that the first or second crossover is objectively better than the other. Almost all of their shortcomings are subjective. In any case, both brands approached the issue of developing these crossovers with all responsibility, although they embodied completely different concepts.

Toyota RAV 4 and Mazda CX 5: crossovers designed for different purposes updated: July 18, 2017 by: dimajp